Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 18, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Benghazi Fiasco
  • Gosnell Trial
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Clay Waters's blog
  • Bozell Column: 'Progress' Gets Canceled
  • CNN's Banfield: 'Take Me Off the Ledge' and Tell Me IRS Audits Weren't Political
  • NBC's Williams Ready to Move On: 'It's Tough to Know the Staying Power of Any Given Scandal'
  • Video: Bozell, Hannity Amused That Obama Sycophant Chris Matthews Worried Obama's White House Filled with Yes-Men
  • Luke Russert: 'Smart' House Republicans Aren't The 'God, Guns & Guts People'
  • Tea Partiers Confront Comcast CEO: Why Would a Conservative Want Their Money to Pay Al Sharpton's Salary?
  • Bob Schieffer Spins Obama Scandals: White House Not Like Nixon's, Which Had Burglars and Bomb Plots
  • NBC's Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, 'The Voters Will Punish Them'

Oh No! Former Klansman Was 'Appalled' by Rick Santorum's 'Insolence' Says NYTimes Reporter

By Clay Waters | January 11, 2012 | 11:58

A  A

New York Times political profile writer Mark Leibovich, in Manchester, N.H. on Saturday, filed “The Santorum of 2012 Comes From a Long History of Political Brawling.” Times Watch sees a clear preference for Democrats and hostility toward Republican subjects in Leibovich’s writing, and this profile of GOP candidate and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum is certainly not a game-changer in that regard, even citing the late Sen. Robert Byrd, a Democrat and former local Klan leader, as some kind of moral authority against Santorum.

Rick Santorum loves professional wrestling, and has been thrilled to meet savage icons of the squared circle like Bruno Sammartino, Gorilla Monsoon and Hulk Hogan. He even lobbied for the World Wrestling Foundation for a while.

When the former senator, a Pennsylvania Republican, was seeking re-election in 2006, he appeared in a campaign advertisement standing in a ring surrounded by pugilists trading eye gouges and body slams. “It makes more sense to wrestle with America’s problems than with each other,” the candidate said.

That ad, though, concludes with Mr. Santorum decking one of the wrestlers with a brutal elbow smash -- a move that illustrates his no-holds-barred political style. People in both parties over the years have accused him of hotheaded name-calling, reliance on immature antics and attempts to reduce politics to steel-cage matches between people cast as heroes or heels.

“He would attack people in a smug way that was harder-edged and more insulting than was necessary, said Mark Salter, the former chief of staff to Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican, adding that lawmakers in both parties shared this view. “He was a bully who was not a potent enough force to be a bully.”

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

...

Former colleagues from his years in Washington, though, still remember his belligerence. One of Mr. Santorum’s first acts in the Senate was to attack Mark Hatfield, an Oregon Republican, for opposing a balanced-budget amendment that Mr. Santorum advocated, even suggesting that Mr. Hatfield, a veteran lawmaker, be sacked as chairman of the Appropriations Committee.

As a senator, Mr. Santorum bemoaned the lack of “statesmanship” in the chamber, which many of his colleagues found particularly rich given his own decorum-busting statements (he referred to President Bill Clinton in speeches as “that guy”), tactics (as a freshman, Mr. Santorum held a “Where’s Bill?” placard on the Senate floor to demand that Mr. Clinton submit a balanced budget) and refusal to apologize (he called Senator Robert Torricelli a liar and explained it away as merely “calling a spade a spade”). He acquired the nickname Senator Slash, which could also work as a pro wrestling character.
 

In a galling move, Leibovich actually harkened back to the late Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd, a former Klansman and local Klan leader, to condemn Santorum for his comments on the Senate floor during the Clinton years.
 

The late Senator Robert C. Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat and one of the most devout traditionalists in the chamber, was appalled by Mr. Santorum. After the younger man accused Mr. Clinton of speaking “bald-faced untruths,” Mr. Byrd delivered a blistering speech in which he derided his colleague’s “insolence” and “rude language” and suggested that Mr. Santorum might be better-suited to “an alehouse or beer tavern.” He lamented that he had lived long enough “to see Pygmies stride like colossuses” in the August chamber.

