Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 26, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Scientist Corrects Gullible Reporter: ‘Climate Change’ Not Causing More Tornadoes
  • Taranto: ‘Obama Presidency Has Given Liberal Media Bias a New and Dangerous Form’
  • Fox's Ed Henry: Colleagues Cheered Me On When I Grilled Bush Administration - They Don't Now
  • Bozell Column: The 'Assassinate Wall Street' Movie
  • Paul Krugman’s Flagrant ‘Austerity’ Double Standard
  • WashPost's Milbank Mocks Nikki Haley, 'Reached Out to' 'White Supremacists'
  • Networks Give Three Times More Quotes to Supporters of Gay Scout Admittance Than Opponents
  • State Dept. Official Who Altered Benghazi Talking Points Promoted; Only Fox Covered

FNC Highlights MRC Study on Network News Double Standard Between Dem and GOP Candidates

By Brad Wilmouth | November 28, 2011 | 01:07

A  A

Saturday's Fox News Watch gave attention to a recent study released by the Media Research Center - parent organization to NewsBusters - documenting that the broadcast network morning newscasts gave more friendly treatment to Democratic presidential candidates in 2007 as compared to the GOP presidential field in 2011.

As he introduced the segment, host Jon Scott noted that, not only were questions for Democratic guests posed from a liberal point of view much more often than from a conservative point of view in 2007, but that questions for Republican candidates in 2011 have also been posed from a liberal point of view much more often than from a conservative viewpoint. Scott:

 

One conservative media watchdog group, the Media Research Center, examined 723 campaign-related segments, including 101 interviews from this past year. And here are the results. According to the MRC study, Republicans were asked to respond to questions with a liberal agenda 82 percent Of the time, and questions about their conservative agendas were asked only 18 percent of the time. Compare those results to 2007 when Democrats were asked about liberal agenda items 72 percent of the time, but on conservative issues only 28 percent of the time.

Right-leaning panel member Jim Pinkerton of American Conservative Magazine brought up the substantial number of "conservative" ideological labels used when the networks refer to Republican candidates, compared to the scant number of "liberal" labels for Democratic candidates:

Well, here's one that's hard to argue with, and that is that, according to the same data, they identified Republicans as, quote, "conservative," 49 times, and whereas they've, and they identified President Obama as a "liberal" one time ... identified him as a candidate back in 2007 one time. Whatever you want to say about the nature of the question, to simply use that label, liberal or conservative, automatically cuts you away from a lot of votes that you might get from non-liberals and non-conservatives, and to label somebody as one is to put them in a box and tries to keep them there.

Pinkerton added:

The Gallup poll, well, let's look at it this way: About 40 percent of the country is conservative, 20 percent are liberal, and the rest of them are moderates. That's Gallup, and it's pretty steady data. The point is, anytime you label somebody, they're below 50, and so automatically, everybody who's not a liberal says I'm a moderate or whatever I am, you're antagonized, and that's why they do it to hurt Republicans, but they don't do it ... (INAUDIBLE)

Below is a complete transcript of the segment from the Saturday, November 26, Fox News Watch on FNC:

JON SCOTT: Just over a month to go until the Iowa caucuses, and the Republican candidates are doing what they can to try to make an impression. They're becoming regulars on the big three network morning shows. But do the producers and anchors of those programs have an agenda against the Republican field? One conservative media watchdog group, the Media Research Center, examined 723 campaign-related segments, including 101 interviews from this past year. And here are the results. According to the MRC study, Republicans were asked to respond to questions with a liberal agenda 82 percent Of the time, and questions about their conservative agendas were asked only 18 percent of the time. Compare those results to 2007 when Democrats were asked about liberal agenda items 72 percent of the time, but on conservative issues only 28 percent of the time. Jim, what's going on here?

JIM PINKERTON, AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MAGAZINE: I think it might be liberal bias, and I hate to throw-

SCOTT: Ellen's rolling her eyes.

PINKERTON: Well, here's one that's hard to argue with, and that is that, according to the same data, they identified Republicans as, quote, "conservative," 49 times, and whereas they've, and they identified President Obama as a "liberal" one time ... identified him as a candidate back in 2007 one time. Whatever you want to say about the nature of the question, to simply use that label, liberal or conservative, automatically cuts you away from a lot of votes that you might get from non-liberals and non-conservatives, and to label somebody as one is to put them in a box and tries to keep them there.

