Actor Josh Brolin Plugs Oliver Stone's W. on 'Today'

Photo of Geoffrey Dickens.
  • Bookmark and Share

The "Today" show has yet to promote the conservative satire An American Carol, that spoofs Michael Moore but they did find time to invite on Josh Brolin to plug Oliver Stone’s George W. Bush biopic W. on Tuesday's show. Co-anchor Matt Lauer interviewed Brolin, who plays the title character, and noted critics were expecting "a political hatchet job" of the President, to which Brolin, defended Stone as he claimed the controversy surrounding the director of such factually murky films like JFK and Nixon, was "hogwash."

However Brolin admitted that one of the reasons Stone tabbed him to play Dubya was because there was something sort of "mean" about the actor. And in describing how he perfected his Bush impression Brolin observed there was an "apish quality," about the 43rd president.

The following is the full segment as it occurred on the October 14, "Today" show:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

MATT LAUER: Oliver Stone is famous for directing some of Hollywood's most controversial films, especially those centered around U.S. presidents. The 1991 film JFK and 1995's Nixon both caused a response beyond your typical Hollywood buzz. Now with a cast led by Josh Brolin as George W. Bush, Stone is at it again, tackling the nation's 43rd president in a new film that is called W.

(BEGIN CLIP)

JOSH BROLIN AS GEORGE W. BUSH: I'm sure historians will say, gosh, you know I wish he could have done better on this way or that way. You know I hope, I don't want to sound like I haven't made no mistakes. You know I'm confident I have. It's just I haven't, you know, really put me on the spot here John. Maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one.

(END CLIP)

LAUER: Josh Brolin, good morning.

JOSH BROLIN: Good morning.

LAUER: That's pretty impressive stuff there.

BROLIN: It's very strange to watch.

LAUER: Is it really?

BROLIN: Yeah because it was so recent that we stopped. You know it was about two-and-a-half months ago and, and Oliver put this film together in two-and-a-half months which I can't imagine, can't do anything quicker than that for sure.

LAUER: When word got out that he was doing this, this movie about George W. Bush you could almost hear the, the critics jumping for their laptops.

BROLIN: I know.

LAUER: They're, they were ready to write, "This is gonna be a political hatchet job." What were you expecting when you saw the script? What did you talk to Oliver about?

BROLIN: You know Oliver approached me before, long before I saw the script and he had seen me in the Valley of Eli, I knew him socially through Paul Haggis and he came to me and he said, "Hey listen, you know I got this movie." There was a movie that he was supposed to do before that Bruce Willis pulled out of, so the whole movie kind of went, you know, it went away. And he brought W. up and he had been researching W. for a year with Stanley Weiser and he came up to me and he said, "Hey listen I think you'd be great playing this character." And I said well why, why? And he said, "I don't know there's something very bucolic, Americana and sort of mean about you." And I said, what do you mean, "mean about me?"

LAUER: Well did you get the idea that this was going to be a mean-spirited look at George W. Bush?

BROLIN: Well I did, initially, I had that thought. And you know, Oliver, I didn't know well enough to know, you know, to know the controversy surrounding Oliver is really just a lot of hogwash. And he's an incredibly sensitive guy who loves, you know, is obsessed with the way people tick and so finally when I read it, I thought it was incredible.

LAUER: Some people who've seen it, I, I have to admit I have not seen it yet, but people who've seen it say they are surprised by the lack of controversy.

BROLIN: Right.

LAUER: The New York Times wrote recently, quote, "The straightforwardness of W. suggests that Mr. Stone set out to make a critical biography but was somehow spooked."

BROLIN: Right.

LAUER: Is, is that a fair assessment?

BROLIN: I don't if he's, I don't think so. I mean I don't think he was spooked. I think, you know, if you look at Nixon, Nixon was a fair account of, of the president. I don't think he's as controversial as everybody thinks. I think it's obvious that he loves politics. He loves people that revolve themselves around politics but I think with Bush, when we take him from 21-years-old to 58-years-old I mean it's truly a biopic. And for me it was one of the great challenges of an actor.

LAUER: Well, well take me through that. How did you go about that? You got a sitting president, clearly you've got a lot of footage to look at.

BROLIN: I do.

LAUER: You can turn on the TV just about everyday.

BROLIN: CNN everyday, right.

LAUER: So, so, how, what did you think you had to capture and what did you think was more peripheral?

BROLIN: Well I mean the fact that we follow him early on, we don't have as much footage, we don't have as much written about him as, as a youngster. So you know you have to do your own rendition of that song. And then older, you know, for me it was nerve-wracking. Finally when we got to the scene where we do the present Bush and you start doing all the gestures and, that we all know so well. And the breathiness in the voice, which I always took to be the stress in his life or the weight of the presidency. You know it, it was a little ridiculous when we first did it.

LAUER: Did you annoy your family and friends as you-

BROLIN: Oh totally!

LAUER: -with your, you know?

BROLIN: No, no, no. I went around for three months completely scared out of my mind. I'm trying on the voice, doing this hand thing that I thought, this apish quality that I thought was, you know, paralleled him. And now you see the finished product and hopefully people will like it.

