NYT's Jackie Calmes Declares GOP 'So Far to the Right' on Risky Budget Cutting
The ambitious, cost-trimming House Republican budget proposal put forward by Rep. Paul Ryan “is not going to become law anytime soon, if ever,” New York Times reporter Jackie Calmes assured us in her Wednesday “news analysis,” “A Conservative Vision, With Bipartisan Risks.” Yet it still “poses huge political risks for Republican candidates for Congress and for the White House in 2012.” A front-page, above-the-fold front-page photo teased the article, with the caption helpfully mentioning that Ryan’s budget “poses huge political risks for Republicans.”
Calmes, whose coverage is quite sympathetic to Obama’s fiscal priorities, especially his expensive “stimulus” package, immediately assured readers the conservative proposal didn’t have a snowball’s chance of becoming law:
The audacious long-term budget path that House Republicans outlined on Tuesday is not going to become law anytime soon, if ever. Senate Democrats and President Obama will see to that.
Even so, the plan rolled out by the Republican majority in the House figures to shake up this year’s already contentious budget debate as well as next year’s presidential politics. By its mix of deep cuts in taxes and domestic spending, and its shrinkage of the American safety net, the plan sets the conservative parameter of the debate over the nation’s budget priorities further to the right than at any time since the modern federal government began taking shape nearly eight decades ago.
The ambitions of the first budget rolled out by the new House Budget Committee chairman, Representative Paul D. Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, cannot be understated. It poses huge political risks for Republican candidates for Congress and for the White House in 2012. After Republicans successfully campaigned in last year’s midterm elections partly by criticizing Democrats for cutting Medicare as part of Mr. Obama’s health-care overhaul, they now propose to eventually privatize Medicare and turn Medicaid into a sharply limited block grant to states.
....
The House Republicans’ proposal poses challenges for Mr. Obama as well. Many Democratic strategists, including some inside the White House and the president’s re-election campaign, see mostly opportunity: Pleasantly surprised that Republicans have defined themselves so far to the right, they see a chance for Mr. Obama to stake out a middle ground. But with Republicans describing their move as a bold leadership stroke, their boast has the potential to feed a budding narrative -- that Mr. Obama has declined to lead in proposing the steps needed to rein in a federal debt that is growing unsustainably as the population ages and health care costs keep rising.
Calmes eventually noted Obama has not been a profile in presidential leadership, but continued the slanted ideological labeling.
His plan underscores just how much the influx of Republican newcomers to the House, many of them Tea Party adherents, have hardened conservatism there.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
NYT ??????
Submitted by John21 on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 2:59pm.
What else did you expect?
They are owned and operated by the far left; they made that deal with the devil decades ago. Just about the time they lost the last of their creditability.
The DNC and Obama could tell them that it would rain Oreo cookies and milk tomorrow and all the staff would be outside with buckets, and when it didn't happen they would write a story about how it was not the One's fault but Bush or the RNC or sabotage and therefore racist.
In 10 years when they are standing in a soup line to get their (bigger than yours) share from the pot they will be telling anyone stupid enough to listen (again) that it was the RNC, Bush, right wing conspiracy that wrecked the nation , not the gods of social welfare and big government liberals unions and Obama.
More navel-gazing
Submitted by Galvanic on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 3:20pm.
With our very national solvency at stake, it's not an issue over whether it will help or hurt Republicans in 2012.
IT'S ABOUT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
That's how everyone outside the Beltway views it. That's what motivated the Tea Partiers in 2010.
Only the trolls in the MSM weigh policy-making and budgets on the scale of political expediency vice the future of the nation.
And it's no doubt one of the major aspects of their irrelevency.
Shows How Far Left the Democrats are
Submitted by Comrade Jim on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 3:34pm.
that financial solvency of the nation appears far right. Democrats have to be over there in the territory of Soviet Economic Planning to think like that.
Am I the only one....
Submitted by almostacowboy on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 4:43pm.
who thinks Paul Ryan's plan for my future taxes are still too high? My wife and I only pay between 18-19% on adjusted gross income now, and he wants us to pay 25%. I don't think soooooooooo.
Are there any Conservative Capitalist republicans (small "r" intentional) left who think that the government has no right to the fruits of my labor (or theirs)?
The $64,000 question should
Submitted by motherbelt on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 4:47pm.
The $64,000 question should be: are these politicians more interested in saving the country than they are their jobs?
Are any of them willing to risk not getting re-elected in order to do the right thing?
No to both. Which is why we are screwed.
They talk about making the "hard choices."
<Chris Matthews imitation> HA!!
And I'm so furious about the lying and fear-mongering that has been going on....and I know it's going to cause the Republicans to fold.....
We need Diogenes searching the halls of government....
<sound of duct tape ripping off roll>
Calmes A Little Left Of Left Budgetwise
Submitted by Boil It Down on Wed, 04/06/2011 - 6:51pm.
So....Budget cuts that don't come near pulling us out of a crisis are risky? I'm sure she was OK with the radical outlandish spending of the last two plus years that threatens the very foundation of the country. It seems that clawing some of that back is just too worrysome for Calmes. She's actually cheering for the ultimate collapse to hasten and has no clue. -bidn-