News that President Barack Obama is demanding new Afghanistan options and answers, after months and eight meetings with top officials on General Stanley McChrystal's request for more troops, led ABC anchor Charles Gibson to express exasperation Thursday night: “What new questions are there to be asked after all this time?”
CBS and NBC, however, weren't so dubious. Though Katie Couric painted “a long, drawn out process,” Chip Reid assigned gravitas to Obama as he asserted Obama “has been agonizing over this decision” and “recently immersed himself in the agony of war.” Reid touted: “That the President is so thoroughly researching such a critical decision is a good thing, according to CBS News national security consultant Juan Zarate.” Reid acknowledged that “there's great danger, he [Zarate] says, if it looks like uncertainty.”
Journalists, though, are making Obama look more deliberative than uncertain. ABC's Martha Raddatz assured Gibson that Obama “has four options in front of him” and “he wants to combine those options...to find the best option.”
NBC anchor Brian Williams offered no hint of any dithering as he segued “to the overall decision about the way forward in Afghanistan,” providing just one sentence of information: “President Obama has reportedly sent his war council back to the drawing board to come up with new options for a possible troop increase and a way to let the Afghans know the U.S. is not making some sort of open-ended commitment.”
Reid began his CBS Evening News story with how “the President has been agonizing over this decision for two months already, and now he's sending the Pentagon back to the drawing board.” He recounted: “Sources say the President is especially concerned that the options fail to include an exit strategy and a timeline for turning over control to Afghan forces, fail to make clear the commitment is not open-ended, and fail to address mounting questions about the credibility of the Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai.”
Reid also fretted over how leaks are impairing the President, not a common media concern: “There's another problem for the President. Instead of this being debated in the situation room, it's all over the front pages. Today Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he's appalled by the amount of leaking.”
From the Thursday, November 12 World News on ABC:
CHARLES GIBSON: Yesterday, he had his eighth meeting with his national security advisers on the question of sending more troops to Afghanistan. The White House said the President's decision won't be announced until after he returns from Asia. Our chief foreign correspondent, Martha Raddatz, joins us now. Martha, eight meetings, we understand he's raising new questions about a number of plans that are in front of him. What new questions are there to be asked after all this time?
MARTHA RADDATZ: Well, you'd think he'd be through with the questions, Charlie. In fact, we thought this was the last war council meeting yesterday, but there are going to be more. He has two specific questions. How soon could Afghan troops be trained, and what is the exit strategy? He simply does not want this to be open-ended, Charlie. And he has other concerns as well about Hamid Karzai.
GIBSON: But are there definitive answers to those questions?
RADDATZ: Well, I think there are probably better answers. I've talked to military officials today and they said, “look, these are very good questions. We have to get better answers to the President.” He is looking for the best option. He has four options in front of him. He wants to combine those options, somehow, to find the best option.
Brian Williams on the NBC Nightly News:
And now to the overall decision about the way forward in Afghanistan. President Obama has reportedly sent his war council back to the drawing board to come up with new options for a possible troop increase and a way to let the Afghans know the U.S. is not making some sort of open-ended commitment. There's also word the American ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl Eikenberry, former army general, has come out strongly against any major troop increase. The President spent a few hours on the ground late today in Alaska, refueling stop on his way to his first trip to Asia as President.
The full story on the CBS Evening News, transcript provided by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth, who corrected the closed-captioning against the video:
KATIE COURIC: Now the road ahead in Afghanistan. It appeared at the beginning of this week that President Obama had finally made up his mind. He was about to agree to a huge troop increase. But that has apparently changed. The President has rejected all the proposals his war planners have given him. Chip Reid in Tokyo is traveling with the President, and, Chip, this has really been a long, drawn out process.CHIP REID: You've got that right, Katie. The President has been agonizing over this decision for two months already, and now he's sending the Pentagon back to the drawing board. On the way to Japan today, the President stopped in Alaska to refuel and spend time with the troops at Elmendorf Air Force Base.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Today we also send our thoughts and prayers to all those who at this very moment are serving on the front lines.
CHIP REID: The visit comes one day after the President told his war council he's not happy with any of the Pentagon's four options for sending between 10,000 and 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Sources say the President is especially concerned that the options fail to include an exit strategy and a timeline for turning over control to Afghan forces, fail to make clear the commitment is not open-ended, and fail to address mounting questions about the credibility of the Afghan government and President Hamid Karzai.
