Are you gonna eat that? According to CNN host Rick Sanchez and one of his May 7 guests, your answer is being decided for you by food industry "manipulation."
"Here's a question that you've probably never thought of when reaching for that next bag of chips or that can of soda. Is it you who's actually deciding what to eat or how much to eat? Or is someone really deciding for you?" Sanchez asked before introducing Dr. David Kessler, former chief of the Food and Drug Administration and author of The End of Overeating.
Sanchez summarized Kessler's argument saying "you and I are being programmed, kind of like manipulated like Pavlov's dog" for profit. No representative from the food industry was brought on to rebut Kessler's claims.
"You suggest the nation's food industry is intentionally creating adult baby food. What does that mean," Sanchez asked Kessler.
Kessler replied, "Much of our food that we are eating is predigested. It's pre-fried, it's bathed in sugar and fat ... Today the food goes down in one or two chews. It's a woosh, you get that a sensory hit and you just reach for more."Later Kessler laid the blame completely on businesses. "The food industry knows exactly what happens in your mouth. They understand the cheese melt, but the main drivers of consumption are sugar, fat and salt. We used to think that we ate to satiate ourselves - that we ate for nutrition. We're eating for stimulation."
Sanchez not only sided with Kessler and left out the opposing viewpoint Sanchez also built up the author's credibility saying, "He's just telling you something about the system that he uniquely knows because of his former position." Sanchez also called Kessler "Doctor," throughout the segment.
The closest Sanchez got to advocating personal responsibility was his suggestion that people should "internalize and externalize" the information, but he quickly resorted to advocating government intervention.
"Internalizing this I would think that there are things we need to do, rather than the blame the other guy for what he's doing to us, what can I do to protect myself against this. And externalizing it I'm thinking: maybe we can also do something as a group or as a government would be to put a little pressure on these guys to stop doing that crap to us."
Kessler defined the government's "role" as "disclosure and education."
J. Justin Wilson, senior analyst for The Center for Consumer Freedom, told the Business & Media Institute, "Kessler's conspiracy theories aren't helping anyone get healthy. Restaurants offer a wide variety of menu options because that's what customers are asking for. Americans are getting the message that exercise and dietary moderation are the keys to health and fitness - not scare tactics or food paranoia. All Kessler has proved with his blame-game routine is that he's way behind the curve."
"Farmers, food producers and restaurants just want to make affordable food that tastes good. If that's too much for Kessler's delicate palate, so be it. He's welcome to choose the low-fat arugula okra lentil couscous salad. It's a free country," Wilson continued. "It's not a cook's fault that we like sweet, savory, or salty foods - that's human nature. Kessler calls it ‘the rise of hyper eating,' but most Americans call it ‘delicious.'"
Kessler has supported the work of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a liberal food police group that has warned against eating all kinds of food (including water, bread, eggs and fresh produce) and advocated government regulation and taxation of "bad" foods. According to CSPI's Web site, Kessler gave the group the FDA's highest honor in 2007.
—Julia A. Seymour is an assistant editor for the Business & Media Institute.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
wow
May 8, 2009 - 12:48 ET by katainkentjust wow.
video games make us violent
movies make us sexual
and food companies make us eat.
Freakin A.
How about this : If you cook your own food you know exactly what's going in your body. Stop blaming other people for your problems.
Yeah, I wonder who made
May 8, 2009 - 14:17 ET by d1carterYeah, I wonder who made Sanchez drink to excess when he ran over a pedestrian and killed him? Should the government intervene here as well?
Sanchez for the Edward Kennedy Humanitarian Award.
May 8, 2009 - 15:09 ET by allanfSanchez said the accident wasn't his fault. You can see why he believes no individual is responsible for anything.
I nominate him for the Edward Kennedy Humanitarian Award.
No, no, no, kata....
May 8, 2009 - 16:33 ET by motherbeltAll true, except that bit about sex....seeing TV shows about teenagers on a sex romp every week does NOT cause teenagers to want sex!
It has nothing to do with it!!
\sarc
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
..?
