At It Again: Calvin Klein Puts Out Orgy Ads, Media AWOL

  • Bookmark and Share

Nearing the ten year anniversary of the controversial “child-porn” underwear advertisements, Calvin Klein has launched another raunchy ad campaign for the spring 2009 collection, featuring an orgy of young men and women.

For the latest ad campaign, Calvin Klein hired Steven Meisel, famous for the photography in Madonna’s pornographic “Sex” book in the early 90s. The ads, which can be seen in women’s fashion magazines such as Lucky and Cosmopolitan and soon to be on billboards, are composed of photographs of three to five twenty-somethings sprawled out half naked on each other in various sexual positions. Viewers can see the multimedia version of the ads in an online video considered too explicit to air in the United States.

Calvin Klein has propagated controversial ads in recent history, the most unforgettable being a 1999 advertisement that conjured up images of child pornography. Due to public outcry, the offending ads, which displayed young models showing their underwear and included creepily suggestive dialogue, were removed from the campaign within 24 hours.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

But so far, the latest ads have caused little controversy. The lack of outcry may be due to a mostly absent media. CNN and CBS’s "Entertainment Tonight" were the only shows to give the new CK ads any press.

The January 29th edition of “Entertainment Tonight” teased the new Calvin Klein ad campaign throughout the entire segment with hosts Mary Hart and Mark Steines rhetorically asking whether or not the add is “too sexy” or “too hot.” Steines gave the crude video this light-hearted introduction: “In tonight's ‘E.T. Obsession,’ a commercial so hot we can barely show you any of it. The latest TV ad for Calvin Klein jeans will no doubt stop you from channel surfing. And the new print ads, coming to a billboard near you, featuring the same partially naked bodies in compromising positions, will surely bring traffic to a crawl.”

They then showed the online video almost in its entirety. Hart and Steines made light of the sexy nature of the ad and inadvertently pointed out that the ad had little to do with clothing:

STEINES: Now, that’s what I call a jeans commercial. Although I’m not so sure I saw any denim whatsoever.

HART: I’m with you Mark. I definitely saw naked.

STEINES: Yes.

HART: Ah, well, that’s all the nudity we have for tonight.


CNN covered the controversial ads on February 17th‘s "American Morning," only briefly mentioning the campaign in a “Recessionistas on the Runway” segment noting that in the struggling economy, designers are trying new tricks to attract buyers. “Calvin Klein is putting out racy ads hoping that shock sells,” CNN correspondent Alina Cho said.

And for Calvin Klein, shock does sell. In 1980, Calvin Klein first made a splash with a magazine and television advertisement featuring a 15-year-old Brooke Shields in CK jeans saying, “What comes between me and my Calvins? Nothing.” Soon after that ad aired, CK jeans sales soared. Neither CNN nor "Entertainment Tonight" mentioned Calvin Klein’s history of offensive advertising.

In the fall of 2008, a 30-second CK perfume advertisement, featuring model/actress Eva Mendez rolling around in a bed touching herself, was banned in the United States for being too racy. Mendez exposed her nipple in the television ad and is heard saying, “Between love and madness lies obsession…Love ... madness. It's my secret.”

A decade ago, the media helped remove salacious ads from public view.  and the could do it again by exposing these ads for what they are – soft core pornography disguised as clothing advertisement.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well..

I'm appalled

Got a link?

 

:D

LOL ^

I haven't taken CK serious since "Karmer" posed for him in his undies on Seinfeld

Outrageous!

I, too, am shocked -SHOCKED- to learn of these garbage ads and hope that you can post the link when you find it so I can register my disgust. [big grin with teeth showing]

Republicans are always accused of being sharks; I wish they'd rise to the level of minnows... Ann Coulter

I understand

Its purely research :) It would be unwise to comment without it .

Stop the presses

Wow, an ad that features women over 21 that is sexy? What will those evil liberals think about next? Online porn?