Concerns about Karzai took on new importance with reports that general Karl Eikenberry, the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, has expressed deep concern about sending more troops until Karzai shows he'll fight the corruption now crippling the Afghan government. Eikenberry, the top general in Afghanistan two years ago, has now joined Vice President Joe Biden in resisting General Stanley McChrystal's request for 40,000 more troops.
The President has now held eight lengthy meetings in the situation room on Afghanistan. More are expected, and he's recently immersed himself in the agony of war, honoring the fallen at Dover Air Force Base and, on Veterans Day, walking through Section 60 at Arlington National Cemetery where war dead from Iraq and Afghanistan are buried. That the President is so thoroughly researching such a critical decision is a good thing, according to CBS News national security consultant Juan Zarate, but there's great danger, he says, if it looks like uncertainty.
JUAN ZARATE, CBS NEWS NATIONAL SECURITY CONSULTANT: It's the body language of indecision or the perception of indecision that may matter more in some ways. Matters in terms of how our allies view our sense of resolve in Afghanistan, how our enemies perceive our willingness to have backbone in whatever decision is made.
REID: And there's another problem for the President. Instead of this being debated in the situation room, it's all over the front pages. Today Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he's appalled by the amount of leaking.
COURIC: And, Chip, when is the President expected to make his decision?
REID: Well, the earliest that we could hear this decision from the President is ten days from now when he returns from Asia, but we're told it could still be several weeks.
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





CHARLES GIBSON: Yesterday, he had his eighth meeting with his national security advisers on the question of sending more troops to Afghanistan. The White House said the President's decision won't be announced until after he returns from Asia. Our chief foreign correspondent, Martha Raddatz, joins us now. Martha, eight meetings, we understand he's raising new questions about a number of plans that are in front of him. What new questions are there to be asked after all this time?
The President has now held eight lengthy meetings in the situation room on Afghanistan. More are expected, and he's recently immersed himself in the agony of war, honoring the fallen at Dover Air Force Base and, on Veterans Day, walking through Section 60 at Arlington National Cemetery where war dead from Iraq and Afghanistan are buried. That the President is so thoroughly researching such a critical decision is a good thing, according to CBS News national security consultant Juan Zarate, but there's great danger, he says, if it looks like uncertainty.














Editor at Large
Comments Policy
If it looks like uncertanty??
November 12, 2009 - 21:56 ET by Patrick MichaelMy God, what else can it possibly look like? Stay Free!!!
Oblahma research? gimme a break!
November 13, 2009 - 10:14 ET by Patriot IIThis arrogant , narcissis clown is researching Afghanistan? He spent 1 1/2 years as a senator voting "present" so while he sits on his dead butt.......men/women are getting killed and wounded because of a lack of backup! this dirtbag can't make a decision on anything that is not about him personally.......well....dumdum......this one is ABOUT you!
relax
November 12, 2009 - 21:58 ET by WesenI think Barry should take all the time he needs. Hey, in 3 years it won't be his problem anyway.
Obama will a community
November 12, 2009 - 22:03 ET by jkwtradingObama will have a community meeting with the Afghans...lol
Yeah, I remember Carter too.
November 12, 2009 - 22:09 ET by c5thenRemember that Carter had to get ALL the facts and research and agonize over his decisions too? That style of "leadership" gave us the Iranian hostages that were held for 444 days. Remember the rescue operation that was attempted and turned into it's own diaster that completely paralyzed the Carter administration from doing almost anything?
Deja Vu all over again.
I fear that Obama is going to cut and run. I hope to GOD that I am wrong.
P.S. It already does look like uncertainty to a large % of the electorate.
Throw 'da bums out!!!
Before it's too late.
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Deja Vu
November 13, 2009 - 10:24 ET by UtherpendI was going to make that same comparison. This Admin is pure Jimmy Carter with a Bill Clinton vener. They think if they wait long enough something will happen and they can shift the blame to anyone but themselves. They will sacrifice anyone and anything to make sure they don't have to make an official decision.
"For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security."
Be nice if..
