Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 25, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Eric Ames's blog
  • Taranto: ‘Obama Presidency Has Given Liberal Media Bias a New and Dangerous Form’
  • Fox's Ed Henry: Colleagues Cheered Me On When I Grilled Bush Administration - They Don't Now
  • Bozell Column: The 'Assassinate Wall Street' Movie
  • Paul Krugman’s Flagrant ‘Austerity’ Double Standard
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered
  • MSNBC’s Krystal Ball Gushes Over Obama Speech, Claims the President is ‘Reining In His Own Power’

RNC Chairman Priebus Turns Tables on CNN Anchor Dismissing His 'Talking Points' on Obama Inaction

By Eric Ames | August 19, 2011 | 16:41

A  A

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus got into a somewhat testy exchange over the President's lack of a jobs plan with CNN's Christine Romans on today's American Morning. "Sounds like you're the one with the talking points," Priebus replied to Romans's assertion that he was just repeating GOP talking points.

Priebus also noted that only congressional Republicans had offered any solutions to the nation's economic problems.  "I don't know if you're paying attention to what is happening in Washington, but it was the Republicans that offered a budget plan that addressed the out of control spending and out of control debt that is looming in regard to Medicare. It was Paul Ryan who presented a plan," said Priebus.

Romans also tried to defend President Obama's only recent spur to action on jobs. "He and his team are in Martha's Vineyard that's what they are coming up with now, they've been consulting with CEOs and economists and small business owners," stated Romans. Priebus then questioned whether or not Romans's remark was very credible. "So you know that that's  what he is doing today? 8:00 in the morning and the President's been consulting with CEOs," noted Priebus.

Chairman Priebus also concisely explained the shortcomings of the President's approach. "It's a lot of pushing, it's a lot of talking, it's a lot of press conferences and a lot of speeches, but not a lot of action. So I think it will be yet to be seen but we'll see what the next speech holds for the American people."

A transcript follows:

CNN
AMERICAN MORNING
08/19/2011

8:05 a.m. EDT

CHRISTINE ROMANS: Let's talk about who can sign legislation and get things going and who can write legislation. That is Congress which actually has a lower approval rating right now than the President. Congress also on recess on vacation. Are you saying that the House Speaker then should call back Congress to get some work done because only 14% of America approve of what they've done so far, less than the President's approval rating.

REINCE PRIEBUS: First of all, I think it was President Obama that's been driving around a bus around the country telling all of the people coming out to see him that he thinks that the congressmen shouldn't come back in August. In fact, they should say back and listen to their constituents which is what Congress is doing, but secondly, when the President had the ability to bring people together and actually put a deal together, he never presented a plan. I mean, the President never put a single sentence on a piece of paper and said, this is my plan for fixing the American -

ROMANS: And that's a talking point, and so we've heard that talking point so let's look forward.

PRIEBUS: It's not a talking point. It's a reality.

ROMANS: I've heard you say those exact words several times. Let's just put it forward. If he comes back with a plan and he puts those sentences on paper, will the Republican Party be the party of no or will the Republican Party in good faith try to figure out a way to get people back to work, put all of this acrimony aside? Because we are in very dire straits. You look at the world markets how they are reacting they do not like what they are seeing from anything in Washington right now.

PRIEBUS: I don't know if you're paying attention to what is happening in Washington, but it was the Republicans that offered a budget plan that addressed the out of control spending and out of control debt that is looming in regard to Medicare. It was Paul Ryan who presented a plan. It was the Congress that passed the plan all but four Republicans voted for it. It was the Republicans that passed cut, cap, and balance that addressed the ten-year long-term window of a mountain of debt that this country is facing.

ROMANS: So answer the question, if the president comes up with a plan -

PRIEBUS: I'm answering your question! The president all he is doing is - my answer is all the President is doing is promising one speech after the next, but offering nothing on a piece of paper. I mean, all the President is offering are speeches and words -

ROMANS: So you want the president to write the legislation?

