Skip to main content
  • CNSNews.com
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • TimesWatch
  • Take Action!

Join Us @:
Facebook
Twitter
Amazon Kindle

Free email alerts!

NewsBusters logo
May 23, 2013
  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Take Action
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • RSS

Hot Topics

  • Obama Targets Fox News
  • IRS Targets Tea Party
  • Censoring the News
Home » Blogs » Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Hypes ‘LGBT Injustice’ During Interview With 18-year Old Woman Charged With Sex With Minor
  • Network Evening Shows Don’t Name Islam in London Terror Attack
  • MSNBC’s Finney On IRS Scandal: ‘Why Didn't Romney Make More Of A Big Deal Of It?’
  • Obama Losing Chris Matthews? Host Rails Against 'Profiling' By IRS: It's Like Targeting Innocent Arabs
  • Jake Tapper Slams Obama Admin for Treatment of Fox News Reporter
  • NBC's Lauer Uses Oklahoma Tornado to Bash GOP Over Sandy Relief
  • New York Times: Obama Administration 'Threatening Fundamental Freedoms of the Press'
  • ABC’s Cokie Roberts Acknowledges Obama’s Contempt for the Press, Blasts 'Presidential Propaganda'

MSNBC's O'Donnell Theorizes Obama 'Manipulated' to Block Budget Deal While 'Pretending' to Want Compromise

By Brad Wilmouth | July 24, 2011 | 21:45

A  A

 On Friday’s Last Word, MSNBC host Lawrence O’Donnell advanced his belief that President Obama never had any desire for Republicans to accept the plan that he himself proposed because his strategy was to "manipulate" the process and appear willing to compromise, while at the same time insisting on tax increases to ensure that Republicans would never agree to his offer. O’Donnell further theorized that, because Republicans were about to agree to a tax increase similar to Obama’s proposal, the President changed his demands to deliberately derail negotiations.

During a segment with NBC correspondent Kristen Welker, O’Donnell observed:

So, to my eye, it was very easy for President Obama to appear - pretend even, if you will - that he was willing to negotiate all of these things that would be difficult for Democrats as long as he was demanding this one thing that he absolutely knew from the start was impossible for Republicans. And in a negotiation where nothing's agreed to until everything's agreed to, the President wasn't agreeing to anything.

A bit later, while speaking with NBC correspondent Kelly O’Donnell, Lawrence O’Donnell added:

They [Republicans] then claimed the President, having reached that agreement with them, then asked for a bigger revenue increase, which they absolutely couldn't do. That would look like, if that's the way it played out, that would look like, in the end, the President making sure they didn't get a deal.

During an interview with Democratic Congressman Chris Van Hollen, the MSNBC host further suggested that President Obama had "manipulated" the negotiations and had won the public "perception" battle:

He didn't get the big deal, but he got the perception that he wanted it, and now he doesn't have to live with any of the politically painful consequences of the big deal. That looks like a big win for the President, and it looks like a perfectly manipulated process by the President from beginning to end.

Below is a transcript of relevant portions of the Friday, July 22, Last Word on MSNBC:

LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Well, Kristen, I’ve been saying for a couple of weeks, there was no hope of a grand bargain, that all of this was a mirage, given that each side had a specific thing that they absolutely would not do, and the other side wouldn’t do, you know, wouldn’t do it, so they were going to be stuck on taxes from the start. So, to my eye, it was very easy for President Obama to appear - pretend even, if you will - that he was willing to negotiate all of these things that would be difficult for Democrats as long as he was demanding this one thing that he absolutely knew from the start was impossible for Republicans. And in a negotiation where nothing’s agreed to until everything’s agreed to, the President wasn’t agreeing to anything.

...

The Boehner news conference was fascinating. He didn’t want to - it seemed at the beginning he didn’t want to specify a number. He said we agreed to a number on revenues, which I found shocking enough, and then later he said it was $800 billion in revenue increases that he and Eric Cantor agreed to. They then claimed the President, having reached that agreement with them, then asked for a bigger revenue increase, which they absolutely couldn’t do. That would look like, if that’s the way it played out, that would look like, in the end, the President making sure they didn’t get a deal.

...

I see a President get a deal - an outcome, I should say - that is the best political outcome he could possibly get, which is the perception of him as the only reasonable man, the one who is willing to compromise and go against his party if necessary on some very difficult things, and he fought and fought and fought, and pushed and pushed and pushed, and wanted the big deal. Even after Eric Cantor walked out, he wanted the big deal. Even after all these breakdowns in the negotiations, he wanted the big deal. He was the only one who wanted the big deal, and he pushed that all the way to the end, and he didn’t get the big deal, but he got the perception that he wanted it, and now he doesn’t have to live with any of the politically painful consequences of the big deal. That looks like a big win for the President, and it looks like a perfectly manipulated process by the President from beginning to end.