ELLEN RATNER, TALK RADIO NEWS SERVICE: If the Media Research study is correct and I read it just like you guys did, then, okay, they have a point, but I want to see how they really tag it because I'm not so sure that if I were sitting there watching the same clips with the same kind of questions and even the liberal and the conservative, I want to sit there with them.

JUDY MILLER, FOX NEWS CONTRIBUTOR: (INAUDIBLE) ... define liberal and conservative and how do they define it and how do they judge it and, you know-

PINKERTON: It was using the, it was, for clarity here to both of you, it was using the word, the L-word and the C-word.

RATNER: I understand, I understand, but I want to sit with them and see what else they're not necessarily, I mean, they have a media bias in the way they did this study.

PINKERTON: I'm sure they'd love to have you come over.

MONICA CROWLEY, TALK RADIO HOST: And the other point, too, is the use of the terminology among the networks, Jim, what you're saying is they use the word conservative, but they mean it in a derrogatory way. And they know that the L-word, the liberal word, carries a negative connotation, and so they're less likely to use it. It's also with the Wings - right-wing, left-wing - they're more inclined to say the right-wing candidate Michele Bachmann, but not the left-wing President Barack Obama.

SCOTT: Isn't that why many liberals are preferring to refer to themselves as conservative - I'm sorry - as progressives these days? But there issort of a negative connotation attached to that term.

PINKERTON: The Gallup poll, well, let's look at it this way: About 40 percent of the country is conservative, 20 percent are liberal, and the rest of them are moderates. That's Gallup, and it's pretty steady data. The point is, anytime you label somebody, they're below 50, and so automatically, everybody who's not a liberal says I'm a moderate or whatever I am, you're antagonized, and that's why they do it to hurt Republicans, but they don't do it ... (INAUDIBLE)

RATNER (WITH SARCASM): Like there's this grand media conspiracy, Jim.
 

  • Conservatives & Republicans
  • Double Standards
  • Labeling
  • Liberals & Democrats
  • 2012 Presidential
  • Media Bias Debate
  • Jon Scott
  • Michele Bachmann
  • Fox & Friends
  • ABC
  • CBS
  • Fox News Channel
  • NBC
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

"Like there's this grand media conspiracy ...."

Submitted by jakee308 on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 1:21am.

THAT says it all. Whether he was making a joke or recognizing what we all feel is true.

  • Login to post comments

Wasn't the appropriately named Ellen RATner a...

Submitted by jawebster1 on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 4:18am.

blonde before?

Please, please Fox News, I beg you, don't hire her as a regular!

Jim Webster
  • Login to post comments

Obvious

Submitted by Kleenex on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 5:56am.

We already knew this with or without the study.

  • Login to post comments

RATner vs Colmes

Submitted by kiwikit on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 6:48am.

No one is as borishily impolite and loud as the latter. At least Ellen lets other people rspond although she's so predictable, she's hardly an asset to the show. Can't they find someone with experience and manners like Judith Miller who's also a leftist? Why are they so, so shrill?

  • Login to post comments

it would be hard

Submitted by Tidy Bowl Man on Mon, 11/28/2011 - 7:46pm.

I think it would be hard to find someone on the left to articulate their ideas on FOX news. The stigma of Right and Left or Conservative or Liberal are nothing when it compared to Mainstream media and Fox news!

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Obama/Holder DOJ's radical departure on press freedom is chilling (Boutrous @ WSJ)
  • Oops: Obama fails to salute Marine, went back to shake hand (Weekly Standard)
  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Leno: Obama Can Close Gitmo By Making it a Government-Funded Solar Company
  • Charlie Sheen Changes Name to Carlos Estevez for Upcoming 'Machete Kills' Film
  • HUH? Slate Editor: Kaitlyn Hunt Case 'Is About Gay Rights. But It’s Not About That'
  • Weekend Open Thread
  • Leno: ‘Not Looking Good for Obama - Today His Teleprompter Took the Fifth’
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use