Bozell Column: Media Will Miss Pope Calling Catholics Home

Photo of Brent Bozell.

Pope Benedict XVI is in America and, like his predecessor, is about to be treated to curiously bipolar coverage at the hands of the American press. While in-country, John Paul the Great received almost universally positive treatment. But up to the point the papal wheels touched down, the media reports were consistently critical – some verging on the savage – and when it was wheels-up, the press immediately returned to their old ways.

The tone this time around will not be so much “news” as the recycled template that our journalistic elite imposes on every papal visit to America in the last thirty years. The usual surveys will be taken off the shelves, dusted, and re-re-represented. Catholics are leaving the Church. Catholics who remain aren’t attending Mass. Vocations are dwindling.

And then comes the analysis from an institution that claims in its ranks only two percent who are practicing Catholics: “Hardliners” from Vatican City are out of touch with their enlightened American flock, from their practices (refusing to allow priests to marry, to ordain women) to their beliefs (abortion, birth control, homosexuality).

Catholic dissidents are regularly afforded the media megaphone to demand that the Holy Father become a Holy Panderer, crumbling rigid orthodoxy in favor of a church that follows instead of leads. They want a church in reverse, in which the appointed shepherds are supposed to be sheep, and the sheep become the shepherds. Yet one need only look at the effects on many mainline Protestant denominations that have traveled that road: their churches are crumbling. So if the Pope were merely holding a marketing session in America, trying to figure out how to keep the most fannies in the pews, this message would not be helpful.

No one understands this better than Benedict XVI (and before him John Paul II). It is not that the Catholic Church is insufficiently enlightened, it is that it has become too liberal. The media are blind (and dissidents thoroughly uncomfortable) to what could be the most natural appeal to hold on to believers: challenge them to believe. Challenge them to live up to their faith, not down to the deviancy of our popular culture. Remind them of what God’s Word demands of them, and expect them to respond to it.

If the media truly were focused on solutions to what ails the American Catholic Church, rather than the advancement of the agenda of its dissidents, they would stop focusing on heretical anti-Catholic groups like Catholics for a Free Choice and instead look for organizations asking Catholics to return to fidelity with the church of their youth.

At which point they’d discover Catholics Come Home.

Founded in 1998 by Tom Peterson, a former advertising executive with 30 years’ experience in that field, Catholics Come Home enjoys the support of many noted Catholic authors, bishops and Vatican officials. It has now launched a national multimedia campaign, with a special emphasis on TV ads, gently nudging lapsed Catholics back into the fold. The group cites a quote from the late Archbishop Fulton Sheen: “Love is a mutual self-giving that ends in self-recovery. You recover God, and He recovers you.”

The message comes with the Christian virtues of faith, hope, and love. It’s not an appeal to “narrow dogmatism,” but it is unequivocally faithful to dogma They see the church as a port in a storm, not a prison guarded by Rottweilers. “God loves you so much that He will not stop searching for you, reaching out to you, and seeking you, so He can bring you safely home to a big, warm, and loving Catholic family. But God is gentle... the choice is yours.”

The media seemingly have no concept of what G.K. Chesterton called “the adventure of orthodoxy” against the prevailing winds of earthly opinion. “It is always easy to let the age have its head; the difficult thing is to keep one’s own,” Chesterton wrote. “It is always easy to be a modernist; as it is easy to be a snob.” Moral relativism demands we roll with its flow, and be swept up in its secular dogmatism.

The hard part about religious belief in modern America is giving up the worship of self, the urge to put our selfish concerns first. “What would American Catholics wish to hear from the Pope when he arrives?” “What do you want him to say?” These are the dominant media questions posed to Catholic leaders before papal visits.

Even orthodox Catholics would be tempted to wax poetic. But when he was asked, Tom Peterson’s simple response was a monumental rebuttal to the very question. “I want the Holy Father to say whatever the Holy Father wishes to say.” It is the faith behind that response that deserves attention from the American media if they are truly interested in answers, not agendas.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you, Mr. Bozell, for

Thank you, Mr. Bozell, for a great column.

