NY Times Reporter Discusses Squelching of WikiLeaks, Leaves Out Her PR Work for Group
In her Tuesday posting on the New York Times's Internet-news blog “Bits,” the unusually named Jennifer 8. Lee (a food writer and former Times staff reporter who now occasionally shows up to write posts for “Bits” and the paper’s local “City Room” blog) interviewed Rebecca MacKinnon of the left-leaning New America Foundation. MacKinnon was speaking at the TEDGlobal conference in Edinburgh about the need to take Internet power away from private corporations and presumably hand it to the government.
Among the victims of private firms Lee brought up: the infamous anti-American anti-secrecy Wikileaks. But why didn’t Lee disclose she has done public relations work for the group in 2010?
Is the Internet due for a “Magna Carta moment?”
That is a question being posed by Rebecca MacKinnon, an Internet scholar at the New America Foundation, who argues that private corporations are exerting excessive power over the Internet and should have that power checked. Just as the English barons crafted the original Magna Carta in 1215 to constrain the power of the unpopular King John, she says, Internet users should organize and push back against the companies.
“The sovereigns of the Internet are acting like they have a divine right to govern,” said Ms. MacKinnon, whose book, ”Consent of the Networked,” will be published by Basic Books in January 2012. “They are in complete denial that there is something horrible they would ever do.” She gave a preview of her book at the TEDGlobal conference in Edinburgh on Tuesday morning and in an interview.
Lee’s Exhibit A was Wikileaks, run by the anti-American and all-around oddball Julian Assange, which the Times collaborated with to splash secret diplomatic cables on the front page of the Times for several days running:
The control that companies exert over the Internet in areas ranging from banking to freedom of speech has raised increasing levels of concern, especially in the wake of the controversial WikiLeaks release of State Department cables last year. Several companies constrained WikiLeaks, including Amazon, which kicked WikiLeaks off its servers after pressure from American lawmakers; PayPal, which suspended WikiLeaks’ account; and credit card companies, which refused to take donations for it.
Lee passed along those concerns about squeezing out WikiLeaks without squeezing in the fact she had done publicity work for Wikileaks in April 2010, when the group screened a clip at the National Press Club depicting a missile strike on a van in Baghdad that killed a Reuters driver and photographer.
Clint Hendler at Columbia Journalism Review dug out that fact (scroll down to Further update, #4) after citing one of Lee’s live Twitter posting from the screening (which did not disclose her Wikileaks publicity work) and having his curiosity piqued by the clip’s credit of a “Jenny Lee” for publicity help. Here’s Hendler’s last post update:
Just after 1pm, Jennifer 8. Lee acknowledged to CJR that she had helped WikiLeaks plan the roll out strategy, including working with YouTube to obtain an exemption for WikiLeaks to the site’s standard 10 minute video length limit. She added that she had not seen the video before this morning’s press conference.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
A couple of things: first,
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 1:21pm.
A couple of things: first, it's a blog entry, and second, I think we should be aware if and when government threatens private business. If these companies choose to do so of their own volition, that's one thing, but being "pressured" with typical government mob tactics is another.
Additionally, I think we should welcome the release of the missle-strike video in its entirety.
Do these people even recognize the irony?
Submitted by CobraMan on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 4:08pm.
"The control that companies exert over the Internet in areas ranging from banking to freedom of speech has raised increasing levels of concern, especially in the wake of the controversial WikiLeaks release of State Department cables last year."
Humm, is this the same WikiLeaks who tried to censure, suppress, the release of their own " confidential" information simply because such information may be embarrassing, damaging, to the founder and supporters of WikiLeaks? If that's not a clear cut case of attempted control of information, done by the very same people who scream "Freedom of Speech! Freedom of Information!," no less, then I don't know what is.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus. The US Supreme Court
Or Anwar al-Awlaki.
First things first, It's a Troll posting, on a blog
Submitted by upcountrywater on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 3:00pm.
Seen the video, "reporters" packing RPG's, POOF.
You Didn't Build That.
Which is reason to show the
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 3:29pm.
Which is reason to show the video in its entirety. I've seen it as well, and what they were calling an RPG may have been a camera. Again, we should welcome the release of these videos. Our government is supposedly accountable to us, after all.
Hmm... a Troll posting, on a blog...
Submitted by SickofLibs on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 3:49pm.
sounds vaguely familiar...
I've seen it, too,
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 4:03pm.
UCW. The video shows a "reporter" running with an RPG, and it also shows "reporters" carrying AK's. The army unit in contact reported incoming AK fire and RPG fire. And, why would a legitimate reporter go out to video insurgents attacking a combat unit of the US Army, seems that would be a good way to collect incoming 30mm rounds? Oops, that's what happened. Some would go to any length to try to turn an RPG, a long, tubular device with a conical warhead, into a 3-legged tripod, but it doesn't work.
Well, Could have been one of them RPG mounted web cam.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 4:31pm.
GoPro, RPG mount only $299.95
You Didn't Build That.
Yeah, first
Submitted by UpNorth on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 7:56pm.
it was a tripod, now it's a tripod, camera and "long, and tubular" lensy, thingee.
Must be the troll hates the military, along with cops.
AT 1:47 in the video, you can see a guy in a light shirt, dark pants, with an RPG.
At 2:07 you can see guys walking in the street with AK's.
At 2:27 you can see the guy with the RPG looking around the side of a building, with the RPG in hand.
Now, if Bradley Manning's best buddies chose to hang out with guys with weapons in civilian clothes(unlawful combatants), that's just too bad, they got lit up, and they deserved to get lit up, it's never a good idea to be in the vicinity of guys with guns.
A camera lens is also long
Submitted by Satchmo on Thu, 07/14/2011 - 4:43pm.
A camera lens is also long and tubular. There is no visible ordnance in the video. Looks like a camera with a lens of long focal length. No weapon is distinguishable on the video. Not saying that they aren't weapons, just that they aren't identifiable and all we have is the official government position, of course. Everyone supposedly distrusts government, except when it comes to the military.
A military photoanalyst, eh?---
Submitted by matthewdean on Fri, 07/15/2011 - 3:02am.
Ho-hum; just another field of expertise for ol' SatchelMouth.
Troll has got to be 500 years old to know so much in-depth stuff about the Constitution, incest, the proper way for the U.S. government to function, consensual sex between blood relatives, politics, physical attraction to the members of one's immediate family, the down and dirty tactics of American law enforcement that allows him to call them out as thugs.
The mind is boggled.
As is his.
MD
Inspymo, What fits under a trench coat? A tube or a cone.
Submitted by upcountrywater on Fri, 07/15/2011 - 4:29am.
it's a tube ER ah cone,
A tube or a CONE
Ok
Tube not a cone
500 years ago inventmo tried to change this very law by consensus: The basic laws of optics concerning magnification, image brightness, field of view, exit pupil and so on are the same for all optical instruments, be they binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, microscopes or telescopes.
Yup after 500 years still cones not tubes.
You Didn't Build That.