May 8, 2009 - 16:42 ET by katainkentwhat shows are these? Wait! I don't want to know! :D
My kids don't watch tv We have no cable anymore actually. They used to watch Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends and ... oh, and The Last Avatar before it was wrapped up. They deemed the rest 'stupid'.
Hold on ‘cause the world will turn if you're ready or not ~ KT Tunstall
Oh, good grief!
May 8, 2009 - 12:49 ET by GalvanicOnce again, the MSM sends the message that we are victims to be protected by the Watchdog Media and Big Government, who must be called upon to protect us from foods, drinks, fun, etc.
They must genuinely believe that we're all stupid.
News Media
May 8, 2009 - 13:43 ET by JDWWhat did they feel about Obama's fastfood run?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
Ha ha, even the smartest
May 8, 2009 - 23:40 ET by CamelopardalisHa ha, even the smartest people aren't safe from the 'evils' of food companies.
No, its not that they want
May 8, 2009 - 14:49 ET by MrSnugglesNo, its not that they want to protect us, its that they dont want competition in telling people what to do with ever aspect of their lives.
So where is it?
May 8, 2009 - 12:58 ET by IgnatzJFahrquarThe part about it being the Conservatives fault. I'm sure it's coming. After all, "we" did kill Jack Kemp.
"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." Mark Twain
And now we know the next
May 8, 2009 - 13:00 ET by moderncommentaries83And now we know the next target of the Nannies: Food and food advertising!
Why is it liberals can never accept that people make choices on their own, that they aren't always manipulated by corporations or advertising or what have you?
It's really a joke.
And ironic, when you consider how much manipulation the media engaged in back during the presidential elections and continues to engage in now:
"Here's a question that you've probably never thought of when reaching
for that ballot. Is it you who's
actually deciding who to vote for? Or is someone really
deciding for you?
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Freedom Of Choice
May 8, 2009 - 14:13 ET by JDWPeople do have choices yet are manipulated such that they never have the facts upon which to base those choices.
Many people here are able to eat whatever they choose whenever they desire without fear of obesity. It is genetic. Others must simply adhere to a diet.
Why must people born with the genes be forced to abide by government restrictions?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
Partial credit only for bias in this story
May 8, 2009 - 13:01 ET by ladywolfeI give author credit for pointing out usual lack of personal responsibility that the left promotes in the blame others utopia they imagine. However the food industry does manipulate consumers and spends god knows how much money on research in efforts to appeal to peoples taste and get them hooked on whatever they are selling. Little more sugar here and deep fried this and that all to bring out those cravings and keep a consumer consuming their product.
Now many here would argue hey appealing to ones customers is simply good business practice and you would be right except one small thing. When a product causes nothing but harm to a consumers health and the company knows this then personal responsibility works both ways. People are responsible ultimately for what they do and do not eat. The food industry however are also responsible for knowingly making products that have no nutritional value at all. They should be pointed out as doing such. It is their free right to make these products and our free right to eat or not to eat them but if your going to point out personal responsibility on consumer end in order to be impartial you must point out the companies knowingly producing bad products.
progress - Pop Tarts with whole wheat flour
May 8, 2009 - 13:57 ET by mom_roxagree lw - The growth in Industrial Agriculture coincides with the growth of our everexpanding waistline (obesity).
Yes, I'm a big proponent of personal responsibility, but many people do not recognize that cheaper food (with less nutritional value) comes with a more expensive price tag in the long run (obesity, high blood pressure, heart disease, etc.) Our government is complicit in this with its intervention/interference with the corn farmers.
...........................
There's a problem with this?
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
packaged food
May 8, 2009 - 14:14 ET by katainkentin general is terrible for you. Refined flour. Refined sugar. Not much else.
We've been a "from scratch" food family for a long time with very limited exposure to soda.
(I do occasionally drink a Cherry Coke but with full knowledge I've just consumed 42 grams (divide that by ~4) that's 10.5 teaspoons - almost a quarter cup - of straight sugar!) But gosh its good :)
I wish I could look back far enough to compare grocery bills but I honestly think we spend quite a bit less by shopping healthier. Now I am curious!
Hold on ‘cause the world will turn if you're ready or not ~ KT Tunstall
Huh?
May 8, 2009 - 13:01 ET by SickofLibsMost of the food we eat is predigested?
