AP's Fouhy: Cuomo Same-sex Marriage Victory 'Sparks' 2016 Presidential Talk; Cites One Dem Media Strategist
"New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's successful push to legalize gay marriage in his state has made him a national hero to liberal voters and has sparked talk of a potential presidential bid for Cuomo in 2016," Associated Press reporter Beth Fouhy insisted in a story filed today.
"But Cuomo paired his quest for same-sex marriage with efforts to slash state spending and curb the power of public employee unions, suggesting a blend of fiscal prudence and progressivism on social issues could be a new Democratic model in tough economic times," she added.
After citing one "California gay-rights leader" who cheered Cuomo as a "civil rights leader," Fouhy waited until the 12th paragraph of her 19-paragraph story to cite a Democrat who's talking up the freshman New York governor as a prospective 2016 presidential aspirant:
Democratic strategist Peter Daou said Cuomo's success on gay marriage had persuaded many skeptical liberal activists to give him another look.
"He has earned some very solid points all the way to 2016, which will mitigate some of the criticism he's gotten from progressives about the way he's governed," Daou said, adding that Cuomo's efforts stood in stark contrast to President Barack Obama. Obama attended a fundraiser last week hosted by gay and lesbian donors in New York but refused to endorse same-sex marriage even as he expressed support for legal rights for gay couples.
"Progressives want leaders," Daou said.
Just who is Peter Daou? Well, he's a "political and digital media consultant" who backed such winners as John Kerry in 2004 and Hillary Clinton in 2008.
If there are other Democrats, especially those who have actually won elected office, who are talking about Cuomo, Fouhy either couldn't find them or decided they weren't important enough to quote in her story about the sparked "talk" about Cuomo as a 2016 contender.
Indeed, Cuomo himself is talking down 2016, but Fouhy will have none of that (real or imagined) modesty (emphasis mine):
Cuomo tried to tamp down talk about his presidential ambitions in a radio interview Monday, dismissing such talk as "silly" and disconnected from the importance of equal rights for gay couples.
"It's not about 2016. It's about the power of the passage of marriage equality," Cuomo said. "I'm not going to engage in this conversation or fuel this speculation." He didn't rule out a run in 2016 but said he had much more work to do as governor.
Cuomo had already racked up an impressive series of legislative accomplishments before Friday's gay marriage vote, giving him robust approval ratings in New York even as governors elsewhere have struggled.
In a state notorious for its political dysfunction, Cuomo successfully pressed lawmakers to pass an on-time budget that cut spending to address a $10 billion deficit without raising taxes. He negotiated several concessions on salary and health care from some of the state's powerful public employee unions without setting them up as political targets or reducing their collective bargaining rights, as Republicans like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker have done.
And Cuomo worked with legislative leaders to craft a proposed overhaul of ethics enforcement after years of high-profile corruption cases eroded public confidence in state government. The bill didn't go as far as advocates wanted but was still viewed as a positive step.
# # #
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
yawn.....
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 1:59pm.
The Gay agenda promoters think that the Gay marriage vote in New York will be a topic that keeps on giving and giving. Not so. The vast majority of Americans are either annoyed or indifferent. It's like the death of bin Laden. A two day story and then most people will have moved on.
ATTENTION STAFF
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:35pm.
Spam
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
Good job, Free
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:44pm.
They'll let just anyone in these days, it seems.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
Wow, that got cleaned up in a
Submitted by Free Stinker on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:48pm.
Wow, that got cleaned up in a jiffy
/// Sarah Palin Fan since July 11, 2007 /// خال
LOL - Yeah, Free, now everybody is going to think MA's a spammer
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 7:20pm.
I had to look at it twice myself.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Spammer went POOF, and no chunks landed on anyone.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:50pm.
that was quick, good job with the plunger...
You Didn't Build That.
Yeah, but now MidAmerica is holding the bag!
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:56pm.
When a spammer is nuked, delete all the replies.
Delete replies or name names
Submitted by nkviking75 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:21pm.
I agree. I missed the spammer, and I was trying to figure out what Mid America did wrong (nothing). Or name a name so latecomers aren't misled.
“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Scorched Earth, Could ah left a smoking residue of a post. ♨
Submitted by upcountrywater on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:29pm.
As a warning to the next, would be spammer. This could be you on spam ♨
...yeah...
You Didn't Build That.
You can tell there was a post between Mid's & the Spambot's
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:19pm.
Because there's a "space" where the post was removed.
I hate spammers. I have a bunch of them on my personal blog, but I've put in some "screening" strings (like ".ru" or "sextoys" to keep them out of even my mod queue. It's a PITA. No one reads their crap anyway.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I just step outside for a minute....
Submitted by MidAmerica on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:11pm.
....and all heck breaks out!
I saw the spam notice and went ??!! and quickly reread what I wrote and couldn't figure out what I was missing. and then I read the other comments...... LOL
That'll Learn Ya!
Submitted by Blonde on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 5:15pm.
See what you did?
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
ENOUGH!!!
Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 2:44pm.
Enough of the gay marriage!!! Who really cares
Agreed
Submitted by mandrake on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:01pm.
And enough with the Jon Stewart already. Since noone really watches him "Who really cares"
mandrake
Submitted by rockyracoon on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:06pm.
