"Whose side is Joe Lieberman On?" demands the subheading for "The Demublican," a January 24 Newsweek Web Exclusive centered on Sen. Joseph Lieberman's (I-Conn.) endorsement of John McCain for President. In the interview, reporter Jeffrey Bartholet presses Lieberman from the left on a host of policy issues and questions and on his loyalty to the Democratic Party. For his part Lieberman often points to issues where McCain has left the conservative fold, such as climate change and the Gang of Fourteen.
At no point, however, does Bartholet ask Lieberman if he feels the "party has left him" on national security/war on terror issues.
Below are the agenda of questions. I've bolded the ones that skew leftward or suggest Lieberman is disloyal or has no good reason to back a Republican over his party's standard bearers. For the full interview, click here.
- You almost won the vice presidency as a Democrat in 2000, and you later ran as a Democratic presidential candidate. Now you're supporting a Republican for president. Why the change?
- You're still a registered Democrat, correct?
- So you won't be able to actually vote for McCain in the primary.
- Will you vote in the Democratic primary?
- Now, as a lifelong Democrat, do you ever worry about the kind of judges a Republican--any Republican--might nominate during the next four to eight years, when liberal justices are likely to retire?
- I'd like to ask you about a couple of issues on which you disagree with McCain. Abortion is an obvious one. He believes that Roe v. Wade must be overturned, and you don't. Are you concerned about that? Do you think he's willing to negotiate that or moderate his stance?
- Let me ask about one more issue you disagree with him on, and that's gun control. He believes that gun control is "a proven failure in fighting crime," and you've been for gun control.
- So you think he might be willing to work with Democrats on measures to regulate gun use?
- Going back to 2006, some of your critics are suggesting that you cannot forgive or forget what happened during that period, when the party and some of its leading lights backed Ned Lamont for your Senate seat. Some have used the word "vengeful." How do you address that?
- How did you make the decision [to endorse McCain]?
- The Clintons backed Lamont in the Connecticut [general] election, as did your colleague Christopher Dodd. That must have had some personal impact. You wouldn't be human if it didn't.
- There's concern now that since you've backed McCain in the campaign that you'll start caucusing with the Republicans in the Senate and tip the balance of power.
- When you say "I have no intention …" or "There are no circumstances …" that still leaves a little wiggle room. Are you meaning to leave that there?
- You've said that you will not run as a VP candidate, yet speculation continues. Do you categorically rule that out?
- Where can you best help McCain going forward, in which states and with which constituencies?
- You're talking about bipartisanship. Ironically, in this particular campaign there are Democrats who are saying the same thing. Barack Obama, for instance. In many of his speeches he talks about the need for bipartisanship and the need to win support from Red States and Blue States and so on. Do you not believe that rhetoric?
- Some of the criticisms of McCain include that he's a bit of hothead and has a temper that flares rather dramatically at times--and that he's old. How do you address those?
- Right now you're campaigning for him against Republicans. Will it become more awkward--or will you feel uncomfortable--if or when you're out there campaigning against a Democrat?
Photo credit: Charles Dharapak, Associated Press, via Newsweek.com
—Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
McCain-Lieberman
January 25, 2008 - 17:59 ET by mattmIt would be the perfect spoiler ticket.
mattm...scary funny
January 25, 2008 - 18:08 ET by LionKingThink about that ticket: McCain/Lieberman.
Does it get more down the middle-of-the-road than that? It would have a lot of appeal to pubs and dims and tweeners.
It is so scary, it just might happen. If it does, I think they would be unbeatable...sad, but true.
Unbeatable -- even against
January 25, 2008 - 21:41 ET by lotrUnbeatable -- even against Hillary/Barack?
It will never happen. Too
January 25, 2008 - 23:19 ET by Scout FinchIt will never happen. Too much blood spillage. She'll go after the seemingly endless supply of illegal immigrants by naming Bill Richardson. And fighting for driver's licenses for illegals.
Besides, whomever she asks will be useless. She has Bill for an unofficial veep.
mattm... That it would,
January 25, 2008 - 18:11 ET by bigtimermattm...
That it would, makes one worry and wonder.
The question is who would
January 25, 2008 - 18:22 ET by mattmThe question is who would it hurt more? When Perot ran in 1992, we had a sitting president who was hurting from a recent recession and a ton of media negativity. We also had a new guy, with charm and looks...etc. Clinton won with less than 43% of popular vote.
Now we have an outgoing President (so "change" is not a big deal...we're getting "change" no matter what), and the Dem candidate is either going to be someone with tons of baggage or an inexperienced lightweight.
If the GOP goes with Rudy or Romney, I believe a spoiler ticket of McCain/Lieberman could hurt the Dems more, but who knows?
I think it would hurt the
January 25, 2008 - 18:29 ET by bigtimerI think it would hurt the dems more too matt...as long a we have either Mitt or Rudy on like you say...otherwise I would worry.
I also worry about Bloomie yet because as far as I know he would hurt the dems too, but it would depend on who he backed if he does do this...if he runs himself I have no worries for our side.
Oh well, time will tell.
"Newsweek Incredulous at
January 25, 2008 - 18:02 ET by Chris Norman"Newsweek Incredulous at Lieberman Backing McCain"
"and after all the Democrats have done to - er - for you!"
Jeez...how come they never
January 25, 2008 - 18:02 ET by motherbeltJeez...how come they never ask "Whose side is McCain on?"""
Sheesh.
Why do liberals care what
January 25, 2008 - 18:21 ET by wiwfWhy do liberals care what Liebermann does anymore? They abandoned him! Now they want him back? He's an Independent, NOT a Democrat. Shut the hell up, Newsweak.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Exactly.
January 25, 2008 - 21:45 ET by lotrExactly.
hey... how come Lieberman
January 25, 2008 - 18:37 ET by MidAmericahey... how come Lieberman isn't praised as a 'maverick'? (rhetorical)
Hey Mid... Excellent
January 25, 2008 - 18:42 ET by bigtimerHey Mid...
Excellent point you have there...excellent!
You go against the
January 25, 2008 - 18:50 ET by motherbeltYou go against the establishment Republican party, you're a maverick.
You go against the establishment Democratic party, you're a traitor.
Don't look for any Dems, or for the MSM, for that matter, to be praising Leiberman's "courage and independence."
i guess i need to read all the comments first
January 25, 2008 - 21:07 ET by Tidy Bowl ManSorry Mom
Yep -- great points -- it's
January 25, 2008 - 21:56 ET by lotrYep -- great points -- it's blatant bias. Lieberman is more of a maverick than McCain, actually. And what's up with this "do you think McCain will moderate his stance on abortion"? What about Lieberman moderating HIS stance -- the Democrats, including Lieberman, are 100% tow-the-line abortion-on-demand-thru-third-trimester-without-restriction.
If McCain-Lieberman can beat Clinton/Obama, then bring them on.
I like Joe. I trust him
January 25, 2008 - 18:57 ET by MidAmericaI like Joe. I trust him more than I do McCain because he is more consistant. If McCain wins does anybody know what we'll get?
THE VP
January 25, 2008 - 18:58 ET by LionKingIf McCain gets elected, we probably will end up with the VP very shortly.
McCain is now allied with
January 25, 2008 - 19:25 ET by alamojbMcCain is now allied with the unashamed Mexico First Nationalist Juan Hernandez: http://michellemalkin.com/2008/01/25/john-mccains-open-borders-outreach-director-the-next-dhs-secretary/#comments
Joe Lieberman & John McCain bossom budchips
January 25, 2008 - 19:32 ET by Lame CherryThis is about about a story named Joe and John, two Senators trying to keep their family fed........and then one day while they were making laws.......up from the ground came a bubbling bill........
Money that is.........casinos........Indian gaming.
Want to know why John McCain and Joe Lieberman are so wed, follow the money on the Indian gaming casinos in their home states with the high end mafia ties.
I might like Joe Lieberman and tolerate John McCain, but these 2 hatched the biggest money skimming operation via the Indian reservation gambling system.
.........and I do not believe they did it for free and as no one has EVER written of this or brought it up, I will conclude it is the Rockefeller banking cartel laundering this money worth billions.
Not the Beverly Hillbillies, but the Jewish guy and the POW guy cashing in on legislation.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
There have been quite a few
January 25, 2008 - 19:40 ET by bigtimerThere have been quite a few ties to the Indians and Casino's and major bribes since the Clinton administration...
I have followed a lot of the hearings from the Clintoon years to present...McCain was absolutely obnoxious leading the way in some of the hearings I saw...
You can throw in Gore/Hillary and Bruce Babbitt...plus Boxer and Reid if memory serves me.
Nothing is going to happen to them..but what's his name got it good...can't think of it at the moment but he is now behind bars.