Where the heck does "Dr." Kessler eat, the Pelican Rescue Farm?
Sanchez outdoes himself every day with these asinine hit pieces.
Pelican Rescue Farm?
May 8, 2009 - 13:04 ET by BlondeOMO, I'm laughing at that one, SoL.
Well, we now have the Thought Police, and the Food Police.....however, I am reserving the right to be appointed the Fashion Police. 'Cause I have an issue with $540 sneakers and really really ugly cardigans.
I hope he fails, too.
Geek joke alert!
May 8, 2009 - 15:05 ET by KJ_sezYou see? All those evil conservative profit-mongers really are Ferengi!
holy crap!
May 8, 2009 - 13:04 ET by UndercoverConservativeFirst it was "military-industrial complex" then it was "big tobacco" then "big oil", now it's "big food"? is there no end to the conspiracies that make the sheeple do all these horrible things?For without them humans would be decent, in shape, moral, debt free?
Why no calls to silence "big media" or "big government" from these people too? Or is that they only wish to suppress anything that threatens Big Media and Big Government in the hearts and minds campaign of Life In America?
WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)
Big Government
May 8, 2009 - 13:52 ET by JDWWho would accuse Obama of smoking, eating steak, riding in low mileage vehicles, or constantly flying in planes which guzzle jet fuel?
JDW
DAILY WAVE
When people fear their government there is tyranny.
When government fears the people there is liberty.
Oh puhleeeze Kessler...when
May 8, 2009 - 13:05 ET by bigtimerOh puhleeeze Kessler...when I eat it's because I am hungry.
I don't do it for 'stimulation' you nutcase you.
Sanchez isn't even worth the mention.
Nothing like trying to control the food industry either...they have been for years, trial lawyers just drooling with hunger.
Hey, let's see if we can Nationalize this industry too while we're at it.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
hold on there BT
May 8, 2009 - 13:24 ET by SickofLibsPlease tell me you're not saying if I regurgitated a couple smelts you wouldn't be even remotely stimulated, even on a primordial level? ;)
SoL... LMAO...that's what
May 8, 2009 - 13:35 ET by bigtimerSoL...
LMAO...that's what I'm saying...and I'm sticking to it!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Stupid Stupid Stupid
May 8, 2009 - 13:17 ET by rammingspeedSanchez is being exploited by CNN for his weak mind and willingness to toot the big government line. It's sad, how these trained monkeys follow the banana.
Laura Ingraham said (on last night's O'Reilly factor) that CNN (along with MSNBC et al) are paying the price through ratings. Both networks have fallen off drastically in viewership since last fall, and garbage like this is one reason why.
But, Ricky Sanchéz!!!
May 8, 2009 - 13:17 ET by Trix RabbitAre not we as an audience "being programmed, kind of like manipulated like Pavlov's dog for profit."???
Are we not being manipulated by the ever obnoxious Billy Mays as he screams at us while he shills his latest crappy product? Are we not being manipulated by one of CNN's sponsors the Royal Saud Investment Group? "Hello. We are the Saudis and WE love you"?
Right now, of my own volition, I'm going to have a triple cheeseburger, a 44oz Dr. Pepper, and a deep-fried twinkie.
¡Que aproveche!
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
time for an intervention!
May 8, 2009 - 13:21 ET by katainkent*gets a megaphone*
put down the cheeseburger and step away from the twinkie. the food police will be here shortly.
Hold on ‘cause the world will turn if you're ready or not ~ KT Tunstall
Run, Trix!
May 8, 2009 - 13:24 ET by BlondeKata saw your cheezeburger, and she's faking.....she intends to steal your cheezeburger and is dressing up as the food police to make you give it up easily.
I hope he fails, too.
Thanks Kata and
May 8, 2009 - 13:29 ET by Trix RabbitThanks Kata and Blonde.
What was I thinking? After the Food Police come over and give my refrigerator a tune up, then the "religious right" will come over and force me to go to church!
(gasp)...someone is at the door already
For the MSM: In your pomp and all your glory, you're a poorer man than me. As you lick the boots of death born out of fear.