Mr. Santorum’s antics in the budget debate inspired Senator Bob Kerrey, Democrat of Nebraska, to make a semifamous remark that “santorum” was in fact a Latin word for an anatomical vulgarity. Mr. Santorum complained, and Mr. Kerrey clarified his remark.

About the Author

Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times. Click here to follow Clay Waters on Twitter.
  • Bias by Omission
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Mark Leibovich
  • Rick Santorum
  • Robert Byrd
  • New York Times
  • TimesWatch
  • Clay Waters's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Byrd was afraid Santorum

Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 12:36pm.

Byrd was afraid Santorum would bring up his clan dealings.

Non, je ne regrette rien. "You aren't angry because I might be a racist, you're angry because you know I'm right".
  • Login to post comments

Sen. Byrd had lived long enough to have said many things . .

Submitted by Gary Hall on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 12:41pm.

Sen. Byrd had lived long enough to have said many things . .

. . like this

"The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth ... in every state in the Union."
"I should [rather] die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

"The late Senator Robert C. Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat and one of the most devout traditionalists in the chamber, was appalled . ."

Who cares what Robert Byrd was appalled by.

(;~/ gary

  • Login to post comments

True, Gary...Byrd wrote that

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:28am.

65 years ago. And he renounced and profusedly apologized for his Klan involvement many times in later years--a lesson Strom Thurmond could have learned and applied to his own racist past, but, by all accounts, chose not to.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

So Byrd, the Dem, gets the usual pass from you, and ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:43am.

the Republican Strom Thurmond doesn't.

Is "by all accounts" an escape hatch clause?

MD

 

 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Why do you equate placing an issue in historical perspective

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:57am.

with giving someone a pass? Oh, I forgot. You're a rigid ideologue and therefore timing, context, and later mitigation and remorse are absolutely meaningless. In fact, such things are not even supposed to be mentioned.

As far as Thurmond, I don't have any idea what he may have felt or said in private which went unreported. So, yes, to that extent "by all accounts" is an escape hatch clause.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Historical perspective---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 2:42am.

my ass.

You opine with your usual defense of any and all things related to Democrats, while insisting that anyone who disagrees is displaying rigidity as an ideologue.

Bernard "Bernie" Goldberg:  " A fish doesn't know it is wet."   How appropriate reference you charging others with being an ideologue.

Mitigation?  Robert Byrd?  How so?

Remorse?  Robert Byrd?  Because he said so?

You have no idea what Thurmond may have felt or said in private; but because the racist slime bucket Byrd mealy-mouthed some platitudes for political survival purposes, you patently kowtow to his statements.

Mention Byrd's 'remorse' all you like, as it heavily underscores your ideological bent.

Democrat, indeed.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

If it weren't for your cast-iron, mind-crushing ideology,

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 3:10am.

unrelenting cynicism, and immutable loathing of liberals and liberalism, your point or points would be virtually incomprehensible, absurdly presumptive, and so irrational as to be unarguable.

But, given the premise, your comment and questions are perfectly logical. Ludicrous, but logical.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Except for the fact, Jer, that you---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 5:55am.

don't appear to immutably loathe conservatives, your post reads like I would describe you as a lefty ideologue.

That you could nail it so well shows how correct I would be.

Good job.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Come on guys - Jer has a point

Submitted by Gary Hall on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 12:54pm.

. . but if Byrd was a Republican, it would not have mattered to our national media how many times he apologized - or set it straight.

Same for Byrd and all of his many "bridges to nowhere" -- they really don't exist in the print of the MSM. Kennedy and his crimes - not really an issue - doesn't need to be mentioned every time his name is mentioned, like it would be if he were a Republican.

Same for Bill Clinton. He doesn't even need to apologize for, or face any questions, about turning his back on Africa as President; on the HIV/Aids pandemic, on Rwanda, on the DR Congo (rape wars of the Congo - millions died), on Sierra Leone, on the Ivory Coast, on Blood Diamonds, and/or on Liberia and Darfur.

Clinton doesn't need to apologize for, or face any questions about, James Riady and friends or for the Dot.com (Enron) bubble fallout which left Bush with a recession and massive federal deficits.

Clinton doesn't need to apologize for, or face any questions about, the damage caused by creating the housing bubble and setting the stage for the sub-prime debt crisis.