PRIEBUS: Look. He should offer a plan. He should offer a way out. He should offer something. I mean, he is the classic community -

ROMANS: He and his team are in Martha's Vineyard that's what they are coming up with now, they've been consulting with CEOs and economists and small business owners -

PREIBUS: So you know that that's  what he is doing today? 8:00 in the morning and the President's been consulting with CEOs.

ROMANS: I don't know if he is doing it this very second. I don't know if he is doing it this very second.

PRIEBUS: Sounds like you're the one with the talking points.

ROMANS: No. I'm saying that is what we are told is happening right now. There will be a plan coming out and I'll tell you, I'll be honest with you. A lot of people are saying we have the broad brush strokes, but what will the plan be? We've heard from Bruce Bartlett earlier today though, this feeling that the President comes out with something, there is too much acrimony in Washington to get it done. He's actually pushing - Bruce Bartlett and others are pushing - the fed is the only game in town right now simply because of the acrimony in Washington.

PRIEBUS: It's a lot of pushing, it's a lot of talking, it's a lot of press conferences and a lot of speeches, but not a lot of action. So I think it will be yet to be seen but we'll see what the next speech holds for the American people.

# # #

  • 2012 Presidential
  • 2012 Congressional
  • 2012 Governors
  • Recession
  • Stimulus
  • Unemployment
  • Congress
  • Economy
  • Christine Romans
  • Reince Priebus
  • American Morning
  • CNN
  • Eric Ames's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

christina

Submitted by D'saredumbpeople on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 4:54pm.

boy she makes Mika look smart...

  • Login to post comments

Disagree

Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:05pm.

In order to do so she'd have to be either a slug or Ed Schultz

  • Login to post comments

Uhhhhhhh......

Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 11:17am.

Aren't those two comparisons one and the same?

  • Login to post comments

Michael Steele would've given a response just like that

Submitted by lsudolemite on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 4:57pm.

/sarc

"Liberalism is hideous.  It is the antithesis of being pro-human.  It looks at life as a burden in and of itself to be managed, rather than as a blessing to be explored and lived to the fullest." --Rush Limbaugh
  • Login to post comments

My vote for best post of the

Submitted by stratman on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 8:43pm.

My vote for best post of the day.

  • Login to post comments

Ouch!

Submitted by Caringwhiteguy on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:03pm.

Romans now knows what it's like to be "Reinced".

The way Priebus handled this interview is the way every Republican/conservative should conduct himself with the media. No more accepting faulty premises. No more letting these people with an agenda hide behind their "journalistic" credentials.

By the way, as has been noted here with little surprise, Michael Steele is now officially an MSNBC contributor.

  • Login to post comments

I didn't know that

Submitted by lsudolemite on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:07pm.

but I'm not terribly surprised, either.

"Liberalism is hideous.  It is the antithesis of being pro-human.  It looks at life as a burden in and of itself to be managed, rather than as a blessing to be explored and lived to the fullest." --Rush Limbaugh
  • Login to post comments

Lather. Reince. Repeat

Submitted by ex buff e-dub on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 6:45pm.

Lather. Reince. Repeat

  • Login to post comments

Score!

Submitted by NC Boy on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 9:52pm.

Score!

  • Login to post comments

Finally! A Republican spokesperson who knows how to handle

Submitted by Rush Fan on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:10pm.

effectively the Leftist media's bias agenda and talking points. Kudos to RNC Chairman Reince Priebus. Hopefully, Priebus will set an example for others on our side.

  • Login to post comments

"I've heard you say those exact words several times......."

Submitted by PAT09 on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:07pm.

........ means talking points to a leftist and principled convictions to a conservative.

  • Login to post comments

Right - and each side

Submitted by amyshulk on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 6:33pm.

Right - and each side believes they are speaking the truth, not using them!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

He Was Exactly Right

Submitted by tcm14 on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:11pm.