Ian Anderson "Wind up"
did you know
May 8, 2009 - 13:32 ET by katainkentdid you know Britian already has its own "food police". No joke.
and hey... you plan on finishing that cheeseburger? ;)
OMO, kat!
May 8, 2009 - 13:39 ET by BlondeNice try at diversion while you swipe Trix's burger.
Love your link....sounds like something Obama would might try to boost his "fabulous unemployment numbers"....an 8 week temporary babysitting scheme.
I hope he fails, too.
Kessler is a wacko from way
May 8, 2009 - 13:19 ET by ConservativeRexKessler is a wacko from way back. They keep dredging up these imbeciles. But Sanchez may have a point. For the kind of people that would watch more than 10 seconds of CNN, food manipulation would be the least of their problems. That crowd would be easily succeptible to it.
If this is what the CNN crowd worries about, then we do own them.
RICK SANCHEZ - NEWS MORALIST
May 8, 2009 - 13:21 ET by SgthulkaHey Rick!
Would the food industry be to sloth as the liquor industry would be to.....Say.....Drunk driving?
They will have to pry my sugar donut ot of my cold dead hands
May 8, 2009 - 13:21 ET by dark_dsThey will have to pry my sugar donut out of my cold dead hands.
Hey Sanchez, I also hear that the beer companies put in a special ingredient that makes a person hit pedestrians.
_______ Him and the Unicorn he rode in on
Every time I walk into Sam's
May 8, 2009 - 13:25 ET by myron243somebody forces me, yes forces me, to buy the choice New York strips and occasionally a brisket and some babybacks. And I have been brainwashed to use charcaol for the steaks and smoke the brisket and babybacks low and slow.
The fact that I'm a 71 year old Texan that was eating steaks and barbecue long before I had a TV or read any type of advertising has no bearing on the argument. It's someone else's fault.Well, kinda. My folks raised me that way. And my grandparents raised them...
good Texas beef
May 8, 2009 - 14:13 ET by mom_roxmyron, one of the reasons that you, as well as my 71 year-old father (a Texan reared on a cattle farm), are doing fine is because you grew up eating grain-fed beef. Today, many cattle are manipulated to digest corn feed which produces an inferior product, and this manipulation creates other unintended negative consequences. Technically, this is still beef, just not as good as what your parents and grandparents ate.
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
mom_rox... Right you
May 8, 2009 - 14:15 ET by bigtimermom_rox...
Right you are....and you can tell the difference if you are old enough to remember.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Mmmmmm....Baaaaar....Beee...
May 8, 2009 - 14:39 ET by MrDavisonMmmmmm....Baaaaar....Beee....Cuuuuuuuuue.
Now tell me, is that the "predigested" kind? That's my favorite. I've been told by some great doctor.
You got me all in the mood for a nice summer BBQ this weekend now. Glad it's Friday!
Yeah, man, like the MSM
May 8, 2009 - 13:28 ET by mattmYeah, man, like the MSM never manipulates anything for profit....uh huh.
Sanchez is a tool and
May 8, 2009 - 13:40 ET by niner-four-whiskeySanchez is a tool and Kessler is selling the typical alarmist pulp.
Doesn't mean it isn't true that the processed food industry isn't manipulating the products, intentionally or unintentionally to exploit human weakness to sell more. Food Science is pretty sophisticated these days and major retail food products are carefully formulated for long shelf-life and high-consumer appeal.
It is ultimately the end-consumer's own responsibility what he puts in his mouth.
Unfortunately, this isn't always as easy as it sounds, in this go-fast, no-time world. It is also unfortunate that healthier, unprocessed foods are often far more expensive than highly processed junk food. A lot more Cheetos get eaten in the ghetto than beans and rice. It's convenient, cheap, and readily available source of calories.
Paradoxically, we have reached a point in human history where more people can afford more caloric food value than ever, yet it may be the biggest threat to health ever seen.
we are being programmed
May 8, 2009 - 14:05 ET by jackie3We are being programmed but not in the way that anchor stated. "food is not pre-digested" and manufacturers are not creating products that are addictive.
We are being programmed on what to eat, what to think, to ban guns, to spend money, to buy on credit cards. Just watch the advertising in the media. The same tricks that Obama used to brainwash his followers are right there in living color.
