NATO Protests Were Sign of Potential Occupy Strength for NYTimes...Until Terror Plots and Violence
The NATO summit meeting in Chicago this weekend was the target of a diverse collage of left-wing groups as people with the Occupy movement streamed into Chicago for protests that culminated in violent clashes with cops and 45 arrests on Sunday. Before the summit the Times reported the protest would be a sign of how strong Occupy remained. Yet once the violence and terrorism charges began flying in Chicago, the Occupy movement all but disappeared from the paper's coverage.
It's a pattern for the Times, which routinely downplayed violence in the Occupy movement, yet fretted over hypothetical threats of violence posed by the Tea Party.
Last Thursday Monica Davey and Steven Yaccino set the table with "Big Gathering For NATO Puts Chicago On High Alert."
The formal meeting of NATO is to start on Sunday, but by Wednesday evening, buses carrying demonstrators from Occupy movements in eight cities around the nation were expected to begin converging on Chicago. The concerns of demonstrators vary widely: among them are those who say they oppose war, and those who say foreign military spending -- and the work of NATO -- has taken away from efforts for health care, education, immigration and other pressing matters.
On Saturday Davey and Yaccino again mentioned the Occupy involvement in "Chicago Protests Draw Thousands Before NATO Event."
A far larger “anti-NATO” march was expected on Sunday, and violent images from earlier global gatherings, like a World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1999, have left some in Chicago on edge -- businesses closed, windows boarded and the Loop oddly quiet.
For some, the outcome of the weekend’s protests will be viewed as a trial of the strength of the Occupy movement months after the groups emerged in cities around the nation with messages about income inequality. Demonstrators have been arriving on buses from Occupy-related groups around the country, and some observers have suggested that the number of protesters who ultimately appear here will serve as a sign of the movement’s current state.
“This is the spring -- this is the rising,” said Christina Cooke, a member of an Occupy group from Buffalo who took part in the march here. “Everyone is still here after the long winter. We are still active with more passion than we’ve ever had.”
Yet when actual terrorism and violence erupted in Chicago, the Occupy link mysteriously vanished from Times coverage.
Sunday's dispatch from Chicago by Idalmy Carrera and Steven Yaccino was titled "3 in Chicago Face Charges Of Terrorism In Protests."
Tensions were increasing here on Saturday, the eve of a NATO summit meeting, after three men were accused of planning attacks on President Obama’s re-election campaign headquarters, the house of Mayor Rahm Emanuel, police stations and financial institutions in downtown Chicago, according to prosecutors.
The men, who were among thousands of people from out of town who traveled to Chicago for a weekend of NATO-related protests, were charged with criminal acts relating to terrorism, conspiracy to commit terrorism, and possession of explosives. Bond for the three men -- Jared Chase, 27, of Keene, N.H.; Brent Betterly, 24, of Oakland Park, Fla.; and Brian Jacob Church, 22, of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. -- was set at $1.5 million each. The state’s attorney, Anita Alvarez, said that this was the first time she knew of that defendants had been charged under the state’s antiterrorism statute. She declined to comment on possible federal charges.
Note that the accused plotters couldn't possibly have anything to do with the protesters "arriving on buses from Occupy-related groups around the country," but are now merely a few of the "thousands of people from out of town who traveled to Chicago" to protest NATO. What happened to the Occupy push?
On Monday the Times raised the Occupy link covering the Sunday violence in which 45 protesters were arrested, only to squash it: "Police Officers and Protesters Clash in Chicago Outside Meeting of NATO Leaders."
The Times outlined terror-related charges against two more men:
Lawyers for both men denied the charges, and suggested that the authorities in Chicago were overstating the claims as a warning to the thousands of protesters, some of them linked to the Occupy movement, who have descended on the city for the summit meeting.
The paper insisted (as it always does) that it was a mostly peaceful vibe, while suggesting "the mood" set by Chicago authorities carried at least some of the blame for violence.
At times, the march was calm. Some protesters could be seen joking with the police. But some protesters said the mood -- and all the talk of arrests and plots -- had raised emotions.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
The answer is: The New York Times
Submitted by needle on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 8:26am.
The question is:
Where did all of the Fabian Socialists go?
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Is there a pattern forming?
Submitted by c5then on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 8:49am.
