Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 20, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Jill Stanek's blog
  • MSNBC: Obama and Merkel Are the New 'Ronnie and Maggie'; Matthews Sees Conspiracy to Push Hillary 2016
  • NBC's Todd Excuses Obama's Poor Speech Performance: Crowd Too Small, 'It Was Hot'
  • Chris Matthews Whines About Sun Harming Obama's Berlin Speech
  • MSNBC's Hayes Slams 'Shameful Spectacle' of 'Anti-Food Stamp Jihad' by Republicans
  • The Inconvenient Suffering of China’s Laogai Prisoners
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies

MSM Claims Komen Donations Down Due to Pro-Abortion – Not Pro-Life – Boycott

By Jill Stanek | March 29, 2012 | 14:22

A  A

The mainstream media is reporting that donations to Susan G. Komen for the Cure have dropped substantially in the wake of its decision and subsequent reversal to defund Planned Parenthood.

According to the MSM, this must be due to disgruntled Planned Parenthood supporters, for instance this March 23 CBS News story:

"I wouldn't want to be a part of an organization that had made such a terrible political mistake." Eve Ellis sat on Komen's New York City board and raised more than a quarter million dollars but now says to restore trust top administrators including the national foundation's board and founder and chief executive Nancy Brinker must leave. "Besides being sad and besides being angry, I was also embarrassed because I had raised this money for an organization that seemed to be different from what I thought it was."

Liberals must pursue this story line. The subliminal message is: Don't mess with Planned Parenthood. It cannot be that pro-life withdrawal of support is the - or even a - problem. It is apparently inconceivable that pro-lifers previously unaware of Komen's relationship with PP might be backing away. From NPR, March 26:

People who were upset enough to withdraw, of course, didn't show up Sunday. Amarie Whetton, part of a women's health group from Raytheon Missile Systems, says fewer people raced on her group's team this year.

An insinuation, from the Associated Press, March 19:

But [Komen Arizona chapter executive director Jaimie] Leopold confirmed another reason for the drop is... lingering mistrust.... Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona has never received funding from the local organization because it has never applied. However, if it did, Planned Parenthood would be considered just like any other health-care providers that apply for grants.... “People, donors need to have confidence in where they put their money. We’ve been working to engage the community,” Leopold said. “We are committed to demonstrating we are a trustworthy philanthropy.”

The meme is also implied in photos, like this one in the Baltimore Sun... But here's a flashback to February 2, two days after Planned Parenthood leaked the news that Komen was defunding PP, from the Daily Caller:

In the wake of this week’s announcement that Susan G. Komen for the Cure will no longer be awarding grants to Planned Parenthood, the breast cancer organization’s donations have gone up 100 percent in the last two days.

It would have gone the other way had liberal types withdrawn enough support to make a dent. In fact, pro-lifers who had withheld donations from Komen started to give. And then stopped, of course. An objective MSM would have more likely concluded Komen's new fundraising woes were due to its continued connection to PP. A Daily Mail blogger (of course, in the UK) pegged the likely scenario:

My take is pro-life women are upset with the cave-in to Planned Parenthood and sacking Komen.... Obviously, the pro-abortion crowd is not as big about supporting Komen. Liberals are less charitable with their money than conservatives are. Or maybe there are just more pro-life women. Had Komen stuck to its guns, conservatives would have supported it and Komen’s coffers would have increased in size.

In reality, Komen has alienated both ends of the ideological spectrum now. But it would have fared better sticking with pro-lifers. A little aside, from my inside source. When Komen announced its original decision, a pro-life leader organized people and groups to send flowers of thanks to Komen. In all, Komen received over three dozen flower arrangements. Poignantly, the flowers did not arrive until after Komen reversed its decision. They were placed in Komen's DC office's war room, where I'm told Nancy Brinker read every card. That must have garnered a little guilt. But Brinker is pro-abortion, don't forget. And she's aligning herself with her abuser. From the Washington Post, March 29:

“No one likes a dust up,” said Brinker. “We’ve passed through this. [Planned Parenthood president] Cecile Richards came to Texas and said, ‘We like Komen. Let’s move on. We’re through this.’ But the residual effects in the media has been difficult."
  • Abortion
  • Cecile Richards
  • Komen
  • Nancy Brinker
  • Planned Parenthood
  • UK
  • Baltimore Sun
  • CBS
  • NPR
  • Washington Post
  • Jill Stanek's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

This conservative woman no longer backs Komen

Submitted by tulsatammy on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 4:03pm.

After the Komen flip-flop, I received an email from the local committee since I had participated in The Race for the Cure for many years. The email was very apologetic toward anyone who had been offended when Planned Parenthood was dropped. So I replied and said that I never knew that Komen supported Planned Parenthood, but now that I know that, I will no longer support their organization.

  • Login to post comments

Once people learned of the connection

Submitted by glogo on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 5:47pm.

Once people learned of the connection between Komen and PP, they were surprised. I knew of the connection years ago. I was always puzzled as to why our Catholic High School was into the "pink" activity. I pointed out the realtionship to others and they felt I was mistaken. When it hit the news about withdrawing support, lots of people found out. By reversing the decision, they weren't able to put the cat back in the bag. I don't contribute to United Way for the same reason. I do not support the primary mission of PP and UW provides local support. I give to whom I want to give; no middle man.

I contacted Komen on their initial announcement and congratulated them. I indicated that I would now be supportive of their primary mission. After their reversal, I followed up and said I reversed my decision as well. I'm glad to hear others felt the same way.

  • Login to post comments

Tom Thumb grocery stores in

Submitted by TE on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 6:41pm.

Tom Thumb grocery stores in the Dallas/Fort Worth area attempt to shake down unsuspecting customers by asking (rudely) if the customers want to give to "cancer research" or some such. Of course, Tom Thumb does not inform their customers that the customers' money will be going to Komen and then on to the country's largest, most active and most lethal death chamber, i.e., Planned Parenthood. I rarely go to Tom Thumb because it is ridiculously more expensive than virtually all of the local grocery stores, but if Tom Thumb ever asks me to fund "cancer research", my answer will be "hell, no".

  • Login to post comments

Lots of stores do that...

Submitted by Radical1979 on Thu, 03/29/2012 - 6:53pm.

then they can say their corporation raised X dollars for cancer.

I never give to any charity I haven't looked into. If they want $1 for a food bank I say, nope, I'll donate the food directly through my church. That way I know where my money is going.

Proud member of the 53%!
  • Login to post comments

I was all for saving boobies,

Submitted by sngnsgt on Fri, 03/30/2012 - 10:07am.

I was all for saving boobies, but, killing babies.......No.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • The regulated states of America infringe on pursuit of happiness (Niall Ferguson)
  • The rationale for wind power won't fly (Jay Lehr @ WSJ)
  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • NewsBusters Interview: Amity Shlaes on Coolidge, Media, and Neo-Keynesianism
  • Facebook Photo Shows Kennedy Girl Shooting Baby Seals
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use