LAUER: Got some really strong reviews that-

BROLIN: Thanks.

LAUER: -we'll, we'll make sure people are aware of.

BROLIN: Absolutely.

LAUER: But Josh it's great to see you.

BROLIN: Yeah great to see you too.

LAUER: The movie is called W. it's pleasure.

BROLIN: Thank you.

LAUER: Say hi to Diane also, please.

BROLIN: I will, for sure.

LAUER: And W. hits theaters nationwide on Friday. You can catch Josh, by the way, hosting "Saturday Night Live," this weekend 11:30pm. Talk about scary. 10:30 Central time, right here on NBC.

—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Follywood

"...there was something sort of "mean" about the actor. And in describing how he perfected his Bush impression Brolin observed there was an "apish quality," about the 43rd president."

There's nothing mean about Bush, and there's nothing apish about Bush.

F-ing offensive Hollywood jerks.

 

NOW PLAYING:
Governor Palin Get Your Gun

 

Another Hollywood Nepot

Another Hollywood Nepot heard from.

I can't tell you how

I can't tell you how disappointed I was when I found out Josh Brolin was going to be in this movie. Sigh. When will I ever learn not to get too attached to an actor? He was so good in No Country for Old Men.

And I doubt that Bush speaks in double negatives: "I don't want to sound like I haven't made no mistakes." What a load of crap.

You forget who his Dad is.

You forget who his Dad is. James Brolin, married to Barbara Streisand.

 

He was great in No Country for Old Men.  But the apple doesn't fall far from the tree evidently.

James Brolin, who was in the Reagan Mini-series

which was a hatchet job.

Given AAC's box office,

Given AAC's box office, it's low-profile cast, and the fact that any "nutty" movie like this (Scary Movie, Not Another Teen Movie, etc.) is not real high profile, this isn't that big a surprise.

Agreed Bal

This is pretty big budget film, and have not seen The Today Show feature Bill Maher for his movie either.

I can't comment if it is a hatchet job or not until I have seen the show, but I considering Stones political views, it would not be surprising.

Real life video games are cool

a major conservative film

a major conservative film is a much more notable news item than yet another tired old liberal circle jerk...

...if Today actually cared about news that is:) 

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

Not really. But I'm sure the

Not really. But I'm sure the Dooc-meister interviewed the whole cast of AAC, right?

...bal, you haven't

...bal, you haven't noticed how orgasmically excited the MSM gets when they dig up some obscure liberal nun or gay pastor once in a while, or a life-long "repub" who's voting for obama?

...because it's "so uniquely different and newsworthy, dontcha know:)!"

pro-lib anomolies (unlike pro-conservatives) are always so ding darned news worthy 

Journalism is the opium of the liberals

How about a story about a

How about a story about a little church in Georgia that made some movies on shoe-string budgets that did very well at the box-office (Facing the Giants, Fireproof, etc).  

I would think that would make a facinating story.  But sadly, there just isn't any room in their busy schedule for those kind of stories.   I bet if a church made an "I love Obama" video for YouTube,  the networks would be all over it.

When asked if he went to war with Iraq  to derail the impeachment vote:  “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).

That is a good story, but

That is a good story, but probably not one that the MSM would look to cover. Maybe a movie magazine.

Has Fox News covered it? 

Bush Bashing Movie

BigSpoon65

Brolin is just another looney from the left.  This movie is one of the reasons that hollywood gets a 450 million dollar pork gift in the bailout bill.  Now the taxpayers must also subsidize garbage movies that won't make enough money to even pay for their own production.  Can't get money at the box office?  No problem, democrats will throw you some pork to enable lots more of those garbage movies.  I'd rather watch my dog drop a steaming Josh Brolin on my lawn and wipe his Oliver Stone along the grass than see this movie!  

Conservative.....Because we can't all be on welfare!

Not to mention...

I believe I read somewhere that the Iranians funded this movie as well. So not only is it bashing Bush it is spreading the Anti-American propoganda Amadeemajhody wants us to hear...all with out saying a word himself.....I mean he can't be bothered he has rape victims to stone to death.

I think it was Chinese funding

if I recall correctly.

I'd be interested to see

I'd be interested to see your source for that, if you can dig it up again.

Its too bad for brolin  and

Its too bad for brolin  and stone that nobody is going to see this movie. it might even gross less than the other anti-american filth movie that came out last weekend.

The only apish quality that Brolin parallels

is his sh*t-for-brains "Truther" father's.

Even the rotten apple doesn't fall far from the tree, Josh.

I'm waiting for the Worcester, Mass. review of "W"

The Worcester Mass. Telegram & Gazette likely will review "W" and give it three stars: a must-see film. The newspaper put a picture of Chris Farley in "An American Carol" on the front page of its entertainment section, but somehow neglected to review AAC, A local reviewer did review Bill Maher's "Religulous," however. The newspaper, a property of The New York Times Co., now tilts well to the left in nearly everything, with even a sportswriter getting in a political dig.

Perhaps someone has the resources to put together a book on the performance of the mass news media this year, especially the partisan AP. The news media should be required to pay, heavily, for what it has done, is doing, and will do.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.