Bozell Column: Bravo's Plan To Exploit Suicide for Ratings
The ratings-hungry producers/exploiters of "reality" TV are in an ongoing search for “edgy” people who are combustibly watchable and whose lust for fame overrides any sense of moral judgment. Then they act shocked when their “characters” self-destruct.
The latest Exhibit A: the suicide by hanging of Russell Armstrong, the husband of one of Bravo’s “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.” His death came just weeks before Bravo planned to begin airing its second season, in which he would be ridiculed before millions. Sadly, this isn't the first time.
There was the boxer from NBC's 2005 program "The Contender" who shot himself before the series aired. A chef from a Gordon Ramsey “Kitchen Nightmares” episode on Fox jumped off a bridge last year. Just before Armstrong killed himself was the 22-year-old man from France's version of "Big Brother" who walked in front of a car on August 10, reportedly because "he could not readjust to life in the outside world."
Sometimes, the networks do the right thing. When Ryan Jenkins, a contestant on VH-1's planned series “Megan Loves a Millionaire,” brutally murdered his wife and then hung himself as the police closed in, VH-1 canned the show. Others are shameless. “Reality” show boss Mark Burnett infamously dismissed the boxer’s suicide during his filming of “The Contender.” Stop the show? “I'm not even going to make any edits [to the show] because it's real.”
Translation: deaths on my cast might be the best thing that ever happened for the ratings of my show.
Bravo and parent company NBC Universal displayed unlimited shamelessness when it exploited Michelle Salahi’s infamous crashing of a White House party for their series “The Real Housewives of DC.” Will they now descend even deeper to exploit Russell Armstrong’s suicide for ratings?
Tom Gliatto, a TV critic for People magazine, pleaded against it: “The fact remains that public interest in the show is now higher than ever. But, in a better world, Bravo would just go ahead and scrap not just the season but the entire series. And I say that as a fan of the show.”
Gliatto added, “It may very well be that his death would have happened without press scrutiny, without [his wife] Taylor's overnight fame and the disturbing revelations about his abusive behavior, but the possibility can't be eliminated.”
A sound, sober analysis.
Instead, Bravo announced no plans to scrap the show. They’ve instructed all the surviving cast members to grant no interviews. Bravo is hoping to control the message through silence, and may succeed, but there is the historical record, and it may prove to be a legal nightmare for the network.
In an interview with People a few weeks before his death, Armstrong admitted that “Real Housewives” was ruining his actual reality. “It got really overwhelming,” he told the magazine. “When you get a TV show involved, and all the pressure — it just takes it to a whole new level....We were pushed to extremes.”
Armstrong’s family is reportedly considering filing a lawsuit against Bravo for contributing to the emotional state that led to his suicide. In response, snarky Bravo defenders in Hollywood gossip circles are mocking the mourning family for granting too many interviews. When you’re a Hollywood sleaze, everyone’s motives are dark. No one can be imagined as having a conscience.
In a preview tape sent to TV critics this summer, Bravo displayed a scene reuniting their “housewives” that ended with Taylor distraught and crying in the bathroom over the sorry state of her marriage. After that scene, another housewife typically suggested the tears were just phony waterworks for attention. Even if Bravo deleted scenes like this, it shows just how cruelty is the bread and butter of most reality shows.
The way that Hollywood scripts these programs, there is no way Bravo won’t spend an entire second season (and maybe a third) milking Taylor’s reaction to and potential recovery from her husband’s suicide.There’s a reason why The Washington Post asked after this suicide if joining a “reality” show is like “making a deal with the devil.” When Bravo executives and producers seem just as happy to watch you die as live, they certainly look evil.
At The Wrap blog, Mali Perl summed up the toll of “reality” TV makers: “What amazes me is that even now, when we can longer hide behind the naiveté of not knowing quite how this newfangled machine works, there is still a seemingly unlimited amount of people not just
willing but eager to get caught up and mangled in its gears.”
- Brent Bozell's blog
- Login to post comments
















Comments
Mr. Bozell, you are way off the mark
Submitted by vaboxrboy on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 8:42am.
