ABC Highlights Pakistani Complaints Against U.S. Drone Attacks on Terrorists
On Sunday's World News on ABC, correspondent Nick Schifrin filed a report recounting complaints by Pakistanis that CIA drone attacks that have successfully killed high-profile terrorist figures residing in Pakistan have also resulted in civilian deaths and injuries.
With the words "A Young Man's Plea" displayed on screen next to him, anchor David Muir introduced the piece:
Overseas tonight, a growing debate over drones. They have been hugely successful in remote, dangerous regions, racking up a long list of terror takedowns. But tonight here, who else have they taken out? Nick Schifrin from Pakistan on a teenager who spoke out trying to stop the drones because of the innocent lives he says have been lost. And then he was accidentally killed by a drone just days later.
After beginning the report by relating National Security Advisor John Brennan's contention that the activities of CIA drones have so far not resulted in any civilian deaths, Schifin highlighted claims of one boy being injured by an attack. Schifrin:
But Sada Ullah would disagree. He says he was 14 when a CIA missile hit his home. He lost his legs and his eye and something more. "I had a dream to be a doctor," he says. "But now I can't even walk to school."
After the ABC correspondent passed on accounts of a teenager who was supposedly killed in a drone attack after he took part in an anti-drone conference, Schifrin focused on the liberal activist who organized the conference:
NICK SCHIFRIN: Clive Stafford Smith organized that conference, and now is taking the CIA to court.
CLIVE STAFFORD SMITH, AUTHOR OF REPRIEVE: Until we get the people of the United States and the West to see the dead children of Pakistan the same way we'd see our own dead children, we're not going to win this battle.
The ABC correspondent concluded:
Many in Pakistan share that anger. But the U.S. is unlikely to listen. Washington is convinced these unmanned, hunter-killers are their best, and only, weapon along the Afghan-Pakistan border.
Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Sunday, November 6, World News on ABC:
DAVID MUIR: Overseas tonight, a growing debate over drones. They have been hugely successful in remote, dangerous regions, racking up a long list of terror takedowns. But tonight here, who else have they taken out? Nick Schifrin from Pakistan on a teenager who spoke out trying to stop the drones because of the innocent lives he says have been lost. And then he was accidentally killed by a drone just days later.
NICK SCHIFRIN: Every day inside Pakistan the CIA hunts and kills. U.S. officials say remote-controlled drones are highly accurate. They've killed more than a dozen of the world's most wanted terrorists without any mistakes.
JOHN BRENNAN, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR: In the past year, there hasn't been any single collateral death.
SCHIFRIN: But Sada Ullah would disagree. He says he was 14 when a CIA missile hit his home. He lost his legs and his eye and something more. "I had a dream to be a doctor," he says. "But now I can't even walk to school."
A lot of people in Pakistan who oppose these drone strikes, including political parties who hold rallies in Islamabad, they say that the strikes kill civilians and increase violence in Pakistan. Civilians like 16-year-old Tariq. Just 10 days ago, he attended an anti-drone conference. He was scared to go back home, where drones fly above his house every day. But he did go home. And three days later, he was killed by the very drones he protested against. Clive Stafford Smith organized that conference, and now is taking the CIA to court.
CLIVE STAFFORD SMITH, AUTHOR OF REPRIEVE: Until we get the people of the United States and the West to see the dead children of Pakistan the same way we'd see our own dead children, we're not going to win this battle.
SCHIFRIN: Many in Pakistan share that anger. But the U.S. is unlikely to listen. Washington is convinced these unmanned, hunter-killers are their best, and only, weapon along the Afghan-Pakistan border. Nick Schifrin, ABC News, Islamabad.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
Terrorism
Submitted by gfrrman on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 8:44am.
...really sucks.....as*hats
g
Did I miss it?
Submitted by 26CX on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 8:59am.
What more effective alternative did they offer for stopping the terrorists?
Are we supposed to accept innocent people being killed by terrorists because other innocent people might be killed as we defend ourselves?
I'm sure there’s no way that
Submitted by Bhaal on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 11:05am.
I'm sure there’s no way that these people would be misrepresenting the facts of what happened. No Pakistani would lie to further a terrorist agenda, especially to make America out to be evil.
I saw that report - my wife
Submitted by jdhawk on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 3:18pm.
I saw that report - my wife insists on watching ABC news - and in it is shows this kid first sitting down and showing his prosthetic legs and then later he is walking to his seat and sits down? Huh? The report says he couldn't walk to school and then we see him walking?
Later in the report, they show a drone as if it is overhead of where this kid is. The only problem with that is that the drones fly high enough where they can only be seen if you have some way of detecting them other than the human eye. Also, they are extremely quiet as compared to manned aircraft. Third, the missiles that are fired from the drones are fired from considerable distances. All of this is on pupose and it is the reason that they as so effective. They generally can't be seen or heard and when you hear the ordance coming in it is too late. In other words, it sucks to be a terrorist.
We don't just launch a drone or ordance from a drone without careful consideration for the target. That includes eyes on the target from surveillance drones/satellites for days and sometimes weeks and "looking" at the target and gathering other "signatures" of the enemy before engaging. So, it is just a bit unbelievable that this kid would be killed in a drone attack unless he was a terrorist or amongst terroirst whether that was wittingly or unwittingly.
And by the way, if it were true that this kid was completly innocent and was killed by a drone, shouldn't ABC be trying to interview the president on this matter? After all, back in the day, wasn't it, "Bush lied; Kids died?" Oh wait a minute, this is O'bozo, a dimocRAT. Never mind . . . .
EOB
Submitted by Chicagoray40 on Mon, 11/07/2011 - 9:32pm.
That's equal opportunity bombing, and to show 'stani's I'm all for it, I'd have an Air Force of these drones going up and down our Southern border picking off Illegal aliens all day and night in a second were I in charge, not to mention all over their border to Afghanistan, where they harbor terrorists with impunity from any real retribution from our so called 'leading from behind leaders'..
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe. –Albert Einstein My Twitter
My Response to a Liberal Cry Fest
Submitted by Utherpend on Tue, 11/08/2011 - 1:34pm.
Boo F***ing Hoo.
Talk to the corrupt and unethical Pakastanis that are supporting terrorist and ask them to stop what they are doing.