Euro-Loving NYTimes Paints 'Isolated' Britain As 'Big Loser' in Battle Over EU Accord
British Prime Minister David Cameron was embraced by conservatives and euro-skeptics after rejecting a European Union agreement aimed at stabilizing the troubled economic union. Yet the tone of the New York Times news coverage is that he blundered, “isolating” Britain by failing to accept the accord’s requirements, including that members submit their budgets to the EU for approval even before being considered by their country’s own parliaments.
Sarah Lyall and Julia Werdigier reported from London Saturday, “In Rejecting Europe Pact, Cameron Is Isolated.”
When he rejected a new European accord on Friday that would bind the continent ever closer, Prime Minister David Cameron seemingly sacrificed Britain’s place in Europe to preserve the pre-eminence of the City, London’s financial district. The question now is whether his stance will someday seem justified, even prescient.
Mr. Cameron refused to go along with the new European plan of stricter fiscal oversight and discipline hammered out in Brussels this week, in great part because of fears that the City would be strangled by regulations emanating from Brussels. He evidently felt he had little choice, and given the virulence of the anti-Europe sentiment in his own Conservative Party, few were inclined to argue that point.
“I said if I couldn’t get adequate safeguards for Britain in a new European treaty, I wouldn’t agree to it,” Mr. Cameron said in a news conference. “What is on offer isn’t in Britain’s interests, so I didn’t agree to it.”
Lyall and Werdigier cited left-of-center critics, then his fellow national leaders.
But many experts questioned Mr. Cameron’s decision to take such a hard line, abandoning Britain’s traditional strategy of acting both within and without the European club.
....
It was clear after a marathon session on Thursday that Mr. Cameron had alienated his continental counterparts. Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, told reporters, “I really don’t believe David Cameron was ever with us at the table.” Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, at one point snubbed Mr. Cameron in a hallway, refusing to shake his hand.
Saturday’s lead story from Brussels by Steven Erlanger and Stephen Castle, “German Vision Prevails As European Leaders Agree on Fiscal Treat – Britain Is Left in Isolation as Euro Zone Adopts Tighter Spending Controls,” also emphasized a country pushed to the sidelines:
Europe’s worst financial crisis in generations is forging a new European Union, pushing Britain to the sidelines and creating a more integrated, fiscally disciplined core of nations under the auspices of a resurgent Germany.
....
The big loser in Brussels was Britain, which had endorsed the 1991 Maastricht Treaty on European integration but opted out of the new euro common currency to preserve its economic and monetary independence.
Prime Minister David Cameron, a Conservative and self-acknowledged “euroskeptic,” was isolated in his refusal to allow the German prescription of “more Europe” -- to give teeth to fiscal pledges underpinning the euro.
Mr. Cameron was perceived as having made a poor gamble in opposing the push by Mrs. Merkel and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, embittering relations and possibly damaging his standing at home. Though some other countries, including Denmark and Hungary, initially shared Britain’s skepticism of the German-led agreement, only Britain ultimately rejected it.
And on the front of Monday’s Business section, reporter Landon Thomas Jr. saw potential financial harm in “A Stark Step Away From Europe – In Britain’s Bid to Shield Banks, a Threat to Its Influence.”
Has Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain hurt his country’s powerful financial services industry more than he has helped it?
Some in Britain worry that Prime Minister David Cameron has further estranged the country from Europe's policy inner circle.
Many bankers and economists are pondering that question after Mr. Cameron’s surprising decision last week to leave Britain out of a historic accord aimed at moving Europe closer to political as well as monetary union.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Greece is not the loser, it
Submitted by Edhenry on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 12:04pm.
Greece is not the loser, it is Britain?
Sovereignty is secondary to a "world order" to assist undisciplined governments.
They're isolated from the Titanic
Submitted by Callawyn on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 12:09pm.
EU and the Euro are imploding, and England isolated itself from the coming disaster.
How is that not a smart move?
Where are all the Liberals
Submitted by Liberallies on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 12:21pm.
Where are all the Liberals now who have always pointed to Europe as this great socialist paradise. Europe is in economic and moral decline. All the regulations, all the socialist policies have done is lead Europe to collectively jump off a cliff. Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy are the worst and what we hear about here in America from our news. But all of Europe is in great and deep financial trouble. Why? Thanks to the socialist economic policies that Liberals here in the USA want to implement and which Obama has been implementing.
Why are socialist, Liberals so stubborn? why? Did they not learn from Japan's two lost decades? From Europes economic, cultural and moral decline?
Europe=Socialism. Europe=Failure
England may have isolated itself from the European failure, but England has done a lot of self harm. Let's see if the English ship can be corrected.
The Euro Zone equivalent of Obamacare
Submitted by Galvanic on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 12:45pm.
The UK was wise not to trade in its own currency for the Euro. Now, the desperate EU needs the UK to surrender its fiscal sovereignty and join an overly, centrally regulated budget scheme in order to help bail out the dying economies of Greece, Italy, et al.
It's not the new rules that really matter, because the losers will always find ways to skirt them. If the rules mattered, the UK's participation wouldn't matter since it is relatively responsible with its budget.
Rather, it's the UK's solvency that is required to prop up the Euro Zone.
It's not unlike the Obamacare mandates that are now being in court.
The big loser is the Euro.
Conerned about the UK
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 12:47pm.
I'm a little concerned about the position the UK is finding itself in. They have a full on invasion of Muslims that could do something sinister at any time from within(France is in the same boat if not worse). Now they are apparently going to be isolated from the EU as well, but it's not just isolation that bothers me, the EU could combine what "might" it might have and take some sort of action against the UK. It would have to have a helluva reason for doing so, but I wouldn't put it past the EU to do it out of desperation or something.
I hope they hold fast. The EU was a joke from the get-go.
-Jon
Didn't this movie run before?
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 1:18pm.
" 'isolating' Britain by failing to accept the accord’s requirements"
I think it starred Neville Chamberlain, who accepted the accords of "peace in our time," before Hltler then attempted to rule the world and threw the accords out the window.
That left it to Churchill to inject a little reality, and help Britain realize that there are worst things than being "isolated" from the rest of Europe.
Amazing how the NYT got it wrong then about Hitler (and Stalin) and they're still getting it wrong.
Looking at the EU I think of
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 2:19pm.
Looking at the EU I think of all the leftists who want a world government. Just think if the USA was required to submit our budget to a world government?
Cameron made exactly the right move as the EU is sinking...
Submitted by Dave. on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 2:31pm.
...under the weight of its bloated and increasingly tyrannical bureaucracy.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
Yes, theyre just a far away island!
Submitted by NJRightWinger12 on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 3:03pm.
Too bad they dont have any kind of Chunnel to connect it to the Mainland,,ohh, maybe some day someone will build some kind of boat to sail towards the British Isles!
Europe rambles
Submitted by Unsane on Tue, 12/13/2011 - 8:59pm.
The Eurozone leaders had zero business asking The Right Honourable Gentleman anything. Because, lest Sarkozy and Merkel (et al) forget, Britain isn't in the fricking Eurozone!
And it's just as well. When the euro first came out, I could not figure out why it got as highly valued as it was. See, very few governments are actually bothering to follow the Stability and Growth Pact. France and Germany ignored it every chance they could. Britain was right to stay out of it, and PM Cameron would have been a fool to sign onto anything bailing the Continent out.
In fact, there are quite a few countries in the EU enjoying a bit of Schadenfreude. Britain, Sweden, Denmark, and other countries that opted out of the euro. Norway is probably laughing hardest as they belong to neither.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)