Really? NYT's Jason DeParle Admits Welfare-Deprived Women Who Mug Immigrants Can 'Seem Unsympathetic'
New York Times welfare reporter Jason DeParle appeared on the NPR program "Fresh Air" hosted by Terry Gross, on Thursday to retell the horror stories that appeared in his lead story last Sunday: "I can't remember a time when I heard people talk so openly about desperate or even illegal things that they were doing in order to make ends meet. They were selling food stamps. They were selling blood. Women talked openly about shoplifting." Even committing "muggings of illegal immigrants." DeParle noted with laughable understatement that such "strategies" can "make them seem unsympathetic."
Asked by the sympathetic Gross about the 1996 welfare reform (which DeParle at the time said risked forcing mothers to "turn to prostitution or the drug trade....abandon their children....camp out on the streets and beg"), DeParle responded with tales of formidable state bureaucracy that won't cut much ice with anyone who has dealt with the DMV:
DEPARLE: Yes, it goes back to what you asked, did it work. It worked in cutting caseloads. But right, those, with a stroke of the pen, Arizona could cut its caseloads in half, but it doesn't mean that those families that lost their cash aid are any better able to support themselves. States are pretty much free to run their programs however they want and to impose any kind of administrative barriers that they choose. So just by changing your administrative procedures, making someone come in twice to sign up, say, instead of once, you can have a big impact on the caseload. And I think a lot of women have, not all, but a lot of women have decided the system has just gotten to be more hassle than it's worth, you know, on a cost-benefit basis. The cash amounts, the benefits have dwindled to such a low amount, and the amount of time that the program requires has gone up. A lot of women have just walked away from it.
GROSS: Now, you write about single mothers who have been dropped from the welfare rolls and what they're trying to do to make ends meet. What are some of the stories that you've heard?
DEPARLE: You know, Terry, I've been interviewing poor single mothers for more than 20 years, and I can't remember a time when I heard people talk so openly about desperate or even illegal things that they were doing in order to make ends meet. They were selling food stamps. They were selling blood. Women talked openly about shoplifting. One woman was quite up front on that she'd been engaging in muggings of illegal immigrants. A lot of women are going back to relationships with, that they had with violent men and were open in saying they were only doing it because they didn't have any other choice. Lots of doubling up. Lots of going to churches, food pantries.
After speaking of the epidemic of food stamp selling, DeParle abruptly pulls back, just in case anyone would use his words to argue that the program is being "widely abused."
DEPARLE: With the limits on cash aid, I think a lot of women have gotten some cash income from their food stamps. I think that's a common phenomenon. But I wouldn't want to leave the impression that I think the food stamp program is being widely abused, misused, isn't needed. In my travels through low-income America, I have, over a period of many years, repeatedly been struck by how often and how hard people struggle to keep food on the table throughout the month. For those of us who never think twice about having enough food, it's hard to imagine what a daily struggle it is for some needy families. So the fact that people are, desperate people are monetizing their food stamp benefit to some degree or other I think is more of a comment on the restrictions of cash aid than it is on the need for food stamps.
DeParle confessed:
I think one reason this group of people hasn't drawn more attention in the downturn is that they tend to have a lot of problems that would make them politically unpopular. Some have addictions. Many have violent boyfriends. A great many have mental health problems. They can be a hard group of people, at least as adults, to feel, for the general public to feel sympathetic toward, particularly during an economic downturn. You know, throughout the past four years we keep hearing about the impact of this economy on the middle class, which of course is important, but it's having a great impact on these people too.
This may be the understatement of the week:
As you can see in this piece, they can resort to strategies that make them seem unsympathetic. This recession has been, and aftermath has been so framed in terms of its impact on the middle class that the poor have largely been pushed out of the spotlight, and you know, the chronically poor, the destitute, the deeply disadvantaged, poor single mothers with mental health problems and homeless problems and addiction problems, I mean they're really in, I think, political oblivion right now.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Wait...I'm confused.
Submitted by NeoKong on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 3:48pm.
