WaPo Story on 40th Anniversary of Congressional Black Caucus Omits Incidents of Discrimination Against White Would-be Members
In her April 1 Washington Post story, staffer Krissah Thompson explored how the "mission" and "challenges" of the Congressional Black Caucus have "evolved" from its initial aim "to eradicate racism."
Yet nowhere in Thompson's 23-paragraph article is any mention of how the CBC has denied entry to prospective members on the basis of skin color, such as liberal Democrats Steve Cohen (Tenn.) and Pete Stark (Calif.).
Here's how Politico's Josephine Hearn reported on the controversy surrounding the former in January 2007:
Story Continues Below Ad ↓As a white liberal running in a majority African American district, Tennessee Democrat Stephen I. Cohen made a novel pledge on the campaign trail last year: If elected, he would seek to become the first white member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Now that he's a freshman in Congress, Cohen has changed his plans. He said he has dropped his bid after several current and former caucus members made it clear to him that whites need not apply.
"I think they're real happy I'm not going to join," said Cohen, who succeeded Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., in the Memphis district. "It's their caucus and they do things their way. You don't force your way in. You need to be invited."
Cohen said he became convinced that joining the caucus would be "a social faux pas" after seeing news reports that former Rep. William Lacy Clay Sr., D-Mo., a co-founder of the caucus, had circulated a memo telling members it was "critical" that the group remain "exclusively African-American."
Other members, including the new chairwoman, Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Mich., and Clay's son, Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., agreed.
"Mr. Cohen asked for admission, and he got his answer. ... It's time to move on," the younger Clay said. "It's an unwritten rule. It's understood. It's clear."
The bylaws of the caucus do not make race a prerequisite for membership, a House aide said, but no non-black member has ever joined.
Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., who is white, tried in 1975 when he was a sophomore representative and the group was only six years old.
"Half my Democratic constituents were African American. I felt we had interests in common as far as helping people in poverty," Stark said. "They had a vote, and I lost. They said the issue was that I was white, and they felt it was important that the group be limited to African Americans."
Cohen remains hopeful, though, that he can forge relationships with black members in other ways.
And forge them Cohen has.
As Perry Bacon Jr. of the Post reported in July 2010, some CBC members have raised money for Cohen's reelection, even endorsed him over black primary election rivals. Still, that doesn't change the fact that the CBC practices discrimination in membership even while it renounces racism officially.
It seems the CBC has the legal right to discriminate on the basis of race for membership, but whether it has a moral obligation to stop doing so is a question which should be posed to readers of the Post in an article noting its 40th anniversary.
- Ken Shepherd's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Four decades of the Congressional Bigoted Caucus is enough
Submitted by Dave. on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 3:12pm.
If they continue to refuse to allow white members, they should be forced to disband, or forced to hold their Klan-in-reverse meetings in non-government facilities, as I do not want my tax dollars paying for and supporting the government facilities these bass-ackward, 1960s throwback racists are meeting in.
These hypocrites are always preaching racial harmony, cultural unity, crying, "Can't we just get along? or else throwing the slogan-of-the-month at us.
What a crock.
It's beyond ridiculous things like this are still going on in 21st Century America, and more ridiculous still that the MSM winks at it.
If the idea was put forward to create a Congressional White Caucus, the MSM would have a collective conniption over it, as they would be spinning on their eyebrows while spitting nails, and smoke would be coming out of their ears.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Dave,
Submitted by Ashrak on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 3:12pm.
I think it is fair to say we think alike on this point. We were writing almost the exact same thing at the same time!
GMTA. ;)
LOL - Thanks, Ashrak
Submitted by Dave. on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 3:24pm.
And I forgot to mention I don't want my tax dollars paying for so much as the swizzle sticks they stir their no-doubt bitter coffee with, either.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
If anyone in Congress had the guts
Submitted by Ashrak on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 3:10pm.
there would be formed a White Caucus to demonstrate the racist nature of the Black Caucus.
The Black Caucus is a race based organization and there is no way to avoid it besides admitting and accepting blatant denial.
I submit that it is past time in this country to reject this outright foolishness and call it what it is - racism - wherever it exists.
I submit also that a title 42 section 1983 lawsuit be filed. If just the threat of it is good enough for Tiger Woods to "be invited" to a private golf course, then actually doing it should bring about positive results.
It is past time for the "Black Community" to be called onto the carpet and put on the spot. Does the "Black Community" want EQUALITY or not? To be sure, it has to be explained and understood that EQUALITY means living by the EXACT same set of rules as everybody else.
I will say this much, Eric Holder was not talking about me when he described a nation of people too scared to talk about "race". And actually, to me, "race" isn't the right term anyway. I prefer BREEDS. We are all part of the HUMAN RACE and we are just different breeds of humanity.
Either we are equal, or we are not. I opine that it is time for the answer as to which be on the table out in the open for al to see.
Stop Racism. Outlaw the CBC.
Submitted by Tenebrous on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 5:16pm.
Where is Je$$e when we really need him? It's far past time for the elitist liberals to stop their racism against skin tones that they don't like -- in this case, whites. Grow up, people, and stop acting like logic doesn't apply to you ("ooh, so discriminating against blacks is wrong, but since I'm black that means that I'm untouchable!").
Visions and Principles blog
The new KKK: Kongressional blacK Kaucus
Submitted by russedav on Sat, 04/02/2011 - 7:27pm.
The new KKK: Kongressional blacK Kaucus
Racism, by any other name, still stinks
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 5:22am.
As long as "African Americans" insist on being called "African Americans" there will be two separate but unequal Americas and there will be racism in America. And that's the way THEY want it. How else could THEY keep claiming victim hood and escaping responsibility?
Masters and Crack
Submitted by CO2Maker on Sun, 04/03/2011 - 5:46pm.
1. The Masters starts this week. Will the CBC get in line with other diversity whiners, er, advocates to clamor for changing the membership rules at Agusta National?
2. Everyone knows that the criminal penalties for crack cocaine are far more more severe than for powdered cocaine. And everyone knows that, of course, that's racist because crack cocaine is cheap and used by overwhelmingly more black, minority, or poor people, mainly in inner cities, while powdered cocaine is more expensive and used by rich white folks in the 'burbs. Of course it's racist. Did everyone also know that in the mid-1970s, the CBC urged federal penalties for crack cocaine be made more severe? Didja? Huh? Yep, the Congressional Black Caucus pushed to make the criminal penalties for crack tougher than for powdered C. Who'da thunk, eh? Well, they did it for a good reason: crack was cheap and was getting much more popular in the 'hood, so the CBC thought that having severe sentences would be a deterrent to its spread.