Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 22, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Jack Coleman's blog
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News

Ed Schultz Flunks Union Donation Math

By Jack Coleman | January 09, 2011 | 15:16

A  A

Nice to see them finally get their lines straight.

After making a questionable claim without a shred of substantiation, Ed Schultz doubled-down with the assertion that what he said was backed up by the head of a major union. That it was -- but only after prodding by Schultz. 

Here's Schultz making the claim on his radio show Jan. 4 (audio) --

SCHULTZ: Now, I'm going to say this, as I said yesterday, I'm going to say it every day, organized labor in this country contributes one-tenth of one percent of the money to elections as opposed to corporations. Now how do we put that in personal terms? Well, you're in the workplace. And that stiff in the bullpen down the other end of the office, he's doing the exact same thing you're doing. But you know what? You're making a fraction of what that guy's making. In fact, he's making 99.9 percent more money than you are! Feeling good about that? That's the disparity! That is the gap.

Later in that same hour, Schultz asked United Steelworkers International president Leo Gerard about the disparity in campaign spending between unions and corporations. As you'll hear, it took a bit of coaching from Schultz before Gerard came around to the same percentage (audio) --

SCHULTZ: How much money do unions in this country, collectively, put into the election cycle as opposed to corporations?

GERARD: On what I would call a pre-Supreme Court decision where there was unlimited secret money, and we did about one-tenth of what corporations did. I would think that now that the Supreme Court  decision allows corporate money to go as unreported as they want and as big a volume as they want, I would not be shocked, Ed, if the next cycle it wasn't 20 times to 25 times more than the labor movement. Because what they're doing is they're attacking the labor movement's, and not only the labor movement, the progressive movement's ability to participate while they're opening and kicking open the doors for the ultra rich and corporates to participate. So ...

SCHULTZ: But the number that I had heard was one-tenth of one percent.

GERARD: Absolutely. Absolutely, as I said, but it's gonna get worse.

SCHULTZ: I mean, right now it's one-tenth of one percent of 100 percent!

GERARD: Yes ...

SCHULTZ: That's what the corporate world does versus the union influence and the union support.

GERARD: But Ed, that's before, let's be clear, that's before this Supreme Court decision to kick the doors open. That's based on the last cycle. That's not based on this cycle.

Several hours later, on his MSNBC show, Schultz reiterated the same suspicious claim, earning well-deserved criticism from NewsBuster Mark Finkelstein --

How off is Ed?  The National Review's Rich Lowry has documented that in the last election cycle, three unions alone kicked in $170 million to Dem coffers.  So corporations would have had to contribute . . . $170 BILLION to match Ed's alleged 1000:1 pace just for those contributions, ignoring the donations that all other unions made! ...

Note: Ed can't even be internally consistent.  He twice suggests that union donations are only 1/10th of 1% of corporate donations.  That would make corporate donations 1000x larger.  But his illustration of someone making 99.9% more would only amount to a bit less than twice as much.  So Ed's only off by a factor of about 500. (emphasis added)

Later in that broadcast of "The Ed Show," Schultz spoke again with Gerard on the same subject they had discussed several hours earlier on Schultz's radio show. This time, however, Gerard dutifully echoed the same figure claimed by Schultz (audio) --

SCHULTZ: I want you to address first the organized labor money when it comes to fees, dues versus corporate money. We need to clarify this because I am sick and tired of hearing right wingers on the air all over America tell us that the unions are buying elections.  What are the numbers?

GERARD: First of all, when they say that, they know they're lying and it's an out and out lie. In reality, the labor movement spends about one tenth of one-percent of what the total corporate money is, or rich person money included.

"We need to clarify this," Schultz suggested to Gerard -- given that unfortunate lack of clarity earlier on Schultz's radio show.

Having cajoled the unsourced figure from a cooperative guest, Schultz on his radio show the following day cited Gerard for "confirming" it (audio) --

SCHULTZ: Thank you, George (a caller). I will not give up and I won't fail to point out, as I've promised, that organized labor in this country gives one-tenth of one percent of the money corporations give in election cycles. I know it's mind boggling, but that is the number. Leo Gerard, Steelworkers International president, confirming that twice yesterday, on this show and on the tube.

About the Author

Jack Coleman is a recovering former liberal journalist from Massachusetts. Click here to follow Jack Coleman on Twitter.
  • Campaign Financing
  • Ed Schultz
  • Leo Gerard
  • The Ed Show
  • Jack Coleman's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

A: One-tenth of one percent

Submitted by mrt721 on Sun, 01/09/2011 - 3:47pm.

A:  One-tenth of one percent.

 

Q: How much of the space in Ed Schultz's head is actually taken up by brain cells?

 
  • Login to post comments

100%

Submitted by adamsmith on Sun, 01/09/2011 - 4:01pm.

Ed's head is taken up 100% percent in brain cells. They just all happen to be dead....

  • Login to post comments

Ed Schultz is a buffoon and

Submitted by goon on Sun, 01/09/2011 - 7:31pm.

Ed Schultz is a buffoon and no one watches this clown anyways...

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use