USA Today Religion Reporter Oddly Suggests Elderly Have No Powerful Lobby Group
Clearly annoyed with conservative moves to cut the federal budget and, I suppose, with the success of conservative voters and the gun rights lobby, USA Today religion writer Cathy Lynn Grossman penned an odd entry entitled "Budget battles: Granny, get your gun," excerpted in full below:
Fresh from a budget showdown that pivoted on social policies for women's health/abortion (pick your language choice as per your point of view on this) Congress and President Obama are taking aim at entitlements.
And it appears the poor and particularly the elderly poor, are going to take a hit. One reason: They're defenseless. So, is it time for "Granny, get your gun?" After all, then they could enlist a powerhouse lobby like the National Rifle Association.
They aren't without defenders now. I expect my inbox soon will be filled with righteous messages from the church leaders and interfaith groups who have been drumming for a moral focus on the budget. They argue it is all our obligation (particularly the wealthy among us) to care for the least.
But are they successful? Are the Tea Party. 2012 potential candidates or Congress listening to their voices? Evidence?
When lobbying doesn't work, there's always public pressure. People who swarm to the capital with colorful signs and traffic-stopping numbers will at least get some media coverage. But the poor and the elderly are the least able to charter a bus to DC and march on the Mall.
So, what would get lawmakers' attention?
Gun rights!
Think about it. Grannies and babies and struggling parents could figure out a gimmick for tying their needs for food, medicine, preventive health services, shelter and education to, say, an inability to have enough money to buy a gun and carry it everywhere from playground to nursing home.
Isn't it un-American and discriminatory for only the prosperous to be able to bear arms? Gun rights never lose in legislative fights these days, do they?
Since folks who say they must have guns -- to protect them against God knows what -- the poor and elderly, whose religious champions are politely acknowledged and ignored, could have the biggest weapons in lobbying on their side.
So, Granny, get your gun.
This is, of course, ludicrous. But still, you have to wonder, when so many politicians will pay homage to the National Day of Prayer next month, why the last, the least and the lost, so often mentioned in those prayers, will have no voice on the budget.
WHO DO YOU THINK ... should sacrifice for solvency, now and in the future?
Recipients of Medicare and Social Security don't have a powerful left-leaning lobby for punishing politicians for daring to tinker with Medicare or Social Security?! Don't tell me Grossman hasn't heard of the AARP.
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I'll tell you, Grossman hasn't heard of AARP
Submitted by Comrade Jim on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 4:30pm.
And its not surprising. MSM wear ear plugs and blinders.
If he hasn't heard of AARP, he doesn't know squat
Submitted by Galvanic on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 4:29pm.
The facts just got in the way of his storyline.
I have to agree with the USA
Submitted by danbo on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 4:42pm.
I have to agree with the USA today, for once. AARP doesn't represent senior citizens. They lobby for their own self interests. And the millions they take from senior citizens selling insurance.
As a senior, my concern is, the money I saved for years will be made worthless by inflation. If anyone lobbies for seniors it's the teaparty.
"You lie!" Rep. Joe Wilson R-(SC)
I wholeheartedly concur. If
Submitted by stratman on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 5:13pm.
I wholeheartedly concur.
If AARP was for the seniors they would not support $500 Billion in Medicare cuts in ObamaCare as well as totalitarian government run healthcare which will be the decider of disputes and the maker of all rules.
Yeah, they don't represent
Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 5:34pm.
Yeah, they don't represent the best interests of senior citizens, but they do make sure to give hell to any politician who dares to introduce meaningful reforms to Medicare and Social Security, which is my point.
I'm with you too
Submitted by Boil It Down on Tue, 04/12/2011 - 10:39am.
AARP exists only to exploit the compassion for seniors to AARP and their associates benefit. They perpetrate and enable fraud at taxpayer expense. A government that operates by the rule of law would have seen the end to them. -bidn-
Well, the House Republicans sure have heard of AARP
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 4:57pm.
and they're gunning for them.
My bet is that the USA editor
Submitted by jdhawk on Mon, 04/11/2011 - 5:45pm.
My bet is that the USA editor got all staff writers together and told them to start writing pieces to sink Congressman Ryan's 2012 budget proposal. This is just one of those pieces.
Of course, this is after Carney held a conference call with all the libtard editors in the country to get them on the "left" page . . . .
Expect a lot more of this out of "left" field crap. If the dimocrats call cuts in the current budget of $39 billion "draconian" and "using a hatchet when a scapel is needed" you can bet this is just a warm up to the budget battles in the future.
Neil Cuvuto interviewed some (D)im witted congresswoman today on his show and had her tied up in knots trying to explain her views on the budget. It would have been hilarious if it weren't so tragic.