He had my vote

STANDARDS strike again!

Those EVIL STANDARDS again! 

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

Wow Unsane

Do you love chasing me from thread to thread?

Also to answer your question from another thread which I clearly said I was not going to contribute to anymore, I gave about 500 dollars to charity last year. Its not much, but its all our family could afford.

You keep accusing over and over of me wanting hand outs from the government, but accusations are always baseless.

He had my vote

The solution is SIMPLE:

So, you don't like me replying to your posts? 

The solution is simple: don't post on NB. 

It really isn't my fault you post things I feel compelled to call you on from time to time. 

 You keep accusing over and over of me wanting hand outs from the government, but accusations are always baseless.  The accusations are spot-on accurate.  On the appropriate thread on the forum, you show repeatedly that you personally cannot function without the government being your very Personal Pampering Agency.  Note I did not state that you take hand outs from the government.  But you DO indeed want them, at minimum, available to you.  (Don't get me started on your article of religious faith that I, a healthy citizen, must be severely punished and stolen from early and often to pamper others with free doctors and medicine.)

(To be fair: me: $600 last year in spite of things sucking.  It went to various symphonies and VFDs.)

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

It just gets tedious

I like to hear other peoples opinion once in a while. It is always the same, I post, you accuse me of something, I say I did not say that, you call me whiner, then blah blah blah.

It is unproductive and silly. You are obsessed with telling me how wrong I am, but I don't agree with much of what you say, but notice I never respond to any on your post or threads caus I could care less what you say when it does not concern me.

 (Don't get me started on your article of religious faith that I, a
healthy citizen, must be severely punished and stolen from early and
often to pamper others with free doctors and medicine.)

I woud love for you to show me when I ever did a thread on univeral healthcare.

 

 

He had my vote

Reactions

I like to hear other peoples opinion once in a while.  Not my fault other people aren't sharing those opinions.  Nor am I stopping anyone else.  It is always the same, I post, you accuse me of something, I say I did not say that, you call me whiner, then blah blah blah.  I could easily say the same for you.  You love to accuse me of putting words in your mouth, blah blah blah. 

You are obsessed with telling me how wrong I am  Not really.  I have too much a full plate for that.  I am more obsessed with the hotties I so deeply admire than telling anyone how wrong they are.  Also amusing, coming from one who will have an orgasm if I ever say "I am wrong." 

but I don't agree with much of what you say, but notice I never respond to any on your post or threads caus I could care less what you say when it does not concern me.  But you can.  And if you do, I won't bitch about it, because if I didn't want people to react to what I said, or if I didn't like their reactions, I wouldn't post here. 

 I woud love for you to show me when I ever did a thread on univeral healthcare.  I will be MORE THAN HAPPY to.  Right around the time you show me where, exactly, I have said you have done a thread on universal pampering, coddling, spoiling, and babying...I mean, health care. 

What I HAVE said is that it is an article of religious faith with you.  Which it is. 

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

Unsane

I'm sorry I am trying my best to be as polite as possible and it is not a knock against you.

I feel the discussions you and I have are useless, I just feel I know how Sarcasmo felt. You and him got into long tiffs as well right?

I feel your posts are long, you have to highlight everything I say, they are tedious to read.

I just don't like your style, make false accusations, then accuse that person of whining.

Oh let me give you an actual example Its like  when I said, I feel bad for all the Palestian Children getting their limbs blown off. you immediately pounced and said.....Well Shawn, I never heard of you feeling bad for the Children of Israel right?

You also won't let things go, this thread has been around for a while and you are still responding and  it kills you to let someone get in the last word.

I just prefer to see you in Chat, because except for that hissy fit you had and use the profanities you used when you disagree with something I say.  Your  pretty good guy.

Have a good night.

Ugh

I feel the discussions you and I have are useless, I just feel I know how Sarcasmo felt. You and him got into long tiffs as well right?  Sarcasmo was a boorish jerk, an ideologue that routinely embarrassed his own cause, and thus damage it constantly...and he didn't care.  I celebrated when that idiot pulled out from NB.  All of that was on him, not I. 

