Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Jeffrey Meyer's blog
  • MSNBC’s Schultz Admits He Doesn’t Know Much About ObamaCare, Still Fawns Over Law
  • Veteran Journalist Brit Hume Condemns FBI Investigation Of Fox’s James Rosen
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About

Bashir and Sharpton Argue There's Racist Motivations Behind New Voter I.D. Laws

By Jeffrey Meyer | March 05, 2012 | 18:13

A  A
Jeffrey Meyer's picture

Joining a daylong drumbeat of hourly segments to hype colleague Al Sharpton's latest project, MSNBC's Martin Bashir pushed on viewers of his 3 p.m. program today that Republicans are trying to suppress if not downright disenfranchise minority voters across the nation.

Bashir opened up the Sharpton "interview" by rhetorically asking if “there is a deliberate attempt at voter suppression being undertaken by the right today?”  To no surprise, Sharpton knocked the softball over the far-left field fence. Sharpton claimed that with less than one percent of prosecutions on voter fraud in the last decade, "one has to conclude it's a deliberate attempt to try and suppress our votes in particularly minority communities that are disproportionately impacted, seniors and students."  [See video below.  MP3 audio here.]

Sharpton is no stranger to making extreme comments, and his favorite standby seems to be accusing Republicans of being racist.  Bashir plays right into the Sharpton conspiracy theory suggesting that, “Could it have anything, perhaps sir, to do with the fact that African-Americans have tended to vote in large proportions for this president?”  To no surprise, the left-wing activist-cum-MSNBC anchor agreed with the phony and disgusting assertion made by Bashir and went on to claim that the recent voter ID laws are "clearly the most frontal attack on the voting rights act we’ve seen in 47 years."

For his part, Bashir failed to balance out the interview with a proponent of voter ID laws, like say, that far-right-wing wacko Jimmy Carter.

That's right, the 39th president has defended voter ID laws. True, Carter would like to see states take measures to slowly implement voter ID laws over time and to offer free ID cards to poor residents -- a step that some states like South Carolina and Georgia already do.

Indeed, South Carolina has even ferried prospective voters to the DMV to get free state-issued ID cards.

Below is the relevant transcript. 

Martin Bashir
03/05/2012
3:23 p.m.  

MARTIN BASHIR: It's been 47 years since the passing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, but the battle to ensure that all Americans are able to vote is very much ongoing. That landmark legislation was achieved through the blood and sacrifice of hundreds who marched from Selma, Alabama to the state capital of Montgomery. They protested against discriminatory voting practices which meant that vast numbers of African-American citizens were deliberately disenfranchised. My colleague the Reverend Al Sharpton and host of MSNBC’s Politics Nation is leading the march and he joins us from Alabama. Good afternoon, sir.

REVEREND AL SHARPTON: Good afternoon, Martin.

BASHIR: Great to have you. Do you believe that there is a deliberate attempt at voter suppression being undertaken by the right today?

SHARPTON: Yes, I do. I'll say it unequivocally.  When you look the at facts that we see fraction of 1% of prosecutions on voter fraud brought in the last decade and that they are now all of a sudden going after voter I.D. laws and lessening early voting in over 30 states being proposed, 8 states already enacting,  just suddenly they all have this same revelation with no data to back it up risking five million people that will be disenfranchised, one has to conclude it's a deliberate attempt to try and suppress our votes in particularly minority communities that are disproportionately impacted, seniors and students.  

BASHIR: Now you will know that some Republicans claim that people can walk off an international air flight, stroll into a voting booth and mark their vote without any attempt to check that they are qualified to do so. Do they have a point in seeking to strengthen identification  requirements?