Clinton doesn't need to apologize for, or face any questions about, looking the other way when the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan during the mid-90's, which in addition to the horrific genocides of it's people and untold suffering of so many women and children, gave Bin Laden a sanctuary from which to hang out and plan 9/11 and so many other attacks.

Clinton doesn't need to apologize for, or face any questions about, how he continued to insists in the summer of 2003, that he still believed that Bush had it right on Saddam's WMD's and need to remove Saddam and to bring a democracy to Iraq.

If Byrd was a Republican, the MSM would have never let him off the hook, no matter how many times he apologized.

(;~/ gary

  • Login to post comments

I understand why Jer has to stand up for---

Submitted by matthewdean on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 10:17pm.

Slick Willie, Byrd, or any other Democrat:

  1. Democrats, even the dead ones, desperately need a defender
  2. Jer is a left leaning Democrat

What tickles me is, that I comment, as a conservative, on a conservative site; while Jer, a left leaning Democrat, spends an absolute ton of time on this site defending the Dems and their personalities, policies, problems and peculiarities - all the while taking any and all opportunities to refer to me as an ideologue.

Jer be funny guy.

MD

 

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Matthew...

Submitted by Jer on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 11:29pm.

Do you have any idea of the demands upon my time and intellect involved in chipping away at the ideological grout which has accumulated inside your brain over the course of a lifetime, completely occluding the free flow of information and ideas?

This isn't an easy job.  The pay stinks.  And if I had known you would be my assignment, I would have opted for HotAir.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Always good to go with humor, Jer, ---

Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 1:33am.

especially after failing utterly to post anything in the way of ringing endorsements for the decisions or policies of your political heroes.

Try their approach - make something up out of whole cloth; or do the mind reading bit again wherein you assure all and sundry that Robert Byrd was serious when he mouthed words indicating he was remorseful for the hatred he personally spewed at American citizens with black skin.

MD

"The credibility of the story is undermined by the selection of sources." - (h/t Jer)
  • Login to post comments

Guidance requested please.

Submitted by The Vet on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 2:01am.

If Uncle Jer could provide us with the shelf life of racially motivated quotations, that would be most helpful. How long until a racial slur is forgiven. We only know now that it is somewhere below that of murder, which never expires.

Sen. Byrd was 28 when he made it. An adult age when your thoughts are fully formed.

The year was 1945. Nearly 80 years after the Civil War had rid the country of slavery and all males of age were given the right to vote. And the letter was concerning the integration of the military.

I urge all to read this story - My War on Two Fronts from American Legion magazine.

That man's story has no expiration date. He was born nine years after Sen. Byrd. The most fascinating part was his description of what it was like when he left the south. I say this because there were a lot of areas that did not, could not condone the remarks of Sen. Byrd at that time. So you can't really sit back and say, "well, you have to look at the morality of the time and put it in context."

  • Login to post comments

There is no expiration date, Vet...

Submitted by Jer on Sat, 01/14/2012 - 12:36am.

and the shelf life is permanent and eternal, although the force and effect of words and deeds and the harm they may cause or have caused can diminish over time. And the author/actor associated with those harmful words and deeds can impact the diminution by his or her subsequent words and deeds.

Apologies, retractions, and statements of remorse are important legally and morally, and forgiveness is not only a psychological boon but a central tenet of the Christian faith and a positive quality in religions generally.

I can't gauge Byrd's sincerity. But I do know that attitudes and views which prevailed regarding race in the 40's and 50's--particularly in certain regions of this country--evolved and enlightened in later years, even within the hearts and minds of many individuals who had in earlier times strongly embraced such views.

Jer

  • Login to post comments

Klanging their way to the top

Submitted by lrgon on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 1:13pm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_members_in_United_States_politics

"In 1924, Harry S. Truman was a judge in Jackson County, Missouri, ...friends Edgar Hinde and Spencer Salisbury advised him to join the Klan. The Klan was politically powerful in Jackson County, and two of Truman's opponents in the Democratic primary had Klan support. Truman refused at first, but paid the Klan's $10 membership fee, and a meeting with a Klan officer was arranged." ---Wikipedia

Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black was a Klansman and US senator but that didn't prevent FDR from nominating Hugo Black to the court. The US senate confirmed Hugo Black by a vote of 63 to 13.

