The presidential field has winnowed down further, with Democrat John Edwards and Republican Rudy Giuliani announcing their withdrawal from the presidential race on the same day. But while the left-wing Democrat was serenaded as a trailblazer, the moderate Republican was mocked for "living an illusion."
While few were surprised by Giuliani's announcement (and subsequent endorsement of fellow moderate John McCain) after his distant third-place finish in Florida, Edwards' decision must have shocked at least one person -- New York Times reporter Julie Bosman, who must be feeling snake-bit after her Tuesday story portraying Edwards as the Energizer Bunny, motoring on and becoming a possible kingmaker at the Democratic convention.
"After finishing third in three of the four primary contests so far -- except in Iowa, where he beat Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York for second place by less than one percentage point -- Mr. Edwards has shown no sign of quitting, and his advisers have insisted that he still hopes to capture the nomination."
Bosman and coauthor Jeff Zeleny posted a story to the Times website Thursday morning on Edwards' withdrawal announcement, a piece highly respectful of the failed Edwards campaign, in a tone tinged with regret, and suggesting Edwards was a trailblazer on health care. And they still constantly referred to him as a "populist," not a liberal.
"John Edwards, the progressive Democratic candidate who made a populist, anti-poverty message the centerpiece of his campaign, has decided to drop out of the presidential primary race, and is to give a speech this afternoon at the same place where he began his campaign -- in New Orleans."
...
"Mr. Edwards had campaigned heavily in Iowa for months and months, fine-tuning a populist message and issuing many proposals, including one on health care, long before his rivals issued theirs. In the caucuses, he finished second, but just about a percentage point ahead of Mrs. Clinton."
The Times spun his last-place showings:
"Indeed, Mr. Edwards was poised to collect enough delegates in early nominating contests to potentially influence the outcome at the Democratic nominating convention in August, if neither Mrs. Clinton nor Mr. Obama won enough delegates to clinch the nomination."
Couldn't the same be said about Giuliani? Apparently not. By contrast with Edwards, the Times had nothing good to say about the former New York City mayor.
Wednesday's lead "news analysis," "Dizzying Fall For Ex-Mayor," by the tag team of Michael Powell and Michael Cooper, showed little respect for Giuliani:
"Perhaps he was living an illusion all along.
"Rudolph W. Giuliani's campaign for the Republican nomination for president took impressive wing last year, as the former mayor wove the pain experienced by his city on Sept. 11, 2001, and his leadership that followed into national celebrity. Like a best-selling author, he basked in praise for his narrative and issued ominous and often-repeated warnings about the terrorist strike next time."
....
"As Mr. Giuliani ponders his political mortality, many advisers and political observers point to the hubris and strategic miscalculations that plagued his campaign. He allowed a tight coterie of New York aides, none with national political experience, to run much of his campaign."
The tone throughout was unnecessarily antagonistic.
"Perhaps a simpler dynamic was at work: The more that Republican voters saw of him, the less they wanted to vote for him.
"Mr. Giuliani was a temple-throbbing Italian-American New Yorker who ruled a cacophonous city seen as the very definition of liberalism. He was somewhat liberal on social issues -- notably immigration and abortion -- where Republican candidates are invariably conservative. And he possessed a complicated family life: he has been thrice-married and has two adult children who rarely speak to him. At the beginning of his campaign last spring, he sat for a celebrity photo shoot smooching with his third wife, who snuggled in his lap."
For the complete version of this story, visit Times Watch.
—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Strangely enough, the NYT might be right
January 30, 2008 - 16:43 ET by WingletDriverThere were significant differences in the type of candidates each of these men portrayed themselves as. Nobody would accuse Edwards of not being a liberal. He just had two "better" liberals running against him. Edwards is a made-to-order Democrat. Clinton and Obama are just more Democrat.
Nobody honestly believed that Giuliani was a conservative. Although he was running against flawed candidates on his side, it was a pipe dream to think that he could somehow make abortion on demand and gun control acceptable to the Republican base. Unlike Edwards, Giuliani did not fit into his party comfortably.
"Indeed, Mr. Edwards was
January 30, 2008 - 23:40 ET by cleverpigCouldn't the same be said about Giuliani?
No, no it couldn't. Edwards had 62 delegates when he dropped. Maybe enough to throw the nomination to someone else if it was close. Giuliani had 2 delegates. I don't know the differences in how the two conventions count up votes and hand out a crown, but how is 2 delegates going to matter to anybody?
Oink, oink, squeal and snort.
January 30, 2008 - 23:51 ET by R D HelmMan, I smell pork.
Clever porcine is in the house!
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
Such an eloquent rebuttal.
January 30, 2008 - 23:59 ET by JasonCSuch an eloquent rebuttal. Thanks for contributing nothing.
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
-
January 31, 2008 - 00:04 ET by R D Helm:-)
Jason,
January 31, 2008 - 00:16 ET by R D HelmBelieve me, I just contributed far more than you can possibly imagine.
Which is why I am letting you off the hook here.
Lol.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
I don't know RD, I can type
January 31, 2008 - 08:35 ET by JasonCI don't know RD, I can type out animal noises too...
Gee, if it weren't for the lack of appalling grammatical errors, I'd think you were SportPolitics redux; grunting and name-calling were about all he was good for.
"He was, and is yet, most likely, the wearisomest, self-righteous
pharisee that ever ransacked a Bible to rake the promises to himself
and fling the curses on his neighbors." -Emily Bronte
I had no idea when I
January 31, 2008 - 01:30 ET by cleverpigI had no idea when I created my screen name how much joy I would bring to the world-- how many people would get to pat themselves on the back and feel smart for inventing some play on cleverpig.
Making people happy makes me happy :)