Showtime to Catholics: Here's an Evil, Degenerate Pope. Happy Easter.
Never let it be said that Showtime ignores Christianity. In fact, the network that aired "The Tudors" is getting into the spirit of Lent and gleefully calling to mind some of the Catholic Church's centuries-old sins.
"The Borgias" is Showtime's new 10-part miniseries about the infamous 15thCentury Italian family of that name, and about a dark period in the history of the Church. Rodrigo Borgia, who as a cardinal fathered children with several mistresses, bought the papacy, becoming Pope Alexander VI in 1492, and misused his office in a variety of distinctly unholy ways. Rodrigo, his son Cesare and daughter Lucrezia made many powerful enemies and were accused of many crimes, including incest, adultery, rape, theft, bribery and murder. Much of it was slander and hearsay, but Showtime and director Neil Jordan didn't scruple to sort out fact from legend.
In fact, Showtime wants the public to know it managed to work as many sins as it could into the first season. A magazine ad for the series puts actor Jeremy Irons' Rodrigo back-to-back with a half-naked woman as his hand touches the ornate cross around his neck and an architectural element creates a mock halo behind his head. The ad reads, "Sex. Power. Murder. Amen." It also adds the tag line: "The Original Crime Family" - fitting, since author Mario Puzo is said to have modeled"'The Godfather" after the Borgias.
"That he [Rodrigo] was a disgrace to the papacy is not in question; rather, the question is why Showtime decided it was worth spending $45 million to produce it," wrote William Donohue, president of the Catholic League.
The answer is simple: "The Tudors," Showtime's other sexed-up period drama, is about to end. The Borgias' story is ready-made to replace it. (That it's a thumb in the eye to the Church during holy season doesn't hurt.) Jordan told Reuters, "They were really one of the most notorious families to have lived. The entire family were pretty hot and lascivious. I didn't have to manipulate events really to make it dramatically engaging or to make them salacious or interesting as people."
Yet Irons told Reuters the Borgias of legend are based on "salacious gossip" and his and Jordan's portrayal "tried to find the truth behind all this history and gossip." And heaven knows Irons wouldn't want to be involved in anything "salacious."
"I know there are some series where there is a bit of history and a bit of f***ing and a bit of history and a bit of f***ing," Irons charmingly told New York Magazine. "I think [Showtime] would have liked to have made it even more about that, but I wouldn't want to be involved in something that's just as obviously …"
Irons told The New York Times, "I hope the Vatican doesn't go down the obvious path of creating a great controversy over this, though I'm sure Showtime would love that." Contrast that with Bill Donohue's ending thought for his column on the Borgias: "It might be worth asking Showtime whether it plans to run a series on Muhammad during Ramadan that features his marriage to a 9-year-old girl, Aisha. Muhammad at the time was in his fifties."
Irons tried to portray the character of Rodrigo as "a man of many different colors and many different behaviors," as he told The New York Times. "I never judge. That's not my job."
But it seems to be Jordan's job. As the Times' Charles McGrath wrote, "Oddly, the villain of 'The Borgias' is Rodrigo's rival, della Rovere (played by Colm Feore), a model of probity and holiness."
Probity and holiness? Revolting.
- Matthew Philbin's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Unlike the Valerie Plame movie
Submitted by shawn. on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 10:19am.
Or Oliver Stones W. I think this series will actually get some viewers
Viewers yes, but only on the
Submitted by Soldat44 on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 1:15pm.
Viewers yes, but only on the promise of incest, perversion and more sex. For the 'window-peepers' of course. Showtime and HBO always play to their base.
Personally, I am waiting for
Submitted by bassndude on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 1:24pm.
Personally, I am waiting for Camelot. I think that is Stars. But it looks like it may be good. Really, I am ready for some Crusades footage!
Save a SeAL, club a liberal/troll!!
The Tudors ended last year!
Submitted by brutony1 on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 2:23pm.
This should be good, and as a Catrholic, I dont consider it Catholic-bashing. We were the dominant religion back then, and they were the most powerful family in probably the largest empire at the time. Its a fascinating tale of what Mario Puzo was rumored to use as his basis for the Corleone family in the Godfather! As long as theres lots of D,V, and S in it, it will make my monthly purchase of Showtime worth it, now that Californication is over with. Sorry, guys, but sometimes the adults need fairy tales to watch, too!
When will liberals WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE! -Me
Agreed
Submitted by vaboxrboy on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 4:12pm.
Sounds like interesting TV. I've see Rome and The Tudors and the Sopranos. Same sorta stuff, different folks. Nothing new under the sun.
"The Real Popes of Vatican City"
Submitted by SickofLibs on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 3:17pm.
In the first episode, Carmella tears out Lucrezia's hair extensions in a drunken catfight that will leave you panting for more.
Borgia, The T-shirt, a steal a $24.95.
Bad Pope!
Submitted by TheReal_mojo on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 5:09pm.
Always with the Borgias. What, the Medici popes were such wonderful pontiffs?
Pfah!
Submitted by fenngibbon on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 9:18pm.
Philbin's so desperate to make this look like an intentional slap at Catholics that he comes the closest to mounting a defense of the Borgias that I've ever seen.
As a Catholic I am not against it
Submitted by octavioj on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 9:49pm.
As long as we Catholics have a pulpit to discuss how our religion has evolved over time it is not bad to show we have gone through dark days. Yes we made mistakes but divine providence brought us back. It is actually an example for other religions. I just wished they had respected Lent. Show it but after Easter. And provide a platform for discussions by religious scholars to comment on the show itself.
As a Catholic...
Submitted by Radical1979 on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 10:12pm.
I wouldn't object if it was as historically accurate as possible. However, I doubt this will be the case.
If it is anything like "The Tudors" it will use the names of historical figures, and get some facts correct, but not nearly enough to justify it as a historical movie. Which leaves me worried about what message this will portray, and how many people will be believe it.
And yes, I'd like to see that movie about the 50 something Muhammed marrying the 9 year old girl myself. I mean, if Hollywood is going to explore topics like these.
You may be correct
Submitted by octavioj on Wed, 03/30/2011 - 4:29am.
Radical,
you may be correct this will not be accurate. But then again it is up to people to determine what is accurate and what is not and look for information. I also fear it will not be historically accurate.
Sounds Like Somebody Drank A Little Too Much Communion Wine...
Submitted by TheReal7Sticks on Tue, 03/29/2011 - 11:33pm.
Well, I felt snark rather than venom would make it less likely for me to be banned again. I learned my lesson the last time I ranted like that. So I figured a little wit would be less controversial.
You might have had a point if this was made by, say, PBS with my tax dollars, but seeing as how the Showtime network is a premium channel that you actually have to pay for to watch, I could care less what Jabba the Don-of-Puke has to say. I think this South Park episode says it all about ol' Jabba, eh? http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s11e05-fantastic-easter-sp...
By the way, the real Pope is Peter Rabbit.