You think many of the discussions are worthless because you refuse to consider what others are saying, I suspect. 

I feel your posts are long, you have to highlight everything I say, they are tedious to read.  Shawn, sometimes I wonder if reading - of virtually any length - itself is tedious for you.  Do you know why I highlight what you say?  To indicate what I am responding to.  You are hardly the first poster I have done that with.  Indeed, in your case, it is absolutely necessary that I do so. 

I just don't like your style, make false accusations, then accuse that person of whining.  Actually, I have yet to make a false accusation.  Hence when you type such phrases, or when you inevitably cry about how long my posts are, I say you whine.  With reason. 

Oh let me give you an actual example Its like  when I said, I feel bad for all the Palestian Children getting their limbs blown off. you immediately pounced and said.....Well Shawn, I never heard of you feeling bad for the Children of Israel right?  Tis true.  I noted that your heart deeply aches for the Palestinian people, but when the rockets they fire fall on Israel and  either kill children or make them orphans - silence.  Do I not have a point here?  I could bring up other examples, but I will not, as you hate reading, and are probably already throwing a fit at how long this post is...

You also won't let things go nor do you.  You remember everything everyone on NB has said to you and constantly recycle them.  Ask Free on the chat.  He noted such a few days ago., this thread has been around for a while and you are still responding and  it kills you to let someone get in the last word.  Damn that track feature on my account, right? 

Besides, it looks to me like someone else is trying to get in the last word. 

TRY to have a good day.

 

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

shawn

I feel the discussions you and I have are useless

You also won't let things go, this thread has been around for a while and you are still responding and  it kills you to let someone get in the last word.

and yet here you are responding Shawn.

Actually, It's Mendes, Not "Mendez"

Her name is Eva Mendes, not Mendez. I did see the so-called "offending ad" featuring Miss Mendes, and I couldn't understand what was so objectionable about it. It was run on late night, so it was out of the 6-to-10 harbor that's supposedly reserved for family viewing.

However, this new one maybe a little over the top. I wouldn't have expected that the CK company would hire the photographer from Madonna's soft-core porn book (which I will admit I have seen and thought it was pretty interesting and sexy. Quite bizarre as well, but still fairly sexy.) Then again, maybe I should have. The difference, though, was that the book was wrapped in a Mylar shrink-wrap that clearly stated "For adults only." I have absolutely no problem with wrapping up something in that nature if it's (excuse the pun) explicit enough that it's only for adult eyes. I probably wouldn't have a problem if it were run late at night on basic cable or one of the late shows, but obviously you can't really do that on primetime TV. So, it's a bit of a conundrum.

Madonna's book sexy? Euuuw!

 I wanted to wear rubber gloves and spray some lysol after looking at it. The commercial is not the worst thing I have ever seen, but the orgy like tone of it, well, not for teens, especially young teens. It just promotes more of the same. I thought the Levis ad was too sexy for the tube, also. The problem is, teens don't go to bed at 9-10 o'clock. They may be up til 1 a.m. I wish they would keep stuff like this on the pay cable channels only, if they have to show it. Otherwise, what's the point? Sexy looking in the jeans, one thing. Looking like you are in foreplay during orgy, another.

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

So you would be for regulation

So you would be for government regulating the content of television?

Huh?

Don't they already (over the air)? I could be wrong, or course... 

"THIS IS YOUR FINAL WARNING!!!  THE HOLOCAUST OF THOUGHT IS DAWNING!!!" - Nevermore, "Bittersweet Feast", from This Godless Endeavor (2005)

Television regulating

I believe that we should set decency standards to the the free airways, but anything that is on Cable should be monitored by as regulation as possible and show people what they want to see within the law.

It is the parents responsibility to monitor what their children watch.

He had my vote