  • Login to post comments

Shhhh boys and girls. 44 Presidents. 44 conspiracies. 1 loon.

Submitted by The Vet on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 1:52pm.

 Hey boys and girls, did you know President Truman did not want to win the Korean War? Yep. The loon doth speak.

President Truman used troops in Korea just to be at war. Only purpose. Being at war. Phweet.

President Truman did not want to win the Korean War.

Tell us more about President Truman, paultard. Do tell us more. And please you forgot to answer the questions about the stick fetching, naked wife viewing, Gitmo dogs. Please. Tell us about the sticks and the dogs at Gitmo.  Please. We like sticks. We like dogs. Come on. And then tell us about Ron Paul and the sticks and dogs and naked terrorist wives. You do your cause so much justice when you talk about the Gitmo dogs that fetch the sticks with the naked terrorist wives.

  • Login to post comments

the klan

Submitted by quipster on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:11pm.

well we do need something but i don't know if we need the klan back again!

quipster
  • Login to post comments

That "something" is the US Constitution

Submitted by lrgon on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 3:54pm.

Do you think that if congress obeyed it we've have this debt?

Drug addicts have more will power and backbone than the spineless congress that can't stop their addiction to spending.

The problem lies with congressmen with little to zero will power to VOTE NO to more debt. The spenders blame the Constitution instead of themselves!

"Somebody stop me! I can't help myself. I need a Balanced Budget Amendment to stop me from my addiction to spending!" No you don't congressman you need to get fired by the fed up electorate that entrusted you to obey the Constitution in the first place! If they obeyed it and followed article I, section 8 there would be no spending for welfare, foreign aid, this department and that agency and bureau,Planned Parenthood, EPA, ad nauseam.

  • Login to post comments

Just asking

Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 2:34pm.

I wonder how many lynchings and church fire-bombings Sen. Byrd participated in.

Americans keeping their own earnings is a Civil Right! Demand your Civil Rights!
  • Login to post comments

Considering that Byrd's spech was like he had Tourette's,

Submitted by drsamherman on Wed, 01/11/2012 - 11:48pm.

he had absolutely no standing to make such an idiotic statement. Byrd had a mouth that could only be described as needing a huge amount of soap applied to it over his political lifetime.

That a Ogasm NYT hack even had the temerity to quote someone using the term "insolence" in this day and age makes all of us wonder just how much worse it will get. Folks, stock up on surgical masks and gloves for this election.

  • Login to post comments

Can you say "Barack Obama"?

Submitted by motherbelt on Thu, 01/12/2012 - 8:01am.

He would attack people in a smug way that was harder-edged and more insulting than was necessary, said Mark Salter,

But I guess that's OK when one has "the power to be a bully."

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Is asking about what you pray for inappropriate for IRS? IRS commish not sure (Say Anything)
  • Another fed court invalidates Obama's NRLB recess appointments (Politico)
  • Former SecState Hillary Clinton's record leaves much to be desired (Kondracke)
  • Sen. Boxer is lying about impact of budget cuts on Benghazi security (WashPost)
  • Left-wing actor Cusack attacks Obama, Holder over AP scandal (Twitchy)
  • Dopey Chicago gun laws prevent museum from displaying unloaded WW2 relic (Fox News)
  • New Google Maps is flat, clean, user-friendly (Gizmodo)
  • New Google Maps looks spectacular (Mashable)
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: An Honest Examination of Race
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

ObamaCare's a Real Pain in the Neck
more cartoons
  • Romney: ‘I’m Not a Fan of the President’
  • Krauthammer on IRS Testimony: ‘You've Got to be a Knave or a Fool to Say That and an Idiot to Believe It’
  • Leno: GOP Should Repeal ObamaCare By Naming it Conservative Non-Profit and Letting IRS Take it Down
  • ABC Drama Warns of ‘Conservative Overlords’ Bringing Anti-Black ‘Salem Witch Trials’ to DC
  • Gay NBA Player’s Twin Brother Gets ‘I’m The Straight One’ T-shirt From Jimmy Kimmel
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use