'Do the Bankers Get It?' Asks Condescending New York Times
By criticizing the leftist Wall Street sit-in, bankers risk showing they don’t “get it,” New York Times reporters Nelson Schwartz and Eric Dash condescendingly suggested in a story at the top of the front page of Saturday’s Business Day, “In Private, Wall St. Bankers Dismiss Protesters as Unsophisticated.”
Publicly, bankers say they understand the anger at Wall Street -- but believe they are misunderstood by the protesters camped on their doorstep.
“Anybody who dismisses them publicly is putting a bull's-eye on their back,” said one hedge fund manager of the protesters.
But when they speak privately, it is often a different story.
“Most people view it as a ragtag group looking for sex, drugs and rock ’n’ roll,” said one top hedge fund manager.
“It’s not a middle-class uprising,” adds another veteran bank executive. “It’s fringe groups. It’s people who have the time to do this.”
As the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations have grown and spread to other cities, an open question is: Do the bankers get it? Their different worldview speaks volumes about the wide chasms that have opened over who is to blame for the continuing economic malaise and what is best for the country.
Some on Wall Street viewed the protesters with disdain, and a degree of caution, as hundreds marched through the financial district on Friday. Others say they feel their pain, but are befuddled about what they are supposed to do to ease it. A few even feel personally attacked, and say the Occupy Wall Street protesters who have been in Zuccotti Park for weeks are just bitter about their own economic fate and looking for an easy target. If anything, they say, people should show some gratitude.
The Times found some open-minded bankers as well who patted themselves on the back in print for their understanding of the protesters' concerns. And just who are these “some” who truly believe these protesters will be marching on banks for years?
A smaller group of bank executives are taking the protests more seriously. They see them as a sign of the growing economic divide in this country -- and are even monitoring the latest developments on Twitter. While peaceful so far, the demonstrations at Bank of America, Chase and Wells Fargo branches from San Francisco to Peoria are eerily similar to those routinely seen at Citibank outposts in Athens, Hong Kong, and in other overseas markets. Some believe it could be years before the swarms of protesters end their marches on bank branches.
A few outspoken members of the financial industry have broken ranks with their more skeptical brethren to say they understand a bit of the outrage of the Occupy Wall Street crowd.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
IMHO, I don't think they
Submitted by Soldat44 on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 4:27pm.
IMHO, I don't think they care.
'Do the Bankers Get It?'
Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 4:47pm.
Somehow I think they're about to - IYGMD.
As for these idiot protesters, they need to be hanging out in front of Bawney Fwank's house, as he was chief among those that forced the banks to loan money to people who could never pay it back, and that's is what got this mess started to beging with.
-Dave
Vote for the American in November
I wonder ....
Submitted by Fredy on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 5:35pm.
Have these protesters ever heard of:
Countrywide,
WAMU,
Wachovia,
Merryl Lynch,
Bear Stearns,
IndyMac,
and many other large banking concerns,
or any of the hundreds of smaller banks that have shown up on the FDIC closed list since the middle of 2008?
Seems like there were more than a few bankers that did not survive this mess.
Oddly, I agree with at least one protesters call for the return of Glass-Steagle.
Glass-Steagle
Submitted by Radical1979 on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 5:37pm.
How many of the protestors actually know what Glass-Steagle is?
I was talking to a man last week who is all for the OWS, but he had never heard of the Community Reinvestment Act, or probably much else.
Speaking of what the protestors "know"
Submitted by Blonde on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 5:48pm.
I just have to ask....do they know how to find their behinds with both hands?
Because their demands make me wonder....and go hmmmm.
Handy Reference Guide to Obama's Gaffes and Goofs ~ Currently Numbering 200 (and Counting)
I listen to a local radio,
Submitted by Hunter12 on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 6:17pm.
I listen to a local radio, where the host, who is a conservative, let's the liberals come on and talk about the "do-nothing" Republicans and how they are the root of all current problems with the country and the economy. I guess he does it to be polite. I wish he would once ask the stupid lib if he'd ever voted for a candidate who uttered the phrase "My opponent doesn't want you to have your share of the American dream!". It was giving these people who didn't want to work for it, something for nothing, ordering the banks to do it, and now we've got the idiots who drove the dream into the ground back for another round of "give me something for nothing" again because I pissed away that last slice you handed me. I see a lot of good coming out of this. The unions and the Democrats are gloming on to the OWS crowd, so you know they're basically PsOS, since likes attract.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Sir Winston Churchill
Level Playing Field
Submitted by Kingfish17 on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 6:24pm.
I've listened to plenty of YouTube vids where the protesters are complaining about how all they want is a level playing field and they want the same treatment that the bailed-out "banksters" got.
So I guess they are saying they should have to pay back their student loans, with interest, just like the banks paid back their "loans"?
"You can’t go take a trip to Las Vegas...on the taxpayer’s dime." Barack Obama
It wasn't the bankers
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 11:14pm.
It wasn't the banks that got "bailed out," it was the depositors. The people like you and I who were about to lose their money thanks to deadbeats like the Occupiers not repaying their loans.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
Publicly too.
Submitted by The Vet on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 6:37pm.
I have my entire life savings on Wall Street. My 401k and IRAs. I LOVE WALL STREET. I LOVE CORPORATIONS. They let me pick good companies that are paying raising dividends. I pay a paltry sum to have the honor of doing that. THANK YOU WALL STREET! I own some of the biggest bank names in this country. Yeah, they ain't recovered yet and I am upside down on them. But since I can buy stocks cheaply, I am diversified like a... Let's leave that one. I have had plenty of others make up for what (on paper) losses I had with the big banks. I LOVE BIG BANKS. I LOVE WALL STREET. I LOVE CORPORATIONS.
THANK YOU WALL STREET FOR LETTING A LITTLE GUY LIKE ME FUND MY RETIREMENT.
THANK YOU WITH ALL MY HEART.
I don't know about the "bankers"...
Submitted by CobraMan on Mon, 10/17/2011 - 11:06pm.
I don't know about the "bankers," but the depositors "get it." They all know who's best to safeguard their hard earned money. Suppose the "occupiers" are successful and thousands of banks close across the country? What going to happen to several hundreds of billions of dollars of other people's money? Will they hide it under their mattresses, bury it in the back yard, stash it away in Mason Jars? What about all the loans banks make every day, loans that depend upon the bank's deposits? Who's going to supply the capital those loans are base on? It's a sure bet that the "occupiers" haven't given that any thought at all. Not that they would care much even if they thought about it.
Hay, idiots, most Americans NEED the banks, so we can keep our money nice and safe. WHY are you attacking the one place where I know my money is guaranteed to be when I need it? YOU many not have a bank account, but most people do, so leave the banks, and OUR money that is deposited in those banks, alone. So do us all favor and stop bashing "bankers," as I, for one, trust them implicitly, FAR more than I trust any of you!
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
what will happen to their trust funds?
Submitted by ohio granny on Tue, 10/18/2011 - 10:24am.
What will happen to the trust funds and investments of the supporters of OWS if they do manage to close down Wall Street and the banks? Where will the money come from to make payroll for the people working? How will anyone buy food if there are no corporations or banks? Do these fools protesting know how to grow their own food? Make their own clothes? How will they heat their homes? How do they even hope to get a job if there is not money to pay them?
I know questions, questions. But what kind of answers do they have? Are they just stupid or willfully ignorant?
Just asking.