gm...

You need to go to HuffnPuff...where there is zilch for reality..you would fit right in.

You mean he might have said something idiotic like "The more money the government can quickly pour into the economy, the better off the american people will be.  Roosevelt failed because he didn't do enough, quickly enough.  Barney Fwank, Cwis Dodd and all the other heroes who protected Fannie and Freddie and CRA should be hailed as the heroes they are."  Something like that, right?

Idiots running the country, and trying to close down our sites.  Pathetic.  Go peddle your lunacy somewhere else.  Better yet, stick around, it keeps us on our toes as we figure out how we're gonna kick the snot of you (in a political sense) once all this lunacy goes south.

Idiot:  NOUN:  A foolish or stupid person...ETYMOLOGY:  Middle English, ignorant person

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com

Well, the President does it so that makes it okay now, doesn't it?

Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July.  Democrats believe every day is April 15th ~ Ronald Reagan

 Too bad you are intellectually vapid and have zero ideas. 

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

Honestly, if there was anything else that would fix this economy aside from a bailout, I think that it would have been done.

In the rush to get out this "stimulus", there was no time to consider other options. In fact, it is obvious that those crafting the bill didn't want to consider other options.
This "stimulus" bill is a payback to liberal constituencies.

Support is needed right now..not Kelsey Grammer interviews

Ah, yes, bipartisan support: "we've passed this bill, so y'all on the other side need to shut up and support it."
If this "stimulus" bill would do what is supposed to, no one would be calling for folks to support it. In such a case, those who were against it would be shown to be wrong.
However, as it appears this "stimulus" bill will do no such thing, then the opposition must support it to provide cover for those that pushed it out.

jmt
http://www.jmichaelt.org

 for his charitiable donations and  performances for the troops. Along with Jackie Mason, he sent one of the largest shipment of care packages to the troops ever. So, that gets my respect. His opinion? It's nice, I agree with it, but it doesn't affect my feelings.

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

"he gave his life so that a president like Obama could come along." 

I don't think so.  He's probably rolling over in his grave over the direction Obama's taking the country.  I guess I'm going to have to revise and extend some of my previous remarks if he is indeed this rino-like.  Here's Lincoln:

On simplification:

I respectfully recommend to the consideration of Congress the present condition of the statute laws, with the hope that Congress will be able to find an easy remedy for many of the inconveniences and evils which constantly embarrass those engaged in the practical administration of them. Since the organization of the Government Congress has enacted some 5,000 acts and joint resolutions, which fill more than 6,000 closely printed pages and are scattered through many volumes. Many of these acts have been drawn in haste and without sufficient caution, so that their provisions are often obscure in themselves or in conflict with each other, or at least so doubtful as to render it very difficult for even the best-informed persons to ascertain precisely what the statute law really is.

It seems to me very important that the statute laws should be made as plain and intelligible as possible, and be reduced to as small a compass as may consist with the fullness and precision of the will of the Legislature and the perspicuity of its language. This well done would, I think, greatly facilitate the labors of those whose duty it is to assist in the administration of the laws, and would be a lasting benefit to the people, by placing before them in a more accessible and intelligible form the laws which so deeply concern their interests and their duties.

I am informed by some whose opinions I respect that all the acts of Congress now in force and of a permanent and general nature might be revised and rewritten so as to be embraced in one volume (or at most two volumes) of ordinary and convenient size; and I respectfully recommend to Congress to consider of the subject, and if my suggestion be approved to devise such plan as to their wisdom shall seem most proper for the attainment of the end proposed.

On the relationship of capital and labor:

It is assumed that labor is available only in connection with capital; that nobody labors unless somebody else, owning capital, somehow by the use of it induces him to labor. This assumed, it is next considered whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent, or buy them and drive them to it without their consent. Having proceeded so far, it is naturally concluded that all laborers are either hired laborers or what we call slaves. And further, it is assumed that whoever is once a hired laborer is fixed in that condition for life.

Now there is no such relation between capital and labor as assumed, nor is there any such thing as a free man being fixed for life in the condition of a hired laborer. Both these assumptions are false, and all inferences from them are groundless.

Labor is prior to and independent of capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights. Nor is it denied that there is, and probably always will be, a relation between labor and capital producing mutual benefits. The error is in assuming that the whole labor of community exists within that relation. A few men own capital, and that few avoid labor themselves, and with their capital hire or buy another few to labor for them. A large majority belong to neither class--neither work for others nor have others working for them. In most of the Southern States a majority of the whole people of all colors are neither slaves nor masters, while in the Northern a large majority are neither hirers nor hired. Men, with their families--wives, sons, and daughters--work for themselves on their farms, in their houses, and in their shops, taking the whole product to themselves, and asking no favors of capital on the one hand nor of hired laborers or slaves on the other. It is not forgotten that a considerable number of persons mingle their own labor with capital; that is, they labor with their own hands and also buy or hire others to labor for them; but this is only a mixed and not a distinct class. No principle stated is disturbed by the existence of this mixed class.

Again, as has already been said, there is not of necessity any such thing as the free hired laborer being fixed to that condition for life. Many independent men everywhere in these States a few years back in their lives were hired laborers. The prudent, penniless beginner in the world labors for wages awhile, saves a surplus with which to buy tools or land for himself, then labors on his own account another while, and at length hires another new beginner to help him. This is the just and generous and prosperous system which opens the way to all, gives hope to all, and consequent energy and progress and improvement of condition to all. No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up from poverty; none less inclined to take or touch aught which they have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering a political power which they already possess, and which if surrendered will surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them till all of liberty shall be lost. (my bolding)

Quick, someone send this to Obama.  I wonder if he's even read any of Lincoln's speeches?  Oh, that's right, he doesn't need to, he's channeling Lincoln!  Gimme a break.

"The future is not set.  There is no fate but what we make for ourselves."

michaelyon-online.com