SHARPTON: Absolutely not. First of all, one would then ask why have you not presented evidence where that is happened. Why would we risk you having something you fear is possible with an absolute that we know five-million  people would be disenfranchised. That's one. Secondly, why do we change the identification that is necessary now. We didn't change it in the last 30 years. But let me tell you this Martin, they didn't ask that we have photo id in their own primaries now. They're not having photo I.D. in Super Tuesday Republican primaries tomorrow. They didn't have it in Iowa. They didn't have it in South Carolina. So Why do they want it in the general election? If they're quote so concerned about that, they should be doing it right now during their primaries. They're not doing it because they're not targeting those voters.

BASHIR: Could it have anything, perhaps sir,  to do with the fact that African-Americans have tended to vote in large proportions for this president?  I’m just suggesting.  

SHARPTON: One can suspect that you're suggestion is well founded. Whatever it is, I think since they are changing something that has not been broken, since they are fixing something that's not broken, one can only suspect there's another motive other than fixing it. Secondly, since it's impacting and clearly the most frontal attack on the voting rights act we’ve seen in 47 years , that's why we're out here marching to protest.  Certainly the people that come from all over the country would not be walking and marching ten miles a day to raise this issue, if we didn't feel it was real threat.
 

  • Campaigns & Elections
  • Martin Bashir
  • Martin Bashir
  • Jeffrey Meyer's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

⇒ The Voting Rights Ask 1965

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:23pm.

I'm assuming that's how he pronounced it.

The liberal mindset (sp?) pustulates that African Americans are not capable of accomplishing such complicated tasks as getting a picture taken.

The liberal mindset dictates that because of their Darwinian religion, some are more evolved than others.  Sharpton hasn't yet realized his failure to join the 21st century is something liberals find quaint, cute, and reminiscent of years gone by.

  • Login to post comments

Cool, I postulate that if,---

Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:45pm.

and I say if, the libs have a mindset; it is indeed a pustulating or pustulant one.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

⇒ Thank you md

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:18pm.

I was just thinking a "pustulation" could only come from an incredibly diseased liberal mind.

Condescending, patronizing racism is the path they incyst upon.  That's what it boils down to.  It's also why Kathleen Sebaceous is so fond of abortions.

  • Login to post comments

Your post, Cool, gets an ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:24pm.

"A" +++ only because I am too lazy to add the requisite +'s to honor it properly. 

As in ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++, etc.

Very good, indeed.   :o)

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

I'm highly suspicious of that transcript...

Submitted by SickofLibs on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:42pm.

When reading it, one gets the impression that Sharpton is speaking English.

  • Login to post comments

I miss Barbara Billingsley...

Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:39pm.

...she, as I recall, could speak Jive.

  • Login to post comments

And before that, she would

Submitted by killa37 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:44pm.

And before that, she would allow Ward to beat the Beaver!!!

  • Login to post comments

I smell another staged event coming soon...

Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 6:45pm.

It won't be long before a bunch of Dems find some 80 year old minority lady who doesn't have an ID, and they will take her to a polling place, and with cameras rolling, we will all see how she is being denied her "voting rights", when they don't let her cast a ballot. This will be the lead story in the NYT, WAPO, all the left wing sites, and all the MSM, for days on end.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama

  • Login to post comments

The "Rev"

Submitted by fivestring_assassin on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:09pm.

Al Sharpton is one of the biggest racists this country has ever seen

Twanna Brawley...Freddies Fashion Mart.....Hymie Town...on and on it goes

And hired by MSNBC to join their stable of known racists and race pimps such as Jonathan Capehart, Eugene Robinson, Meliisa Harris -Perry, the lunatics at the Grio.com, Martin Bashir, Toure, ,,,,the list is getting larger

A Recession is when your neighbor is out of a job. A Depression is when YOU are out of a job.. A recovery is when OBAMA is out of a job Hat tip to Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Hymie Town was Jesse Jackson's phrase

Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:15am.

Sharpton cleverly positioned himself to be the leading African-American-To-Go-To in the MSM Rolladex when Jackson fell, which he did when the news of his illegitimate child broke. He's even avoided scorn from the MSM for being $1.6 million behind in his taxes.