  • Budget
  • National Debt
  • Taxes
  • Congress
  • Eric Cantor
  • John Boehner
  • Lawrence O'Donnell
  • MSNBC
  • Brad Wilmouth's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Printer-friendly version
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Comments

Did Barry even HAVE a

Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 9:52pm.

Did Barry even HAVE a plan...........or did he just walk in every day and throw out whatever he could to make sure that nothing was going to work??? Just so he could go to the press and bitch and moan and pout like the petulant little prick that he is???

  • Login to post comments

B

Submitted by GregE on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:13pm.

The worse things are economically, the better shot he and his czars have of implementing a grander plan. Can you IMAGINE if Democrats still had the majorities in both Congressional chambers that they did for the first 2 years?

Number one, we wouldn't be having a debt discussion. They'd simply raise it. No cuts, no tax increases, nothing. Yet they're all over tax increases now. And they wouldn't just raise it. No, they'd raise it enough to implement more spending, yet enough to ensure that no matter how much spending they kept doing, it would still last until after the 2012 elections.

  • Login to post comments

>>>>>

Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 9:56pm.

<<<<<

  • Login to post comments

Yeah Baby!

Submitted by River City on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:00pm.

Mr. O'Donnell nailed it. Bet he gets called on the carpet tomorrow morning. The whitehouse won't be happy with this. But, unfortunately O'Donnell getting fired or suspended won't change reality. The whitehouse doesn't want a deal. They want chaos. I'm glad someone finally saw what we could see all along. Obama doesn't want a deal.

"Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind."  Ayn Rand

  • Login to post comments

Hard to believe

Submitted by GregE on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:21pm.

....I am agreeing with Lawrence the Terrible.

You are right, this is NOT going to sit well with Obama and Co, having his designs exposed by a media partner.

  • Login to post comments

O'Donnell may be right but he

Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:00pm.

O'Donnell may be right but he says nothing that would suggest he is at all repulsed by Obama's lying, maneuvering, and double crossing - all for political advantage and gain. I think O'Donnell probably thinks Obama's deceitful charade is "brilliant" politics.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

True

Submitted by River City on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:17pm.

You are right and that's why he didn't hesitate to put it out there as what he theorizes is the way Obama is playing this. They all see him as brilliant & the best politician in our time. Whatever is good for Obama is good for everyone in their minds. How short sighted they are.

"Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind."  Ayn Rand

  • Login to post comments

Just remember how the MSM

Submitted by killa37 on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:20pm.

Just remember how the MSM used to fawn over der Schlickmeister's ability to lie............and when he scammed or double-crossed the Republicans........the MSM always made him look like he was the one who came out on top. So this is standard operating procedure for the MSM - they NEED to do it, because they are complicit in the whole lie and scam themselves.

  • Login to post comments

Amazing, how the MSM is

Submitted by Chris Norman on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 11:42pm.

Amazing, how the MSM is openly admiring of Democratic political chicanery and sanctimoniously negative towards any Republican political maneuvering - no matter how common place.

Let's make the 2012 campaign: "The War on Error"
  • Login to post comments

If these statements were made

Submitted by MikeB on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:13pm.

If these statements were made on an PMSNBC show, nothing will be done because no one saw/heard it, beyond O'Donnell's family. It's like the old philosophical question, "If a man makes a statement and there's no woman around to hear it, is he still wrong?"

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

Wow just like the Blues

Submitted by jkwtrading on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:17pm.

Wow just like the Blues Brothers O' Donnell saw the light. lol...

  • Login to post comments

Typical Chicago Politics

Submitted by Avitar on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:24pm.

As long as you don't care about the country what Larry O' Donnell proposes makes perfect sense tactically.

  • Login to post comments

O'Donnell: "That looks like

Submitted by GregE on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 10:29pm.

O'Donnell: "That looks like a big win for the President, and it looks like a perfectly manipulated process by the President from beginning to end."

And a win for the President is a loss for America.  Its all about him first, middle, and last.  America be damned. The first win that was a loss for America was November 2008.

Any President who says he wants to "fundamentally transform" the USA, is not to be trusted when it comes to affairs of the USA, and should not be mayor of a town, much less President of the United States.

  • Login to post comments

Obama is playing congress and the American people for fools

Submitted by Dave. on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 12:06am.

Obama wants this country to hit the skids, and is doing all he can to bring that about, even as he pretends to by trying to turn it around.

He isn't trying.

Not even a little bit.