I am sick of these MSM journalists accusing Repub politicians of repeating talking points. Well at least they're politicians, what's the excuse when a "journalist" is the one with all the talking points?

  • Login to post comments

They could replace her with a robot or an iphone app

Submitted by Lipton on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:34pm.

and no one would notice. She was just awful.

I should be impressed that Priebus called her out on having talking points, but that was so patently obvious from the start of the interview, that he would have been remiss if he didn't acknowledge it.

I'd like to thank Hollywood for renewing my interest in reading.
  • Login to post comments

Were they actually trying to

Submitted by ThePickle on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:55pm.

Were they actually trying to pas off this "interview" as "journalism"?

This was a text book example of a screeching partisan hack, posing as a journalist, do everything they could to excuse the utter lack of leadership on the part of the President.

  • Login to post comments

As a former member of the MSM...

Submitted by Tom1969ca on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 8:09pm.

...I'm actually embarrassed by this. This wasn't an interview; it was a debate. Hopefully other GOPers will learn from Priebus' example - don't bother answering the question if it's not premised in reality!

As Sen. Patrick Moynahan (D-NY) was famous for saying, "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion; they are not, however, entitled to their own facts!"

Q: How is America different than the Titanic? A: The passengers on the Titanic didn't vote to hit the iceberg!
  • Login to post comments

Really tired of the "come together" talk

Submitted by bkeyser on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 5:57pm.

Okay, we've got a large pothole in the center of the main avenue through town. So far, the only proposal to address it comes from one particular group of folks (for instructional purposes, we'll call them: SANE) and involves using a non-union company to bring in some heavy machinery, dig up around the hole, strengthen the area surrounding the hole, and apply a permanent concrete base with a macadam surface. This will not only repair the pothole, but will insure it does not return after a few years of rough weather and traffic.

Others (again, for instructional purposes, we'll call them: INSANE) are not so sure about this idea and would prefer some input as to the solution. Sadly, they aren't able to develop a viable solution that comes close to the likely success of the SANE proposal and they don't like that non-union workers are employed in this case. So they put their heads together and decide that the better thing to do would be to fill the hole with homeless people. Kills two birds and all that...

The media, solidly in bed with the INSANE group, disparages the SANE group and ignores their proposal. Ultimately, all they're able to muster is a claim that the SANE group should come together with the INSANE group and somehow merge the two proposals. For the sake of the town, of course. I suppose that could mean using non-union workers to fill the hole with homeless people, or it could mean using homeless people to fill the hole with concrete and macadam. But in either case, the longevity of the repair is severely questionable. In the end, it is likely nothing will get done, the pothole will grow larger, and a DOT truck will suffer front-end damage as it plows over the menacing road damage.

Sometimes it's better to just do what's right and throw out what is wrong; compromise is not always the best policy. (Yes, I happened to read something from Aesop today...)

  • Login to post comments

bkeyser.....Compromise is a very good thing, when my wife and I

Submitted by Rush Fan on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 6:18pm.

I can't decide on where to go for dinner, vacation, etc. But you are absolutely correct that "compromise is not always the best policy."

In years gone by when Hollywood made patriotic movies, and many Congressional Democrats were similar to what we now call "Blue Dog Democrats", compromise was possible and made sense. But today the extreme Left Socialist/Communist has taken over the Democrat Party. Compromise is no longer an option for most issues. Defeating Democrats and installing a majority of Republicans, hopefully fiscally conservative Republicans, is our only option.

  • Login to post comments

Occasionally...

Submitted by Rukus on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 7:53pm.

Hollywood comes up with a good, patriotic movie. I watched "Taking Chance" for the second time last night, brought tears to my eyes. Kevin Bacon did a good job in that movie, it's worth a watch.

