Time Blogger Condemns CEO for Shooting Elephant That Destroyed African Villagers' Crops
The great thing about being a enviro-evangelist blogger in the United States is the moral high ground it gives you from which to condemn people who fall short of your ecological credentials.
Take Bryan Walsh, the blogger behind Time magazine's Ecocentric blog. Walsh took GoDaddy.com CEO Bob Parsons for hunting down an elephant in Zimbabwe that was a threat to a village's crops.
In an April 4 post, Walsh set out to convince readers that hunting elephants, even when done as a defensive measure to save a village's crops, is illegitimate.
Of course, that's easy to say from the climate-controlled comfort of a New York magazine office, so Walsh reserved the bulk of his ire not for the villagers or the Zimbabwean government but for Parsons, who apparently made a politically incorrect choice with his own money:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Parsons told me he spent $60,000 to $70,000 for his elephant safari. That's obviously money that could have gone to any number of organizations that deal with human-wildlife conflict, like WWF, the Wildlife Conservation Society or Conservation International. Or, if Parsons wanted to directly help the people of Zimbabwe, he could have donated money to an NGO like Operation Bootstrap Africa, which has a five-star rating from the watchdog Charity Navigator.
Walsh went on to note in fairness that Walsh had given $1 million to Haiti earthquake reliefs efforts, but continued to rail against Parsons for seeing the controversy over his elephant kill as a "net positive" for GoDaddy.com:
America, it's up to you. If a CEO posting a video of oneself shooting and killing an elephant—an elephant that is a vulnerable species, one step away from being considered endangered—ends up paying off for his business, well, then punch my ticket for Canada.
Maybe instead Walsh should attempt a year living in a Zimbabwean village trying to eke out a living between the perils of the natural environment, the hectoring of Western environmentalists, and the madness of the corrupt dictatorial Mugabe regime.
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Canada no, Africa yes
Submitted by expatriot on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:03pm.
Walsh needs to get a ticket to Africa and live in that village for the rest of his life. Maybe he will have a change of heart.
Longevity
Submitted by TBAR on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:07pm.
He probably wouldn't last long enough to learn his lesson.
Interesting, isn't it?
Submitted by Ashrak on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:14pm.
Lefties always have a "better" place for you to spend your money and are quick to slam you because you didn't put your money where their mouth is.
Socialism is great until you run out of other peoples' money to spend.
Sheesh. Actually, it isn't interesting at all, it just makes me want to puke.
And you know why?....
Submitted by OldJarhead77 on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:20pm.
Because LEFTY ENVIRO NAZI TROLLS like this guy have no clue what its like in the real world. They would rather blame others for action, then take action themselves and possibly save the people in that village... WHY because the TRUTH is for all the LIBERAL ANGST they PRETEND to have when it comes to the poor the TRUTH is THEY DON"T CARE! They want to APPEAR compasionate but where the rubber meets the road... they are NOWHERE TO BE SEEN! Their solution is simple Throw money at it... that will Assage the WHITE LIBERAL GUILT give the money to others to solve the problem then get in your limo and be driven to your MILLION dollar apartment, Drink your thousand dollar wine and sleep soundly because you "DID SOMETHING?" The Fact is YOU DID NOTHING! The man who shot that Elephant is a HERO to those people.. as for the LIBERAL ENVIRO NAZI TROLLS..... THEY (THE L.E.N.T.) as I call them would rather have the government feed that village then have them grow their own crops and be self suffient.The people of that village would like you to go away, since you really have no value to them.
Give other peoples money
Submitted by expatriot on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:27pm.
As long as the money is other peoples money they are all for it. None of them donate to any program to assist these people. They expect others to do the job and when the job is done and it is not done to their standard they demonize them.
so true
Submitted by russedav on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 11:53am.
They actually want others to suffer (e.g. buying their vote for a pack of cigs or a bottle/can of booze/beer, something to get high) so they can exploit them for crass political power leveraging purposes. Like Pelosi who got the minimum wage raised (that makes everyone poorer) for everyone but her companies until she got caught and then played dumb.
The villagers growing peanuts is probably not a good idea.
Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:27pm.
Surely there must a crop that elephants dislike.
Then all can live in harmony as one.
Who are you and what have you
Submitted by Scuba Dude on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:45pm.
Who are you and what have you done with SickofLibs?
Did you lose some sort of bet? :-)
We can hunt elephants?!
Submitted by King of the Britons on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 4:34pm.
Sweet! I wonder if I can get some of those elephant feet coffee tables?
--Patrick Henry
Canada?
Submitted by ckc1227 on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 5:38pm.
Hmmm, I wonder if Walsh realizes Godaddy sells their stuff to Canadians too?
Zero sympathy for Parsons
Submitted by krendler on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 9:17pm.
Sorry. Parsons deserves every bit of bad publicity he's getting. Trying to spin his safari as some kind of "humanitarian mission" is completely laughable. Really, Bob? That's why you went all the way down there? Because you heard about these poor folks crops and wanted to help them.
Uh huh.
Why not simply defend your right as a hunter to do what you did, and spend your dollars as you see fit? (unless you're ashamed of it).
Instead we get "I only went there to help."
Fair enough, but that still
Submitted by Ken Shepherd on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:20pm.
Fair enough, but that still doesn't address the hectoring activists who think they have a right to dictate how African villagers handle their wildlife problems.
free market system
Submitted by mom_rox on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 12:51am.
So Mr. Walsh thinks that money should have been spent elsewhere.
Presumably, many, many people shared in the benefit from the $60k-$70k cost of the trip. I'd like to see Mr. Walsh go to the recipients of this money (and the trickle down recipients) and tell them that Mr. Parsons should have spent his money on a "more deserving group". It appears that Mr. Parson did "directly help" some people in Zimbabwe.
What about in the 70's and 80's
Submitted by OuttaMyWay on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 7:29am.
When their communist hero's were going through africa killing elephants for ivory, taking pictures, then using them to feed their army? oh, and the army was killing innocent villagers, and burning crops.