"For those of us who never think twice about having enough food, it's hard to imagine what a daily struggle it is for some needy families. So the fact that people are, desperate people are monetizing their food stamp benefit to some degree or other I think is more of a comment on the restrictions of cash aid than it is on the need for food stamps."
Wouldn't they have more food if they didn't sell their food stamps....?
Let's be blunt. If you are selling your food stamps then obviously you don't need them.
They use the money for drugs, alcohol and cigarettes.
Confused?
Submitted by Huapakechi on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 4:15pm.
No, you're not confused. You're just not thinking like a liberal.
Liberal doctrine does not hold people responsible for their actions. They hold society to blame for the addictions and problems that those of us who think conservatively opine as self-inflicted wounds.
Growing up in the 50s and 60s, I was blessed with a father who allowed me to make my mistakes and take my lumps. I also learned that the most painful lessons are the ones I remember longest.
Ya can't fix stupid, but ya don't have to enable that sort of behavior. The current welfare system has done nothing but enable the addicts, foolish, gullible, and those without ambition to continue their spiral for generations. It was originally designed to entrap those at the economic bottom and keep them there as a dependable voting base for the democrat party. It has succeeded.
"Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, free food, transportation and housing, and he will vote Democrat for a lifetime."
“The press is so powerful in its image-making role that it can make a criminal look like he’s the victim and make the victim look like he’s the criminal. If you aren’t careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”– Malcolm X
"Strategies" to commit crimes?
Submitted by Galvanic on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 4:10pm.
Does one really need a strategy for mugging innocent people and steal property?
DEPARLE: . . . States are pretty much free to run their programs however they want and to impose any kind of administrative barriers that they choose. So just by changing your administrative procedures, making someone come in twice to sign up, say, instead of once, you can have a big impact on the caseload. . . .
States are accountable to their citizens.
If the citizens believe their state government is performing poorly or criminally, it can vote in new officials.
DEPARLE: . . . And I think a lot of women have, not all, but a lot of women have decided the system has just gotten to be more hassle than it's worth, you know, on a cost-benefit basis. The cash amounts, the benefits have dwindled to such a low amount, and the amount of time that the program requires has gone up. A lot of women have just walked away from it.
Then, perhaps at least some of them don't need the benefits badly enough.
DEPARLE: You know, Terry, I've been interviewing poor single mothers for more than 20 years, and I can't remember a time when I heard people talk so openly about desperate or even illegal things that they were doing in order to make ends meet.
News Alert for DeParle!!!!! The current Federal budget is the budget that the Democratic Congress and this President passed in 2009. Because no new budgets have been passed, the current one is essentially a copu of that older one, sustained fiscal quarter after fiscal quarter by continuing resolutions. So, if the money is inadequate, blame Obama, Pelosi, and Reid.
Ya think?????
Submitted by motherbelt on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 4:46pm.
Lots of going to churches, food pantries.
They say that as if it's a BAD thing.
That's what real charity IS, you morons. People donating food to their church's food pantries for the needy!!
I guess the ideal would be that if taxes were high enough to "provide" then no one would need churches and food pantries. All "charity" would come from the taxpayers, by force. That's their idea of a perfect world.
MB
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 5:21pm.
Dont forget, churches may require recipients of charities to attend services, get job training, and other horrors. Much better to give without strings attached. /sarc off
~Not to Democrats
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 4:52pm.
As you can see in this piece, they can resort to strategies that make them seem unsympathetic.
Dems are very sympathetic to unscrupulous riff-raff; it's ordinary, law-abiding, tax-paying, American women who stay home with their kids who deserve scorn.
Monetizing their benefits
Submitted by Wineguy13 on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 5:49pm.
Definitely the best euphemism I have heard lately. I have been thinking of monetizing my neighbor's IPad next time he leaves it unattended. Remarkably, the twenty years that this welfare reporter (the NYT has a WELFARE reporter?) has been covering deadbeats, he hasn't wondered why they don't get out of poverty. He just accepts the premise that the beknighted poor deserve the spoils of taxation. He and his ilk are pathetic.