_____________________________________________________________ I'm not too drunk to dance! It's just that people keep stepping on my hands!
  • Login to post comments

Gary.....Thank you for your recommendation. I haven't seen

Submitted by Rush Fan on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 9:11pm.

Taking Chance, but I definitely will based on your recommendation and the 7.3/10.0 rating from IMDB users.

  • Login to post comments

Compromise...

Submitted by Tom1969ca on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 8:13pm.

Before I got married I wanted to have a bachelor party, but my wife-to-be didn't think that was a good idea. So we compromised.

And I didn't have a bachelor party.

Q: How is America different than the Titanic? A: The passengers on the Titanic didn't vote to hit the iceberg!
  • Login to post comments

well said

Submitted by seriously on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 8:31pm.

Great post!

always remember, there's a time for compromise and a time to stand strong.

  • Login to post comments

Mr Priebus

Submitted by grammajane on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 6:02pm.

Get on every tv show possible and say what you said today. Teach other Republicans to follow in your foot steps. This constant praising and fawning of Libs is so out of hand and it is refreshing to hear your voice. Please keep it up!!! Would love to see Mr. Priebus and david gregory go at it on meet the depressed

  • Login to post comments

If Priebus continues to be this effective...

Submitted by OxyCon on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 6:54pm.

If Priebus continues to be this effective...the "mainstream" media will have to resort to investigating his personal life and those of his entire family looking for dirt...as they always do. Maybe they will start calling him a racist, terrorist or closet case, as they've recently done to other conservatives.

  • Login to post comments

roflYou don't know how right

Submitted by buddyc on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 7:40pm.

rofl

You don't know how right you are. They illegally investigated Steele's credit history.

  • Login to post comments

Preibus ain't no conservative

Submitted by TheHistorian on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 7:39pm.

But it is nice to see an articulate RNC Chairman after Mr. Steele.

“Liberals tend to put the onus of your success on society and conservatives on you and your family.”

Dennis Prager

  • Login to post comments

Great job. That is exactly

Submitted by buddyc on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 7:16pm.

Great job. That is exactly what republicans need. A guy quick and articulate on his feet.

The American Morning has been bullying any republicans that come on that show. The bias is horrific.

He took her to the woodshed.

  • Login to post comments

Why.....

Submitted by GregE on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 7:30pm.

..........does everyone think the GOVERNMENT always has to have a plan to do something? How bout they put up a plan that reduces their grip and gets their sorry arses doing LESS?

  • Login to post comments

Wow is he always that good?

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Fri, 08/19/2011 - 11:02pm.

He was just right. He shut her garbage down at every turn. This interaction should be studied and modeled. These liberals also think it's okay to lie for your cause to the infidels. So you need to swat the lies down and attack their agenda. Excellent!

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

"There will be a plan coming out."

Submitted by CobraMan on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 12:11am.

"There will be a plan coming out."

And that's pretty much all we've heard now for over a year. They plan on making a plan sometime in the near future.

Hay, Liberals, just how much time does Obama NEED? He's already had several meetings with CEO's, "Small Business," advisers, an the like, and, even after more than a year, he STILL hasn't made any actual plans! All he's done is to promise to have something soon. All he's done is talk.

Oh, and by the way, why would Obama travel to Martha's Vineyard to make these "plans?" All of the resources he would need to make any real plans is at the White House, and not at Martha's Vineyard. If he was going to make a plan, he would have to make it at the White House, unless he's "planing" to transfer all of his legal, administrative, and policy staff to Martha's Vineyard with him, which is insane as that would be VERY expensive.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution

Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court

Or Anwar al-Awlaki.

  • Login to post comments

Talking Back

Submitted by HardRightTurn on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 12:10am.

First Joe Walsh, then Connie Mack, now Reince Priebus. What is going on with the Republicans? Talking back to the press and calling BS on them. My, my, my.

