Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
June 19, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama ScandalWatch
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Serena Williams Slams French Taxes: 'Seventy-Five Percent Doesn't Seem Legal'
  • Bozell Column: Censoring the 'Anti-Gay' Viewpoint
  • Martin Bashir, Who Compared Conservatives to Hitler, Now Decries Nazi Comparisons
  • Bob Herbert: There Would Be Tons of Outrage on Left if Bush-Cheney Pursued Obama’s Policies
  • Liberal College Students Sign Petition to Make Spying on Fox News Legal
  • ABC Hypes Obama Family's 'Beautiful' Vacation, Avoids Any Hint of Extravagance
  • Piers Morgan Defends the Nanny State: 'People Need Nannying'
  • Liberal Pundit Marc Lamont Hill Condemns Photo of Obama Holding ‘Military Style’ Watergun

MSNBC's Schultz Derides GOP 'Fearmongering' on Iran As Panetta Hints at Military Strike

By Brad Wilmouth | December 20, 2011 | 07:11

A  A

On Monday's The Ed Show, MSNBC host Ed Schultz accused Republican presidential candidates of "fearmongering" on the issue of the danger posed by a nuclear Iran, but, ironically, on the same day the CBS Evening News led its show with an interview with Obama administration Defense Secretary Leon Panetta who hinted at the possibility of a nuclear strike on Iran within the next year because the radical Islamic state is believed capable of assembling a nuclear bomb within that time.

As he interviewed Joe Cirincione of the Ploughshare Fund about the latest on North Korea, Schultz switched over to talking about Iran:

 

During several recent GOP debates, there was a lot of - I guess you could say fearmongering is what I call it - about Iran getting nuclear weapons.

After Cirincione suggested that the Bush administration was to blame for North Korea and Iran advancing their nuclear programs, Schultz took a crack at GOP candidate Rick Santorum. Schultz: "I mean, Rick Santorum made me feel like we were going to get hit in 10 minutes."

The same day's CBS Evening News relayed Defense Secretary Panetta warning that Iran could have a nuclear weapon within a year:

SCOTT PELLEY: The Secretary of Defense says tonight that the United States will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon. In an interview with CBS News, Leon Panetta says that, despite efforts to disrupt their nuclear program, the Iranians have reached a point where they can assemble a bomb in a year or potentially less. ...

Panetta told us that Iran needs only one year to build a nuclear weapon.

So are you saying that Iran could have a nuclear weapon in 2012?

LEON PANETTA, DEFENSE SECRETARY: It would be, you know, sometime around the year that they would be able to do it, perhaps a little less. The one proviso, Scott, is if they have a hidden facility somewhere in Iran that may be enriching fuel.

PELLEY: So that they could develop a weapon even more quickly than we believe?

PANETTA: And faster, that's correct.

The Defense Secretary soon hinted at the possibility of a military strike by the United States:

PANETTA: If they proceed and we get intelligence that they're proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop them.

PELLEY: Including military steps.

PANETTA: There are no options that are off the table.

Below are transcripts of the relevant portions of MSNBC's The Ed Show and the CBS Evening News from Monday, December 19:

#From the December 19 The Ed Show on MSNBC:

ED SCHULTZ: During several recent GOP debates, there was a lot of - I guess you could say fearmongering is what I call it - about Iran getting nuclear weapons. Here it is:

 

MICHELE BACHMANN: Iran will take a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe our ally, Israel, off the face of the map, and they've stated they will use it against the United States of America.

RICK SANTORUM: -and we should be planning a strike against their facilities and say if you do not open up those facilities and not close them down, we will close them down for you.

NEWT GINGRICH: If, in the end, despite all of those things, the dictatorship persists, you have to take whatever steps are necessary to break its capacity to have a nuclear weapon.

MITT ROMNEY: If we reelect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon.

SCHULTZ: Have at it, Joe. What do you think?

[JOE CIRINCIONE OF THE PLOUGHSHARE FUND]

SCHULTZ: I mean, Rick Santorum made me feel like we were going to get hit in 10 minutes.

 

#From the December 19 CBS Evening News:

SCOTT PELLEY: Good evening. The Secretary of Defense says tonight that the United States will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon. In an interview with CBS News, Leon Panetta says that, despite efforts to disrupt their nuclear program, the Iranians have reached a point where they can assemble a bomb in a year or potentially less. Secretary Panetta spoke with us at the end of an overseas trip, during which he reviewed strategy in Afghanistan and officially ended the war in Iraq.

On the way home, he boarded the jet nicknamed "The Doomsday Plane." This is the command post where he and the President would direct a nuclear war. In an interview for 60 Minutes, we sat down in the compartment where he would execute the Commander-in-Chief's orders. Panetta told us that Iran needs only one year to build a nuclear weapon.

So are you saying that Iran could have a nuclear weapon in 2012?

 

LEON PANETTA, DEFENSE SECRETARY: It would be, you know, sometime around the year that they would be able to do it, perhaps a little less. The one proviso, Scott, is if they have a hidden facility somewhere in Iran that may be enriching fuel.

PELLEY: So that they could develop a weapon even more quickly than we believe?

PANETTA: And faster, that's correct.

PELLEY: If the Israelis decide to launch a military strike to prevent that weapon from being built, what sort of complications does that raise for you?

PANETTA: We share the same common concern. The United States does not want Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. That's a red line for us, and it's a red line obviously for the Israelis. If we have to do it, we will do it.

PELLEY: You just said if we have to do it, we'll do it.

PANETTA: That's right.

PELLEY: What is "it"?