Marketing is brainwashing. Advertising is brainwashing. How many adds do you see for not spending money, for not going out to eat, for not buying a new car, for not buying toys and video games, for not dieting, for not buying name brand cookies?
Look at the ridiculous news stories. The fact that this site has so much to material to post is mind boggling. The mainstream media has replaced real reporting with super size McDonald's clown news.
There are very simple techniques used to brainwash consumers into buying junk they don't need. Any well trained salesman can tell you them.
Alexander Hamilton: "We are a Republican government. Real liberty is
never found in the despotism or in the extremes of a Democracy."
The irony here is that the
May 8, 2009 - 14:41 ET by MrDavisonThe irony here is that the tool Sanchez can't see that HE's the one doing the programming!
Where's the beef?
May 8, 2009 - 14:44 ET by QueenMumOne can only hope that Sanchez and Kessler some day balloon up about 50-100 lbs. If someone doesn't know by the time they reach adulthood what is and is not healthy food, they will suffer the consequences of their own bad behavior and either learn from the experience or not. And I didn't see any mention of how the "poor" in America are some of the most overweight.
This is America, damn it. And we are free to enjoy eating for any reason we want.
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
Hasn't anyone noticed what
May 8, 2009 - 15:00 ET by fitzfongHasn't anyone noticed what a fat load Rick Sanchez is? Must be that addictive commissary food.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
Yeah, I suppose it was also
May 8, 2009 - 14:58 ET by fitzfongYeah, I suppose it was also Anheuser-Busch's fault that Sanchez had to get liquored up at the football game before getting in his car and killing that pedestrian. Or maybe it was the car's fault?
Pinhead tyrants like the "Dr." Kessler, Morgan Spurlock and Michael Jacobsen are emboldened by the recent election of That One. Not content to run their own lives, they feel entitled to ruin everyone else's "for their own good". But they're so greedy, so undisciplined and so arrogant that they think they can shove this crap down our throats without anyone pushing back. Perhaps "the obesity 'crisis'" is an issue tangible enough for people to realize the true motives of the Marxists...and to trigger the revolt against it.
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -Winston Churchill
New WH Position
May 8, 2009 - 15:58 ET by jdlybrandOK, it's all clear to me. What we need is a Cheeseburger Czar to save us from ourselves.
Chizburger, chizburger
May 8, 2009 - 16:03 ET by QueenMumHey, jdlybrand. Weren't Obama and joltin' Joe recently featured in the MsM ordering cheeseburgers? And what about the Dear Leader flying in a pizza chef? I guess it's like Clinton saying "But I didn't inhale."
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
I'm skinny and can eat
May 8, 2009 - 16:23 ET by freecitizenI'm skinny and can eat whatever I want. I don't want my choices limited because other people can't accept the fact that they aren't me.
And I smoke too, so pbbbbbt!
Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.
Neener, neener, neener
May 8, 2009 - 16:31 ET by QueenMum"I'm skinny and can eat whatever I want."
Well, pbbbbbbt back at ya! :)
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand
Ahh, quit smoking
May 8, 2009 - 16:40 ET by general companyand see what happends to all that skinny, that what happend to mine anyway. I am not over weight, but I have to work like heck at the gym to ensure I am not. : [
but quit smoking anyway,
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
My typical response to
May 11, 2009 - 07:59 ET by freecitizenMy typical response to people who tell me to quit smoking is to tell them to lose weight. Somehow my suggestions for them to lead a healthier lifestyle always causes offense, but they can't understand why it bugs me when they do the same to me. Tell a fat person they are fat and you are mean. But telling a smoker he's going to die is being concerned. This is where I could go all biblical about splinters, beams, eyeballs and such, but why bother
And I will always be skinny. It's a metabolism thing in my family.
Liberal: remove all that's Right, and this is what's Left.
