Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Cal Thomas's blog
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'
  • Chuck Todd: Obama Administration Wants to 'Criminalize Journalism'
  • Al Hunt On Rosen Outrage: Obama 'No Better Than Nixon'; Holder Should Take Hike

A Solution to the Debt Menace

By Cal Thomas | May 11, 2011 | 12:19

A  A
Cal Thomas's picture

Here's a safe prediction: The "bipartisan" group of congressmen led by Vice President Joe Biden will fail to solve the $14 trillion debt crisis.

Here's another prediction: The Heritage Foundation (www.heritage.org/) has developed a formula, made possible by a grant from The Peterson Foundation (www.pgpf.org/), that could balance the budget in 10 years, reduce the debt to 30 percent of gross domestic product within 25 years, cut the size of the federal government in half by 2036, reform the tax code, restructure Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, while protecting the most vulnerable, and not increasing taxes if -- and it is a very big if -- politicians prefer the solution to continued bickering.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

SOCIAL SECURITY: The plan's centerpiece foresees "a gradual transition over many years to a flat benefit system ($1,200 per month in 2010 dollars that would be indexed in future years) to protect seniors from the risk of living in poverty." Higher income seniors would see gradual reductions in their benefits, based on their non-Social Security income. Benefits for single seniors earning $100,000 and couples earning $165,000 would be phased out.

The minimum retirement age would increase to 68, reflecting today's longer life expectancy. "Those who work past their full retirement age would receive a special annual tax deduction of $10,000, regardless of income level." The tax on retirement income would be eliminated.

The plan would make seniors less dependent on income from Social Security by offering them savings options. "A new savings plan would automatically place 6 percent of a worker's income in a savings plan they own and control, unless they voluntarily opt out of enrollment. This money would not be double-taxed, unlike today's Social Security payments and other savings options."

MEDICARE: "Transformed from its current unsustainable and open-ended system into a defined contribution that helps those who need it most." Medicare eligibility would be determined on non-Social Security income, with a similar means testing of allotments. It would be completely phased out "for seniors receiving $110,000 (single) and $165,000 (married)." The program would be put on a long-term budget.

All seniors would be allowed to choose from traditional Medicare fee-for-service coverage, as well as expanded options in private plans, ensuring competition and controlling costs.

Unlike the current program, the reform would offer catastrophic health coverage as a standard feature in both Medicare and private plans.

All of this is linked to full repeal of the euphemistically titled "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," which, says the Heritage proposal, "centralizes decision-making over health care services within the federal government, thereby limiting choice and options for affordable care." The Heritage plan proposes to create a health care system driven by consumers, not managed by government.

MEDICAID: Tailored to focus on the disabled and vulnerable elderly. "States would be given greater flexibility to experiment with health programs" and would "cap Medicaid spending at 2007 levels."

TAX REFORM: A single, flat tax for individuals, lowered overall rates, elimination of taxes on gifts and transfer. All deductions would be eliminated, except for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and education.

FEDERAL SPENDING: Non-defense discretionary items would revert to 2008 levels. Federal spending has jumped 21 percent faster than inflation in just the last three years.

What's the difference between the Heritage Foundation plan and the one proposed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan? Stuart Butler, who headed the team that drew up the Heritage proposal, tells me the Ryan plan "can't balance the budget any time soon. Ours does."

Heritage president Ed Feulner says, "We have come to a time of decision. For too long, Congress has been on an unsustainable binge of spending, taxing and borrowing. Our nation is going broke, and we are passing the costs of these misguided politics to our children and their children. America is on the verge of decline -- economically stagnant and permanently debt-bound, heavily regulated and bureaucratic, less self-governing and less free."

Knowing what must be done and not doing it is not just irresponsible, but deplorable.

The Heritage plan offers a way out if politicians put the welfare of their country ahead of their own.

  • Budget
  • Medicare
  • Social Security
  • Taxes
  • Economy
  • Government & Press
  • Column
  • Cal Thomas's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Forgot the...Public funded unions, and EPA, OSHA, FDA.

Submitted by upcountrywater on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 12:56pm.

Nice to address taxes, however there is all them fees and fines, that are growing every single day.

You Didn't Build That.

  • Login to post comments

It is a viable and reasonable plan

Submitted by c5then on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 3:02pm.

That is why it will never happen. The democrats want to keep spending ever increasing amounts and demonize the rich for not paying "their fair share", while the republican leadership wants to nickle and dime the spending cuts and pretend it's significant all while crying about how big government has grown.

In short, both sides would rather have the issue to use in their political speeches rather than fix the problem and move on.

And the reality is that no budget plan will survive a change of control to the opposite party from when it was enacted. So all this talk about 10 year or 12 year plans is all complete Hooey.

Unless Ron Paul or a similar Constitutionalist is elected to the Presidency with supermajorities in both the House and Senate, there will be no reduction in the size of government, only a temproary spending freeze.

 

Madison and Jefferson and Franklin built a Republic - Roberts killed it! 

  • Login to post comments

Ron Paul will never be

Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Wed, 05/11/2011 - 11:09pm.

Ron Paul will never be elected because he is a loon. He has pretty good economic sense but no concept of foreign policy as it needs to be today. ATM he is in the right place to affect spending and yet he cant do anything except vote. You are right in that both parties want us to see the football passed between the parties and do nothing about the real problem.

Nuke em til they glow; then shoot em in the dark
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
David Limbaugh's picture
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh Column: Partisan Obama Culture Spawned a More Abusive IRS
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Howard Dean Dismisses Benghazi Scandal as ‘Laughable Joke’
  • NYT Lawyer: Obama Worse Than Nixon, 'Worst President Ever' on Press Freedom
  • Letterman: 'Obama's in So Much Trouble Politically He's Thinking of Killing Bin Laden Again'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use