I watch these shows and participate in the blogs and have even spoken with the cast members via their own blogs. Bravo and the producer, Andy Cohen have been devastated by the events of the past weeks and have pulled the premiere of this season. They are STILL contemplating whether to run this season or just move on to another cast. If they wanted to exploit the situation they would've had specials on and re-run old episodes and footage to speculate about how this could've happened. And ANYONE who watches these shows can tell you they come up with "forgotten footage" all the time, once even highlighting a dinner party that went bad.
In fact, it is you who is exploiting this situation to advance your own agenda. You don't watch the show, you didn't do your research, and you have no idea of what Bravo is doing as a result of this tragedy. Reality TV is not the greatest form of entertainment and it makes people do things they would not normally do. But your reckless writing on this particular show is beyond the pale. This makes three bad articles in a row since last week. Maybe you need some time off to read, study and even take the time to watch the things you criticize.
Wow, did you miss the point.
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 8:59am.
By a mile.
Which part of this did you miss??
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:02am.
His death came just weeks before Bravo planned to begin airing its second season, in which he would be ridiculed before millions.
After his death, they decided not to air it.
That makes it OK?
It's about bringing him to that point in the first place.
No matter what they air, they can plan on increased ratings because of curiosity.
The only way they could show that they are really devastated by this is to stop doing what they're doing.
My advice
Submitted by StarAZ on Sun, 08/28/2011 - 11:55am.
If you think the show "brought Armstrong to that point," then I would not watch if I were you--I doubt you do anyway, since you don't seem to know the background there. This is the usual fingerpointing...
"I watch these shows and participate in the blogs".
Submitted by UpNorth on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:01am.
OK, got it. You have absolutely no life, you live only in the vapid wasteland that "reality TV" is, and you interact with those brain-dead folks. I'd bet you believe in the tooth fairy and global warming, too.
Premature e-flackulation
Submitted by Tim Graham on Sun, 08/28/2011 - 1:46pm.
Chuck, you're too early in defending Bravo. There's no postponement so far. NYPost had a story suggesting there may be a Taylor interview special exploiting the suicide. Wait and see...
In a nutshell, coward, you
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 08/28/2011 - 8:11pm.
In a nutshell, coward, you have demonstrated why you are so intellectually vapid. Good job.
The only "cheers" we will feel is knowing your cowardly drive-by posts have been run off of here for good.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
Not a big reality tv fan
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 8:59am.
Nobody forced the folks on this show to be on tv. It is very sad, but it's not all Hollywoods fault.
Yes, Shawn is right
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 9:38am.
The smut would not be on TV if it didn't make money.
I also agree with the other guy above. We might not like Bravo's programming, but it's a stretch to blame them for someone's personal choice to commit suicide. It's not like the producers told him to do it.
The smut would not be on TV
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 10:53am.
The smut would not be on TV if it didn't make money.
That's one of the most callous bits of rationalization I've heard.
So anything they can market, and get people to participate in, is fine?
Good morning MB
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:36am.
Pretty sure HC was just taking a sarcastic swipe at me :-)
where is the part where I said it's fine?
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:54am.
I just think it's pointless to put all the blame on the producers when it's obvious that the "ratings stunt" is successful to bring in the... er... ratings. If the American people don't get disgusted enough to turn it off, what you think will happen?
Let's swap a few words in here...
Submitted by WhoIsJohnGalt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 12:41pm.
The *heroin* would not be on *the streets* if it didn't make money. I also agree with the other guy above. We might not like *heroin*, but it's a stretch to blame *the pusher* for someone's personal choice to *shoot up*. It's not like the *pusher* told him to do it.
Stand back and watch the fun, right? No responsibility whatsoever? And don't use the legal/illegal argument; laws are not the only barrier to deviant behavior in a civilized society.
what do you presume we do?
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 6:35pm.
Make it illegal for Bravo to produce reality shows?
Teenagers commit suicide due to bullying... should we make it illegal to tease kids in school?
By all means, Shawn, if
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:00am.
