Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 21, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Clay Waters's blog
  • After Terrible Storm, ABC Devotes 10 Minutes to Crime, Botox and Entertainment, Skimps on IRS
  • ABC and CBS Ignore Obama Administration Investigating FNC's James Rosen
  • NBC's Gregory Scolds GOP for Comparing Obama to Nixon
  • CBS Highlights Ex-IRS Staffer Who Declares There Were No Politics at Cincinnati Office
  • Monday's Amnesia: CNN Covers Powerball Jackpot Winner as Much as IRS, AP, Benghazi Scandals
  • The Obama Scandal the Big Three Networks Aren't Telling You About
  • WashPost 'Express' Tabloid Cover Laments: How Can Obama 'Break from the Storm' of Scandals?
  • It Gets Worse: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News

Smugfest: NYTimes Editor Tanenhaus, Joe Klein Tag-Team to Condescendingly Rip Jonah Goldberg's Book

By Clay Waters | May 22, 2012 | 14:49

A  A

Not content with letting partisan liberal journalist Joe Klein review "radical Republican" Jonah Goldberg's new book The Tyranny of Clichés, the May 18 edition of the paper's Book Review podcast opened with book editor Sam Tanenahus talking with Klein about his hostile Times book review. Tanenhaus (pictured), author of a little screed called The Death of Conservatism that was discredited within months of its 2009 publication by the rise of the Tea Party, spent the first 14 minutes of the podcast slamming Goldberg's book along with Klein.

This exchange occurred about 40 minutes from the end of the podcast:

Tanenhaus: "Now Joe, just so our listeners get out [unclear] of this idea liberalism is really statism, is one that conservatives have been making for a very long time. Go back to the origins of National Review and the mid-50s they were saying this. Then it kind of fell away and now it's back again. How did this happen?"

Klein: "It's back again at the weirdest time, because liberals stopped being statists a long time ago. there was a time when liberals were in favor of things like socialized medicine and so forth. Now most of Barack Obama's ideas originated in the Republican Party, things like the individual mandate, universal health care version. Cap and trade. These are all Republican ideas. The liberals nowadays would rather bail out auto companies than own auto companies. Nobody believes in socialism and pure socialism anymore."

Thirty-seven minutes from the end Klein ludicrously identifies himself as a moderate: "Well the thing that, the thing that, as a flaming moderate, the thing that I find most obnoxious about this, is the relentless defense of ideology and of ideologues as just people who have a world view."

Some of Klein's "flaming moderation" includes smearing Tea Party supporters as racist. MRC's Scott Whitlock caught Klein earlier this month discussing a Tea Party rally in Arkansas: "And there are Mexican Americans all over the place and their grandchildren are marrying out of their race or becoming gay. The President of the United States doesn't have the good sense to be either black or white and his middle name is Hussein." Klein's Time Magazine cover story of May 4, 2009 reviewing Obama's first 100 days as president, was so effusive about his "stupendous" and "spectacular" achievements that it won the "Master of His Domain Award for Obama Puffery" category for MRC's The Best Notable Quotables that year.

Back to the podcast, in which Klein accuses Goldberg of lying nonsense:

Tanenhaus: "Now, when he contrasts conservatives and liberals, which every now and again he does, he'll say, well it's true conservatives may engage in some of the same style of debate. His argument is that conservatives are more honest about their ideology because at least they come out and admit it. What do you think of that point?"

Klein: "That's also pulling the wool over our eyes, because what he actually says, is that all these conservative arguments are about a single simple thing: Freedom. Conservatives are for freedom. Liberals are for the state. That is nonsense. It's just not true."

Tanenhaus: "Does he ever really define freedom in this book?"

Klein: "No, and he has nothing to say about policy."

....

Tanenhaus: "You know, another thing that's interesting about it, Joe, is to read a book like The Tyranny of Cliches, to read a writer like Jonah Goldberg, and some others, you would think, 'Liberals continue to dominate American politics.' And we look back over the last 30 years and it's, if anything, it's the Republican Party and conservative arguments, as you say, Barack Obama has borrowed many of them, that seem to be dictating the debate. Why this opposite belief coming from the right? What are they seeing? Who is this book really written for or at or about?"

Klein: "The right in this country, especially with the growth of right-orienetd media, like Fox News or the Drudge Report, it has become a hermetically sealed feedback loop. When you write a book with the title Liberal Fascism, or you know, The Tyranny of Cliches -- How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas, you are thinking about a certain market...."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Klein patted himself on the back for going out to the country, talking to real people, and not finding ideologues (he didn't mention the Tea Party in Arkansas). He and Tanenhaus got along so well that near the end Klein invited Tanenhaus to join him on his tour of battleground states this summer. The segment concluded with Klein ripping Goldberg's "radical Republican" worldview:

Sam Tanenhaus: "Joe, is there anything a liberal can learn from Jonah Goldberg's book?"

