Update at bottom of post.
In a story on "Potential Problems at the Polls," Time's Michael Scherer passed along to readers a misleading anecdote about some nuns from South Bend who were "turned away" from the polls in Indiana's May presidential primary. The scary tale of sweet elderly nuns being robbed of their right to vote was how he introduced Time readers to potential problem #6, "New Burdens of Proof."
The sisters of the holy cross [sic] in notre [sic] Dame, Ind., don't have much use for driver's licenses. Or at least that's what a dozen of the nuns thought on May 6, when they went to vote in the presidential primary. They were each turned away as a result of a recently established ID-check requirement at Indiana polls.
In truth what actually happened was the nuns refused to avail themselves the opportunity of voting via provisional ballot and Scherer is hardly the first to mislead readers as to the facts of the incident in question.As I noted in a May 6 NewsBusters post:
If you have been watching the primary election coverage tonight you've probably seen at least one story about elderly nuns from South Bend, Indiana, who were "denied the right to vote" for lack of a photo ID.
It's a shame when the mainstream media, bear false witness. Even more so when they exploit the nun angle to carry water for left-wing groups that opposed the law all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Under Indiana's voter ID law, persons lacking proper ID can vote. The only difference is they cast a provisional ballot which is not counted until after their identity is verified within 10 days following the election.
In one of her earliest drafts, AP's Deborah Hastings did note the 10-day provisional ballot exception, but still crafted her coverage to paint the South Bend sisters as the victims of an unforgiving law:
About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place by a fellow bride of Christ because they didn't have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.
Sister Julie McGuire said she was forced to turn away her fellow sisters at Saint Mary's Convent in South Bend, across the street from the University of Notre Dame, because they had been told earlier that they would need such an ID to vote.
The nuns, all in their 80s or 90s, didn't get one but came to the precinct anyway.
"One came down this morning, and she was 98, and she said, 'I don't want to go do that,'" Sister McGuire said. Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.
Even some otherwise balanced news outlets got the story wrong at the time, such as "Fox & Friends," whose co-host Gretchen Carlson told viewers of the May 7 edition that the nuns were "barred" from voting.
Update (14:27 EDT): An e-mail tipster from Remington, Ind., points out that the State of Indiana went so far as to come to the South Bend nuns rather than requiring them to come to them. The story from the Associated Press via WNDU's Web site:
A group of elderly nuns visited a mobile Bureau of Motor Vehicles branch in South Bend to get photo identification required to vote.
In the May primary, about a dozen Roman Catholic nuns from Saint Mary's Convent were turned away from a polling place because they didn't have required photo ID.
A mobile license branch visited Saint Mary's College Friday, and several Sisters of the Holy Cross got new or updated state ID cards. Most of the elderly nuns use walkers or canes, so the mobile BMV trailer was more convenient for them than traveling to a license branch.
Sister Francis Helene Fox got a state ID card because her driver's license expired in July. The 83-year-old says she's never missed voting and she didn't want to miss the vote this year.
if (self['plpm'] && plpm['Mid-Story Ad']) document.write('');if (self['plpm'] && plpm['Mid-Story Ad']){ document.write(plpm['Mid-Story Ad']);} else { if(self['plurp'] && plurp['97']){} else {document.write(''); } }if (self['plpm'] && plpm['Mid-Story Ad']) document.write('');
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Mr. Shepherd:
October 27, 2008 - 11:24 ET by j. frank wilsonHow many provisional ballots are actually counted? Half? What are the rules for supervising the decision to accept or reject them? Who monitors that process?
jfw,are you lazy?
October 27, 2008 - 11:40 ET by larry on LIyou know how to use a computer to ask someone to answer a question ,when with the same computer and the same effort you can get the answer?just a game for you to play?
Fwanky is acting like a
October 27, 2008 - 12:33 ET by Scuba DudeFwanky is acting like a typical Lib, don't bother to find the answer yourself, have someone else do it. So he is the perfect Bambi voter, one who does not want to work yet still get paid and have the Govt provide him with everything.
I am a firm believer in having photo ID if you are going to vote. They require it when you get on an airplane or want to get booze or cigarettes and a multitude of other things. I don't want my vote diluted because of ACORN and others that promote voter fraud.
How many provisional
October 27, 2008 - 11:53 ET by Dan The Man 2How many provisional ballots are actually counted? Half? What are the rules for supervising the decision to accept or reject them? Who monitors that process? - Good questions Frankie, why dont you investigate that problem and get back to us. I imagine the provisional ballots will be counted if there is a need to, ie if there if they will make teh difference. And if the nuns come back with proper ID as required by a law that has been in place for some time.
In any election it is up to the voter to be informed as to what the voting requirements are, ignorance of the law is no excuse. The nuns are old enough to know this and if they can't figure it out then they have no business voting in the first place. Voting is a privilige just like driving, one must have the right credentials to do either.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
AP not content with merely distorting the story...
October 27, 2008 - 11:41 ET by SickofLibs...Fellow bride of Christ??? Nice little mockeroo there, Hastings.
Let's agree to call this
October 27, 2008 - 11:57 ET by jdhawkLet's agree to call this "journalist" a propagandist. He didn't pass along anything, he purposely lied to fit the "story" that he was spinning.
This year marks the end jounalism as is commonly known. The drive by media is propagandizing the news to fit the meme of the socialist like bambi (aka 57 states). And now we know that bambi is a socialist by his own admission.
The best part of all of this concerning the drive by media is that their readership and viewership is sinking. The saddest part is that it is not happening fast enough nor are there sufficient varied media resources that are fair and balanced to replace them.
An ID doesn't have to be a
October 27, 2008 - 13:19 ET by suzycreamcheeseAn ID doesn't have to be a driver's license! *primal scream!!!!!!*