If a conservative TV host had a past like Sharpton's, he/she would be the regular target of the MSM.

  • Login to post comments

⇒ Jackson's downfall

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 11:24am.

Jackson's sudden fall from grace occurred when he whispered to Julian Bond, in front of a hot mic, that he wanted to surgically relieve Senator Obama of his testicles.

Jesse's been groveling for scraps ever since.

  • Login to post comments

You mean there are racist motives behind their accusations

Submitted by lgeubank on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:17pm.

They don't want verification of identity, because that would inhibit their voter fraud. After all, most of the guttersnipes and dishonest people in the world are liberals, so voter fraud aids Democrats.

So they race-bait, and make up scurrilous accusations against Whitey. They trade on race to achieve their policy objectives -- a very racist tactic.

  • Login to post comments

⇒ That must be it

Submitted by Cool Arrow on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:21pm.

Because without Photo IDs, the precinct workers won't know when an African American has entered the polling place.

Brilliant!

  • Login to post comments

Because racist accusations are the easiest path

Submitted by lgeubank on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 10:58pm.

They're the easiest way to try to prevent voter ID laws, moron.

  • Login to post comments

Sorry

Submitted by bobsmom on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:51pm.

at the headline "Bashir and Sharpton Argue" I got such a laughing fit my husband had to come in and whack me on the back. My brain just went to a hissing slapfight between these two useless idiots, and I was done.

  • Login to post comments

Well, Al

Submitted by nolefan2 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:31pm.

why do I have to have photo ID for everything else I do in life and why isn't it unconstitutional? We all know that when you don't have to prove you are who you say you are that there is a great deal of room for voter fraud. But then that is the whole purpose of your argument against voter ID isn't it? If you have voter ID chances are you can't vote several times in several places. Chances are no one will know you are an illegal immigrant. I'm sure your president has enough smarts to figure out a way to get photo IDs for those in this country who can't afford it, right? If he can figure out how to redistribute the wealth, he can figure out how to get some pictures taken. After all, the only ones who need it are those who don't drive and therefore have no driver's license with their photo on it. Come on. The majority of the American people are not as dumb as your constituents are. We know a scam when we see it.

  • Login to post comments

Working as a retail security

Submitted by MrSnuggles on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 9:50pm.

Working as a retail security agent catching shoplifters I can tell you from experience that homeless guys and drug addicts all have id cards and not drivers licenses so its not difficult to get one

  • Login to post comments

Wait a minute.....

Submitted by GregE on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:35pm.

...Two guys who focus on race, play the race card constantly, and make their living on it............argue that there is racism in voter ID laws.

Oh, ok.

  • Login to post comments

It Has Nothing To Do With Race!...

Submitted by bigdaddy on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 8:45pm.

...What it does is disenfranchise the largest block of liberal voters....the deceased.

With voter ID the dems will have to "dig up" some more votes from somewhere else.

The Democratic Motto, "Vote Early, Vote Often"...

  • Login to post comments

The Right to Vote

Submitted by GregE on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:00am.

They want anyone to be able to walk in off the street and fill in the dot. That benefits liberals, and that alone says a ton.

It is always said that greater turnout benefits liberals, meaning there is basically a core number of people who care and always turn out. Anyone beyond that is really apathetic but came out for some reason, whether it was they bought into some hype, they're told to vote to add to a friend's voting numbers, one of their friends are going so they'll go because someone else is, they are younger, etc etc. More voters doesn't mean informed voters. I would guess that the percentage of apathetics go up in a big way when the numbers are over X percent of registered voters.

2008 was a huge example. More voters than ever. Busloads, simply to vote for the first black president. History being made, so let's go vote. Nevermind issues. Many of those voters never voted in their lives, and may never again, and couldn't tell you who anyone is beyond President and Vice President, and maybe couldn't even give you the VP.

