SF Chronicle: 30 Percent of City's Illegal Immigrant Juveniles Really Adults

Photo of Ken Shepherd.
  • Bookmark and Share

Illegal immigration has all but disappeared as an issue on the MSM radar screen since the primaries wrapped up, and it's unlikely to be resurrected given the generally liberal immigration stances of both Sens. McCain and Obama.

Nonetheless, some credit is due to the San Francisco Chronicle for not one but two articlesin the Septmeber 17 paper on the city's so-called sanctuary policy and its problems.

For one thing, 3-out-of-10 juvenile offenders who were not reported to the feds as illegal immigrants under the sanctuary city policy were, well, actually adults, noted reporter Jaxon Van Derbeken:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Nearly 30 percent of the felony offenders San Francisco juvenile justice officials have reported to federal immigration authorities since the city stopped shielding youths from deportation have turned out to be adults, authorities say.

The city's Juvenile Probation Department has referred 58 offenders to federal authorities since Mayor Gavin Newsom announced July 2 that the city no longer would protect youths from deportation under San Francisco's sanctuary law. The mayor took the step after The Chronicle revealed that the city was paying for flights home and $7,000-a-month group homes for underage, undocumented offenders, who as adults could face prison and automatic deportation.

But wait, there's more, as Chronicle staffers Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross noted in a separate article:

It turns out that San Francisco wasn't shielding just juvenile illegal immigrants from deportation if they committed crimes - City Hall officials have discovered that there are 372 convicted adult felons on probation in the city who weren't reported to the feds.

The findings were reported in an audit overseen by the city's incoming probation chief, Patrick Boyd, after Mayor Gavin Newsom asked for a review of how San Francisco's sanctuary law was being implemented in the wake of a series of Chronicle stories describing missteps in the handling of juvenile felony offenders.

City officials repeatedly claimed that adult illegal immigrant felons were being turned over to federal officials - unlike juveniles, who for years were protected under what authorities now concede was a misinterpretation of the sanctuary law.

Officers with the city Probation Department are supposed to include defendants' immigration status in their pre-sentencing reports to judges. But "that policy wasn't being followed," at least not by everybody, Boyd said.

And apparently, no one was checking.

Unfortunately neither Van Derbeken or Matier & Ross noted Newsom's Democratic Party affiliation, but other than that, their reporting on such a critical issue neglected by the mainstream media this election season is welcome.

—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

My uncle works for ICE, and

My uncle works for ICE, and he has detail duties that involve juveniles. 

He says that he regularly has to report "juveniles" that he is in charge of that are actually adults.

Thomas Jefferson once said, 'We should never judge a president by his age, only by his works.' And ever since he told me that, I stopped worrying. - Ronald Reagan

Anyone who believes keeping criminal illegal aliens around

is a good idea, is nuts and deserves to be re-called from their elected office if they hold one.
This is a total bastardization of this country's laws and underlying value for the 'rule of law'. San Francisco and other cities who style themselves as 'sanctuary cities' are sending the message that its OK to break some laws but not others. Not to mention that if you are the 'right' class or group or can pass as one, you will get better treatment than anyone else.

You want change? Give me a dollar.

While we're truth telling,

While we're truth telling, how about the padding of the unemployment rolls?  What makes anyone think a person who has committed mulitple felonies won't take unemployment benefits either????  There maybe over a million illegals drawing unemployment as we speak and the idiots running the unemployment offices don't check to verify if the SS# provided actually belongs to the person drawing the benefits.  The only time they check is if the person says they are not a citizen who claims they were legally allowed to work here with a green card. The government social service agencies have their own version of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.

just gaming the system

What did you expect? We grant immunity to juveniles and suddenly everyone is a juvenile. Oh my, am I surprised - NOT!

Next, we grant immunity to 10 million illegals and surprise, we wind up with 100 million illegals.

Oh well, I just hope I live long enough to read in the Manila Times on my tropical porch at the beach how the civil war in America is going between the towelheads and the beaners, the white folks having left for elsewhere and the blacks having gotten hunted to extinction by both of the others. It should be fun to read.

Flying pigs and other city officials

I'm confident that SF city officials will soon be holding special hearings to investigate why the citizens of SF were decieved and those responsible for lying to the taxpayers will be brought before a grand jury.  As confident as I am pigs will be flying by my window any second now.

So where does SF get all of this money to buy votes in exchange for government handouts?

San Francisco Bay Area Tax Rates rank among the highest of all US major cities:

Total Tax Rates - Tax Index 112.2

Service Industry Tax Rates - Tax Index 111.9

Manufacturing Tax Rates -  Tax Index 113.5

R&D Tax Rates - Tax Index 111.9

When will citizens in cities such as SF start demanding more accountablility/responsibility from their public officials?   Where are the SF barracuda hockey moms stepping up to demand reform in their city government?

It would better serve the citizens of SF for the SF Chron to continue to highlight this wasteful government spending than gushing over the very same ones responsible for ripping off SF taxpayers.  Leave out the Party affiliation if you must but at least stand up for your readership that is getting screwed by an out-of-touch mayor and his corrupt administration.   

Better yet...

...when are they moving, and where?