PANETTA: If they proceed and we get intelligence that they're proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop them.

PELLEY: Including military steps.

PANETTA: There are no options that are off the table.

PELLEY: A nuclear weapon for Iran is?

PANETTA: Unacceptable.

PELLEY: Panetta told us that, while the Iranians need a year or less to assemble the weapon, he has no indication yet that they have made the decision to go ahead.
 

  • Iran
  • Israel/Palestine
  • Middle East
  • Ed Schultz
  • Rick Santorum
  • Scott Pelley
  • CBS
  • CBS Evening News
  • MSNBC
  • The Ed Show
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop George Soros

Comments

I'd call

Submitted by HockeyKid on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 7:26am.

I'd call Mr. Ed a talking horse's posterior, but what comes out of him isn't even good as fertilizer.

"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me

  • Login to post comments

I guess it's not

Submitted by motherbelt on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 7:49am.

I guess it's not "fearmongering" when a memeber of the Obama administration does it.

Hey, don't worry Ed, we've got close to a year for The Obama to talk to Ahmadinejad.....with no preconditions, of course.

  • Login to post comments

It all depends on the polls, Special Ed.

Submitted by Newsbubba on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 8:20am.

If election polls next year show that attacking Iran will get Da One reelected, then Iran is toast.

If they show that it will hurt his chances, they get the bomb!

Bambi has only one loyalty, and that is to himself.  He would sell Moochie to a sex slaver if that was what was needed to win.  Of course, there ain't going to be many buyers for that Clydesdale, so he may have to heavily discount the price.

Comrade Bubba
  • Login to post comments

About all that "fearmongering":

Submitted by CO2Maker on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 8:42am.

When Republicans discuss the apparently undisputed likelihood that Iran will actually develop a nuclear weapon if they are not stopped, and then say that a nuclear Iran is dangerous, Ed "I hope my face doesn't freeze this way" Schmutz calls that "fearmongering," i.e., trying to scare us with overstatements and exaggerations. (Ask Israel if talking about nuclear Iran is "fearmongering.")

But when Democrats and liberal pundits talk about the unsubstantiated racism of the Tea Party and go so far as to worry aloud, on TV, frequently, that if Obama succeeds he will be assassinated, we are to take that as somber, sober, thoughtful analysis. That's not fearmongering? That's not using an outrageous rhetorical gambit? That's not dangerous and polarizing?

There's more fearmongering—and more potential danger—in what Chris the Wide Mouth Frog, Rachel/Ron Maddow, Larry O'Donnell*, Olber ... (where'd he go?), Malloy, GAROFALO**, Joey Rebar, and the women of the Viewgina Monologues speculate about the racial animus agains President Obama than anything being said about Iran.

* O'Donnell was co-author, co-producer, and script supervisor of many episodes of the West Wing. During its 7 years on TV, a frequent theme was racial and ethnic tensions, including shows about racist whites opposed to the friendship between Chloe Bartlett and Charlie Young, the president's young black personal aide, and an assassination attempt on the President.

** GAROFALO is an acronym that means "Go ahead, roll on floor and lick Olbermann."

  • Login to post comments

Be very quiet.

Submitted by okiehawk44 on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 9:21am.

Ed Schultz is a gift to us. He must represent the best of the Democrats because he has his own show on tv and spouts utter crap nightly giving us a gift that we only need to point to for its meaning to be known.

Thank you Ed for being you.

  • Login to post comments

WELL

Submitted by KornKing on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 10:22am.

Appears the Fargo Fatass was too busy slobbering over the shrimp during his last visit to the White House

  • Login to post comments

Strike Shultz First, then Iran

Submitted by tvhall on Tue, 12/20/2011 - 1:42pm.

Title says it all.

Shultz - AFI

***************************************************************************************** T.V. I love my country, it's my government I don't trust.
  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • President Obama parrots false 'equal pay' statistic (Bader @ OpenMarket.org)
  • Whose war on women? (FRC)
  • Romney's revenge (Avik Roy @ NRO)
  • Relax, the Arizona voter registration ruling was narrowly drawn by Scalia (Hans von Spakovsky)
  • Snowden loses his moral authority with dangerous leaks (Rothman @ Mediaite)
  • Rapper Lil' Wayne stomps on American flag (Rare)
  • Apple releases information about data requests from NSA, other agencies (LA Times)
  • Five myths about privacy (Solove @ Washington Post)
  • Polls show Americans more libertarian on pot, gay marriage, guns (Barone)
  • Single men are opting out of society thanks to suffocating liberalism (Right Wing News)
  • What if Superman had to join a union? (Steven Crowder)
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: The Superman of Dads and Grads
Cal Thomas's picture
Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas Column: Broadcast Nets, Ailes Is What's Good for You
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: If the GOP Falls for 'Immigration Reform' Ruse, It Deserves to Die
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Let People Sell Their Organs to Sick, Needy Recipients
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Anthony Weiner's Underage Girl Problem
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Audit the Man of Steel?!
more cartoons
  • Slate Says Lack Of Emotionalism Sunk Gun Control Bill
  • O’Reilly: Obama Could Be Impeached If Evidence Shows Intel Agency Read Emails Without Warrant
  • Christie: Obama’s ‘Charm Offensive Should Have Started January 2009’; ‘Bit Late in Dating Game’
  • Howard Stern to Jimmy Fallon: ‘How You Got The Tonight Show I Don't Know. You Barely Beat Craig Ferguson’
  • National Media Skip Over Charges U.S. Ambassador Abused 'Minor Children'
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use