NYT's Roger Cohen Embarrasses Himself Over Obama, Appropriates 'Yes We Can' Phrase


Roger Cohen's column for the New York Times's international edition, "Beyond America's Original Sin," is the 1# read Times story at nytimes.com as of Friday morning, and it's no wonder -- Cohen basically endorses Barack Obama (not in so many words, as that would be a violation of finicky Times's regulations against columnists endorsing candidates).

The column itself is, frankly, embarrassing -- part Cohen apology for being born in apartheid South Africa, mostly Obama hagiography over his recent race speech that even appropriates the "Yes We Can" call-and-response slogan beloved of his more fervent supporters.

It takes bravery, and perhaps an unusual black-white vantage point, to navigate these places where hurt is profound, incomprehension the rule, just as it takes courage to say, as Obama did, that black "anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races."

Progress, since the Civil Rights Movement, or since apartheid, has assuaged the wounds of race but not closed them. To carry my part of shame is also to carry a clue to the vortexes of rancor for which Obama has uncovered words.

I understand the rage of his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, however abhorrent its expression at times. I admire Obama for saying: "I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community."

Watch Cohen actually parrot an Obama campaign slogan (actually less a slogan and more a screech from the self-congratulatory liberal ID):

Honesty feels heady right now. For seven years, we have lived with the arid, us-against-them formulas of Bush's menial mind, with the result that the nuanced exploration of America's hardest subject is almost giddying. Can it be that a human being, like Wright, or like Obama's grandmother, is actually inhabited by ambiguities? Can an inquiring mind actually explore the half-shades of truth?

Yes. It. Can.

The unimaginable South African transition that Nelson Mandela made possible is a reminder that leadership matters. Words matter. The clamoring now in the United States for a presidency that uplifts rather than demeans is a reflection of the intellectual desert of the Bush years.

Hillary Clinton said in January that: "You campaign in poetry, but you govern in prose." Wrong. America's had its fill of the prosaic.

Cohen has flashed his liberal bona fides before, in both columns and reporting, but nothing like this.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It takes bravery, and

It takes bravery, and perhaps an unusual black-white vantage point,

That's a crock. Obama doesn't have a black-white vantage point; at least not in his adult life. He seems to completely ignore his caucasian heritage. As his sister said of him, he is black, because that is "how he has named himself." He is not interested in straddling a line or seeing both sides.

For whatever reasons, he has made his choice.

motherbelt

True. That's totally the feeling I get, too, from his big speech the other day, with the flags plastered behind him ("see everyone, I AM patriotic!") at every turn putting the onus and/or blame on whites, in subtle ways, the way he worded things on every issue.

And this juicy bit:

It takes bravery, and perhaps an unusual black-white vantage point, to navigate these places where hurt is profound, incomprehension the rule, just as it takes courage to say, as Obama did, that black "anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races."

Yes, let us continue to learn MORE about it's roots. Let's ramp UP the understanding more. Then in the next generation, even MORE more... and so on. Yes, this will "narrow" that chasm, the more we understand THEM. Of course, he ends it "eloquently" ;) with "that exists between the races". But peel away the onion, and he's saying "whites, understand US... meet us here... none of this meet-half-way stuff."

But I digress. What he is asking is that we not move forward, not rise above it all, which flies in the face of "change". He wants us firmly entrenched in history, to know their "profound hurt". All mankind hurts, but the "black experience" in America, that hurt is "profound"... like nothing else. Righteous, a bit? I think so.

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

 

Sometimes, don't you sort of

Sometimes, don't you sort of wish he would get elected, so that America can say once and for all, what more do you want????

mb

Totally! I've been saying that myself.

And for another reason -- and sorry Leon, but I'm gonna say it strictly from past experiences (see past racial-related verdicts/decisions) -- I will lay money down that there will be rioting if he doesn't win. I hope I'm wrong.

 

* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change

 

Like the "change" slogan,

Like the "change" slogan, has Obama ever completed the "YES WE CAN...........???"

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

Yes we can

I liked the slogan better when it was used to fire up California Angels fans about 15 or 20 years ago. As my aging brain semi-recalls, the Angels didn't make the playoffs that year, proving that there's no magic in the phrase.

Chai

“...Bury me on my face,” said Diogenes; and when he was asked why, he replied, “Because in a little while everything will be turned upside down.”

Master of Race Relations

Is this guy talking about the same Obama who just tarred and feathered the "Typical White Person" as a xenophobe?

How much can he really care about race relations if he's willing to make excuses for Jeremiah Wright?  He admires Obama for tolerating hate?  This thing reads like a parody.

What a transparent attempt to rescue Obama from his ever-deepening hole.

I admire Obama for saying:

I admire Obama for saying: "I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community."

  BO can't disown the black community but the black community he has chosen disowns the white community.  It's a community that revels in its blackness.  They want to be 'Black Americans', separate but equal.

Some Canards

Only a black can "understand" blacks; only a black can teach blacks; no black can be a racist; blacks are in prison, not becasuse they committed a crime, but because they are "victims"of white oppression; blacks "need" Afirmative Action programs in order to succeed in this racist society; "poverty" causes crime in the black community; gangsta' rap is part of black "identity"; ebonics should be taught in the schools; it's all whitey's fault; whites who use the "n" word should be fined, jailed, or at least have their careers ruined.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Cohen a breath takingly arrogant and ignorant hypocrite.

Were a conservative politician of any race or national origin to associate himself even briefly let alone for twenty plus years with a hate monger such as the Rev. Jeremiah Wright he would be flogged to death by the likes of the drippingly liberal self-righteous Rodger Cohen.  Hate is hate whether it is the KKK or Black Liberation Theology as practiced by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and his Trinity United Church of Christ.

 

The exposure of this black hatred and bigotry is no less shocking to white America than the divided response to the OJ trial verdict.  There is real anger and disgust there as well; and to simply project a guilt trip on white Americans, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

 

Get elected because you are a smooth orator Obama?  No, you cannot!