TYPICAL
January 25, 2008 - 20:16 ET by BobAnthonyTypical questions from a communist who prays at the temple of Soros, Kos, Pacifica, et al! Look, coming from someone who has lived in CT-Stan all his life like myself, this red kid (me) has no place in a bluer than UCONN Blue state like this one. Lieberman is the lesser of two evils when it comes to state Senators:
On the war on terror, Israel and National Security Joe swings for the fences and knocks a homer out everytime.
But on immigration, he sides with Democrat Dodd in wanting amnesty for illegals.
I say lesser of two evils, because Dodd sided with Lamont in the contentious race in 2006 where the Kos people nearly turned CT into a Soviet state--if it isn't one already despite the presence of a Republican governess in Jodi Rell. Dodd basically stabbed Lieberman in the back and really showed the type of socialist he is.
The same can go for this "reporter"
Interesting
January 25, 2008 - 21:05 ET by Tidy Bowl ManI find it interesting that in the media, if McCain sides with the dem's he is a Maverick, brave and a mad genius that we all should love. Media Darling.
When Lieberman sides with the Republicans he is off the ranch crazy.
I've never heard those questions asked of McCain. Just switch the Dem/Lieberman to Rep/McCain.
Just for clarity I am NOT for McCain. I am an aching FredHead without a home.
TBM... I am an aching
January 25, 2008 - 21:09 ET by bigtimerTBM...
I am an aching FredHead without a home.
Don't feel alone....
I admire Lieberman as a
January 25, 2008 - 21:23 ET by Gary P JacksonI admire Lieberman as a principled man. He chose his ideals over his party, and went independent. McCain, not so much. He continues to stink up the Republican party, even though he is totally out of step with what the bulk of the base is all about. Heck, even his mom knows the base won't support him! Only his ego keeps driving him to stay in this race!
I do not think a McCain/Lieberman independent ticket is in the offing, nor do I think it would hurt the Republicans if it was. Besides, McCain is dragging his Vice President around with him: Lindsey Graham.
Wow. The attitude of
January 25, 2008 - 22:15 ET by fitzfongWow. The attitude of Newsweek is frankly breathtaking. The scumbags in his party stabbed him in the back, supporting Ned Lamont and getting Lieberman defeated in the primaries. Then, he gets reelected as an Independent without their help (in fact the scumbags worked heavily against him)...he kicks their a** and now owes it to them (?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!) to support one of their deficient candidates? Wow. Delusional.
Besides, Lieberman has
January 26, 2008 - 00:59 ET by Gary P JacksonBesides, Lieberman has threatened to move over to our side of the aisle over WoT issues. How bad would THAT piss the drive-bys off!
John McCain: The Democrats' Favorite Republican
January 26, 2008 - 09:24 ET by PopularTechJohn McCain: The Democrats' Favorite Republican (Video) (1min)
"I believe my party has gone astray. I think the Democratic Party
is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and
their philosophy." - John McCain
McCain: For and Against Tax Cuts (Video)
Huckabee: Raising Taxes OK
The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource
If they haven't noticed
January 26, 2008 - 10:55 ET by ahusserIf they haven't noticed Lieberman is no longer a Democrat. He ran and won as an Independent. He also supports the troops and the war on terror. I think that ticket would be a winner. They both would do well with middle of the road Republicans and swing voters and pull in some Democrats as well who are frustrated with their now Socialist Party. Just remember this. If McCain wins the nomination, and I think he has a good chance, and "real" conservatives don't vote. The other side will win. Period. Whoever is nominated on the Republican side needs to be supported. In the end I believe McCain is an honorable and honest man. Frankly Hillary is an abomination with not enough porters in the world to carry her baggage. And what exactly is Obama, a closet muslim, a racist black who either inadvertantly didn't show proper respect to the American flag or did so by design and belief. He is not only a lightweight as others describe him but he is a total unknown. However, that being said, it really means close to nothing if the Republicans do not win back congress. If that does not happen a Republican President's only job will be vetoing lefty bills.
I'd like to ask you about a
January 26, 2008 - 16:06 ET by HAL9000I'd like to ask you about a couple of issues on which you disagree
with McCain. Abortion is an obvious one. He believes that Roe v. Wade
must be overturned, and you don't. Are you concerned about that? Do you
think he's willing to negotiate that or moderate his stance?
Why does the MSM always ask this of anti-abortion figures and never of pro-abortion ones? Why is it that Pro-lifers are always the ones who must "adjust their views?"
This is tiresome.