NYT's Cowell Looks Fondly on Post-War Austerity Versus 'Newest Altars to Consumption and Greed'
New York Times correspondent Alan Cowell issued a moralistic “Memo from London” on Monday on the humble joys of post-World War II austerity compared to today, where the "have-nots" are tempted by things they cannot have: “As the riots in London and elsewhere in August seemed to show, the profound gulf between haves and have-nots has been magnified by the inequalities and envies of a society that has built its newest altars to consumption and greed.”
Cowell used the memoir of a left-wing intellectual to make his point in Monday’s “New Austerity Incites a Bitterness the Postwar Generation Did Without.”
Before he died of Lou Gehrig’s disease in 2010, the historian Tony Judt recalled childhood days just after World War II in a debilitated Britain that was slowly ceding its empire and its pre-eminence.
“Clothes were rationed until 1949, cheap and simple ‘utility furniture’ until 1952, food until 1954,” he wrote in a memoir, concluding that austerity in “that bare-bones age” was “not just an economic condition: it aspired to a public ethic.”
It was not just in Britain.
....
The difference now is that the taste for wealth, the aspiration to automatic betterment and the assumption of ever-expanding horizons have become universal, cemented by the growth of the European Union and the adoption of a single currency, the euro, that has spread a leavening of prosperity among the 17 countries in the union that use it.
In Mr. Judt’s early days, after the grinding deprivation of a world war, austerity trumped global conflict. Now, the point of departure is prosperity, a fool’s paradise in which Europeans came to see affluence as a state of being, a birthright.
....
As the riots in London and elsewhere in August seemed to show, the profound gulf between haves and have-nots has been magnified by the inequalities and envies of a society that has built its newest altars to consumption and greed.
....
In Mr. Judt’s day, austerity guaranteed a minimum level of access to basic supplies, the harbinger of better days; now, austerity is about the removal or diminution of jobs, pensions, comforts and benefits that have accrued since then -- the herald, thus, of much darker times.
Previously, the London-based Cowell has used his reporting to flash his personal opposition to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
been known for ages
Submitted by Agnostic on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 9:57am.
If people use all their energy in surviving and fear they will not have the resources to practice in envy and class hatred against their governments.
Capitalism changed that by giving the opportunity for success to more than those born into opportunity. The bad decisions in Capitalism (excessive pensions and bad investments) should have been punished by the markets - without government involvement. A striation of markets creates opportunity for increased and diverse market places. Excessive government involvement prevents striation efficiency and enlarges the 'wealth gap'. A limited amount of government influence is a necessity - more than a little government interference slowly erodes the system.
Proggie's Rewriting/Redefining of EVERYTHING.
Submitted by Annie Ashe Fields on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 11:00am.
GREED: Greed used to be gluttonous covetousness - no matter who was doing it or why.
Now, if you are in OWS, and just feel wronged, deprived, or otherwise locked out of what you have not been able to earn on your own, it's not greed they are expressing, it's righteous indignation at income inequality.
I dunno... In my stupid, simple America, when you look at some guy who's done well and rage "GIMME!!," that's GREED. Dangerous greed, based on an utterly unmerited, misplaced sense of self-entitled covetousness.
I could go on... There's whole DICTIONARY full of words these people have changed and it makes me cranky.
Bogus, Britain rationed into
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Tue, 11/15/2011 - 1:26pm.
Bogus, Britain rationed into the 1950's because they were broke, the British citizen weren't any to happy about it. Only idiot leftist dreams of failure.