November 12, 2009 - 22:14 ET by DarasenOf course it would be nice if he was as concerned about making the best choice in other areas like health care or cap and trade and so forth. Instead on these things that need serious consideration of all aspects and potential pitfalls all we get is "We need this now". If Obama were really as smart as the media like to play him out to be he'd be smart enough to know he has no military experience what so ever and rely on the advice of the commanders on the ground.
He's in over his head
November 12, 2009 - 22:22 ET by Edward Lee... and he knows it. It seems to me like he's paralyzed with fear that he'll make the wrong decision, so he makes none at all. Can you imagine what he'd be like taking fire in a real fox hole? Um, Barak, can you *please* pass the ammo?
Our enemies are probably thinking that this would be a good time to attack.
Does the President realize
November 12, 2009 - 23:08 ET by motherbeltDoes the President realize that making no decision is, in itself, a decision?
Why, present has always worked before
November 12, 2009 - 23:39 ET by Dan The Man 2Yeah
That fact seems to be lost on the Media as well.
November 12, 2009 - 23:45 ET by MightyMouth"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
psst Barry stick your head
November 12, 2009 - 23:39 ET by jkwtradingpsst Barry stick your head up to see if anyone is there....
Ten more days??
November 12, 2009 - 22:53 ET by wolfemanicWhat he fails to understand is that if you wait to be sure, you've waited too long.
With pencil and paper I could have a plan to take over the world by now.
This has been
November 12, 2009 - 22:44 ET by MidAmericaThis has been President Dither's war for 11 months already!
Imagine the morale of the troops on the front lines as they are asked to risk their lives when their 'Commander' is unable to lead.
As John Kerry put it in his Viet Nam testamony: "How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"
"Continuing his pledge to
November 12, 2009 - 22:56 ET by BKeyser"Continuing his pledge to extend the hand of peace to our Muslim counterparts, Barack Obama announced today that while he ponders troop levels in Afghanistan, he is sending weapons and ammunition to Taliban fighters as a show of good faith. Most political pundits agree that this is a thoughtful gesture by the President and really tries to -as he often says- 'level the playing field'."
"Chip Reid, where do you stand on this issue?"
"Clearly, Katie, this is a wonderful display of statesmanship. Only a true leader would dare to be this bold. We're told that the Iranian Ambassador has issued a statement that if Mr. Obama continues to show this kind of leadership, they'll begin to consider a possible move toward talks with the IAEA about whether or not they'll release pictures of the Qom nuclear site prior to it's construction."
"Thanks, Chip. That's great news. If the previous administration had been thoughtful enough to see how emboldening the enemy could lead to progress in nuclear talks with Iran, we might not be facing such challenges today. Personally, I'm really encouraged about this bit of news. No matter what we do with troop levels, we'll never win in Afghanistan. At least this way, we can pull out with honor, knowing that the lightly armed and once defeatable Taliban is now on equal footing with our own brave, but morally defeated Military. Mr. President, your pragmatism is why we voted you into office. Thank you for proving us right. This has been the CBS Evening News, and I'm Katie Couric. Goodnight, and God bless President Obama."
You're way too good at this stuff
November 12, 2009 - 23:25 ET by CO2MakerAre you the one and only "Baghdad B" Keyser? <g>
Roots
November 12, 2009 - 23:05 ET by miss911ninjaHe's "recently immersed himself in the agony of war" and is now "agonizing" over his decision? Sounds like waaaay too much drama and emotion for a president who I believe is just trying to calculate which choice will benefit him the most or hurt him the least. Politically he's between a rock and a hard place. That's the root of his indecision.
Ah, The Agony
November 13, 2009 - 07:48 ET by kilrodAh, the Agony of War, the Thrill of Victory, the Agony of Defeat,---??, lets see, which course will get me the most votes for re-election,---??, oh yeah, if i choose Defeat, i can blame it on Bush and at the same time keep all my socialist/marxist/facist comrads happy!!---??, but what about those pesky American Patriots, those tea-baggers, lets see,--- if i just don't make a decision that gets us Defeat and i can blame Bush, and if we loose a few more Troops, are a lot, so what, they volunteered, they asked for it,--- and in the meantime, if we get healthcare and crap, i mean Cap & Tax, passed that'll take care of those pesky, tea-bagging American Patriots, he-he-he, they don't call me Cerebral for nothin. Ah the AGONY---!!~~!!
kilrod
If an unborn child cannot trust you, why should I,??
