NYT's Stelter Defends Hollywood, Dismisses Idea of Palin-Hatred as 'Conspiracy Theory'
New York Times media reporter Brian Stelter on Monday defended Hollywood and the new HBO movie "Game Change," a hit job on the 2008 vice presidential campaign of Sarah Palin based on the book by liberal reporters John Heilemann and Mark Halperin. In "Rogue, Rube or G.O.P. Star: Portraying Palin," Stelter defended Hollywood from "conspiracy theories" that the movie is meant "to undermine a future run for president by Ms. Palin" (as if Hollywood liberals wouldn't love to have it accomplish just that).
Stelter also vigorously defended the movie-makers choice to focus solely on Palin at the expense of the portions of the book devoted to the bloody Democratic primary tussle between Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. But it doesn't take a conspiracy theorist to realize that overwhelmingly liberal and Democratic movie-makers would prefer the "Palin is an ignoramus" parts, rather than the parts that might have made Hillary and Obama look petty.
“Game Change” the book is an authoritative 448-page retelling of all 500 or more days of the 2008 presidential campaign. “Game Change” the film, to be shown by HBO on Saturday night, is a reconstruction of the two months when Sarah Palin was running for vice president on John McCain’s ticket.
The difference between the two has sparked conspiracy theories among conservative allies of Ms. Palin, who comes across in both the book and the film as woefully unprepared for the campaign and for the vice presidency. The film, they assert, was conceived by Hollywood liberals to undermine a future run for president by Ms. Palin, who has pre-emptively attacked the film as a work of fiction, though she says she has not seen it.
Others also have questioned the focus on Ms. Palin, among them the conservative columnist Byron York, who wrote last month, “Why did Hollywood focus on only one-half of ‘Game Change’? The other half would have made a great movie.”
The answers are numerous -- and probably disappointing to conspiratorialists. “There were a number of films in the book,” said Len Amato, the president of HBO Films. “Our job was to zero in on the best one.”
HBO at first tried to translate the hard-fought primary campaign between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton into movie form, but the script for it was unwieldy (and the prospect of casting an actor to play a sitting president was noxious to some people involved). On the other hand, the selection of Ms. Palin, then governor of Alaska, as a vice presidential candidate was compact enough for a two-hour movie.
Times Watch can name at least two movies starring the character of President George W. Bush released during his presidency: "W," by Oliver Stone from 2008, and "Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay" the same year. Where was the "noxiousness" back then? As for screenplay concerns, one can easily imagine a higher aesthetic standard being applied to a treatment of the Obama-Clinton race than one that makes fun of Palin, who is reviled in Hollywood circles.
Mr. Plepler and Mr. Amato denied that the film had a political agenda or that its release during the 2012 Republican primaries had any strategic purpose. Although no evidence exists to suggest otherwise, they know the accusations will be made. In a Fox News interview on Saturday, Ms. Palin cast the film as a product of a “pro-leftist, pro-Barack Obama machine,” and added, “Hollywood lies are Hollywood lies.”
Stelter relayed more convenient-sounding excuses as to why no one would possibly want to watch two Democrats tearing into each other on HBO:
HBO did, and had an Obama-Clinton script commissioned, but it did not satisfy the people involved. “I found it to be very interesting, compelling, but it just seemed like it needed a mini-series to cover it all,” Mr. Roach said.....Furthermore, he thought, the tension between Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton was just as evident in public as it was in private, spoiling some of the thrill for viewers who had already watched the campaign play out on television. But in the Palin chapters, he said, “what was happening behind the scenes was 10 times more amazing than what was happening in the public eye.” When he reread the chapters after Mr. Roach’s call, “I was amazed by how beautifully it was going to beat out as a movie.”
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
The liberals are still
Submitted by robert108 on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 3:28pm.
The liberals are still soiling their diapers in fear of Sarah.
I love how they keep
Submitted by kareling on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 4:09pm.
I love how they keep criticizing the fact that Palin attacked the film for being a work of fiction when she hasn't even seen it. How much of Fox News do they watch? How often do they listen to Rush?
I believe it was George Bernard Shaw who said that one does not need to eat the entire egg to know it's rotten.
Typical Hollywood
Submitted by I hate marxists on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:07pm.
The left definitely hate smart attractive women that have integrity and talk facts with passion,they much rather have idiots like Jump for Joy Behar and the like. Let's face it, the US is going separate ways and what I mean is that we're never going to get along with each other as a whole so let's divide the line and take sides now. Your choice is either you want leftists running this country and destroy the freedom of religion, freedom of thought, freedom of expression unless you agree with their doctrine, freedom to decide of you want to be monetarily successful or not. Jealousy breeds anger and the left are definitely angry people.
I love my country but I dislike politicians who tell me how to live and try to take away my very existence
Typical Hollywood
Submitted by I hate marxists on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:07pm.
The left definitely hate smart attractive women that have integrity and talk facts with passion,they much rather have idiots like Jump for Joy Behar and the like. Let's face it, the US is going separate ways and what I mean is that we're never going to get along with each other as a whole so let's divide the line and take sides now. Your choice is either you want leftists running this country and destroy the freedom of religion, freedom of thought, freedom of expression unless you agree with their doctrine, freedom to decide of you want to be monetarily successful or not. Jealousy breeds anger and the left are definitely angry people.
I love my country but I dislike politicians who tell me how to live and try to take away my very existence
Another example
Submitted by LinTaylor on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 5:14pm.
"Transformers", released in 2007, has an off-screen Bush kicking back on Air Force One and asking an aide to get him a snack while a war between two groups of alien robots rages on the streets of America. In contrast, the sequel ("Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen", 2009) makes deliberate references to Barack Obama being the man behind the joint taskforce of US military and the Autobots (the good Transformers).
Concerning conspiracy theories
Submitted by needle on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:23pm.
“NYT's Stelter Defends Hollywood, Dismisses Idea of Palin-Hatred as 'Conspiracy Theory'”
Here is a theory – not a conspiracy theory, just a plain and simple theory: Stelter did not see “Undefeated,” and in particular he missed the opening first few minutes of Hollywood and media types spewing their raw hatred of Sarah Palin. If he had seen that -- Stephen K. Bannon could have made the whole movie just one very long succession of similar bile pouring forth from just about everybody in Hollywood – Stelter could not have dismissed Hollywood’s PDS as 'Conspiracy Theory,' unless, of course, Stelter was part of the NYT.
You want a conspiracy theory? How about the notion that the NYT is the newspaper of record?
I hear such nonsense from liberals from time to time; and even though they do not always say it explicitly, it is plenty evident that that is what they actually think.
- Looking forward to the self-annihilation of the Manipulated Stories Machine.
Oh, we can't criticize Ear Leader, can we?
Submitted by Mary Louise Turner on Mon, 03/05/2012 - 7:47pm.
There's a good reason you guys at HBO chose to skip the parts of "Game Change" where Ears is actually being criticized (that in itself is a surprise, considering that libs wrote that book!) HBO's parent company gave millions to his campaign in 2008, and we can't criticize Ear Leader, can we?