Personal Responsibility
May 8, 2009 - 16:38 ET by ConservativeMissourianIt is clear that people in the US need to be eating better. The amount of unhealthy/overweight adults and children in this country is getting ridiculous. One thing that consumers cannot control is the terribly ingredients used in most of today's food products. Just look at the ingredients. But more importantly, people need to make lifestyle changes. This includes eating better, being active, and most importantly quit blaming other people!! It is the companies' job to market what we as a country want, otherwise they would be out of business. They are not brainwashing us into being obese. If we start eating better then the food industry would be marketing that. But then there would just be people complaining about that.
salads at McDonald's
May 8, 2009 - 21:34 ET by mom_roxCM, I think that the food industry has started a slow change to healthier products. McDonald's now serves salads, apples and yogurt - not because of a government order, but because they can make a profit (meaning that consumers are buying these products).
I like that more organic and healthier products are being sold. Even something as simple as cereals with lower sugar content - that's a win-win - better for the consumer and it saves the cereal maker money. (no one is stopping you adding more sugar to it yourself) I know that to some the word organic connotes an aging hippie eating beansprouts, but I think of my grandparents' kitchen: food from the vegetable garden, fruit trees, livestock and the fish we caught in the pond.
I'm afraid that if/when we get public-funded health insurance, the government will then start dictating our food choices instead of letting us decide.
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
This is one issue that I can
May 8, 2009 - 21:37 ET by balboaThis is one issue that I can unequivocally agree with the right (if this is a stance of the right). Fast food restaurants don't make people fat; their choices do. I think it's great that McDonald's has some tasty salads now, especially if you're doing some driving on the highway. But you can't blame restaurants for making people fat. Quit eating out! Quit eating Ho-Ho's!
Why is it ?
May 9, 2009 - 06:05 ET by jacktheripperthat "organic" food, free range this or that is so much more expensive? I mean overhead must be low (no peksy chemicals to buy no fences or buildings to put up for those chickens) they should be giving this stuff away!I'll bet the "big oil" companies are breathing a sigh of relief
" The Future Is X Rated"
simple answer: economy of scale
May 9, 2009 - 09:15 ET by mom_roxjtr - I think the simple answer is an economy of scale. I'm not an expert, but cramming a large quantity of chickens (or other animal group) into a building (which requires extra vaccinations/chemicals) creates cheap McNuggets. "Free range" chickens (I put that in quotes because some really aren't free range) still require shelter and fencing plus acreage and probably increased manpower.
I think Big Chemical: BASF, Dow, DuPont, etc. profits more than Big Oil from this. Not only from the additional chemicals used in industrial poultry and livestock operations, but in corn production. The increase in corn production is a big factor of the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi River runoff from fertilizers and chemicals used in corn production). Our government "stupidly" mandates ethanol in our gasoline which leads to an increase in water pollution. (Corn farmers can't drink the water from their own water wells.)
Regarding balboa's comment above, one could attritube to not wanting a nanny state govt. to either a conservative or libertartian principle. People usually think Big Business is automatically Republican, but Don Tyson (Tyson Chicken) is a big Democratic Party donor (and Friend of Bill).
As I mentioned above, I don't want government intervention in how people eat. I think that consumers willing to pay for food prepared without the extra chemicals will lead to more "organic" food choices, and gradually the price of the healthier foods will decrease somewhat relative to the mass-produced food. Sorry for the ramble, but this is such a complicated issue when you realize all that is involved in food production.
~~save your tea, dump congress~~
People risk their lives and
May 10, 2009 - 03:02 ET by RR GOPPeople risk their lives and have even died trying to get to this country so they can be fat.
I don't know how many people I've known who don't drink, don't smoke, won't eat this, won't eat that...and they always seem to be down with something and/or have emotional and/or psychological problems...and they criticize others for their choices. The jocks with knee braces and have arthroscopic surgery...
Our cemeteries are full of 'healthy' individuals who died in their prime.
Of course, unhealthy behaviors are just that, but these Communists and others that prefer Big Brother totalitarianism for our own collective good want to dictate what's healthy for us and try to manipulate us into lifestyles they deem healthy (gee, who woulda thunk that doing drugs and males engaging in anal sex with each other would qualify as somehow being natural and healthy?).
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Another liberal telling us
May 10, 2009 - 10:33 ET by rbosqueAnother liberal telling us what we ought to do.
I thought liberals love "choice"? I can do as I please.