It's chaos he wants, as that serves his purposes when it comes to bringing his plan to full fruition.

And don't kid yourself - Obama does have a plan, and he has been implementing it since Jan. 20, 2009.

He cares nothing for this country, nor the people in it. He wan't raised as an American, and was taught from an early age to hate and despise this country.

He is only interested in putting us in our place once and for all.

-Dave

Vote for the American in November

  • Login to post comments

Well, no shit, Sherlock!

Submitted by johnsonl on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 6:39am.

Where'd you park the squad car? What's the WH mantra? "Never waste a crisis!"

  • Login to post comments

This is why I like Lawrence

Submitted by amyshulk on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 6:44am.

This is why I like Lawrence O’Donnell - he says what he sees. The fact that he's an admitted socialist and speaks in such glowing terms:

"That looks like a big win for the President, and it looks like a perfectly manipulated process by the President from beginning to end."

Should be a BIG red flag, but that it isn't? Speaks to what the D's have devolved to.

The government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.
Ronald Reagan
  • Login to post comments

It was only a matter of time ...

Submitted by Par for the Course on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 6:49am.

It was only a matter of time before we all were thrown under the bus.

  • Login to post comments

Has Lawarence been into the sauce again?

Submitted by Dan In SC on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 7:14am.

Why does this guy sound like he's making sense? I think I just fried my circuit board.

  • Login to post comments

Manipulation or sagotage?

Submitted by tominhouston on Mon, 07/25/2011 - 11:58am.

From the perspective of political commentary, manipulation is a handy word to have around.
From the perspective of the American people, sobotage is more accurate.

  • Login to post comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Stop Censoring The Gosnell Trial!

Editors' Picks

  • Deputy kills PBS NewsHour staffer (Washington Examiner)
  • Oklahoma disaster was tragic, but larger ones have occurred (USA Today)
  • Mainstream Media Scream: Today’s Savannah Guthrie questions GOP ‘overreach’ (Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner)
  • Desperate Carney complains asking about scandals like asking about birth certificate (RCP)
  • Look at NYT's partisan-hack rewrite of the IRS hearing (Draw and STRIKE!)
  • Study: Christians who tithe have better finances than those who don't (TGC)
  • The media are willing accomplices to Obama (PolitiChicks)
  • FBI has suspects in mind in Benghazi; Obama prefers to try them in court (AP)
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter Column: When Did We Vote to Become Mexico?
Chuck Norris's picture
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris Column: Why Tim Tebow Is an Ultimate Clutch Player
Walter E. Williams's picture
Walter E. Williams
Walter E. Williams Column: Hating America
Michelle Malkin's picture
Michelle Malkin
Malkin Column: Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point
Ann Coulter's picture
Ann Coulter
Coulter Column: Sorry, Sen. Rubio, But Your Immigration Plan Is Still Problematic
More >

RSS FeedAmazon KindleFacebookTwitter

Stop Censoring The News!

Gosnell's Just the Tip of the Iceberg
more cartoons
  • Dennis Miller: 'Nixonian' Obama Will Need Teleprompter to Say 'I Am Not a Crook'
  • Leno: Obama Knows Nothing Because They Moved ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ to the White House
  • IRS Charged With Unfair Scrutiny of Pro-Life Groups' Prayer Events, Protest Signs
  • Ex-AccuWeather's Bastardi Slams 'Ambulance Chasing' by Global Warming Theory Activists
  • Goldberg: Scandal Reporting Needs to Focus on Hard News, Not Political Spin
More >
NewsBusters

Executive Editor
Matthew Sheffield

Editor at Large
Brent Baker

Senior Editors
Tim Graham
Rich Noyes

Managing Editor
Ken Shepherd

Associate Editor
Noel Sheppard

Contributing Editors
Tom Blumer
Geoffrey Dickens
Dan Gainor
David Limbaugh
Mithridate Ombud
Clay Waters
Scott Whitlock

Senior Contributor
Mark Finkelstein

Contributing Writers
Matthew Balan
Michael M. Bates
Erin R. Brown
Jack Coleman
Kyle Drennen
Douglas Ernst
P. J. Gladnick
Stephen Gutowski
Matt Hadro
D. S. Hube
Kathleen McKinley
Dave Pierre
Amy Ridenour
Julia A. Seymour
Terry Trippany
Rusty Weiss
Brad Wilmouth

Publisher
Brent Bozell

Site Design
Dialog New Media

 

  • Home
  • Blogs
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Search
  • Account
  • rss
  • CNSNews
  • MRC TV
  • Biz & Media
  • Culture & Media
  • Take Action!
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Amazon Kindle
  • Advertise
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2005-2013 NewsBusters.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use