Gas prices have been going up, and at least one grandmother is upset.
"Why am I spending my grandchildren's college money so I can drive this car? Why? What is - what is the reason for this?" she asked on the November 14 "Good Morning America."
To answer her question, the ABC morning show pressed the president of Shell Oil, John Hofmeister.
Co-anchor Robin Roberts asked what Hofmeister himself could offer those customers "who are really hurting."
"You are in the business of making money, no one is disputing that," said Roberts, "But your profits, Shell's profits are up 11 percent and some people are saying, you know, in a time like this, in an economy where people are really struggling to make ends meet, could you cut back a bit on your profits - you're still going to make billions of dollars - but you could really help out a lot of people here by doing that."
Hofmeister calmly explained to Roberts the business side of a company as large as Shell.
"We do have a responsibility to our shareholders," he said, "and of course they like to see our profits go up, ah, as time goes on. The reality is, what do we do with those profits. If we're just sitting on that money and doing nothing with it, that's wrong."
Even after Hofmeister offered detailed explanations of at least a billion dollars' worth of research his company was doing on alternative fuels and technologies, Roberts wasn't satisfied.
"Isn't it true that only about 1 percent of your profits actually go into looking for alternative fuels? Is that enough? 1 percent of your profits?" argued Roberts. She suggested, "you can understand that when you say a billion dollars it sounds like a lot, but when you make $58 billion, it doesn't seem as much to people."




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
SIgh
November 14, 2007 - 17:09 ET by Prester John"Why am I spending my grandchildren's college money so I can drive this car?"
I give up lady, you tell me!!
Oh, and no doubt Roberts makes voluntary contributions to the US Treasury to fund all her liberal programs instead of keeping it for herself and her family, right?
My thought exactly, John.
November 14, 2007 - 17:49 ET by motherbeltMy thought exactly, John. I would have said "why are you denying yourself gas money in order to pay for your grandchildren's college? Don't they have parents?"
It is her choice to spend
November 14, 2007 - 18:21 ET by Free ThinkerIt is her choice to spend that money on gas. I also caught the remark about this economy where so many people are struggling to make ends meet. Again, perhaps some are but it really comes down to how you prioritize and budget what you earn. We all make choices. The price of gas is what it is because that is the price people are willing to pay for it.
....and again there is
November 14, 2007 - 17:22 ET by MidAmerica....and again there is no mention that taxes exceed oil company profits on a gallon of gas.
or that the dems want even higher taxes
MidAmerica, have you heard
November 14, 2007 - 17:46 ET by motherbeltMidAmerica, have you heard a single member of Congress or the Senate suggest rolling back even part of the federal gas tax to help consumers out a bit?
Me neither.
Somehow higher gas prices
November 14, 2007 - 18:35 ET by MidAmericaSomehow higher gas prices due to market forces are bad but higher prices due to taxes are good and can even stop climate change.
Also, for years the libs
November 14, 2007 - 20:50 ET by motherbeltAlso, for years the libs have whined that we are spoiled; we should be paying $5 a gallon for gas, like they do in Europe, as that would force us to conserve. Now that it's at $3.00, they're screaming. But of course that's because all the markup isn't taxes.
Oil Profits
November 14, 2007 - 17:35 ET by IRRRVERNI am no actuary, however $1 billion of research out of $58 billion in profit does not look like 1% in my basic math 101 mind.
Of coarse I could be wrong.
Chuck from Tacoma
Well.....
November 14, 2007 - 18:08 ET by William PhelpsI am an actuary, and you're right. Math 101 taught you well.
These reporters seem to think that corporations really sit on profits. They need to pay for new facilities and R&D like he mentioned. Companies can't be expected to fork over their profit like that. The federal government should consider relaxing taxes on gas. I think the federal gas tax is around $0.19 per gallon and state taxes average around $0.21. With gas prices at $3.00, the government is getting about 13% when we get gas.
The Democratic voiced Congress wouldn't dare suggest lowering taxes for the holidays. I bet they'll come up with some sort of aid program that involves a tax increase, though.
More like 20% William
November 14, 2007 - 19:33 ET by RackieMore like 20% William
Gotcha. I just eyeballed
November 15, 2007 - 12:18 ET by William PhelpsGotcha. I just eyeballed those same figures to guestimate 21 cents for the state average. So there ya go. 20% savings would be amazing to the economy. Thanks Rackie.
Yeah...
November 14, 2007 - 18:19 ET by heldmyw...an AIDs program. Like HIV. Destined to kill the host.
Put it in perspective
November 14, 2007 - 18:20 ET by Ralph Hansen Ph. D.Shell is a huge corporation but probably ranks somewhere around No. 20 on the list of the world's largest oil producers. I've heard ExxonMobil is No. 13 or 14.
The global oil industry is controlled by foreign governments, but the media insist that the price is being manipulated by small (in comparision) US corporations.
When will they get a clue?
Government meddling
November 15, 2007 - 07:29 ET by UnsaneThe four largest supplies of oil are controlled by government-owned companies: Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Iran, Venezuela.
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
Lefties are consistently
November 14, 2007 - 18:33 ET by robert108Lefties are consistently ignorant about basic economics, which is why it is always a good idea to vote Republican.
Maybe it is time for the
November 14, 2007 - 20:56 ET by ahusserMaybe it is time for the Government to defend it's currency. A part of the high price for oil is the incredible shrinking dollar.
What could go a long way
November 15, 2007 - 07:30 ET by UnsaneWell, if only we could convince Congress that it is actually a good idea to use the funds they are getting to pay down the debt instead of paying for their home districts' pork projects...
Res tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
If the poor grandmother
November 15, 2007 - 06:22 ET by ckc1227If the poor grandmother needs money so bad, she should have been at work instead of asking stupid questions on GMA.
Simple Rule To Live By
November 15, 2007 - 07:31 ET by UnsaneRes tantum valet quantum vendi potest.
}}---> Better rule to live by
November 15, 2007 - 07:48 ET by Cool ArrowBuy 'em for what they're worth and sell 'em for what they think they're worth.
Plant crops - not questions