Hard-Left PBS Vet Bill Moyers Returns, to Fulsome Praise from the New York Times
Reporter Elizabeth Jensen paid tribute to hard-left public television host-for-life Bill Moyers in the Sunday Arts & Leisure section, under the fulsome headline “He’s Back, Just as Curious as Ever.”
The MRC’s Brent Bozell paraded a list of Moyers' many hypocrisies and hard-left statements in a 2004 column:
It was Moyers who charged that Bush and Cheney and Co. were "feeding on the corpse of war." It was Moyers who compared people who wear flag pins to those who adored the Little Red Book of the communist mass-murderer Mao Zedong. It was Moyers who suggested the Republicans retaking the Senate in 2002 would unite Washington behind "eviscerating" the environment and transferring all the wealth from the "working people" to the rich, who apparently as a class have never held a job of any kind....Who can forget Moyers denouncing the cozy relationships between conservative foundations and conservative policy experts appearing on television as Moyers headed the Schumann Foundation and not only funded all his favorite left-wing wonks....?
None of that made it into Jensen’s piece on Moyers and his seemingly inevitable return to public television.
That didn’t last long. Just 20 months after retiring his PBS series “Bill Moyers Journal,” Mr. Moyers was back in the studio on a Wednesday morning in December, deep in conversation about moral political psychology with the author Jonathan Haidt.

The interview veered from Manichean thinking among baby boomers to the social conservative understanding of karma, all as it related to the roots of the country’s political divide. Mr. Moyers worked his way through a sheaf of notes, as the scheduled 90 minutes stretched a good hour longer. (“This is fun,” he said to his guest during a pause.) Emerging from the studio, he said he had decided mid-interview that the discussion would probably take up the entire hour on his new weekly program, rather than be a 20-minute segment.
“Bill Moyers Journal” ended in April 2010 because Mr. Moyers, now 77, said he needed a break from the incessant demands of weekly television. But there’s no sign he is easing up this time around.
The new show, which begins this month on public television stations, has a different name, “Moyers & Company,” and a warmer set, featuring a blue-and-green background. But much will carry over from the old program, including Mr. Moyers’s thoughtful interviews with thinkers who wouldn’t otherwise get much television face time and a focus on the country’s most pressing political and economic questions. “I’m coming back because in tumultuous times like these I relish the company of people who try to make sense of the tumult,” Mr. Moyers writes on his Web site, billmoyers.com.
It turns out Moyers got some help from a wealthy ally in the NYC nonprofit universe.
The seeds of Mr. Moyers’s return were planted several months after his last show ended by Vartan Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
When “Bill Moyers Journal” ended, “I was very sad,” Mr. Gregorian said in a telephone interview, praising the host’s intelligence and “the respect with which he approached everyone, whether he agreed with them, to know their ideas.” Mr. Moyers, he added, helps in “enlightening our democracy” -- a Carnegie mission -- by putting “before our nation questions that we should discuss.” The Carnegie Corporation, which was instrumental in the founding of public television, gave Mr. Moyers a lead gift of $2 million for the new show.
Jensen made only one brief reference to why not everyone succumbs to Moyers’ psuedo-intellectual spell. While Moyers was never called liberal, he was somehow a "target of some conservatives."
Mr. Moyers said he was unsure why PBS, where he has spent most of his career since 1971, declined the show for its main schedule. Some public television executives, who would not publicly comment on a sensitive issue, said they believed that PBS did not want to realign itself with Mr. Moyers, a longtime target of some conservatives, as it was fighting to keep its federal financing.
....
In the interview Mr. Moyers added that with the Web site, “we don’t have to worry about somebody at PBS losing sleep over the fact that David Stockman says the Republicans have lost their minds on taxes.”
Typically, there were no dissenting voices in Jensen’s piece.
Jensen performed similar service in an earlier profile of Moyers on May 2, 2010, under a headline that posed a question that only a liberal Times reader would ask: “How, Exactly, Do You Follow Bill Moyers?” Jensen focused on left-wing complaints about Newsweek editor Jon Meachem, the host of the program replacing Moyers' “Now on PBS,” without ever delving into conservative complaints about Moyers and his history of neo-Marxist rhetoric delivered in a just-folks Texas accent. Moyers was merely called “the lion of PBS.” Not even the “liberal lion.”
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Blinders on
Submitted by Tim Graham on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 8:24am.
Does Elizabeth Jensen know that conservatives exist? Only in that they somehow find Moyers controversial (but aren't worth quoting). Pathetic.
You gotta love libs
Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 9:34am.
Some conservatives "find" Moyers controversial but Tim Tebow IS "polarizing."
Tim. . not only conservatives. .
Submitted by Gary Hall on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 12:06pm.
. . but rather she (and Moyers, as well) seem to be unaware that a sizable majority of Americans hold very different views on the major issues in our country, than that of her radical leftist minority does.
It's not just conservatives - well, on the other hand, if they were to actually read the tea leaves (polls) they'd walk away thinking that a good 60-75% of the country was conservative; certainly relative to their positions.
I only wonder when Republicans get smart enough to understand that they could run on the position that they are the populist party - on immigration reform, on ObamaCare, on most abortion issues, on same sex marriage, on the size of government, on taxes, on cutting spending, on guns, on what shouldn't be taught in schools, and on American exceptional ism.
(;~>/ gary
He's baaaaaaak
Submitted by mcherr on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 10:04am.
"Just as curious as ever" Curious as in wierd.
“How, Exactly, Do You Follow Bill Moyers?” Certainly with a Department of Sanitation pushcart, a broom and a shovel.
- "It is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them. Using this kind of reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything about anything, without having to bother to deal with facts or logic." – Thomas Sowell
Moyers Curious?
Submitted by Tugboat Phil on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 11:01am.
The only thing he's curious about involves his rectal orifice and an earthen excavation.
And he's still not sure which is which.
⇒ He's curious yellow
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 10:43am.
He can sit in the stall next to Chris Matthews and they can pass bare-breasted pictures of Ear Leader under the partition to each other.
This must be something Moyers discovered about himself after trying to dig up homosexual dirt on Barry Goldwater.
The guy looks like an ugly
Submitted by killa37 on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 12:01pm.
The guy looks like an ugly version of my late grandmother, although she had a lot more sense than he's every been able to accumulate in his life.
The liberal
Submitted by grammajane on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 11:32am.
hacks at pbs are getting worried about 2012 so bring back the biggest hack of all to again, rant and rave about Conservatives and how awful they are and again blame Bush for every mistake possible.Pbs must be getting hard-up for viewers and decides to bring back another has been for an hour of hate, lies and BS from this arrogant so-called know it all. Wonder who his competician will be....matheews or schultz??
won't help them
Submitted by Mark81150 on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 10:22pm.
I can't think of a single conservative I know who watches the PBS shows,..
or independent,
or even a democrat,...
Most folks stopped watching PBS after Sesame St. and the few who do after that, quite after their favorite Brit comedies were dropped.
The kind of adult who watches PBS is more concerned about trying to impress folks with having watched it, than seriously taking anything away from it, like an opinion.
As Bernie Goldberg so eloquently phrased the Liberal's
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 1:01pm.
world view: "A fish doesn't know it's wet."
moyers
Submitted by angelann1 on Tue, 01/10/2012 - 1:33pm.
If we want marx we can read his crap ,we don't want marx on publicly funded venues !