By all means, Shawn, if people are willing to humiliate themselves, why not exploit them for ratings?
MB
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:43am.
What happened was very sad. A big reason for the suicide is he owed lots of money.
Most folks on this show are super rich and don't need money, they just needed more fame and that s why they signed up. Like I said, it is extremely sad, but nobody twisted their arm n
I understand your contention
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:48am.
I understand your contention that nobody forced them, but don't you think it would be a good thing if producers didn't exploit people who are in desperate straits?
If it was me MB
Submitted by shawn. on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:58am.
I would scrap the whole show. I would sleep alot better at night. I don't agree with Bravo is doing but I can understand What they are doing from a business prospective.
The Housewives so called 'reality' shows are for idiots
Submitted by cbeyer on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 9:22am.
These shows are TOTALLY contrived. While they may be based on some actual elements related to the actors personal lives, the entire focus is around creating 'drama' between the wives at never ending lavish parties. Somehow the video camera 'just happens' to be there when a catfight breaks out between one of the wives. Then there are the sidebar commenties by those involved which add further to the stupidity of it all.
Anyone who believes the unfolding dramas between these women are not at a minimum scripted and phony needs to get a life.
Exactly.
Submitted by NeoKong on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 10:08am.
They are about as real as that show Dual Survival where no matter what conditions are the Sam Kinnison twin is walking barefoot and wearing shorts and somehow they always manage to light a fire with sticks, find water in the desert or find something disgusting to eat in front of multiple camera angles. Isn't it lucky how they always seem to find sort of piece of plastic, a tarp or a chunk of sharp metal that always seems to come in handy at just the right time.
You're right, cbeyer,
Submitted by motherbelt on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 10:57am.
The fact that they use the term "real" is positively jaw-dropping.
Just look at how the women dress. Does anyone know a "real" housewife who wears 4-in stilettos every day?
The constant parties are so stupid and phony
Submitted by cbeyer on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:48am.
Good response. It also seems that 90% of these housewives lives are built around lavish phony scripted parties. They have to do that because if they truly filmed every day life at home (when they weren't dressed in $1000 dresses) there wouldn't be a story line. I am truly amazed that ANYONE really believes these trashy stupid shows are based on anything resembling reality.
~What, they're not buffoons?
Submitted by Wrathful Brunette on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 9:36am.
Surely one of these show producers merits the epithet of 'ass', 'buffoon', or 'bizarre'. No?
Huh.
that language is reserved
Submitted by Hoosier Conservative on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 9:38am.
for tea party candidates the GOP wants to get rid of.
Reality Shows
Submitted by NVRAT on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 10:38am.
I`m sorry folks but, these shows are totally ridiculous and I mean all of them. Its to bad that Hollywood and other TV producers can not come up with more interesting shows , something that would be benefit the society as a whole and maybe even educate someone. I don`t know maybe our society has gone to pot and is so warped that these shows bring out the sickness.
Aw
Submitted by StarAZ on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 11:24am.
I can almost guarantee Bozell knows nothing about this. As for comments that real housewives don't wear stilettos--that is pretty much missing the irony, too.
good things
Submitted by kata on Sat, 08/27/2011 - 12:15pm.
It be a good thing if shows like these didn't get any production dollars, advertisement dollars or controversy thirsty viewers (A perfect exhibit A is in this thread) or volunteers! But they do. Where there's a market there's a show. The only way crap like this won't find its way to television is if people stop watching. I think articles like this do nothing but give it exactly the press it wants.
You have a point, but...
Submitted by Unsane on Sun, 08/28/2011 - 8:14pm.
Articles like these do a great service. For people like me - who have goven up on television decades ago - they serve as a reminder that I'm not missing a thing. If not for CNBC and my desire to watch certain sporting events I wouldn't even have a cable package on my TV.
"CONSUMED DEMOCRACY RETURNS A SOCIALIST REGIME" - Slayer, "Fictional Reality", from Divine Intervention (1994)
yeah well
Submitted by kata on Sun, 08/28/2011 - 9:04pm.
I don't need to watch my sister change my niece's diapers to remind me of how much I don't miss it. ;)