ABC Highlights Movement to Loosen Union Rules to Fire Bad Teachers More Easily
On Friday’s World News, ABC correspondent Ron Claiborne filed a report recounting some of the unreasonable problems faced by school systems when trying to lay off bad teachers as a result of hurdles put up by teachers unions. Claiborne noted one example of a Los Angeles teacher who was fired after five years of effort by the school system, costing $3.5 million. ABC anchor Diane Sawyer, who later admitted to having come from a family of teachers, gave voice to complaints over the system as she introduced the report:
Almost every one of us, parent and child, has been frustrated by a teacher who probably should not be teaching, but is protected by tenure or seniority, and the unions have been blamed. Well, now, for the first time under growing public pressure, a big teacher's union says they're ready to change that.
Claiborne’s report notably included a soundbite of former D.C. schools chancellor Michelle Rhee complaining about the difficulty of firing bad teachers, although the ABC correspondent did not note the role that organized labor played in defeating the mayor who appointed her, Adrian Fenty, in the Democratic primary in 2010, resulting in her dismissal in spite of impressive achievements.
Below is a complete transcript of the report from the Friday, February 25, World News on ABC:
DIANE SAWYER: And now we turn to the winds of change blowing toward public schools in America. Almost every one of us, parent and child, has been frustrated by a teacher who probably should not be teaching, but is protected by tenure or seniority, and the unions have been blamed. Well, now, for the first time under growing public pressure, a big teacher's union says they're ready to change that. And we ask Ron Claiborne to tell us what this means for American schools.
RON CLAIBORNE: It took the Los Angeles school district five years at a cost of $3.5 million to fire six teachers for poor performance. In Washington, D.C., 75 teachers were dismissed for alleged incompetence in 2008. One missed 20 days of work in two months. An arbitrator reinstated all of them. And in New York City, hundreds of teachers considered too inept to teach in classrooms continue to be paid.
MICHELLE RHEE, FORMER CHANCELLOR OF D.C. PUBLIC SCHOOLS: The public is responsible for continuing to pay full salary and benefits for these people year in and year out. That's an absolute waste of taxpayer dollars
GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE (R-NJ): Really there’s two places left in America where there's a profession where there is no reward for excellence and no consequence for failure. Of course, we all know the first one is weathermen. Unfortunately, the second one is teaching.
CLAIBORNE: Now, the head of one of the largest national teacher's unions is offering a proposal that makes a major concession, what has long been one of its core issues: tenure.
RANDI WEINGARTEN, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS: If somebody ought to be removed, it will make it easier to do that.
CLAIBORNE: Under the proposal, a teacher rated unsatisfactory could be required to submit to an improvement plan which could last anywhere from a month to a year. After that, they could be fired within 100 days.
WEINGARTEN: The goal here is to evaluate, to help improve and, if we can't, to sever the teacher in a dignified way.
CHESTER FINN, THOMAS B. FORDHAM INSTITUTE: If you've got a really incompetent teacher, shouldn't take a year and a half to get them out of the classroom. That's not good for kids.
CLAIBORNE: Speaking to teachers today, some agreed there should be a way to weed out failing teachers. Others saw the proposal as an erosion of their job security, like one veteran teacher in Providence, Rhode Island, who declined to be named for fear of reprisal.
VOICE OF UNIDENTIFIED MALE TEACHER: It's wearing on teachers. We already feel betrayed by everyone.
CLAIBORNE: And we were just on the phone with the nation's largest teacher's union, and they, too, are on board with UFT’s proposal to streamline dismissal procedures for bad teachers. As budget cuts and, with them, teacher layoffs grow all across the country, this will be a key issue, Diane, who can be fired first?
SAWYER: All right, Ron, thank you. And I'm from a family of teachers, and we know that it's worth saying, good teachers are simply great. They're the central thing, heart beating in America. Thank you, Ron.
- Brad Wilmouth's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
→ Just disgusting
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 11:11pm.
Suddenly ABC is willing to admit what we've all known for years - that the current tenure system is one of the most abominable setups ever devised.
And why would they proffer such an admission? Because something bigger is now on the table - compulsory support for the Democrat Party, regardless of political leaning.
