Cal Thomas Column: Lady Thatcher Was Prophetic on the Folly of the Euro
LONDON -- One of many things left out of the film "The Iron Lady" was Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's warnings on the effects a single currency would have on the economies of European nations. Thatcher's premonitions place her among the great political prophets of all time.
On the single currency, Peter Oborne, a columnist for the London Daily Telegraph, writes, "Mrs. Thatcher foresaw with painful clarity the devastation it was bound to cause. Her autobiography records how she warned John Major, her euro-friendly chancellor of the exchequer, that the single currency could not accommodate both industrial powerhouses such as Germany and smaller countries such as Greece." Thatcher predicted the currency would harm poorer countries because it would "devastate their inefficient economies."
The idea of a European Union modeled on the United States was unlikely to succeed from the beginning because, unlike American states, European countries lack a common bond. There are different languages, different histories (Colorado, for example, never invaded Nebraska) and different religions, including for six decades, atheism imposed by communist dictators in Eastern Europe.
How can a European "E Pluribus Unum" be forged out of that?
BBC reporter Laurence Knight stated the obvious when he summed up Spain's financial disaster by noting its citizens during the relatively brief "good times" of the 1990s spent much more on housing and other material goods than they could afford. Sound familiar? Living within one's means was a lesson forgotten by individuals and governments, whose main preoccupation -- in Europe and America -- has been giving people what they want in hopes they'll re-elect the politicians who dispensed the goodies. That formula has contributed to an unemployment rate in Spain approaching 25 percent. Spain last weekend was approved for a bailout of up to $125 billion from the eurozone, the fourth country to ask for a loan since Europe's debt crisis began.
Knight wrote last month, "Unfortunately for Spain, it shares a currency with Germany. That means Spain can no longer simply devalue the peseta -- something that would automatically make its workers cheaper and more competitive in the world. There is no peseta to devalue."
As columnist William Rees-Mogg wrote last Friday in The Times, "So far as British opinion goes, Europe is seen as a cost to be borne rather than a loyalty to be cherished."
After all this, the "conservative" British government, still ignoring Thatcher's warnings, is proposing a referendum that, if approved by voters, would move Britain closer to the European Union. The Daily Telegraph reported, "EU leaders are discussing moves toward more integrated financial, fiscal and even political systems among the 17 countries that use the euro."
Are they mad? Why would Britain want to associate itself with governments and economies (and people) that have behaved so irresponsibly? During the Cold War, Britain did not try to integrate its economy with that of the Soviet Union. In Europe, union has not brought unity, nor can it. Does Britain want to share more of the continent's misery, or should it try instead to point its people and the eurozone states to real change with freer and more empowered individuals, not government, leading the way?
Again, Margaret Thatcher was right when she said, "A democratic Europe of nation states could be a force for liberty, enterprise and open trade. But, if creating a United States of Europe overrides these goals, the new Europe will be one of subsidy and protection."
Most profoundly, Thatcher warned, "We have not successfully rolled back the frontiers of the state in Britain, only to see them re-imposed at a European level with a European super-state exercising a new dominance from Brussels."
That is precisely the seductive siren call the "conservative" British government now hears. It is a call, that, if answered "yes" by voters will wreck Britain's struggling economy and potentially cause it to go down the drain along with most of the other economies on the continent.
Today's politicians can't pretend they were not warned.
(Readers may e-mail Cal Thomas at tmseditors@tribune.com.)
- Cal Thomas's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
I am no genius.
Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 4:20pm.
In fact, I can be a really stupid FN moron (must be a Democrat gene left over from my ancestors) sometimes, but I was right on the EU and the Euro, waaaaaaaaaaay back when.
I said when they formed the EU that it wouldn't last 20 years, plus or minus. I said then that the Brits were the only ones with the brains to stay the hell away from the Euro monopoly money.
It really is easy. All you have to do is be against ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that liberals/socialists/communists/fascists propose and you have a 99% to 1% chance of being right in the end! In fact, I'd almost say a 100% chance, but even dopes like that get lucky once in a while. Of course, as soon as something starts to actually work, they correct themselves quickly.
Try it and see if it ain't da troof.
Another way to look at it
Submitted by jon_torlin on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 5:39pm.
It's also called "Anyone with a shred of common sense saw this coming years ago."
That same methodology was applied to Soetoro when he first came into the public eye, especially with Joe the Plumber and his talk about the redistribution of wealth. Anyone with a shred of common sense saw what kind of world we're going to live in back then before it actually happened.
Goes to show how much common sense there was in this last election. *sigh*
-Jon
But, but ...
Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 06/12/2012 - 5:19pm.
She was dotty. Just ask Meryl.
This is Spot On
Submitted by porgiefirefighter on Thu, 06/14/2012 - 12:50pm.
"Today's politicians can't pretend they were not warned." They do and will continue to pretend.
So-called progressives give themselves the option of ignoring history when it is not convenient and ignoring warnings from "non-progressives" like Lady Thatcher.
This option, ignoring everything that does not contribute to the progressive cause, is a dangerous dialectic that is playing itself out before our very eyes. The progressives, predictably, shut their eyes to it and ridicule anyone who points out the obvious.