To more fully comprehend the Left, one must read “Leftism As Psychopathy” by John Ray, M.A., Ph.D. Caution, it might scare you a little bit.
http://jonjayray.tripod.com/psycho.html

  • Login to post comments

Eventually

Submitted by hbnolikeee on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 10:53pm.

event the meekest soul reaches a breaking point. How many years of marginalizing, lying, plotting to bilk citizens out of more of their money and more of their freedoms of choice? It's time to call out the lies and liars. If that is standard Priebus, we should be thankful and wish that more members of the GOP followed his example of what tactics to employee when dealing with these liberals.

hbnolikeee
  • Login to post comments

I would rather be a proud

Submitted by Snappy on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 11:12am.

I would rather be a proud member of the party of "No" than a simpering fool in the party of "Nothing"

  • Login to post comments

Absolutely

Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 11:09am.

You have to say no to childish, irresponsible, whining demobrats.

  • Login to post comments

PRIEBUS: Sounds like you're the one with the talking points.

Submitted by DaMav on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 2:28pm.

Bwaaaaaaaahahahaha NICE!

  • Login to post comments

Communist News Network

Submitted by povertypimpin on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 2:39pm.

CNN counters facts and reality by accusing guests of using GOP talking points. Lemon did the same thing with Rand Paul.

  • Login to post comments

Where are the

Submitted by gfrrman on Sat, 08/20/2011 - 7:46pm.

"shovel ready" jobs? Wasn't TelePrompTer Boy "laser focused" on jobs since he came into office? .........crickets

G

"Eventually, Socialists run out of other peoples' money...." MARGARET THATCHER
  • Login to post comments

The Republicans have a prime directive

Submitted by hayate1 on Sun, 08/21/2011 - 11:53pm.

which is to get Obama out of the WH no matter what the cost to the country. How can Obama deal with people who place party before country? They want to drag the economy down so that they can get the WH. All this blaming Obama is absurd since it has been the Repubs who have not once given an inch to the Dems on anything. Even things that the Repubs drafted up in prior years, when supported by Obama they still didn't vote for their own legislation!!

A few choice quotes of the true American patriots who dont much care to help Americans:

Michele Bachmann stated: "Right now, our number one goal is to make sure that Barack Obama is a one-term president. That's the goal." [Fox & Friends, 6/17/11, via Nexis]. She has also expressed "hope" that higher unemployment helps her campaign.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has acknowledged that the "single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."

"Facts are not decided by how many people believe them. Truth is not determined by how loudly it is shouted."

  • Login to post comments

Kinda like what the D's did

Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 4:20am.

Kinda like what the D's did under Bush, huh?

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Kinda...

Submitted by Jer on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 4:44am.

they just never quite mastered the art. And they were missing key guidance provided by the likes of a self-appointed "Last Democrat Standing" and "National Treasure" honoree advising his tens of millions of devoted fans that "I hope he fails!" before Bush was even sworn into office.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Well, Carville may have

Submitted by NC Cop on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 11:09am.

Well, Carville may have waited a few months after Bush was sworn in and he CERTAINLY doesn't have the followers that Rush does, but it didn't stop him from hoping Bush fails:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/11/flashback-carville-wanted-bus...

"On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: "I certainly hope he doesn't succeed."

"We rush into these focus groups with these doubts that people have about him, and I'm wanting them to turn against him," Greenberg admitted.

Certainly sounds like they were wanting Bush to fail, huh?

  • Login to post comments

To think that Leftists did

Submitted by stratman on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 11:56am.

To think that Leftists did not want Bush to fail after their hyped Gore loss is rewriting reality. Carville is a distiller of others thoughts. He filters the Left's mood and packages it for mass consumption. There was nothing original in Carville's statement. He merely mouthed what others were already saying, what he believed would play well with the illiterati.