I'm just so comforted...
November 13, 2009 - 00:00 ET by caiobabeknowing that MY President is in control of this situation.
hmmm...c'mon man, pull your head out ur ass and make the grand decision. You bashed Bush for his Afgani decisions and now YOU should expect some equal time in the bashing department.
Hopefully your laxness in deciding didn't cost us anymore American lives.
The dishonest lame stream
November 13, 2009 - 00:04 ET by d1carterThe dishonest lame stream media is the biggest threat to our continued success. How can the American public make decisions with this kind of crap shoveled out each day.
Remember when we all said
November 13, 2009 - 00:35 ET by USA4freedomRemember when we all said you can’t vote “present” as the President?
In the words of one of our favorite pastors “The Chickens have come home to roost”
Sad that this fool have the lives of our military in his hands.
Not sad.. tragic is the better word.
Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.
Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.
USA... Major
November 13, 2009 - 00:44 ET by bigtimerUSA...
Major tragedy.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
USA, he just doesn't like
November 13, 2009 - 07:32 ET by motherbeltUSA, he just doesn't like any of the options that have been offered him (per CNN). To me, that means he knows what he wants to do, but no one is giving him that advice. If so, why doesn't he just do what he wants to do?
Time to man up, Mr. President. You're the CinC. If you want to bring the troops home, do it, and let the chips fall where they may. Say that you were wrong when you said Afghanistan was the "necessary war."
Afghanistan -- Crap Or get Off The Pot?
November 13, 2009 - 00:36 ET by lgeubankHe wants to cut and run, but he hasn't figured a way to make it palatable to all sides of the political spectrum in this country. So he's thinking, thinking, thinking . . .
meanwhile troops are dying, dying ,dying...
November 13, 2009 - 00:37 ET by MightyMouth"The bureaucracy is growing to meet the needs of the growing bureaucracy"
It's been a despicable
November 13, 2009 - 00:40 ET by bigtimerIt's been a despicable outrage.
A disgrace.
I will never forget..or forgive.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Obama's indecisiveness on Afghanistan is a tactic to buy time
November 13, 2009 - 01:23 ET by richardshMy gut tells me that Obama is more concerned with the passage of his healthcare bill which will lead us into socialism, than our soldiers on the battlefield fighting for an America that seems to be disappearing. But Obama making an actual military decision? Let's be real. He knows that whatever the decision is, its going to piss some people off. Obama is now learning that you can only vote "present" to a point.
There was a time when people thought that Obama almost "walked on water". I'd say that's changed and that now he is better described as someone "walking on glass". He needs every vote possible.
I bet that if he had gotten healthcare in the form he wanted a number of months ago, he would have already cut and run in Iraq and Afghanistan as fast as he could.
So, the only thing Obama is probably 'agonizing' over is how to "tap dance" around his military indecisiveness so that he can buy time to can get his socialist healthcare plan through.
He's likely already made a military decision - which I believe is to 'cut and run'. He just can't make that decision public just yet because he is still seeking the Healthcare Holy Grail and maybe a Stimulus II.
If you need any evidence to give you a window to Obama's soul, just watch his TV delivery to America on the day of the Fort Hood massacre when he gave the infamous "shout out" to Indian chief Joe Medicine Crow. The true Obama came through and it wasn't pretty.
He has blood on his hands
November 13, 2009 - 01:37 ET by bigtimerrichard...
Yep, true colors came shining through that day...those prisms didn't shine....never did, never will.
Excellent post.
'Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea'~Breitbart
Bamacision
November 13, 2009 - 02:29 ET by newstogodWe can't look like we are copying Bush so, here's what I want you to do -- when you see the bad guys shoot them. When you find a cooperative group teach them how to play gitar hero or bridge.
ntg---
November 13, 2009 - 02:37 ET by matthewdeanYou suppose if that plan does'nt work out, the O will find a way to hang the misfire on George W?
Be a first, huh?
MD
"There is no distinctly American criminal class - except Congress."
Mark Twain (1835-1910)
Four options?
November 13, 2009 - 05:15 ET by Dragonsbreath1. Surender?