Anyone who doubts that many of the problems in the Catholic Church in general, and the priesthood in particular, have been spawned by liberalism, need only read "Goodbye Good Men" by Michael Rose.

Raised a Catholic

Yeah, raised a Catholic and speak Italian and lived in Italy for a decade and learned everything about Church history that a Catholic school would never teach you.

Liberalism was always half-baked and now in its Baby-Boomer led version, radicalized in the late sixties, Modern Liberalism, as it should be called, is a poison pill.

But to think that the dearth of vocations has anything to do with that is just plain nuts in the other direction.

John Paul II was great on fighting the commies but the Church is dying because of itself, not some outside agency or some vicious conspiracy.

We are supposed to worship the Deity, and any man-made institution has to make mistakes, even grievous ones, such as the ones that John Paul II only partly apologized for.

So we have to admit that much needs to be changed at the Church, including, but not limited to, the non-infallible teaching on birth control that Paul VI approved over the committee he appointed to study the matter at the Vatican Council, allow divorce and accept the same situation as Greek and Russian Orthodox churches have, married priests.

I have to add that much of the commentary here has been posted by people who have the lib disease of identity politics in the opposite direction and who seem to know nothing about Church history or even that the Church doctrine on birth control is not an infallible ex cathedra teaching but a doctrine from which you can dissent, but not disobey.

The Catholics disobey anyway. Italy is below zero demographically and they love their church.

re: Raised a Catholic

...Liberalism was always half-baked and now in its Baby-Boomer led
version, radicalized in the late sixties, Modern Liberalism, as it
should be called, is a poison pill...

Never were truer words spoken. I had respect for liberalism and liberals at one point in my life. They were the counterpoint and between us there was room for debate and discussion. These creatures who call themselves liberal today are bombastic, dogmatic and intolerant. JFK was a liberal - his brother Teddy is a Marxist, or should I say a Modern Liberal.

Although not Catholic, I used to enjoy the inspirational qualities that the Catholics had included as part of the Mass. They lost me, however, when they brought in the guitar-playing peacenik saps because they took any inspirational qualities away and replaced them with PC pablum. It's been downhill ever since.


"All that is necessary for the trimuph of evil is that good men do nothing."

- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)

www.conservativeboot...

Yes, you are right

The Church took on some of the hokier aspects of liberalism. They changed the Mass from Latin and turned the priest to look at the congregation.

Joseph Campbell, the comparative religion expert, said that they destroyed the mystery of the Mass by excluding ancient Latin, a way to take you out of domesticity and, by turning to face the people, the Mass lost its feeling of taking you outside of yourself up into the Divine Mystery.

They changed what they should not have changed, the Mass, for example, and refuse to change what should be changed.

Hey, and the last English pope, whose name escapes me at the moment, was the son of a priest, a common occurrence before the imposition of celibacy on the clergy. Died by poisoning, it is believed.

According to history, the Welsh Catholic priests so successfully resisted the attempt to impose celibacy, that they married clear up to their induction into the Anglican Church, at which point they could continue to marry.

The pope is not someone beyond legitimate criticism and he should not be subject to criticism that the libs refuse to lay on themselves and their side, which is SOP for them, but legitimate criticism exists of this pope, and John Paul II on matters of doctrine.

On politics, John Paul II was a genius. I ran with enthusism to see him come out of the Vatican in a car one night. Stood only a few feet from the car. Loved the mans capacity to work with Reagan to overthrow the truly "Evil Empire". Disagreed with his attempt to uphold doctrines, which if studied, prove to be rather recent in origins, such as the one I have already cited.

With respect, I disagree.