Yes, we have a right to vote. Sadly, too many do not referee themselves and require of themselves a responsibility to pay attention. My vote..........Mark Levin's vote.........George Will's vote..........your vote............and the vote of the guy who pays attention to nothing and goes to the polls just because he figures one candidate is a cool guy or so he heard...........all count EXACTLY the same.

In our work, our businesses, organizations, etc.......merit counts for something and people of merit most often are noted for it................but when it comes to voting, it is 100% total equality, no merit required whatsoever.........You and the guy who plays eenie meenie minee moe in the voting booth count EXACTLY the same. You paid attention, you spent your time (hence, your life) learning about issues. He did nothing, his entire time spent was the time it took to get to the poll, vote, and get back to his everyday life. And his vote counts the same as yours. Sickening.

Right to vote etched in stone, but zero responsibility required.

  • Login to post comments

Voter ID

Submitted by joeschmo1 on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 8:01am.

I guess these two bozos have NEVER been to an airport (where you must show a valid ID), or a CASINO (where you must have a valid ID to collect your winnings), or a HOSPITAL (where you must have a valid ID), or for God's sake...ANYWHERE! Why is it that showing your ID to do one of the most important things in your life (vote) is considered racist?

These guys are first class morons with nothing but an axe to grind over nothing. The sad part is that the mainstream media bangs the drum for them.

  • Login to post comments

The same people who are crying "racism"

Submitted by johnsonl on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 9:59am.

are the same people who have to produce I.D. to receive public benefits.
Their arguments don't wash.

  • Login to post comments

We ID...

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:58pm.

...It's the law.

That's a sign I see in every store, gas station, shop, or other retail establishment that sells tobacco. So, where the heck is Al Sharpton, and why isn't he complaining how this law is "disproportionately impacting" minorities, seniors, and students? If an id requirement is "disproportional" in one instance, due to things like racial and economic status, then it must be "disproportional" in ALL situations, due to the same reasons.

It's interesting how hypocrites like Sharpton continually apply the selective application of outrage to such diverse, widely accepted, and, in most cases, totally necessary requirements like producing an ID upon request. Asking someone to produce an ID to buy a pack of cigarettes? Well, that's a great idea! We wouldn't want to take a chance that the person buying that pack is too young now, would we?

Asking the same someone to produce an ID so they can vote? Oh My God, that's down right bigoted!

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

But, doncha see how hard it

Submitted by celator on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 12:59pm.

But, doncha see how hard it would be for all those dead democrats to vote if they had to produce an ID? How would the D's ever win an election again? Obama can use a phony Social Security number for ID only because he's special, ya see.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

That reminds me...

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:12pm.

Here in the State of Minnesota, you only need to produce a document with your current address on it as a proof of residency, a "proof" that is required to vote. I wonder if an obituary listing your grave site would be acceptable?

My grandfather resides within the State of Minnesota. Yes, he resides six feet under the soil, but he is still a resident! Of course, his current medical condition, chronic mortius, makes it rather difficult for him to actually visit the local voting booth, but, as a resident, isn't he electable for an absentee ballot?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

No doubt a grave site address

Submitted by celator on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:12pm.

No doubt a grave site address would be highly acceptable. Preferred, probably. ;-] My wife is a voting clerk here in Maine, and she tells me that people from NH, Mass and Vermont wander in to vote D when there's a presidential election. All we need here is verification of a local address, and the ability to breath and blink your eyes.

"This is not your mother's Democratic Party"--Andrew Breitbart, CPAC, February 2012
  • Login to post comments

The ability to breath?

Submitted by CobraMan on Tue, 03/06/2012 - 1:16pm.

"The ability to breath." Since when is that an impediment?

Once of these day I'm going to fill out an application for an absentee ballot. In the section that deals with which medical condition prohibits me from traveling to the local voting booth, I'll list "chronic mortius" as a cause. I wonder if they'll even know what that actually means?

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use