As the weekend ends, catching up with a Wednesday Washington Post article which encapsulated how journalists are revolted by conservative economic policy and upset at how an aversion to tax hikes may prevent passage of Obama's health care takeover. “Health Reform Threatened by Conservatives' Anti-Tax Fantasy” read the headline over a Wednesday “Business” section column by Steven Pearlstein, a former reporter now freer to express his personal opinions which likely reflect the perspectives of his colleagues still in daily journalism.
Lead paragraph of Pearlstein's July 29 column:
Nothing has been more damaging to rational discourse about economic policy than the notion, peddled relentlessly by Republican conservatives and accepted by too many centrist Democrats, that raising taxes is always and everywhere bad for the economy.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
They are already way too
August 3, 2009 - 00:22 ET by robert108They are already way too high, so raising them in a recession is just stupid. Nice try at distraction with hyperbolic generalization, though.
I suppose this bozo...
August 3, 2009 - 00:27 ET by on-the-rocksused to write for the economics portion of the Washington Post.
And they wonder why newspapers are slowly dying.
Even this rock-headed geologist can understand why excessive taxes are bad for the economy.
Yeah, I guess we just don't know what is good for us.
I believe his great, great,
August 3, 2009 - 06:45 ET by ThisnThatI believe his great, great, ..., great grandfather was a writer for the original paper, "Ye Old Pre-Washington Pillar". I have one of the original writings:
Dateline, 4 July, 1776, by Stephan Phearlstan: British Colonies Threatened by Patriot's Anti-Tax Fantasies. The crisis that started in 1773 when hateful locals dumped The King's tea in Boston Harbor has come full circle today with a so-called "Declaration of Independence". Using inflammatory words such as "absolute tyranny" and "imposing taxes on us without our consent", 56 madmen in Philadelphia today have peddled the false and inflammatory notion that our courageous King George-Obama III has caused much injury to the peasants of America. And the worst part? They have the audacity to say that God, not King George-Obama III, has the power to grant certain unalienable rights to them including -- get this, so laughable -- the right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Stephan's note to "Ye Old Pre-Washington Pillar" editors: Our polls indicate that this little Declaration will be easily dissolved by King George-Obama III, especially given the great power of this fine paper to influence opinion and disregard all facts.
___________________________________
"Tax the rich" is a basically unstable way of governing - The NYT
Pearlstein gives imbeciles
August 3, 2009 - 00:29 ET by bigtimerPearlstein gives imbeciles a bad name.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
But didn't Obama say ... ?
August 3, 2009 - 00:29 ET by metaphorsbwithuSo why did Obama promise that 95% of "taxpayers" would not see their taxes rise in any form, and that they would receive a net tax cut, and that he would cut "unnecessary" spending and streamline government if elected?
Oh, that's right. Obama is never to be taken "literally".
metaphorsbwithu
meta... As Obama has
August 3, 2009 - 00:36 ET by bigtimermeta...
As Obama has previously said...
...."It's just words".
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
That explanation is no
August 3, 2009 - 05:38 ET by motherbeltAs George Stephanopolous once famously said:
That explanation is no longer operative.
And then we have his also famous:
The President has kept all the promises that he intended to keep.
Nevermind this guy's
August 3, 2009 - 01:49 ET by G. MayNevermind this guy's obvious bias, he shouldn't invoke "rational discourse" when his logic is so impaired.
If taxes are always raised and never reduced, then it stands to reason (easily so) that at some point it is bad for our economy.
Where to begin
August 3, 2009 - 02:57 ET by KC MulvillePhilosophy reveals the power of the unknown. Case in point:
The key is the phrase: "he expects to generate ..." It isn't an expectation; it's a calculated risk. There's a difference. Expectation and risk are not the same thing.
And Pearlman's whole article is a red herring anyway. Conservatives don't object to paying taxes for things that government ought to do. We resent being asked to pay for things government shouldn't do. I'll pay for the army, and happily so. But why should we pay to fund a campaign promise that some jerkweed politican made to get elected? Taxes in general are a necessary evil, but not all taxes are part of the necessity.
Hey Steven Actually the
August 3, 2009 - 04:03 ET by Jack BauerHey Steven
Actually the "biggest threat" to healthcare reform is not the party which does NOT control the House, Senate, President, or the means of communication, AKA the state run media.