Gov. Walker should take note that if ABC is willing to put pedophile teachers and bad teachers (once the unspoken proof of union dominance) on the chopping block, you can bet the union is shaking in their boots at what is to come.
Any other profession...
Submitted by drsamherman on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 11:14pm.
...would quickly weed out the incompetents through revocation of licensure! Can anyone name another profession where such ineptitude and incompetence would be accepted so readily?
→ Dr. Sam
Submitted by Cool Arrow on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 11:22pm.
If you're talking about teachers, the unions have the opinion that their failure is 100% the fault of parents.
I wonder sometimes if it is not easier to keep kids ignorant rather than raise their level of education to that of yesterday's 9th grader. I think you'd discover most teachers don't comprehend on a level higher than 8th grade.
Only a diamond can cut a diamond and reveal its optimum facets.
Yeah, let's pay teachers more, but the current crop is substandard and certainly pampered.
CA
Submitted by Radical1979 on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 11:30pm.
Schools now want their teachers to reflect "diversity". It will be denied, but many are looking for that rainbow in the ranks of teachers, and the ability to teach all the bull$h1t self-esteem nonsense liberals so love. Instead of teaching kids not to bully and to be polite, kids now have classes to learn about diversity instead of telling 'em knock it off and get back to work.
It's not so much about education as it is about mind control.
Cool,
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 1:15am.
It would be easier to pay teachers more, if we streamlined the districts.
In San Antonio, we have something like 15 or more different school districts.
That, of course, means 15 or so superintendents, assistants, boards (most paid not much if at all, but still redundancy), and, biggest bone of contention I have, 15 or more sets of curriculum.
I realise this is a local issue, but it goes to the subject of pay. How much of teachers' pay is being eaten by this type of redudancy?
As for the unions, I stated in another thread that "Waiting for Superman" is a good documentary detailing the roadblocks that unions have put up re. firing bad teachers. It'll make you wanna cry to see what they have done to our children.
Then again, between abortion and the NEA, liberals don't seem to care much for children anyway.
I believe the locals should
Submitted by Dan The Man 2 on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 10:27am.
I believe the locals should decide if they want to make a school district of not. If there are 15 in a city then so be it.
That's fine for you
Submitted by RESTLESS 1 on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 12:10pm.
But when my property taxes are skyrocketing, one, unified district makes more sense.
It's a local battle, but it has been a maddening one.
"Can anyone name another
Submitted by stratman on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 2:39am.
Sure, Sam:
Depending upon what happens with the physicians writing the fraudulent notes, possibly the Wisconsin State Board of Medicine as well.
I'm Not Impressed
Submitted by Tenebrous on Fri, 02/25/2011 - 11:50pm.
Teachers unions have just about razed public education in this country over 50 years or so, and now, when there's no money left and the public sentiment wants to tear them limb from limb, only NOW do they decide to give a little and instead of allowing the teacher to be gradually fired over a period of 5 years, they fasttrack it to 1 year and 3 months.
I don't think anything else could top this example of union hubris. Teacher unions are OBSOLETE and need to be dismantled now.
Visions and Principles blog
Ahhh.....LAUSD.
Submitted by big.league.slider on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 2:32am.
LAUSD spends $30K per student and still has a 60% dropout rate. Can anyone name a private business that has a 60% failure rate, year after year?
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/08/20/lausd-spends-30k-per-student/
LAUSD's dropout rate would be even higher if the state's exit exam criteria had not been severely dumbed-down. I recall reading a study that put the K-12 cost of each LAUSD high school graduate with grade level math skills, at over $1,000,000.
Think about that. $1,000,000 of taxpayer money to teach one LAUSD 18 year-old basic algebra.
Collective bargaining
Submitted by Red Bill on Sat, 02/26/2011 - 12:05pm.
WI has recognized that collective bargaining is the reason for the states deficiet, why can't they change it. If the reason for the deficieet was that... the speed limits through the state were too high... wouldn't they move to lower them? That would be the prudent thing to do.
I hear more and more MSM 'journalists' saying "we" instead of "they" when speaking of Democratic reactions to political situations. How DO they call themselves journalists?