Let's Blame the Right for Everything: NY Times Ludicrously Labels 9-11 Truthers 'Right-Wing'
Is the right to blame for everything, even 9-11 Truthers?
New York Times Metro reporter Colin Moynihan botched some basic politics in his Friday metro section tribute to a leftist journalist and radio host, "At an On-Air Haven for Dissent, a Voice Is Silenced." Text box: "Taking a stand against 9/11 conspiracy theories."
Moynihan, who has made a cottage industry of issuing flattering coverage of prominent radical leftists, from domestic terrorist William Ayers to convicted terrorist-aiding lawyer Lynne Stewart, was covering the case of Bill Weinberg, a local radio host. Weinberg was fired from left-wing WBAI for accusing his hosts of "promoting fringe right-wing commentators and conspiracy theories claiming that the United States government was behind the destruction of the World Trade Center."
One problem: The so-called Truther movement is identified with the hard left, not the right. That may help explain why the Times has dealt with it in almost flattering fashion the few times that it has covered the subject at all. Most notorious was reporter Alan Feuer’s June 5, 2006 piece from a Truther convention in Chicago.
Moynihan either bungled facts or failed to correct misinformation from the radio host:
For nearly 20 years, an East Village journalist named Bill Weinberg has been a familiar late-night voice on the left-leaning radio station WBAI-FM (99.5), ruminating about radical politics, global turmoil and life in New York City.
In mid-March, however, the station canceled Mr. Weinberg’s program, the Moorish Orthodox Radio Crusade, after he accused WBAI of promoting fringe right-wing commentators and conspiracy theories claiming that the United States government was behind the destruction of the World Trade Center.
....
Mr. Weinberg said the disagreements that led to his departure began in 2009 when he questioned gifts sent to people who had donated money to the station. The gifts included documentary-style DVDs like "Painful Deceptions" and "Loose Change 9/11," which presented the destruction of the World Trade Center as "an inside job" orchestrated by the Bush administration or by foreign governments with ties to it.
"The output of the lugubrious mini-industry which has sprung up around 9/11 conspiranoia has become increasingly toxic over the passing years," Mr. Weinberg said on the air. "The most innocent of the DVDs and books are just poorly researched, merely exchanging the rigid dogma of the ‘official story’ for another rigid dogma, no more founded in empiricism or objectivity. But, not surprisingly, lots of creepy right-wing types have got on board, using 9/11 as the proverbial thin end of a wedge."
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
"One problem: The so-called
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 5:18pm.
"One problem: The so-called Truther movement is identified with the hard left, not the right."
There are elements from both the extreme right and left among the Truthers, but it's primarily a movement of the extreme right. Bill Weinberg mentioned two "documentaries" as examples. One, "Painful Deceptions," is the work of a right-wing writer who, among other charming attributes, is a Holocaust denier, while the producer of the other, "Loose Change 9/11," is Infowars' Alex Jones, uber-righty, and perhaps the single most prominent, most active Truther (who has appeared repeatedly on Fox News). The American Free Press, which has circulated many of the Truther stories (ever hear the one about the seismic data indicated a bomb?), is a neo-Nazi org. Earlier this year, Skeptic magazine published a survey of participants in We Are Change, the big Truther umbrella group. When it came to politics, it found that these participants "were overwhelmingly involved in right-wing politics, particularly with Ron Paul, the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party." And so on.
(That Sekptic article is apparently not available online, but is mentioned on Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement )
Hmmm nice try but the left own this one and using
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Sat, 05/28/2011 - 5:54pm.
Wiki as a source is like using the NY Slimes as a source. Anyone can edit that source and they may or may not correct it. Ron Paul is only fiscally conservative so wrong there. Van Jones and his ilk are the ringleaders of the truther movement and he's hardly right wing. Neo-Nazis believe in government control like socialist liberals do so they're not right wing. Alex Jones hates right wingers and calls himself a social lib not a right winger! Before you know it you'll call the Communist Manifesto right wing literature once it no longer serves your left wing ideology. Lefties use to adore Mussolini and Franco before WWII. Revisionist history only works in the lamestream media and on looney left wing blogs, not here.
Obviously, if you redefine
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Sat, 05/28/2011 - 8:44pm.
Obviously, if you redefine "right-wing" until none of the right-wingers are right-wingers anymore, you've got a point. Falling short of that, however, you have only an ignorance of the history and terminology in question (or a revisionism of it that preemptively marks the actual history as "revisionism" and hopes no one notices).
I didn't use Wiki as a source. I used Skeptic. I linked to Wiki because it referenced the study published in Skeptic (which is apparently not available online).
classicliberal---
Submitted by matthewdean on Sun, 05/29/2011 - 1:44am.
BS artist.
MD
Hmmm the only ignorant one if YOU
Submitted by gmaniac1 on Wed, 06/01/2011 - 4:42am.
If anyone is using revisionist history it's you and failed to defend your statement whatsoever. Not too surprising considering all you liberals can do is copy and paste your ideas from some "source" as stated previously. And you linked "skeptic" from "wiki." Okay I'll call your bluff and how is "skeptic" a worthy source? You liberals call someone else "ignorant" when you can't push you lies as fact. So as usual you lose and we win.
he a "catch" for sure
Submitted by Rackie on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 5:22pm.
Mister Bill is so irresistably charming I'm surprised he is not married.
Republicans and
Submitted by robert108 on Fri, 05/27/2011 - 7:51pm.
Republicans and conservatives, including Tea Party members, are not "right wing". That's just intellectual laziness.
"Republicans and
Submitted by classicliberal2 on Sat, 05/28/2011 - 12:33pm.
"Republicans and conservatives, including Tea Party members, are not 'right wing'."
That's only true of the liberal ones.
This is mostly false.
Submitted by wiwf on Sat, 05/28/2011 - 11:22am.
This is mostly false. Troofers are overwhelmingly liberal. However, I remember chatting with a few Ron Paul supporters in 2008 that were stuck in a conspiracy/X-Files mindset, and did believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy. It blew my mind.
Plus, 9/11 never was a conspiracy, so these people don't deserve any attention at this point. Kinda like the Birthers.