My One Question for All the GOP Presidential Candidates
In my previous two columns, I outlined the 10 questions we need to ask to find our next president. I believe them wholeheartedly, but I have one last question that is almost as important as all of them combined. And it is for all the GOP candidates.
During former House Speaker Newt Gingrich's November trip to Charleston, S.C., he said the following: "I do approach this whole campaign, I think, differently from everybody else. We have a number of friends who are also running. We have no opponents except Barack Obama. I think that's very important. I think (Abraham) Lincoln was very wise, as was captured in a book called 'Team of Rivals.' ... Literally everybody who was his opponent ended up in the Cabinet because he needed all of them in order to be able to put together the political power during the crisis that we faced. I would say the same thing. I don't know of a single person currently running who wouldn't be a very effective member of an administrative team and who doesn't have real talent and, in some way ... a unique strength. So I don't have any opponents on the Republican side."
The book to which Gingrich refers is "Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln," by Doris Kearns Goodwin, Pulitzer Prize-winning author and presidential historian. In addition to topping charts and receiving scholarly acclaim, the book itself is political genius and, I believe, outlines the crucial strategy needed to not only rally the present GOP base but also win the White House and save our republic. (I also wrote about this unifying strategy in a column titled "The 8th Miracle To Save America," which can be found at http://www.creators.com/opinion/chuck-norris/the-8th-miracle-to-save-america.html.)
Goodwin's prize-winning treatise details how Lincoln brought together his candidate rivals by appointing them to key positions in his administration when he became president.
Let me highlight a few critical points from Goodwin's book review in The New York Times:
"The party in the 1860's was a coalition of politicians who only a few years earlier had been Whigs (Lincoln, Seward, Bates), Democrats (Blair, Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles and Vice President Hannibal Hamlin), Free Soilers (Chase), or had flirted with the short-lived anti-immigrant American Party, or Know Nothings (Cameron and Bates). In addition, several cabinet members personally disliked each other: Blair and Chase, Seward and Welles, Chase and Seward, Blair and Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, who replaced Cameron in January 1862. Lincoln's 'political genius' enabled him to herd these political cats and keep them driving toward ultimate victory.
"How did he do it? Goodwin deals with this question better than any other writer. Part of the answer lay in Lincoln's steadfastness of purpose, which inspired subordinates to overcome their petty rivalries. Part of it lay in his superb sense of timing and his sensitivity to the pulse of public opinion as he moved to bring along a divided people to the support of 'a new birth of freedom.' And part of it lay in Lincoln's ability to rise above personal slights, his talent for getting along with men of clashing ideologies and personalities who could not get along with each other."
The big question today is this: Is there a Lincoln on the present political GOP landscape who can discern the times and is able to unite this team of rivals to save our country?
Today's Republican presidential competitors are a unique blend of gifted and talented people. How many times have you heard from others, "There are strong elements I like in all of them"? You may not want to see all of them in the chair of the Oval Office, but wouldn't you want to see most help the president and country in some position? Who wouldn't want to utilize the brilliance and experience of Gingrich? Who doesn't appreciate the resolve and moral resiliency of former Sen. Rick Santorum? Who wouldn't want to see our country benefit from the business background and leadership of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney? Who doesn't like the emboldened constitutional spirit and frugal fiscal passions of Rep. Ron Paul? And who wouldn't value Texas Gov. Rick Perry's advocacy for jobs and against frivolous lawsuits via tort reform?
I recognize that candidates cannot choose Cabinet members or others in their administration before they are elected, but that does not mean they cannot pledge to. That is why my one last question for all Republican candidates is this: If elected president, will you appoint your GOP rivals as a part of your administration, to utilize their skill sets as President Lincoln did with his rivals, in order to unite and restore our republic?
Yes or no?
Lincoln once said: "I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right, and part with him when he goes wrong."
Lincoln also echoed Jesus' words: "A house divided against itself cannot stand."
GOP candidates: Yes or no?
Follow Chuck Norris through his official social media sites, on Twitter @chucknorris and Facebook's "Official Chuck Norris Page." He blogs at http://chucknorrisnews.blogspot.com. To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
- Chuck Norris's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
If all the GOP candidates were melded into one.
Submitted by ahusser on Tue, 01/17/2012 - 5:32pm.
We would have a heck of a candidate. But going forward greatness is not recognized before the fact. Right now the infighting, which I believe is inescapable, as men with strong egos are fighting for the brass ring and using these attacks as the implementation, for good or ill, of their strategy for capturing the nomination. Romney is frontrunner now but the others want to kick him off the hill and become the king. Until it is a done deal who will be the GOP candidate then how the spoils (read VP and cabinet appts.etc) are divvied will have to wait. The problem with the criticism of each by each candidate as well as the orchestrated attacks as a strategy to ultimately win the candidacy plays into a news media which is basically in opposition to the GOP. The President doesn't have to do much but stand aside and await the outcome then he can do the attacking himself or let others do his dirty work if his handlers so choose. Meanwhile any ugliness in the GOP side of the campaign can be reported, enhanced, distorted and ridiculed by a compliant left wing media. The GOP has to avoid several things going forward to win the presidency. Not garner a third party candidate. (Killed Bush 1), Be seen as moderate enough to garner middle of the road and independent votes, without these folks the GOP can not win. Counter attack the inevitable slanders the left will throw his way effectively try to negate a powerful anti conservative/GOP press. Attack the president on his record and his agenda force the opposition to show their true colors which is socialism/collectivism at every opportunity. Whoever the candidate is he is going to have to take a punch and be able to counter punch and attack and be aggressive. Finally conservatives have to realize that the candidate can not be all things to all conservatives and stand behind him and vote for him because four more years of this yahoo are unacceptable.
"Somehow, I told you so, just doesn't quite say it." Will Smith in 'I, Robot.'