NBC's Engel: Reform Activists 'Were Crying' Over Egyptian Election Results
On Saturday's Melissa Harris-Perry show on MSNBC, NBC correspondent Richard Engel conveyed that the reform advocates who led the toppling of Hosni Mubarak's regime in Egypt are distraught at the kinds of candidates that Egyptian voters are choosing to replace Mubarak, with both major presidential candidates likely to curtail freedom if elected. Engel recounted: (Video at bottom)
Well, let me put it to you this way: Here in our bureau in Cairo last night, several people here who were supporters of the revolution, who were out in Tahrir Square to topple Mubarak when there was this air of enthusiasm, this revolutionary zeal that anything was possible, several of them last night in this office were crying when they learned that these are the two people that they have to choose between.
Engel ended up cautioning: "Be careful what you wish for."
Last year, after initially seeming to downplay the possible dangers posed by a rise in power by the Muslim Brotherhood, months later he more soberly predicted that the rise in 'ferociously anti-Israel" public opinion in Egypt would likely mean "this thing ends in Jerusalem."
Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Saturday, May 26, Melissa Harris-Perry show on MSNBC:
MELISSA HARRIS-PERRY: So these two candidates who ended up in the runoff here, these are really the most polarizing candidates, the Muslim Brotherhood and basically old Mubarak regime. So how is it that we ended up here? What does it mean for what this election will actually mean for Egypt going forward?
RICHARD ENGEL: Well, let me put it to you this way: Here in our bureau in Cairo last night, several people here who were supporters of the revolution, who were out in Tahrir Square to topple Mubarak when there was this air of enthusiasm, this revolutionary zeal that anything was possible, several of them last night in this office were crying when they learned that these are the two people that they have to choose between.
On one hand, Mohammed Morsi from the Muslim Brotherhood, who wants to impose Islamic law which is something many people in this country, including Muslims, don't want to see. Egypt has a devout population. People go out, they pray, they fast. They are Muslims in their day to day life and don't see any need to impose Islamic law in government. There are also about 10 million Christians in this country who worry that they could become permanent second-class citizens.
On the other hand, you have Ahmed Shafiq, who was somebody who still praises Mubarak, who was from the old regime. He was a prime minister. He presents himself as a strong man, the kind of person who's going to crush dissent - not a revolutionary, not the kind of change that people went out to see.
So democracy could either allow people to choose Islamic law, which a lot of people don't want, or to choose another Mubarak, which is not what they expected either. So I guess it's a question, some people are asking, "Be careful what you wish for."
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
"Barrack who"?
Submitted by LAM SON 719 on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 11:23am.
"Barrack who"?
There will be a lot more crying over Libya went it is over
Submitted by dscott on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 11:26am.
Geez guys you didn't see that one coming? Obama set the M.E. on fire which will culminate in wars with Iran, Israel, Egypt, Syria and other nations. 100s of thousands will die. So was it worth it? Was it worth profiteering on green energy by shoving up the price of food for Ethanol? But then the econuts are probably cheering the deaths and giddy at the thought of thousands more dying not using up the earth's resources...
These fools thought they were so clever instigating revolutions. Now you begin to understand former (Bush, Reagan & Clinton) US policy on these nations, they understood the consequences and weren't willing to roll the dice knowing so many people would be killed and the possible negative outcomes. Obama undermined the entire policy on Egypt by canceling the funds for the pro-democracy transition project. A representative type government would have eventually occurred in Egypt with patience and planning, but no, Obama, the community organizer had to do it his way.
Now you will see...
Submitted by HeavyChevy on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 11:29am.
the media quietly distancing themselves from the Arab spring when they were championing it (with a passion I might add) not to long ago.
Yes
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 11:57am.
They were more like cheerleaders than journalists.
It will be hard as hell
Submitted by HeavyChevy on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 12:30pm.
trying to walk their actions back or maybe the media would go the route of folks who try to explain the constant failure of socialism "sure it would have worked the problem, it just wasn't done right"
This would be funny as hell as a big ol "I told you so" if so many more people weren't about to be slaughtered once the Muslim Brotherhood start initiating their rule full bore.
They won't walk it back. They
Submitted by motherbelt on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 12:43pm.
They won't walk it back. They dare not. They will try to paint a smiley face on it, for as long as they can.
Christiane Amanpour will go over there and do a report on how "protected and cherished" women feel now that men are "respecting" them according to Sharia law.
And they will fall back on Well this is what the people voted for!! Who are WE to object to their culture?"
Or in the famous words of Katie Couric's daughter, Who made us the boss of them???
That's going to be one twisted smiley face that's for sure!
Submitted by HeavyChevy on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 1:08pm.
Maybe they may even toss in a "It's Bush fault" for good measures.
Oops, must have forgotten to take history in school
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 11:55am.
Remember when the peasants welcomed the Revolution in Russia?
They were soon sorry too.
Yep
Submitted by HeavyChevy on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 1:12pm.
like then, this will not end well...
Revolutionary's remorse?
Submitted by drsamherman on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 12:10pm.
I better call APA to have "Islamic revolution dysphoria" put into the new DSM.
Nah. On second thought it is just easier to label them crazy and ignorant for allowing the situation to devolve back into what all of us on this board knew would happen. One step "forward" turned into "one step forward right off the cliff".
Richard Engel: The NBC Reporter Hamas can't love enough
Submitted by djwolf12 on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 12:29pm.
I DESPISE Richard Engle. This scumbag should just quit his post at NBC News and become the PR Agent for Hamas and Hezbollah. Wait a minute, HE ALREADY IS!
I still remember the "Egypt Supports Wisconsin" connection
Submitted by gopcongress on Sun, 05/27/2012 - 8:00pm.
This is instrumental in defining two very different paradigms that the socialist media originally thought were exactly the same.
During the time of the Egyptian protests, Madison was besieged with protestors proclaiming solidarity with "the people," and many references were made to the "democracy forces" in Egypt after they got rid of their leader. In fact, in Egypt, supposedly to garner western support, the protesters even showed solidarity with the Wisconsin protesters with signs like this:
http://www.iplanretirement.com/retirementblog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02...
Now let's look at the results:
In Egypt, the anti-Israeli forces (analogously, "Democrats") have taken hold of the society, not just government; life looks bleak there for Western interests as well as their citizens. In Wisconsin, the Democrats could NOT persuade voters to kick out the governor who enacted Tea Party-led reforms to get rid of the bloated union structures.
Answer: Liberals, democrats, and anti-Israelite "Muslim Brotherhood" types will not win in the US. But the mainstream media will never get the memo.
"The news and truth are not the same thing." -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER