Lauer Pushes Pence to Compromise on Tax Deal
On Thursday's Today show, NBC's Matt Lauer pushed Mike Pence to compromise on the tax deal to get the measure passed before Christmas as he hectored the Indiana Republican Congressman that "there are things in this package that neither side likes, but that's the basis of compromise." Lauer even attempted to start an intramural fight between Republicans as he threw the words of Congressman Paul Ryan in Pence's face, as seen in this exchange:
MATT LAUER: You said this is a tough call. How do you think it's gonna go in the rest of the House? Do you think it'll pass?
MIKE PENCE: Yeah I think it is a tough call. Look no, no House Republican wants to see taxes go up on any American. And, and most of us have been fighting to make sure that no American sees a tax increase in, in January. But, for my part, I just believe that this tax cut deal will do little to create jobs. It adds to the national debt. I think we can do better. I think we can take time to do better and Congress should do just that.
LAUER: Even as you make this decision one of your fellow Republicans, Paul Ryan, is criticizing it, saying, "You know what this is a purely political decision." As a matter of fact I think he goes further to say, "It's a purely personal, political decision. That as someone who is being considered or perhaps considering running for president in 2012, you can't be seen as too cooperative with the Democrats or President Obama." How do you respond to that?
The following is the full interview as it was aired on the December 16 Today show:
MATT LAUER: Indiana Republican Congressman Mike Pence has already announced he will not vote for the tax cut deal. Congressman Pence, good morning to you.
REP. MIKE PENCE: Good morning, Matt.
LAUER: You said this is a tough call. How do you think it's gonna go in the rest of the House? Do you think it'll pass?
PENCE: Yeah I think it is a tough call. Look no, no House Republican wants to see taxes go up on any American. And, and most of us have been fighting to make sure that no American sees a tax increase in, in January. But, for my part, I just believe that this tax cut deal will do little to create jobs. It adds to the national debt. I think we can do better. I think we can take time to do better and Congress should do just that.
LAUER: Even as you make this decision one of your fellow Republicans, Paul Ryan, is criticizing it, saying, "You know what this is a purely political decision." As a matter of fact I think he goes further to say, "It's a purely personal, political decision. That as someone who is being considered or perhaps considering running for president in 2012, you can't be seen as too cooperative with the Democrats or President Obama." How do you respond to that?
PENCE: Well I would respond, look we, my decision is based exclusively on what I think is the right thing to do for the American people. And that is that you gotta recognize a couple of things. First, uncertainty is the enemy of our prosperity. A two year extension of the tax code is not going to encourage the kind of investment that's gonna be, begin to create jobs in this economy. And I really believe that this, this Congress ought to take a breath. We ought to roll our sleeves up and we ought to do what we can, like John F. Kenned y did, like Ronald Reagan did-
LAUER: Right.
PENCE: -and embrace permanent extension of all the tax rates. I'm arguing, you know, let's not do this take it or leave it deal from the Senate. If the liberals want to have an amendment today on raising taxes, let, let every House Republican vote on what we know would help this economy and that is-
LAUER: But it's really not a take it or leave it deal Congressman.
PENCE: -a permanent extension of the deal.
LAUER: It's not a take it or leave it deal because there's compromise in this deal. There, there are things in this package that neither side likes but that's the basis of compromise, and isn't that what's better for the country at this particular moment?
PENCE: Well I think, you know, I hear about the compromise. I know this, this deal was largely negotiated by leaders in the Senate and the White House, despite the fact that the Constitution clearly says that bills relating to taxes should begin in the House of Representatives. But look, bottom line is, this is not about whether or not there was compromise involved. It's about what is it going to take to get this economy moving again? In a two year tax extension that simply takes tax increases that are scheduled for January and says they're gonna come two years from January, is not gonna encourage the kind of investment that will put Americans back to work.
I was in Muncie, Indiana just the other day, Matt, and I, I had a banker walk up to me and say, "Look nobody's gonna come in and sign a five year note and borrow money and create jobs on a two-year tax code." That's the reality. What we're asking for is an up or down vote on making all the current tax rates permanent. I think most Americans know that's what we should be doing, to get this economy moving again.
LAUER: Congressman Mike Pence from Indiana. Congressman, thanks for your time this morning. I appreciate it.
PENCE: Thank you.
- Geoffrey Dickens's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Exposing and combating
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 3:42pm.
Exposing and combating liberal bias committed by Newsbusters:
THIS IS NOT A TAX CUT DEAL. THERE ARE NO TAX CUTS. Calling it a tax cut deal IS liberal bias.
Good catch Satchmo, I'm too
Submitted by Geoffrey Dickens on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 3:54pm.
Good catch Satchmo, I'm too quick to type "cuts" after "tax."
Dave. Exposing and combating annoying nit-picking libtrolls
Submitted by Dave. on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 3:58pm.
We know there are no tax "cuts" in this hideous spending bill, but there are extensions of existing tax cuts within it, therefore referring to those existing cuts is not being incorrect.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Not really, but hey, if you
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:55pm.
Not really, but hey, if you want to allow the Dems/libs to continually define the terms and frame the debate, go right ahead.
It is the current tax rate.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:57pm.
So, why can't it be called the current tax rate? Because the Dhimmikrats would have to admit that they want tax increases. That's why.
So pathetic.
<sigh>
Submitted by Model850 on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 6:43pm.
OK Satch, this is the third time now I've corrected you in as many threads. Despite your insistence that there are NO TAX CUTS in the deal:
THERE IS A TAX CUT IN THE DEAL. THE FICA PAYROLL TAX IS CUT BY 2% FOR ONE YEAR.
Sorry everyone for shouting.
True, the deal is mostly about extending current tax rates, but there is a tax cut in there regardless of how many times you SCREAM there isn't. Please try to keep up.
Kthanksbye!
On a different note I heard NPR this morning open a story about the deal going to the House for a vote by re-framing the bill as "The president's tax cut deal...." Perhaps slightly accurate in the strictest technical sense (since it is his deal, in a way), but it made it sound like he was the sole author of the thing and a tax cutting champion of the people.
But there's no agenda at NPR, right?
Tax Cuts
Submitted by MightyMax on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 3:57pm.
I agree w/ Satchmo
This is not a Tax Cut.
I do wish the politicians would get the wording right.
This is just to keep the current tax rates in place (to some extent) anything else is a tax increase.
Thomas Sowell made a good point in his article.
You can't really get the rich w/ this tax increase....they have already made their millions or billions.
So increaseing taxes on them will do nothing to the wealth they already accumulated....it will only hurting a family who happens to fall into the "rich" category according to this admin.
I do wish the politicians would get the wording right.
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:59pm.
What? Tell the truth?
Hahahahahahahahahahaha...............riiight.
Lauer belongs on the view
Submitted by Barack_must_go..... on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:02pm.
Lauer belongs on the view with the other pushy broads. He is such a sissy next he'll resort to pinching or hitting Republican guests with his purse.....sheesh, what passes for hard hitting journalism in progressive circles is more like ' slap & tickle ' night down at the local gay bar.
Barack_Must_Go.....
So now Matt Lauer is a
Submitted by Beukeboom on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:13pm.
So now Matt Lauer is a lobbyist trying to influence a congresscritter?
BTW, the correct terminology is that it is an "extension of current tax rates."
I thought....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 5:00pm.
Matt was the new majority (soon to be minority) Whip.
The question from Pence, in rebuttal to Lauer, should have been.
Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:28pm.
The question from Pence, in rebuttal to Lauer, should have been..
"Matt, how many Democrats have you had on your show in recent days where you have pushed them to compromise with the Republicans as you are pushing me here today?"
Matt would have responded with something like, "Hey we don't have a pony in this debate - we're just a fair presenter of the news."
Pence then could have properly rebutted with, "Well, that's the daily lie for all of you folks, is it not?"
(;~/ gary
Ambush is all MSM knows.
Submitted by BaBlam on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 4:29pm.
No conservative should agree to be interviewed on an MSM propaganda vehicle.
The only thing they are interested in is the opportunity to ambush, ridicule, embarass, intimidate, and castigate.
They're not interested in news or truth, they just want a "Got-Cha" momment.
Something they can then spin it to a Liberal advantage and pound the airwaves with it.
Lauer is a head hunter, just like every other so called T.V. Journalists on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, & CBS.
They're like a 5 headed Dragon, different heads, same aggenda.
Rep Pence should know better.
Matt Lauer
Submitted by NotFondOfLibs on Thu, 12/16/2010 - 10:40pm.
Can anyone every recall when Matt Lauer called upon a democrat to compromise with Republicans in order to settle an issue? Lauer is a one way street. He always wants Republicans to give something up but never democrats. But what else can we expect from this pitiful excuse for an alleged journalist. People like Lauer, Couric, Sawyer, Williams, Stahl, etc are nothing but ambush journalists. Republicans should stop appearing on their programs.