Almost everywhere that the Occupy ________ movement sends people, there are confrontations with police, violence and now, on a number of occasions, people arrested for terror plots.
And I have yet to hear any logical or cogent statement about what exactly is being protested at the NATO summit. Are these people upset that there are a group of countries that have pledged mutual defensive pacts with each other? Are they upset that NATO protected the Lybian rebels? What is it that they want?
Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it!
They're just angry, period
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 9:06am.
Normally, they like to riot at G-8, World Bank, and IMF events; if you want to get the gist of their game, got to the website for ANSER (the .org, not the .com).
But with the G-8 Summit held at the ultra-secure Camp David, which has a permanent Marine detachment, they opted to demonstrate at the NATO conference because it included many of the same players and more. Chicago also provides plenty of media coverage, and it is the site of the '68 Democratic Convention Riots, so it has symbolism.
There was no coherent message (there wasn't one last year either); they showed up in Chicago because, well, because they can, I suppose. What they want is for Obama and others to give them more government hand-outs: guaranteed jobs, free college education, cheap housing -- all of which they believe are their rights. They want Washington to take $$$ from the rich and give it to them in the name of social justice, or economic justice, or whatever.
As for me, I think I'll enlist in the Symbionese Liberation Army.
FREE SYMBION !!
NATO is attached at the hip with the UN
Submitted by lrgon on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 12:56pm.
Occupiers are leftwingers and the leftists love the United Nations.
The UN represents the ultimate concept of big government in the minds of the left. Since the UN has sought for years to ban guns held in private hands the left embraces these totalitarian goals.The UN favors universal population control via forced abortion and sterilization. When was a leftwinger not an abortionist? The UN is basically a leftwingers dream come true.
The irony of this occupying showbiz is that the occupiers may not realize how close NATO is to the UN. Or they do and the "occupiers" were hired to give the NATO war lovers some needed positive spin in the leftwing media.
NATO,
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 1:02pm.
NATO was seen as an impediment to Socialism/Communism as one time and that perception has remained enough in what passes for history books for NATO to remain a target. Just as NATO has been an important but a nearly useless bureaucracy for a long time but some people still see them as 'war lovers' because of past interference and political stands.
Bring on a Summer of OWS !!
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 8:55am.
The Chicago melodrama indicates that OWS will resume where it left off: in the hands of radicals who have nothing else to do but eat free food and provoke police.
I welcome the return of OWS. It eats up Leftist resources, creates bad imagery for to media, angers city residents, and further convinces the average American that he/she has little or nothing in common with this collection of mostly young, white males spanning the left end of the political spectrum from socialists to anarachists.
The demonstrations are also happening in cities run by Democrats, who eventually get fed up themselves and move to oust them.
It's wonderful!
I sturggle to understand the
Submitted by inquiringmind on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 8:57am.
I sturggle to understand the leftist Mind. They seem to have to suspend reality for their thinking to work. For the NYT to support this OWS movement when is is made up of anrchists who want to overthrow all governments not just ours is a real mystery to me. ( don't tell me it is a movement against the wealthy, not when Russell Simmons , Alec Baldwin and that fat guy who make fake documentries are held up as heros)
Beyond that I look at people like Soros, Andrea Mitchell, and Krugeman and see very wealthy people who have benifited from Capitalism and this Republic and yet they are constantly preaching against it and supporting other thinking that would severly damage the US.
Projected guilt
Submitted by needle on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 9:40am.
The OWS louts and wastrels are projecting their guilt for their lack of industry.
The Limousine Leftists are projecting their guilt for their industry, or at least for their absurd good fortune for some industry.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
The NYT is unable
Submitted by dr-go on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 9:31am.
to grasp the reality that it is irrelevant as shown by the continuing agendas that are embraced only by a small percentage of the citizenry but happily, a large percentage of their readership.
Who really cares what the strange people at the Times think or write?
The President
Submitted by desert3030 on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 10:17am.
Stated he helped the economy by staying in a hotel. More along the line Blago & Tony are in jail and couldn't get the house ready? The Mayor was busy stopping the city from being destroyed by the occupiers, the new wing of the Obama supporters.
Or he could have held the meeting at GITMO. It is still open and there would have been no damage and the same activites would have been available.
He'll help the economy even more if . . .
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 2:14pm.
. . . he moves back to his Chicago home permanently on January 20, 2013.