I couldn't agree with you more in regards to Leibovitz, enough already.
Facts are like kryptonite to the liberal.
The gay marriage issue matters
Submitted by nkviking75 on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:30pm.
I care. I live in a state (Iowa) where seven unelected justices on our state Supreme Court overruled a duly enacted law defining marriage as an institution requiring a man and a woman. The people were angry enough that when they had the chance they refused to retain three justices for the first time ever. I suspect they would have dumped them all if they could. Efforts to amend our constitution to restore traditional marriage are being blocked by the Democrat controlled Senate (the House is Republican).
It also matters because the courts believe they can ignore centuries of tradition and the intent of the people who wrote our laws. They think they can change the meaning of "marriage". And if they think they can give words new meanings, our laws become worthless. So the fight is likely to go on in Iowa for years.
“Always love your country — but never trust your government!" -- Bob Novak (1931-2009)
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
Definitions.
Submitted by mandrake on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:43pm.
You seem to be upset over the definition of a word. (marriage). Did you know the word SET has over 460 definitions and growing? Language and understanding evolves..so don't get hung up on definitions.
Reminder:
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:46pm.
Words mean things.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Static
Submitted by mandrake on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:50pm.
Agreed, but that mean language cannot evolve?
6000 years
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:30pm.
Language can evolve all it wants. But marriage has meant the same thing in virtually every language for about 6000 years or so.
When something works, I'm hesitant to jerk with it. You know, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"? That sound familiar?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Interesting
Submitted by mandrake on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:44pm.
Why did you pick the number 6000 years? I never would have thought you were a Biblical literatist. I thought you were an Ayn Rand athiest. You continue to surprise. :)
Keep Dodging, Moron.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:21pm.
You are comedy gold, Mandrake. When someone challenges you on your inferior logic, you fold like a wet napkin, but continue to blather on, looking for some other weak position to assume.
Visions and Principles blog
History deficient
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:05pm.
Call me crazy, mandrake, but I think that 6000 years would be the length of time something called human civilization has existed in one form or another. You know, the rise of the civilizations in the Fertile Crescent, and so on.
Your being history deficient does NOT surprise.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
not too deficient
Submitted by BosTarus on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 12:13am.
Considering "Ancient History" begins roughly 10,000 BC (12,000 years ago) and prehistory dates back 2.6 million years (the start of the paleolithic era-or the Stone Age) I don't think he was too inaccurate to question the 6,000 year figure.
What part of "civilization" confuses you?
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:11pm.
CIVILIZATION, my hair-splitting Leftist.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Ok, who are you?
Submitted by mandrake on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 7:53am.
The Unsane I know would have taken a flame thrower to me for that comment, but that was rather mild. So who are you and what have you done with the real Unsane?
I never bought that argument
Submitted by BosTarus on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:49pm.
The whole "it's been this way for __ thousand years-why change now?" argument is pretty iffy. Human history is full of broad opinion changes and the shedding of old traditions.
For 98% of human history, slavery was an accepted and condoned aspect of human culture. That clearly does not make it right. Thankfully we've evolved beyond that (mostly).
Weak
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 8:08pm.
Except in some cases it is not iffy. Name a civilization that has long endured without family.
At least in your idiotic attempt to conflate slavery with this issue, you do acknowledge that slavery goes on today.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
I don't think
Submitted by BosTarus on Wed, 06/29/2011 - 12:14am.
anyone is proposing we do away with the family unit...
Word gaming
Submitted by Unsane on Thu, 06/30/2011 - 12:12pm.
Keep word gaming. Because that is all you have.
Why does marriage exist? Why do we even bother having such a thing?
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
The Dems dream ticket (if they could change a few laws
Submitted by virginia republican on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 3:22pm.
and the constitution) would be a handicapped, ex-felon, illegal alien lesbian and, for VP, a tax-evading, bigamist ,atheist who cheats on both his wives, is a deserter, and had a sex change operation at government expense. Does that just about cover all the bases?
Both would be minorities, of course.
Cuomo should be locked up until after 2016 . . .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 4:18pm.
As I commented yesterday:
Hero Andrew Cuomo?? This guy should be in jail..
From the leftist ragtag New York Mag, the Village Voice:
Can one even imagine how much pain and suffering and hardship this man has already caused tens of millions of people, not to mention the entire country and 1/2 the free world?
In 2007, the liberal Center for Public Integrity seemed to be investigating Andrew Cuomo, penning this news releaase:
The word needs to get out - as the national media has had their eyes set on him as a future presidential candidate, and now their positioned to endorse him before the starting blocks are set.
(;~> gary
Cuomo Should Run in 2016.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Tue, 06/28/2011 - 6:25pm.
Please, please, please let it be so. I can't wait for this guy to throw his hat into the ring. He'll wear that homosexual marriage achievement like an albatross and the Freddie/Fannie thing will be the gift that keeps on giving -- to us. I love how the liberals consistently overplay their hand. The media landscape will be even more gutted by 2016 which will further decrease the influence of the leftard media, and these "progressives" can't anticipate what that will mean. Cuomo needs to be the face of the Dem party. Let's see what we can all do to make it happen!
Visions and Principles blog