Klein: "Goldberg's book is an insight into the conservative -- I won't say conservative, no -- into the radical Republican state of mind now. True conservatism, as you know and as you've written, is far more moderate. Goldberg is playing word games. He has nothing to say about real political issues, real political policy as it's practiced in this country right now. And so Democrats can learn about the little bit and liberals can learn a little bit about the threadbare nature of an opponent that sometimes seems overwhelming when rhese views are in the mouth of Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or whomever."

Tanenhaus: "Thanks so much Joe."

Klein: "My pleasure Sam."
 

About the Author

Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. Click here to follow Clay Waters on Twitter.
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • Jonah Goldberg
  • Sam Tanenhaus
  • Books
  • New York Times
  • Time
  • TimesWatch
  • Clay Waters's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Jonah Goldberg is a radical republican?

Submitted by ohio granny on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 5:09pm.

Tanenhaus and Klein are radical leftists contrary to what they want to the public to believe. Anyone who dares criticize Obama and/or the left is made out to be a radical. Guess what guys? Not very many people buy what you are trying to sell. The New York Slimes continues to bleed subscribers, becoming more and more irrelevant all the time.

Good thing you guys love each other. Not very many others do.

  • Login to post comments

Sam Tanenhaus battling the green-eyed monster of jealousy.

Submitted by drsamherman on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 5:18pm.

Sam's book is at 525,405 at Amazon, while Jonah Goldberg's book is at 229 as of 4:15 PM central May 22, 2012.

The marketplace votes with its wallet and Sam lost. It was like running Angela Davis against Ronald Reagan.

Sam is clearly motivated only by jealousy. So is Klein. What they have produced is suitable for bird cages, cat litter pans, garbage cans and wrapping fish.

  • Login to post comments

Please show Tanenhaus a "your brains on Kool-aid" T-shirt

Submitted by needle on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 9:20pm.

Tanenhaus: “His argument is that conservatives are more honest about their ideology because at least they come out and admit it.”

Then later:

Tanenhaus: "You know, another thing that's interesting about it, Joe, is to read a book like The Tyranny of Cliches, to read a writer like Jonah Goldberg, and some others, you would think, 'Liberals continue to dominate American politics.' And we look back over the last 30 years and it's, if anything, it's the Republican Party and conservative arguments, as you say, Barack Obama has borrowed many of them, that seem to be dictating the debate. Why this opposite belief coming from the right? What are they seeing? Who is this book really written for or at or about?"

Yeah, Tanenhaus just scored an own goal.

- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.

  • Login to post comments

About that whole Republicans invented the individual mandate....

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 12:47am.

Klein:...most of Barack Obama's ideas originated in the Republican Party, things like the individual mandate.... 

First of all, it never went anywhere, did it? Wonder why. Hmmmmm. 

Second, Republicans were advocating everyone buy CATASTROPHIC health insurance. Not comprehensive. Kinda different animal there

. Stuart says that Heritage’s version of the individual mandate contained “three critical features” that distinguish it from Obamacare’s mandate: (1) it required people to buy catastrophic coverage, rather than more expensive comprehensive coverage; (2) it was primarily financed “through the carrot of a generous health credit or voucher…rather than by a stick”; (3) Heritage’s mandate “was actually the loss of certain tax breaks…not a legal requirement.”

  • Login to post comments

Kinda like a horse and a zebra...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 1:17am.

From the same article:

"Today, there is near-unanimity on the right that the individual mandate is an egregious violation of individual liberty. But liberal critics are right to point out that that wasn’t always true. Based on my research, I see no contravening evidence to the claim that Stuart Butler and Heritage were the first people to advocate the individual mandate, in the context of a private-sector health-care system. (Obviously, single-payer plans also contain individual mandates, but to buy government-run health care.)"

Jer

  • Login to post comments

What?

Submitted by The Vet on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 6:36am.

What does this have to do with what I said?

  • Login to post comments

Sorry Vet...

Submitted by Jer on Wed, 05/23/2012 - 10:48pm.

I believe I misconstrued your point. I thought your "kinda different animals" remark was an implication that the Heritage/GOP version was not a true individual mandate.

I now believe you were simply emphasizing the distinction between catastrophic and comprehensive coverage requirements.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
  • The folly of 'do something' liberalism (Patriot Update)
  • DOJ targeted more Fox News reporters than Rosen (Twitchy)
  • WashPost vs. WashPost on IRS probe (Ed Morrissey)
  • Media too prone to fall sway to Obama's referrent power (Salena Zito)
  • Five reasons to keep government out of Internet governance (Eli Dourado)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • NYT Gets Sen. Cruz's Opposition to Marketplace Fairness Act Dead Wrong
  • Oops! CNN Commentator Falsely Accuses Okla. State Rep While Trying to Score Liberal Points on Tornado
  • Sen. Whitehouse Blames GOP For Okla. Tornado, Storms, Rising Seas, Etc.
  • On Leno: Kids Ask Obama the Darndest Questions
  • Morning Joe Meteorologist: Tornado Averted 'By The Grace of Whatever'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use