2. Just pack up and leave?
3. Blame Bush.
4. All of the above.
"While Americans died at Fort Hood, Obama had a good laugh..."
The media's spin for this
November 13, 2009 - 07:01 ET by TykThe media's spin for this guy is sickening. I never thought it would be THIS bad with Little Barry Bam Bam as President. Dude is so in over his head it's not funny. If I have to read one more time how SMART this guy is. The media can keep trying to spin that this guy is smart, and thoughtful, blah blah blah, but history will judge him where he belongs: one of, if not THE worst Presidents ever.
Recipe for disaster . . .
November 13, 2009 - 08:20 ET by GalvanicABC's Martha Raddatz assured Gibson that Obama “has four options in front of him” and “he wants to combine those options...to find the best option.”
In other words, there are four options, and the President is crafting Option Five.
Adding complexity to an already complex situation is not the answer. The President needs to fish or cut bait in Afghanistan. Implementing a policy which his staff deems politically palpable to the Left without drawing the wrath of the conservatives is dead on arrival.
He's looking more and more like LBJ, who, according to his Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, had run out of ideas on Vietnam by 1967 and merely perpetuated the war because he didn't want to be the first President to lose a one.
Obama, too, is focused more on his legacy than on the challenge at hand, which, like LBJ in the Sixties, can only lead to disaster.
The enemy isn't the Republicans or Fox News, Mr. Obama. It is Islamic terrorists and its in our face, as one Major Hasan, US Army so recently reminded us. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are desperate and playing to win at any cost. If you don't have the fortitude to overcome them, then stop asking our service members to sacrifice for a lost cause and get the hell out.
10:15 am...
November 13, 2009 - 08:30 ET by SickofLibs"Mr. President, your schedule indicates it is time to immerse yourself in the Agony of War.
"OK, thank you."
10:23 am...
"I'm done. What's for lunch?"
"I'm done. What's for lunch?"
November 13, 2009 - 09:31 ET by holeinthehullHoleinthehull
He must eat early lunches, cause I know he didn't spend more than 15 minutes agonizing
10:38
Dithering Idot
November 13, 2009 - 08:30 ET by miller51550Wow..
Let's see... my commander on the Ground has decided that to WIN in Afgainstan he needs more troops.
He tell me in August... it is now Thanksgiving... and I STILL do not have the Bal-s to make a decision. Meanwhile, troops continue to be wounded and killed trying to do their job.
Why not have them hunker down and hide until I make my decision.. perhaps I can sit on my hands... and play golf, have weekly parties, travel on campaign trips, do anything EXCEPT make that hard decision.
Folks that voted for this draft dodging idiot (remember this is the politician THAT FALSIFIED his Selective Service paperwork by forging dates on the wrong forms while in Chicago.. after he exited Harvard.)
The Brave continue to DIE.. while out Muslim POTUS continue to protect his brothers in Afganistan.
IMPEACH OBAM NOW
Folks that voted for this
November 13, 2009 - 11:21 ET by Dan The Man 2Folks that voted for this draft dodging idiot (remember this is the politician THAT FALSIFIED his Selective Service paperwork by forging dates on the wrong forms while in Chicago.. after he exited Harvard.)
Link me with this stuff as I remember in 1975 when I registered, I was thrown into Holding and never had to worry about the draft again. In fact there was a lot of confusion on whether we still had to register and I am not certain I had to register, but I did anyways. A few years down the line I remember that one did have to register.
analyzing what? the facts are on the table
November 13, 2009 - 09:29 ET by holeinthehullHoleinthehull
Obama has taken the "analyze to your paralyzed" to new heights, in fact so high that he can't see the Americans dying on the battlefield!
Exit Strategies
November 13, 2009 - 09:52 ET by ricklailWhat was our strategy for getting out of Europe on D-Day?
When Patton saved the 101st at Bastonge what was his exit strategy?
When the Marines hit Iwo Jima what was there exit strategy?
There really can't be an exit strategy unitl the enemy surrenders or we have sent them to meet our God.
Semper suprene nitens
OBAMACARE: If it ain't good enough for my Congressman then it ain't good enough for me.
Dithering
November 13, 2009 - 10:54 ET by Spiker"Can't I just eat my waffle?" - Barry's response to question during 2008 campaign
I think it would be a good title for his memoirs.