The New York Times vs. Unjust State Spending Cuts: Florida Edition
The New York Times vs. state spending cuts, take four. Reporter Lizette Alvarez led off Friday’s National section with a story on the plight of unemployed Floridians: “The Jobless See A Lifeline at Risk - Florida Eyes Cut in Benefits.”
Alvarez’s story hyped the liberal compassion factor even more than a similar story in Wednesday’s Times, on a move in Michigan that will also trim state unemployment benefits from 26 weeks to 20.
In the year [Richard Dudenhoeffer has been collecting unemployment checks in Flagler County, where joblessness remains stubbornly high, Mr. Dudenhoeffer, 61, has not even gotten his foot in the door, despite his almost daily efforts to find a job, any job. No interviews. No phone calls. No e-mails. No flicker of hope.
Without charity and his $247 weekly unemployment check, he would lose it all, he said, starting with his mobile home and his car, a lifeline in a county with no public transportation.
....
The Florida House of Representatives approved a bill in March that would establish the deepest and most far-reaching cuts in unemployment benefits in the nation. Like the law signed in Michigan on Monday, the measure would reduce the number of weeks the unemployed could collect benefits from the standard 26 weeks to 20.
But the House proposal in Florida -- in a high-unemployment state that already has some of the lowest benefits -- takes it one step further by tying benefits to the unemployment rate. If the rate falls, so do the number of weeks of benefits. If the rate dips below 5 percent, the jobless would collect only 12 weeks of benefits, the lowest level.
This has workers worried in Florida, where the unemployment rate, while continuing to inch down, is 11.5 percent, considerably higher than the nation’s rate of 8.9 percent. Michigan’s rate is 10.4 percent.
Alvarez at least mentioned that the trims are necessary because Florida's unemployment fund (paid for by a tax on businesses) is in deficit. But she also got quite moralistic over the budget trim:
But to some here in Flagler County, where the economy rose higher but fell harder than in any other in Florida in the past decade, the idea of creating jobs by taking away meager benefits from people whose lives have been upended does not seem just. From 2000 to 2010, this slice of Florida, just north of Daytona Beach, had the highest population growth in the state, spurred by construction as houses multiplied along vast stretches of open land. The collapse here was equally drastic. Construction jobs disappeared practically overnight, and the county now has the state’s highest unemployment rate, 14.9 percent.
- Clay Waters's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
From 2000 to 2010, this slice
Submitted by motherbelt on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 8:22am.
From 2000 to 2010, this slice of Florida, just north of Daytona Beach, had the highest population growth in the state, spurred by construction as houses multiplied along vast stretches of open land. The collapse here was equally drastic. Construction jobs disappeared practically overnight, and the county now has the state’s highest unemployment rate, 14.9 percent.
So people moved there for construction jobs?
And now want to stay there on unemployment indefinitely?
need more background
Submitted by wizardjr on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:11am.
What's this guy's REAL story? Has he always been on welfare or unemployment? Is he a migrant from another state? What are his job skills? What was his last job? Why can't he go where the jobs are (somewhere someone is hiring)?
I've become very synical of late when hearing these stories or when some number is bandied about the the LSM. It usually turns out to be full on bull crap.
WORKING
Submitted by kinijane on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 12:55pm.
I would much rather see someone draw unemployment extra weeks than see those who never worked a day in their life draw a check month after month, year after year and never worked a day in their life and feel like they deserve it. At least the unemployed had to work some where, some time or they wouldn't be eligible. Also I think maybe this mans age is against him.
WORKING???
Submitted by DebinFla on Tue, 04/05/2011 - 9:38am.
You bring up a good point and I totally agree that those who simply will not work should not be rewarded by MY tax dollars, neither should criminals, which is what illegal aliens are, yet they are GIVEN money and benefits?? In what world could this system not cause economy problems? And even unemployment benefits should NOT go on forever. If the man is 61 and this is all he lives on, it seems to me he neglected to plan for his own future, not my fault, this is self inflicted, too. A quote I heard once applies here-- "Lack of planning on YOUR part, does not constitute an emergency on mine", or something along those lines.
Justice?
Submitted by Tenebrous on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 7:43pm.
Justice is not taking my money and giving it to people who aren't working! That's justice, you socialists.
Visions and Principles blog
Waaaaaaaaa!!
Submitted by Bob K on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:31pm.
So what do liberals think? That unemployment benefits should go on forever? Well, it is really not a question that needs to answered, I already now they do indeed think that is how it should be. They will only be happy when there is a guaranteed annual income, courtesy of taxpayers.
This is a sticky one. I have
Submitted by RR GOP on Mon, 04/04/2011 - 11:45pm.
This is a sticky one. I have no problem with the state lending a helping hand to those who have worked and have fallen on hard times, or those who truly can't work, but for that same reason (economy/jobs) the money available to the state to do things like this and carry on other routine functions is evaporating, private sector jobs are evaporating, so we're more likely to be in the same position (jobless), less tax money and so on.
I'm bracing myself for Weimar. I think all this is beyond the capability of either political party even assuming they have the best interests of the American people at heart.
"Under Capitalism, man exploits man. Under Communism it's just the opposite."
"All that Communism needs to make it successful is for someone to feed and clothe it."