That would be a neat trick, don't you think? The party with absolutely no powers wags the dogma of the extreme leftist (a motley crew of washed up 60s radicals, Marxists, commies, soft-socialists, et al) Democrats.
But nice try blaming the minority for the sins of the majority.
The biggest threat is "knowledge." Something the likes of Pelosi and her ilk loathe.
The more Obama's Fannie Mae Bad Health Care is exposed to the light, the more citizens realize they don't want this failed government model.
They don't want this crazy experiment in creating a Government Medical Industrial Complex.
Please try to wrap your head around that.
PS
Nothing has been more damaging to rational discourse about economic policy than the notion, peddled relentlessly by Democrat socialists and accepted by too many "moderate" Republicans, that lowering taxes is always and everywhere bad for the economy.
My attempt
August 3, 2009 - 05:05 ET by Vivaldi5Sorry, WaPo, but I like my headline better:
Nice!
August 3, 2009 - 07:23 ET by heldmywI like it!
Fraser Institue in Canada says "DON'T DO IT!!"
August 3, 2009 - 06:22 ET by Zacra"A July 2004 study by the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute, Paying, More, Getting Less,
concluded that after years of government control, the Canadian medical
system is badly injured and bleeding citizens' hard-earned tax dollar" ..."delays affected Ontario heart patients scheduled for coronary artery
bypass graft surgery. In a single year, for this one operation, the
doctor said, "71 Ontario patients died before surgery, 121 were removed
from the list permanently because they had become medically unfit for
surgery," and 44 left the province to have the surgery, many having
gone to the United States for the operation." Where will we go?
Buyers’ remorse?
August 3, 2009 - 20:04 ET by needleI had the distinct impression that last year ALL Canadians was rooting, HOPING, and praying for – and who knows how many were also making illegal campaign contributions for -- Obama, the angle of CHANGE, to be elected.
Do I now hear buyers’ remorse? “Remorse” will be a mild term for it next you get seriously ill.
- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler to manage your portfolio.
Nothing has been more
August 3, 2009 - 06:31 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsNothing has been more damaging to rational discourse about economic
policy than the notion, peddled relentlessly by Republican
conservatives and accepted by too many centrist Democrats, that raising
taxes is always and everywhere bad for the economy.
How's turnabout on that statement?
Nothing has been more clear about economic
policy than the notion, peddled relentlessly by Democrat liberals and accepted by too many leftist Republicans, that raising
taxes is always and everywhere good for the economy.
Isn't that what we keep hearing from this crowd? Raise taxes to solve every problem. They beat us about the head with it and since it never works they always say 'Raise 'em more!'. Why don't the damned R's ask, in public, pointedly, how the relentless raising of taxes helps America?
D
.
Write Congress and Senate and tell them what YOU think!
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Nothing has been more
August 3, 2009 - 16:18 ET by mattmNothing has been more damaging to rational discourse than the fact that liberals won't accept proven facts of reality. Raising taxes ALWAYS hurts the economy - it's indisputable. You take money from private citizens and it hurts their personal economy and thus it hurts the economy overall.
The question is whether the return is worth the cost. That gets to what the government uses the money for. If they use is wisely and for policies that protect freedom, the investment is worth it, if it's wasted on boondoggles and self-perpetuating dependency programs, then it's not worth it.
The bottom line is that these leftoids aren't really interested in whether their fantasies hurt the economy, they just want socialism and the power they derive from it.
BTW - This is NOT "health reform" or "healthcare reform" - it's a socialist take-over of the medical industry.
If this goober-cheese Pearlstein wants to pay higher taxes....
August 3, 2009 - 16:43 ET by R D Helm...so illegal criminal "invaders" in this country can have "free" health care while sending our grandparents or parents to an early grave, he can write a check to the IRS today.
BTW, I don't know what cave this elitist snot has been residing in, but I am seeing a hell of a lot of democrats out there, speaking out against what is nothing more than a seizure of our private health care system by the federal government.
I am seriously questioning Pearlstein's intelligence.
-Dave
The cave this elitist snot has been residing in
August 3, 2009 - 20:14 ET by needleLet’s see: The Washington Post is published in ...YES! Washington, DC.
That would suggest that the “cave this elitist snot has been residing in” is in the general area of “The Beltway.” The other clue is the general arrogance and disconnectedness of his prose.
- Relying upon the State Run Media for your information is like relying upon an embezzler to manage your portfolio.