Journalists Ignore Reality That 'Post-Racial' President Isn't
In the run-up to Obama’s election, journalists were promoting him as a “post-racial” candidate. Now with the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court we know that both the media and the candidate were lying to us.
As USA Today columnist DeWayne Wickham wrote on May 5, 2009, “For many people in the USA, Obama's election ushered in a post-racial era that was expected to push race to the back burner of our national consciousness.” But his presidency isn’t “post-racial.” It’s not just the obvious identity politics where craven political calculations are used to pick candidates of appropriate age/race/gender/class/shoe size. It has to do with Obama’s stance on using racism to correct racism.
That position was evident in Obama’s deliberate choice of Sotomayor who figured prominently in a major case of racial injustice. The case in question – Ricci v. DeStefano – involves 18 New Haven, Connecticut, firefighters who sued because they were blatantly discriminated against because of their race. The 17 white and one Hispanic firefighters took the lieutenant’s and captain’s exams and, when they did well and black firefighters did not, the city canceled the results. On appeal, our likely next Supreme Court “justice” ruled against the men even though the evidence was stacked on their side.
That, along with a few truly moronic statements by Sotomayor, has thrust her candidacy into the spotlight, and it was no accident.
Obama has tried to look neutral on this issue as the Justice Department chimed in seemingly on both sides in what one lawyer told Newsweek was a “political straddle. “ Obama’s legal folks backed the city against the firefighters, but urged the case be sent back to the lower courts for reconsideration. It appeared he was trying to bury the issue.
That was a ruse.
For the rest of this column, please go to: