NYT's Harwood Leans on Discredited Exit Poll to Paint Brighter Picture for Obama in Wisconsin
In the aftermath of Wisconsin Republican Gov. Scott Walker defeating a union-backed recall election, New York Times reporter John Harwood still saw bright hopes for Obama both in Wisconsin and nationwide, basing his Saturday "political memo" on a study from a liberal group, in "Demographic Shifts in Key States Could Aid Obama in Fall." That's slanted enough. But why is Harwood also relying on the worthless exit poll from the Walker-Barrett vote last Tuesday to argue that Obama is ahead in Wisconsin?
In this traditionally Democratic state, where Republicans triumphed in Tuesday’s failed recall of Gov. Scott Walker, President Obama holds a thin cushion against economic and political woes: the shape-shifting November electorate.
....
That’s no guarantee the Democratic incumbent can survive the effects of tough economic times with the coalition that gave him a double-digit victory four years ago. But in Wisconsin and other competitive states, demographic changes add another variable to a campaign conversation that has largely revolved around high unemployment and slow growth.
“A number of states are urbanizing and losing their historically large rural conservative vote,” said Jan van Lohuizen, a Republican pollster who advised President George W. Bush.
The result, added Ruy Teixeira, a Democratic political demographer, is “a little bit of a tail wind” to offset stiff economic headwinds.
Indeed, Mr. Teixeira frames the battle between Mr. Obama and Mitt Romney, his Republican challenger, as a contest pitting “demographics versus economics.” In an analysis for the liberal Center for American Progress, he and his co-author, John Halpin, calculated that in 12 battleground states, the proportion of votes cast by working-class whites, a group Mr. Obama lost lopsidedly in 2008, will drop by three percentage points this fall.
....
Another shift resulted not from demographics but from a surge in labor turnout in response to Mr. Walker’s battle against public employee unions; even as public employee unions have hemorrhaged members, one-third of the vote was cast by residents of union households, up from 26 percent in 2010.
Those shifts were not enough to lift Tom Barrett, the Democratic mayor of Milwaukee, to victory in the recall election. But among those voting, exit polls showed, Mr. Obama was favored by 51 percent to 44 percent over Mr. Romney.
Never mind that those very same exit polls also suggested a very close result between Walker and Democrat Tom Barrett, when in fact Walker won by seven points.
UPDATE: NewsBusters's Matthew Sheffield made the point in a comprehensive dissection June 7 on the uselessness of exit polls.
The continued faith in the flawed Wisconsin survey is even more amazing when you consider the dreadful record exit polls have of matching up with the actual vote totals. In nearly every case of error, exit polls have oversampled Democrats, a fact almost never pointed out by the nation's news organizations.
....
If the exit polls were off by 7 points in the Walker-Barrett race, it seems reasonable that they were off by about 7 points in the Obama-Romney race, too.
So, why did the media not acknowledge that the recall election results had shown their exit polls to be worthless, rather than forge ahead with stories about the exit polls showing Obama leading Romney?
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Ahhhh the magic exit polls...
Submitted by c5then on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 3:05pm.
wrong on almost everything except this one question.
Was this where Obama got the idea that the Private sector was fine too?
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
It will make it so much sweeter in November
Submitted by ChrisNH on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 3:15pm.
I already have a list of all the Leftist Media Hacks who, within the past year, DECLARED that Obama would not only win re-election...but do so 'easily.' Happily for us and anguishing for them, Obama has run out of runway to see a positive economic recovery. So, he has THAT not to look forward to. And Europe--that collection of countries that run themselves in a way that would make Paul Krugman proud--will be the anchor that drags Obama to the bottom and keeps him there. How's THAT for sweet irony?
Despite howls from Leftist Media Hacks that "There's Not a Lot a President Can Do...", voters won't buy that bit of biased rationalization in November.
We all know
Submitted by NYCMiddle on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 3:34pm.
that this recall election in Wisconsin was meaningless - except for the fact that it has helped the President and will ensure his election to a second term.
Much like Joshua Holland who argued Wisconsin was not a referendum on Union "Rights" because no one ran on that issue on AlterNet.org.
Sure. Keep telling yourselves that.
Among those voting?
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 3:46pm.
"But among those voting, exit polls showed, Mr. Obama was favored by 51 percent to 44 percent over Mr. Romney."
Are you telling me that each and every person who voted in the recall also filled out an exit survey? The numbers don't add up. They tell a completely different story. There were 2547 exit poll respondents, but over 2.5 million votes cast. That's only 1/1000th of the voters actually saying who they preferred. No wonder the exit poll never match the actual results. You're basing the entire premise on 1/1000th of a sample. We have no idea what the 2.5 million people who didn't fill one out actually think. You're projecting the numbers onto a blank screen, so to speak. This wasn't a random survey, so statistical analysis won't work. The results, therefor, are meaningless. So why are you using them?
If you people were honest, you would say "amongst those who filled out an exit poll." But you're not trying to be honest, are you? And, yet, you wonder why we question your integrity? Well, this is a perfect example.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
You know, it's funny...
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 4:01pm.
You know, it's funny. People, especially the "educated" journalists, keep asking why exit polls are so wrong. They think that they are an accurate indication of trends even though they see, time and time again, that they are not. What they don't understand is that, unlike a random poll, they're not indicative what what is going to happen, not indicative of a trend. They can't be. They're not random!
Unlike a scientific poll, the respondents are not being randomly picked and questioned as to how they will vote, or who they prefer. The responses are subjective, based upon those who seek to respond, and not objective, based upon those who were randomly selected and who do respond. That means that statistical analysis can not be used on the results and, because of this, an accurate trend can not be established. It's scientifically impossible. One would think that the "educated" journalists, political "analysts", and such, would be able to figure it out. They never seem to, though, do they?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.