That the Left do not have a media person to match the popularity of Limbaugh has with non-Leftists may be an indictment of their lousy messaging not reverberating within their group.  The dirty secret is the Left doesn't ultimately believe their own BS when it finally applies to themselves and not just others.  Alternately, the reason the Left does not have a Limbaugh media personality is becuase the Left are ubiquotous in the Media, their voice diluted by an overwhelming presence of mediocrity created by the mode  -  AKA too many Lefty yappers.

  • Login to post comments

I note, NC Cop...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 4:12am.

that you neglected to mention that Carville's remark was made eight months into the Bush presidency--not prior to his inauguration as was the case with Limbaugh. And that Carville immediately retracted the comment upon learning of the 9/11 attacks as he and Democrats publicly rallied around President Bush--at the same moment conservative talk-show hosts were squealing "it's all Clinton's fault...the blood is on his hands."

Jer

  • Login to post comments

I note, Jer---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 4:20am.

that you have once again mounted your charger of truth, and ridden the poor steed to death in search of support for the liberal truth of things.

Never gonna find it, outside the liberal clique, and what's more, the ASPCA is gonna get you.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Well, I was adding an addendum to my post to NC Cop but

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 4:36am.

damn, Matthew is just too quick for me and blocked me. I post a comment, and he frantically bangs out a reply as if every remark I ever make is specifically addressed to him and must be answered by him.

I'll have to sneak back sometime tomorrow when Matthew is hopefully not around.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

md, is the idea to deliberately disrupt every dialog I attempt

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 4:45am.

to have with another poster? Or is it just an uncontrollable compulsion of yours?

Jer

  • Login to post comments

jer

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 2:26am.

"they just never quite mastered the art" Oh now that IS funny!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Truly Stupid

Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 11:06am.

You are absolutely nuts if you believe what you just wrote. If this was the case why then didn't Obama fix the economy when he had a bullit proof majority in both houses of congress? Why didn't his congress establish a budget? You are a complete dumbass and should remain quite when grown ups talk.

  • Login to post comments

pcnav---

Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 2:39am.

Well, of course Jer believes what he writes.

He is a lib.

Some days he is exceptionally articulate; other days he is a verbal contortionist extraordinaire.

I think that stems from his days as a barrister.   :o)

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

matthewdean

Submitted by amyshulk on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 6:17am.

I like jer. He doesn't froth - now if he would just answer me about if Joe of MJ ever changed his {jer's} view, I'd really like him!!!

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Forgive me, amy...

Submitted by Jer on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 11:03am.

I'm not sure I quite understand the question. Has Joe changed it what way? I'll be back later and give you my opinion.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

jer

Submitted by amyshulk on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 5:52pm.

I think I asked if Joe of MJ ever swayed you agree with any conservative position?

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

amy...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 7:21pm.

There are several generally considered "conservative" positions with which I agree, although Joe didn't necessarily have anything to do with my political philosophy. For the past couple of years he has been an advocate for less hyper-partisanship in politics and I think that's a good idea.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

amy---

Submitted by matthewdean on Tue, 08/23/2011 - 11:27pm.

Jer doesn't froth?

You must have missed many of Jer's replies to me.

I can get ol' Jer to FROTH - !!!

He pulls about a 7.4 on the Richter Froth scale.   

Only reason there hasn't been a higher reading, officially  noted and logged, is because them froth bubbles fog up the readings something fierce.    :o)

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

pcnav...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 12:10am.

Why are you wasting your time seeking my opinion about bullit (sic) proof congressional majorities, etc., if I am absolutely nuts as well as a complete dumbass who should remain quite (sic)? And, furthermore, Matthew Dean wants to know why you would probably misspell "cat" even if you were spotted the "c" and the "t".

Jer

  • Login to post comments

pcnav---

Submitted by matthewdean on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 1:47am.

pay no mind to ol' Jer; he's just a sour-assed liberal on a conservative site who has absolutely no way to defend his idol, Barack the Magnificent, against charges of malfeasance, misprision, and being an inexperienced, lying, ugly, purple-lipped pos from the dung heap of Chicago Democratic politics.

And furthermore, Jer gets so disconcerted that he has to stoop to putting words in other people's mouths.

Caught ol' Jer in some misspellings of his own, but when he gets to snarkin', -watch out - the dude is a world class snarker.

He doesn't, however,  handle being the snarkee very well at all.

He tends to get pissy, like a Brit twit.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

matthew...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 12:03pm.

Is there an NB rule that you are required to respond to EVERY SINGLE COMMENT I post? I honestly can't recall the last time you missed one. If so, I'm sure it was entirely accidental.

BTW, unlike you I'm not a spelling and grammar nazi by habit. But when some guy who has never once engaged me in any sort of dialog breaks the ice by calling me "truly stupid", "absolutely nuts", "a complete dumbass" who should shut-up while the adults talk, all in the space of a 2 1/2 line post, then I have absolutely no compunction about pointing out his spelling problems.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

No, Jer---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 3:15am.

I don't believe there is such a rule on the books, and if there were, I am sure someone would advise me of it.

Some one like------YOU.

Or, more realistically, you would endeavor to keep me from such knowledge.

Is there a rule that says you ABSOLUTELY MUST WHINE about EVERY RESPONSE I make to you, that you don't like?

Apparently so.   :o)

You would be awe struck, I am sure, at the number of times I just pass on by w/o comment because you are such a bone deep liberal that it would be useless to engage in an ideological dispute with you, regardless of subject specificity.

And incidentally, though I truly dislike liberals, because of the aforementioned 'ideology' that they eat, sleep, and the resultant stink they exude out through their pores, I am not a "nazi" anything.  You incessantly mewl about how I misrepresent what you say and tell lies about you; and oddly enough, I have yet to be told by any of your friends on this site to "stop with the lies about Jer".  You think that might be because everything I say is there to be read by, and responded to, by anyone who so chooses - and that most regulars see us as nothing more than two childish jerks who waste a lot of space with grade school bickering?

I see it, but I am not likely to change, because:

  1. I enjoy it ---   &
  2. As a liberal on a conservative site, your comments quite often deserve to be harangued, and as the author of same, so do you.

"Nothing personal, Sonny.  It's just business."   (h/t Al Pacino as Michael Corleone - 'The Godfather')

 

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

That's fine, Matthew...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 3:29am.

Obviously, it's a source of enjoyment for you and I want you to be happy. I just think you overdo it a bit. Being acutely aware that you not only tend to reject my advice but seem to be genuinely offended by it, nevertheless, here's more: I think your criticism, derision and ridicule would be more effective if it were more selectively employed.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Well, Jer,we will then ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 08/25/2011 - 3:46am.

likely continue forward, together, on different roads.

No thoughts, however, on your criticism(s), derision, and ridicule?

Strictly a one way street, eh?

Odd how that works; especially since I am the conservative and you are the liberal, here.

Someone, somewhere, did say that liberals want to tell others how to live their lives; though I can't imagine where they would get such a strange notion.

You?

MD

 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Talking Points?

Submitted by pcnav on Mon, 08/22/2011 - 11:01am.

That is funny! She says he is repeating talking points then immediately follows with the oldest one of all, the "Party of No" that was introduced by Pelosi over 4 years ago. How did we get to this point when idiots like this are providing us our 1st Amendment protected press reports. This is propaganda pure and simple.

  • Login to post comments

Jer, just one question.

Submitted by UpNorth on Wed, 08/24/2011 - 7:38pm.

Why didn't 0 do something, other than ram healthcare down our throat, while he and his party held both houses of Congress?  You know, like a budget?   Just curious as to what your take on that is?

To re-elect Obama would be like the Titanic backing up and hitting the iceberg again.
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Can Close Gitmo By Making it a Government-Funded Solar Company
  • Charlie Sheen Changes Name to Carlos Estevez for Upcoming 'Machete Kills' Film
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use