  1. I’m an ex-Jesuit, and I would love for the church to allow married priests in the Latin Rite. If they rescinded the rule, I’d go back in tomorrow. I could even give you an extended argument as to why married priests ought to be allowed. But no matter how much it would serve me, I have to be honest. The vocation problem isn’t because of celibacy. Think about it – back in the years when the seminaries were filled, they had celibacy then, also. Celibacy has been constant. It wasn’t as if the pope imposed celibacy a few decades ago, and priests left as an angry rejection of it. On the contrary, celibacy has been in place long before there was ever a crisis. So, logically, we can’t say that the cause of the vocation decline was celibacy. And if celibacy didn't cause the vocation decline, rescinding the rule won't solve the crisis, either. Honesty forces us to look elsewhere for an answer.

  2. As for the birth control rule, you got the history of the decision correct, but I think you missed the larger picture. It’s true that most people evaluating the morality of condoms would conclude that there’s nothing wrong with condoms. (I know I would.) But the encyclical Humanae Vitae was much more about a respect for life. The encyclical taught that we shouldn’t interfere in the nature that God gave us.

    "Yeah but come on, condoms aren’t so bad!" Maybe not by themselves, but look what came with them. Now we have cloning, stem cells from aborted fetuses, organ farming, and so on. Paul6 was ahead of his time. He realized that the moment you open that door a little, the floodgates will open. So, yeah, it may be an unpopular decision, but I’ve come to agree with it.

  3. As for divorce, forget it. That’s a Jesus teaching.

Biblical scholars tell us that the gospel writers occasionally put words in Jesus’ mouth that maybe Jesus didn’t actually say. So there is always a question whether Jesus said it or not. We’re fairly confident that Jesus actually said the “this is my body” and “I am the bread,” etc. We’re not so sure about other things. However, most scholars agree that the divorce thing is most likely a direct teaching from Jesus.

How can we claim to be Christian if we reject what Jesus taught specifically? He said no divorce, and that's that.

Notes from a fallen away----

After leaving high school and deciding not to enter the seminary, this old man chose to be a random participant in the church and religion of my birth. While openly ignoring it, I always closely watched it. My children were all baptized in the Catholic faith. As the church "modernized", (guitar masses and sundry other issues), I drifted even farther away, but always watched. Why?? Why did I watch?? Because I believed the church was guiding me to salvation, because I believe in Jesus as the Son of God, because I accept the basic religious beliefs of the Catholic church. The more the church changed, the less confidence I had in it to spread the word of God. I set out to re-establish my attendance and participation and when I went back to my church, the stations of the Cross had been replaced with a stereo system and the choir was a meeting place for any number of liberal groups or causes. I defended the church in the issue of the pedophile church using the old , but true argument that all should not be judged by the few. Yet the church keeps becoming more secular, more involved in the tides of man and less involved in the word of God exept as they interpret it in an extreme liberal fashion. They have made settlements with the violated, but never come out and stated that the church had been committing a vile, mortal sin and to ask God's forgiveness for straying. Perhaps the Pope has accomplished that recently. I wouldn't know. The only time I read about the church is when they get involved in matters political in the USA. Such as asking their parishioners to aid and abet in illegal immigration.

Fall on your knees, give honor to God and let the officials in Caesar's world perform their duties. Pray for the souls of your flock, lead them and guide them in love of God. Prepare them for salvation. At the risk of my soul, at 75 years of age, I tell you that I have found peace with God. I no longer trust the church to be the shepherds of the flock. I view them as a large extension of a Socialistic party.

Raised Catholic

I even  went to Catholic school for six years. As soon as I was old enough to say, "I'm not going to church," I quit for about 25 years. I attend a Missionary Church now. I guess I don't like all the ritualism of Catholicism. I told my brother I'd rather talk to God than recite to him. I still believe in Pergatory, but not the Apocalypse, so I guess I'm a pick-and-choose believer. However:

At Mom's church, they had to built another addition, as the 4 masses per weekend couldn't hold all the attendants. The Catholic church in Kalamazoo, MI is not shrinking a bit.

  MSM - shaping all the perceptions you need to believe.