In his weekly column, New York Times Public Editor Clark Hoyt ludicrously argued that Barack Obama has gotten tougher coverage since January 2007 (when Obama entered the race) than John McCain:
By my count, The Times has published more tough articles on Obama, 20, than on McCain, 13, since the beginning of last year.
The Times has never filed any story targeting Obama that remotely approaches the mendacity of its February 21 hit piece alleging a McCain affair with a telecommunications lobbyist (Hoyt himself at the time said the Times was wrong to run the affair allegations). Also, Hoyt's narrow definition of bias helpfully eliminates stories with asides about McCain's temper, or constant mentions of McCain's "gaffes."
Hoyt also avoids the paper's laudatory treatment of Obama's "race speech" in Philadelphia, delivered solely in response to troubles with his relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, but compared by the Times to speeches by John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King. Meanwhile the Times constantly hinted in both editorial and news stories that McCain was making racial appeals in his campaign advertising.
Hoyt's conclusion also ignored clear double standards in coverage. McCain campaign reporter Elisabeth Bumiller has three times brought up the fact that McCain has sometimes called the Czech Republic by its old name Czechoslovakia. Meanwhile, the Times has yet to report on Obama's "57 states" gaffe, or Obama's evident belief that the climactic scene in Alfred Hitchcock's "North by Northwest" (in which Cary Grant hangs off Mt. Rushmore) was actually shot on Mt. Rushmore. Neither does Hoyt's list factor in the two separate stories questioning McCain's eligibility because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone (rumors about Obama's birthplace have never been covered by the Times).
And Hoyt's emphasis on "tough" stories doesn't take into account the effect of soft-soap puffery like the June 5 "Many Blacks Find Joy in Unexpected Breakthrough." Also left off: the Times's rejection of a McCain op-ed opposing Obama's own Times op-ed supporting withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
During the Republican primary, John McCain did benefit from being the Times's version of an acceptably moderate Republican in a race that included Mitt Romney and the moderate but Times-loathed Rudy Giuliani. But that changed as soon as he clinched the GOP nomination.
—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
OBAMA CAM: TYPICAL LIB ANSWERS
October 7, 2008 - 19:46 ET by reelman46OBAMA CAMP: TYPICAL LIB ANSWERS
When guilty as sin the democrat spin machine can be depended upon to say one or more of the following:
1…You misunderstood
2…We (or I) were not aware
3…Its another republican smear
4…We have moved past that
5…Let’s talk about when the Republican…yada yada
6…Bush and Rove policies yada yada
7…We have modified our (my) position
8…Its out of context again
9…Its due to the past 8 years of
10.We have already responded
We live in a political era where just getting a straight firm clear
answer is nearly a miracle half the time. The media is so inept at
followup research questions. So inept due to bias. So inept due to some
false sense of the mission of the media (get to the truth). So inept
because they think its about them instead of the country and the
voters. So inept because questions should be the same as possible for
all candidates. So inept because they want sound bites for the next 2
weeks.
Will any lib media ask about the BHO alliance with Ayers? About
ACORN registering cons, illegals and the homeless? About what BHO
actually did in congress? About the fact thug dictators and Hamas
prefer him to win? About how taxes reduce gov-ment income? About how
small business does not pay capital gains? About the fact that pointing
at other bad behavior never excuses yours? About the fact BHO is rated
the #1 liberal and Biden #3? Fat chance.
And you wonder why Fox News is stomping the TV lib media into
oblivion and conservative talk radio is doing the same while biased
papers decay?
Doug Schexnayder, Ph.D. (theconservativecrawfish)
NYT Public Editor Ludicrously Argues Paper Tougher on Obama
October 7, 2008 - 19:53 ET by Scuba DudeHa Ha Ha Ha hA ha ha ha ha ha hee hee hee hee haa haa haa haa
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Wow, that is FUNNY!!!
Never knew the NYT has such a sense of humor.
It is, what it is
October 7, 2008 - 19:53 ET by Lee BoggsIf he feels the need to defend the NYT's credibility, then the NYT's credibility must need defending.
I used to access the NYT online
October 7, 2008 - 20:11 ET by NorthCoasterI used to access the NYT online version just to keep track of what they were saying when they were telling secrets and lying about Pres. Bush. I got tired of the bias so it is now blocked from my e-mail list.
This is a joke, right?
October 7, 2008 - 20:27 ET by Captain KirockClark Hoyt is really not this stupid is he?
He is either making a joke or he is just dishonest.
Barack told him so.
October 7, 2008 - 20:50 ET by FishFace222Barack told him so.
I agree with the NYT. Look
October 7, 2008 - 21:55 ET by ThisnThatI agree with the NYT. Look at how many Obama Op-eds they have rejected, and how many they have accepted from McCain. It's brutal out there.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
This "journalist" knows how
October 7, 2008 - 22:13 ET by d1carterThis "journalist" knows how to keep his job until the very end.