'Nightly News': Antarctic Ice Changes Man’s Fault; No Other Possibility Acknowledged

Photo of Jeff Poor.
  • Bookmark and Share

The penguins soon won’t have a home and it’s all our fault.

You might get that impression after watching the January 14 “Our Planet” segment on “NBC Nightly News” about the ice shift in Antarctica.

In 2006, the Antarctic peninsula near South America lost 60 billion metric tons of ice; 132 billion tons disappeared in West Antarctica,” said Anne Thompson, NBC News chief environmental affairs correspondent. “Big numbers that could have a big impact.”

Thompson blamed mankind as the “prime suspect” for the changes – ignoring all other possibilities, despite some scientists that are skeptical of that theory.

“Like the warming scientists are seeing in Greenland and the North Pole, the prime suspect behind the melting at the South Pole is global warming,” Thompson said. “Manmade carbon dioxide and other gases trapping heat that may well be warming the waters in the coldest police on earth.”

But it isn’t a unanimous “consensus” the ice in Antarctica is melting or that man is contributing to any of the changes on the continent. Thompson ignored other credible scientists who have contrary views.

A recent report posted by Marc Morano, communications director for the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, outlined the objections of 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on manmade global warming. One of those scientists had doubts about man’s ability to have a profound sudden impact on Antarctica.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

MMMMM......Not so much truth here.

Here's a blog with a link to the photo evidence that the Antarctic Ice Sheet is growing.  Sorry AGW freakazoids.  Scientific evidence proves your consensus wrong........again. 

Faciem durum cacantis habes

Aw c'mon, everybody knows

Aw c'mon, everybody knows that Penguins taste like Chicken! 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

LOL

You would think that penguins would taste like fish.  I guess we could ask a leopard seal. 

Faciem durum cacantis habes

Of course

she ignored any other possibility! To admit any exist is to admit the end of the man made global warming scam... The libs can't be bothered with such "inconveniences" like facts.

Some help, please.....

Since the South Pole is truly the southern most part Antartica, just where exactly is "West Antartica"?

Wouldn't any point in any direction from there be North Antartica?

 

just West of

Eastern North Pole. :-)

Geographically-impaired

Good point, Freaky Boy. My guess is it's somewhere between Oz and Mordor.

Freak, just in case you are

Freak, just in case you are serious, I'll try and answer.  Antarctica is a continent the size of North America, not a point.  All points on that continent, indeed, on the whole globe are north of the south pole.  As there is an east and left...uh, exuse me, west coast on the North American continent, there is an east and a west portion of the Antarctic continent, unless your frame of reference is the south pole, in which case, yes there are only northern coastlines on that continent.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Sorry, still not right...

There is a west coast in North America because if you walk (drive, fly, etc) west, you reach the coast. In Antarctica, if you walk west until you reach the coast, you'll be walking forever. There will always be more Antarctica west of you. Note: far enough north and you will see western edges of pennisulas or outcroppings, but the western coast of Florida is not the same as western North America.

Why not get your facts

From the source. In the Internet age, the actual data is online, for ice it's all here http://arctic.atmos.... -- Independent of any spin, lies, obfuscation or otherwise coloring.

Guess what? The Arctic ice is recovering rapidly from last year's lows, and the Antarctic ice is at record levels. All without man doing anything.

The hoax is designed to separate the taxpayer from their money, anyone think to ask how paying more taxes solves anything? Or how using Ethanol and generating CO2 is better than using gasoline and generating CO2? If you think CO2 is a pollutant, don't exhale :-).

We could all benefit

from the MSM not exhaling. That is if they REALLY think they can do something to save the environment. They bellow more noxious gas in a half hour than my Expedition does driving coast to coast! :-)

This story has picked up so

This story has picked up so much traction with the MSM you would think it was the end of the world. Unfortunately, the methodologies used in this report are suspect, and appears to be suspiciously motivated by the IPCC (they stated on MSNBC they plan a field trip to see this 'catastrophe.' For more balanced information, see these links:

Antarctic Peninsula In the News

Latest Antarctic Sea Ice Extent 

You know if they had tied

You know if they had tied one of the Gitmo detainees to that sled we could have had a water boarding demo and killed two liberal talking points in one report.

The Penguins just signed an

The Penguins just signed an agreement with the City of Pittsburgh for a new arena to replace the aging Civic Arena, aka "The Igloo", which will be melting away due to global warming (or maybe a controlled demolition) in another year or so. So fear not... the Penguins do in fact have a new home.

go pens

 

And liberal community nearby is trying to squeeze the Penguins organization for anything they can get

Just plain stupid

Given the specific heat of salt water, the idea a recent warming of 0.6 deg C could drive enough heat into a mass the size of the oceans and change ice freeze/thaw patterns to any significant degree is so utterly ridiculous it is truly hard to fathom how people can be so blatantly stupid.  

*There are 2 types of politicians. Those who know AGW is a scam and those who are just stupid.

And 60 billion metric tons isn't much

And how much would 60 billion metric tons be, anyway?  Someone should back up my back-of-the-envelope calculation here, but this is a depression in the ice sheet that's about thirty-five feet deep by sixty miles square.  Might be impressive to look at, but on a continent the size of North America, suggesting that this is anything but trivial is disingenuous at best.

   Rover

Rover, I get 23 feet deep

Rover,

I get 23 feet deep by sixty miles square - close enough.

Note to Anne Thompson, NBC

Note to Anne Thompson, NBC News chief environmental affairs correspondent:

Dear Anne,

I'll get right on that ...

Ok, I'll bite, how much has

Ok, I'll bite, how much has the ocean risen due to this "catastrophe"?"  What, it hasn't?

Pfffftttt . . .

By the way, when you see the rich like the Kennedys at their compound in Masstaxes start moving their homes inland or putting them up on stilts like some kind of thatched hut in a tropic land, then you can start worrying about GW. 

Speaking of the Kennedys, weren't they the ones that fought the alternative energy windmills off their coast - because it would ruin the ambience? 

Do as I say - not as I do . . .

 

Seems that last year. Al

Seems that last year. Al Gore bought a new place in San Francisco. Is it above the high water mark? Does Al Gore believe himself and is just a really stupid investor. Or is Al Gore a hypocrite that doesn't believe his own BS.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

An Inconvenient truth.

The only problem with her story. Base San Martin and Faraday Have been cooling since the high point in the late 80's. Was she concerned about AGW in 89? And something very interesting happened at Cms Vice Do Marmabio and Base Esperanz on 07.

Did my pick up do that?

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

They know what's going on?

The IPCC forcast going back to 1990. High, Low and Mid sensitivity. Vrs Remote  Sensing Systems (satellite) data, GISS data (Hansen),  UKMET (United Kingdom Meteroological Office), U of Alabama Huntsville calculatuions (Drs Christy and Spencer)

Here and the source.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

The RSS satellite data

The RSS satellite data tells the WHOLE story.  We know that surface based sensors and gauging stations are often placed in, how do I say this, um, "compromising positions"......

Even at that though look how Hansens curve goes up in relation to the UKMET and UofA data.  Naaaawwwww, their not skewing the data are they??....<end sarc>

"Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat's dream. If you control carbon, you control life," Richard Lindzen - March 2007.

I'm assuming the graph is

I'm assuming the graph is measuring + - degrees C variance from the 1990 base.

If so the variance between Hansen and RSS is about .3. What's the supposed warm up for the last 100 years? .6? .8?  

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

The Antarctic Ice is GROWING!

PopTech does it again!

PopTech does it again! Good work! ;-)

Take that Libs!

 

Newsbusters. Log on and find out What the heck is so yummy over here!

You need to admitt that in

You need to admitt that in this report, she does confess that the other side of Antartica has not loss any ice at all.

"The penguins soon won’t

"The penguins soon won’t have a home and it’s all our fault."

Not a big deal. If it comes to this, the penguins can just fly to a new home.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Hey, it could happen. We are talking about make believe here. :)

Penguins

It's so sad, but I've heard Arctic Penguins are extinct.

Why isn't the MSM reporting on this travesty?

I ♣ My Seal - BTWNPITA

The math is not difficult

I worked through the calculation for the sea level rise associated with the loss of 200 billion metric tons of ice after I heard the figure in a scary History Channel shockumentary that Greenland was shedding that amount each year.

If spread over the entire planet, that volume of meltwater would raise sea level .01 inches.  So if the rate of melting continues, sea level would rise one inch in the next 100 years.  Doesn't sound quite as scary as 200 billion metric tons though, does it?

Significant parts of the Antarctic continent have never seen temperatures above zero degrees Fahrenheit, much less a temperature approaching the melting point of ice. 

A similar statement can be made of the Greenland ice sheet, although the cold is not nearly as severe.  According to Weather Underground, the highest temperature recorded last summer at Summit Camp on the Greenland ice sheet was 34 degrees on June 26.  It was the only time in 2007 the temperature reached the melting point.

But surely the whole thing will soon slide into the ocean.  Gimme a break!